>Got into Harvard at 17 >Probably was in a MKULTRA experiment. >Became Berkley Math prof at 25 >"Fuck this, too many newfags" >Quits amazing job. Moves to Montana and lives in a cabin to learn survival skills and become self-sufficient. >Reads Jacques Ellul. >Nature is the only refuge from the system. >Mfw the next day industrial developers show up, Ted btfo >"It was from that point on I decided that, rather than trying to acquire further wilderness skills, I would work on getting back at the system. Revenge." >Bombs (((academic))) and (((technology))) POIs in 15 different attacks. >Published manifesto in the NYT: >Leftists "mainly socialists, collectivists, 'politically correct' types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like" >"a movement that exalts nature and opposes technology must take a resolutely anti-leftist stance and must avoid all collaboration with leftists...[l]eftism is in the long run inconsistent with wild nature, with human freedom and with the elimination of modern technology"
The only issue I see here is his parents are from poland... but I'm pretty sure he didn't like them.
Dude basically says to do what all y'all do around here. Make things politically / industrially unstable and force a major collapse because that is the only way people will give up their menial comforts and actually revolutionize against the system.
>The only issue I see here is his parents are from poland... Why? >looks at flag Ah, I see. It would've been better if they were Swedish cucks instead.
1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.
2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.
3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.
Aiden Cook
I can't tell if they were polish or (((polish)))
Anthony Morgan
>cared about the environment
Sup Forums would dump 5 million barrels of crude oil into the ocean if muh free market told them it was a good idea.
Christian right wingers liked the environment right up until they realised that liberals do too, so now they are in favour of fucking up the planet solely to upset liberals.
Jason Wright
Pretty interesting point actually
Anthony Reyes
>pdf on website has four questionable or explicit images depicting anime women >I'm trying to restore Christian values to the west You are sending some pretty mixed signals here.
Did you get to the part where I talk about banning 3D pornography?
Jason Reyes
...
Dominic Thompson
damn dude if you're going to write an insane treatise at least proofread it.
Leo Stewart
My copy editor fucked up.
The 2nd edition will have the images dividing the book into sections and the couple of typos I caught will be fixed.
Jaxon Evans
Fuck, he was definietely my guy, beside this anarchobullshit propaganda.
But he had some serious fucked up expiriences you cannot banter with, so I understand why. He understood also that he is full of bullshit tho.
Elijah Garcia
pastebin version?
Julian Price
>open pdf >see pics >close tab I guess you can say I didn't, but what is the point of 2D when we are already bending Matthew 5:27-28?
Michael Lee
I explain around page 50 or 60. The 2D is for those who would make a big fuss over banning porn.
If I could, I would ban it out-right. But there's just too many who would complain and need an outlet.
Please, read the book. We're all tired of these wicked sinners.
Caleb Anderson
We're not cuckservatives user. I support the environment and don't buy global warming conspiracy shit
Environmentalists are their own enemies. They stopped the development of nuclear power. Which could have solved all our energy and pollution issues decades ago. They protest against experiments to reverse the effects of climate change. They focus on entirely retarded policies like banning water bottles that do nothing significant.
The Sierra club used to oppose immigration for purely environmentalist reasons until SJWs forced all the "racists" out.
Isaac Morales
I guess the more appropriate question was why you would even include such image with your work? I does little to help your own credibility?
Hunter Green
I wrote it for my Millennial peers and Generation Z. Once the Baby Boomers die we'll be in charge.
Joseph Rogers
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States#Founding >Several of the children who Cameron experimented on were sexually abused, in at least one case by several men. One of the children was filmed numerous times performing sexual acts with high-ranking federal government officials, in a scheme set up by Cameron and other MKULTRA researchers, to blackmail the officials to ensure further funding for the experiments.[133]
Hunter Watson
Actually, he had shit to say about "conservatives" too.. >"He also criticizes conservatives, describing them as "fools" who "whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values."
To me, he is describing the differences between the right and alt-right... Except buddy wrote it before 1995?? That is some prophetic ass shit!
Holy shit... That's messed up. No wonder old Theo was pissed!
