Is he officially /ourguy/?

Is he officially /ourguy/?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=a8zLcMGCedA
youtube.com/watch?v=5uTMPwFlf9I
youtube.com/watch?v=GLbjmIajj9g
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Fuck no.

you're not one of us anyway though

his best content is his biblical stories and religiosity - definitely worth checking out.

He is pretty cool. Doesn't impress the nazi lot though.

He's my Marduk alright.

meme flag.

no. He's far too intellectually inconsistent.

would you prefer my leaf

Yes, but of course Sup Forums will hate him, because he doesn't meet their ultra-specific individual special ticks-every-box definition of /ourguy/.

You should know that by now; that's why this place cannot ever get anything done aside from ultra-short-lived campaigns.

Examples?

i liked him at first, before he started huffing his own farts. now hes basically sargon

HWNDU was pretty good though

/thread

>now hes basically sargon
care to provide any examples of him going full-sargon?

>Jordan "If You're A MGTOW You're A Weasel" Peterson

fuck him

>"If You're A MGTOW You're A Weasel"
when did he say this?

Nazifags and leftists hate him, so I like him.

I don't agree with him on everything, but at least he forms his on opinions and can explain them unlike the e-whores that spout what they read on Sup Forums and T_D

never strays outside the normal safe opinions, talks shit about the alt-right, mgtow, basically anything even moderately controversial. built a huge fanbase and developed giant ego, started becoming very hypocritical (faith goldy situation)

same shit that happens to all e-celebs

Please no more retarded PhDs. I prefer controlled opposition Spencer at this time.

Lol no.

>whites shouldn't be allowed to have in group preferences
>jews are fantastic people and beyond criticism and absolutely need to maintain their in group preferences

That's the most obvious one. But even outside of Sup Forums opinions Peterson is a joke. The second conversation he had with Sam Harris really evinced his cognitive dissonance.

>sam harris describes a scenario where someone reading a cookbook derives meaning from each recipe
>Peterson: "Yes! that would be called schizophrenia!"
>Harris: "do you see how that pertains to our conversation?"
>Peterson: "No."

>doesn't think whites should be able to advocate for their interests
>anti-MGTOW
>won't address the JQ

Nope, not /ourguy/, but he is somewhat useful in exposing SJWs.

Jungian psychology is literally New Age tier. Ladies who read horoscopes and believe in the healing power of crystals read Jung. "Archetypes" are for brainlets who cannot into actual science.

>never strays outside the normal safe opinions
i sincerely disagree with this. he stuck his neck out on canadian campuses when everyone else was hiding their head in the sand
>talks shit about the alt-right
he has to or else people will call him a nazi. besides the tiki torches made the alt-right look retarded already.
>mgtow
i honestly don't know what this even means anymore. the definition has changed so much over the years.
>developed giant ego
hes a professor of course he has an ego. wouldn't you?
>started becoming very hypocritical
he literally points out the irony when asked why he kicked faith goldy off. i think its kinda funny to be honest
youtube.com/watch?v=a8zLcMGCedA
>Sam Harris really evinced his cognitive dissonance.
link?

also
>being mad jordan peterson made this bitch look foolish

>>jews are fantastic people and beyond criticism and absolutely need to maintain their in group preferences
I've seen a hell of a lot of his stuff, i really don't remember this one.

Can you link me to the video where he says this?

God damn, she would be so hot if she just stopped using those gross fake nails.

They're so obvious and bad looking.

youtube.com/watch?v=5uTMPwFlf9I

Learn his opinions before hailing him as your hero.

It's literally your fault that women don't like you, you should have sacrificed more to them at the altar of pussy worshiping.

His pathetic "apology" is also shallow and half-assed:

youtube.com/watch?v=GLbjmIajj9g

Remember: womyn didn't do 'nuffin

>Sup Forums
>officially
lurk more faggot

If you've seen a lot of his stuff then you'd have seen by now he literally does not criticize jews, EVER. He constantly harps on their superiority and even points to points in the bible where jews are degenerate and tries to justify it by saying "EVERY TIME THE JEWS MAKE A MISTAKE THEY ACCEPT IT'S THEIR FAULT! THEY ARE LITERALLY BLAMELESS!"

Also very interesting how he doesn't mention the jews involvement with the murder of Jesus Christ. Seems like a fairly big omission.

>It's literally your fault that women don't like you, you should have sacrificed more to them at the altar of pussy worshiping.
isn't that correct? if you're a fucking loser soyboy faggot why would anyone want to fuck you

>this is what passes as a "doctor" these days

Fuck that kike

its true though. if you haven't sacrificed your time on your body, or sacrificed your time and energy on having a successful career, no one will want to suck on your fucking pecker
just because you're a virgin and his words offended you doesnt mean hes wrong

>outwardly denies race realism not because he doesn't believe in it but because he thinks it would tank his incipient career as a Patreon donation recipient
jp is garbage

>Sup Forums posts
lol

And what exactly have women done to deserve all this sacrifice?

>I exist, therefore the world owes me
Typical female thought.

1) He hasn't even got to Christ yet in his series

2) Christ's death was part of the divine plan, the retard-tier fundie christian opinion that Jews killing Jesus was a bad thing is the oldest, dumbest inconsistency in their reasoning there is.

3) Why would he criticise the Jews? He's not talking to them, he's talking to regular westerners who feel something is missing, and explaining the positive meanings that can be extracted from old stories, he doesn't criticise Indians either when he's talking about the Hindu gods.

If your litmus test for a person who is espousing 99% of the kinds of stoic principals most here are for is that they have to talk shit on Jews wherever possible, then you're going to be sorely disappointed for a very long time, and ultimately get nothing done.

>And what exactly have women done to deserve all this sacrifice?
nothing. its just the way the world is. they have a hole and you want to stick your dick in. make it happen. you're not entitled to get your dick wet.

I'm not entirely sure you know what MGTOW is.

Just because a frog is on our side doesn't mean it's Kermit

yes

Why the hell would Sup Forums love a guy that doesn't agree with 100% that most Sup Forumsacks think.

I do understand that Peterson is useful, but in case his fanboys ever find this place, they need to be TOLD that his logic is not flawless on many things. Such as his individualism, civic nationalism and liberalism.

>I'm not entirely sure you know what MGTOW is.
jordan is saying they go their own way because they're bitter about not getting laid. he said you need to make more sacrifices. my point is he isn't wrong. you're not entitled to get your dick wet. if you want women you have to sacrifice your time in improving yourself.

>liberalism
he has said he isn't a fan of liberal ideologies. that makes him okay in my book

MGTOW has never been, is not, and will never be about benis in bagina.

Please educate yourself before voicing your opinions about subjects which are alien to you.

>and will never be about benis in bagina.
its about rejecting the necessity for women, i know what it is. his psychological perspective is they feel the need to reject them because they're bitter about benis and bagina. i don't necessarily disagree

Ahhhh, the Dutch.

>you reject women because women have rejected you because you didn't give them enough free stuff
You do not know what MGTOW is and you talk like a feminist, and so does Jordan Peterson.

You can still pretend he's anti-SJW if it makes you feel better.

prof peterson is a gem, in a world of political correctness.

he is our Trump. and the thing is, he makes his case with facts.

No. He's against white identity, even though he claims shared identity is important. He is an extreme individualist, even though he admits that humans are tribal animals.

He is basically a really smart guy from an era where we still had white nations. He knows much about psychology, religion and human behavior, but he is unable to get rid of the mindset that's ruining the west. That mindset worked 50 years ago, but now it is almost as destructive as the worst kind of marxism.

>MGTOW
>Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW /ˈmJɡtaʊ/) is a mostly pseudonymous online community[2][3] supported by websites and social media presences[4] cautioning men against serious romantic relationships with women, especially marriage.[5][6] The community is part of what is more broadly termed the manosphere.[7]
>According to the columnist Martin Daubney, members of the MGTOW community believe that legal and romantic entanglements with women fail a cost–benefit analysis and risk–benefit analysis.[10] Jeremy Nicholson, writing for Psychology Today, similarly described MGTOW as "guys who have been frustrated and punished to the point that they see no further incentive to relate [to dating] [...], they focus on making themselves happy".[11] Kay Hymowitz has stated that some self-identified MGTOW express discontent because they see women as hypergamous and manipulative.[12] The Business Insider reporter Dylan Love wrote a "fully-realized MGTOW (there are levels to it) is someone who shuns all relationships with women, short-term, long-term, romantic, and otherwise. He eventually shuns society as a whole."[13] Some MGTOW have many short-term casual relationships or engage in sex with prostitutes.[9] Celibacy, however, is also an option. A MGTOW that chooses celibacy over relationships is said to be "going monk"[14] and some embrace maintaining their virginity.[15][16]
seems to me rejecting the necessity for women is a pretty good summation of the MGTOW ideology

Probably to you since he makes bank.

good for him. luckily i learned from him for free via youtube and never gave him a dime.

But the argument is that these aren't just recipes in a cook book. These are our civilizational stories. Crafted to teach us lessons about the world that we know to be true.
It's a lot better than muh nothing matters and everything is interpretable into any perspective.

>I’m plying him or any other “/ourguys/“ give a fuck about bunch of autistic twats.

When are you gonna realize your guys don’t care about you cocksuckers and would probably make fun of you

>anti-MGTOW
Common-sense is a good thing user.

>would probably make fun of you
>A MGTOW that chooses celibacy over relationships is said to be "going monk"[14] and some embrace maintaining their virginity
i think we know who they would make fun of

BASED jew loving indevisualists!!
It's okay if our grandkids are black as long as they share our values!!
Neck urself

And

Fpbp

Yeah, maybe if they had worked harder and sacrificed more to become a sex toy for women they would be happier

>shut up and obey, otherwise you're a weasel
t. Jordan Peterson

How many shekels have you offered at the altar of pussy last week?

It's Dr. /ourguy/ for you, bucko.

He's a good antidote to this fucking place

>become a sex toy for women they would be happier
or go to the gym and make money. those involve sacrifices that also lead to having women

This is Jordan Peterson in his natural state, completely devoid of bitterness, evidently passionate about this subject matter in teaching his students. He's sacrificed this natural state of contentedness to serve US. He's willingly broached a field where his liveliness and happiness are taken away from him, but he persists because he believes it's for the greater good. What a hero.

this is completely incorrect. MGTOW is mainly men who have always sought after meaningful relationships being taken to the cleaners by sociopathic women using the state's monopoly against men, against them. trapping them into financial bondage with unwanted pregnancies. alimony + child support payments and whatever else.

it's common practice for women to seek out men with resources and secure their own financial position by way of posing as prospective life-long companions, using sex and faux companionship in order to seduce men into sacrificing for them and committing to them. only to leave those men eventually because they know that the state will enable them to continue a similar quality of life that they had while they were married / in a longstanding common law marriage / relationship by way of utilising its monopoly on power. forcing men to pay to enable that lifestyle for their former spose via the threat of imprisonment.

it's not about sex. it's about not having your life ruined by a sociopathic narcissist who seeks to enslave you either by seduction or state legislation.

it's about keeping the power differential on your terms, on your side. you call the shots. you decided when you come and go, you decide when you do or don't invest in a woman. and most importantly you decide what you do with your life and what the quality of your life will be.

it has practically NOTHING to do with getting laid. this is something people who're in long-standing relationships tend to say, which of course is likely a projection due to their own anxieties in relation to their own relationships. "this dude's making me nervous about my relationship so I better shame him to shut him up so I can go back to living in blissful ignorance"

This, and also

Have you listened to nothing the man has said?
He's his /ownguy/

Anyone that countersignals attacks on the white race and understands the JQ is /ourguy/. Oh, and not being a degenerate helps too.

He does neither.

>Anarchist
>asking about us
Well are you a radical individualist or aren't you?

in order to share that perspective you would have to generalize all or most women as "sociopathic narcissists who seek to slave you by seduction or legislation". when the truth is if you think that way you're most likely a bitter virgin.
>it has practically NOTHING to do with getting laid
again, i disagree. if you hate women that much you're probably a bitter virgin. i just don't see any other way you could feel that way about 50% of the population without having some issues.

no he a fucking hypocrite just like all leftist.

Yes.
He's laid the bread crumbs for normies to redpill themselves but you retards kept publicly bombarding him the JQ so he had to distance himself least he be destroyed and everything he's done and said before (all which is practical and beneficial) would be undone.
So yes he is still your guy, even if you're too stupid to realize it.

This guy has made like two good points in his entire life:

1. Embrace that primal "shadow" aspect of yourself that's kept your genetic line going until this day. Ramble ramble ramble, "hardened people develop hardened faces as they stop submitting to the world, and you can identify someone who will easily submit by the same of of his features & how they're pressed."

2. Human beings are not rational. Give them everything they want/need, and they will go out of there way to do something destructive simply to prove that they aren't "keys on a piano to be played" to someone else's will.

The guy does a lot of mental masturbation, and his gestures/tone make the things he's saying seem more important than they actually are.

With this said, he does make some original points now and then that amuse me.

...

If that's his actual plan he is being intellectually dishonest.

If isn't he's just dumb.

*Shape of his features

Women don’t want average guys.

Most guys are always going to be average or below. This is a fact, whether everyone goes to the gym or not.

Getting an above average job and having above average looks isn’t an option for most.

Of course he is a fucking liberal. Even conservatives of 2017 are liberal. Liberal doesn't mean you're SJW.

Individualism is a core part of liberalism and he's a huge fan of it.

le centrist
smells own farts
(YOU)

He never said that

That’s why fagboy can’t link a vid

The alternative is for everything else he's said to completely and utterly binned. You can't say the truth out loud yet. You can only plant the seed.

>Getting an above average job and having above average looks isn’t an option for most.
the only thing you can't change is your face genetics. you can easily workout and become above average by virtue of just being physically fit.
also most people have access to education, which leads to a successful career. if this isn't an option for you i don't know how to help you.
>individualism
where did this meme come from?

pretty certain he doesn't want to be /yourguy/
so no

if someone was out there trying to be Sup Forums's posterboy he would be as big a faggot as anyone on the left

>/ourjudeochristianzionist/

If you're a boring person, going to the gym and being focused on money isn't exactly pushing the envelope, champ.
Sup Forums seems to attract a good number of directionless dorks who need a leader, an /ourguy/.
What's funny is the most convincing candidate will always be someone who tells you to think for yourself, useless advice for someone with no ideas and no direction.

no.
>unequivocally against any sort of collectivism
>individualism is the only path to self improvement and societal harmony
>acknowledges that displacing populations/culture could be bad, but then
>doesn't see that collectivist immigrant cultures always overrule and destroy a society full of individualists

it's a zero sum game, somebody will always come out on top. it might as well be us and not them / (((them))).

there's plenty to pick from in the alt right

this is a fair point actually
i remember when the "alt-right" first became a thing and the true redpilled on Sup Forums was saying to reject that shit because its a ploy by the left to fit conservative thinking young adults into a group they can marginalize. now its just a derogatory term for someone that falls right of the political spectrum

I’m already good looking and have a good job.

Im not talking about me. I’m addressing society generally. Women want top 20% in status.

This will ALWAYS leave 80% of men in a bad position... ALWAYS.

This, Peterson is a good first step towards the redpill. Nothing more.

>society full of individualists
>leaf flag
you're only as individual as human nature allows. Individualism as an idea can be as socially corrosive as collectivism is economically stunting.
China's blend of totalitarian policy mixed with free market capitalism is going to own and appeal to africa.
Your individualism will be a memory, a low value relic of the 20th century.

>Women want top 20% in status.
those women aren't realistic and/or they're young, pretty and stupid. when you hit like 30 shit gets a lot more realistic, and the ones that were doing yoga still look good by then. shit might suck but its the way the world is.

...

It’s the way it is NOW.

It’s not the way it was. It’s not the way it has to be.

That’s the point.

i'm bored anyway

my perspective isn't limited to women though. I assume that the majority of people out there are sociopathic to a large degree and also highly narcissistic. because that's what I observe in most people.

I give everyone a chance to show me they're not like that but nobody ever really does. pretty much everyone is out for themselves.

it's a simple fact that the majority of people alive today if given the chance would exploit any weaknesses you may have to get an edge on you or take something from you at your expense. and this applies to both men and women.

so no, you're wrong.

the difference is that men have never brought any issues into my life. ever. but every single time I've gotten into a relationship, I've suddenly had a potentially life-destroying situation on my hands, and a woman oh so obviously seeking to domineer me and have me essentially be a slave to her on top of that. and this only occurs when I enter a relationship with a woman. when I consider a woman equal to myself and as such want us to be together.

if the power differential is on my side however, because I don't care about the girl I'm fucking and she knows it. I have no problems. she does as she's told and I make her feel good to a degree as a reward.

and this is something else MGTOW proposes. women respect power, indifference towards women is a show of power. because strong men don't need women to be happy. they don't tie their value as a male or their sense of fulfillment to whether or not they're in a relationship or even attracting women. they gain contentment from living their life as they see fit, and to a woman, that is highly attractive and respectful.