>The non-Levantine origin of AJs is further supported by an ancient DNA analysis of six Natufians and a Levantine Neolithic (Lazaridis et al., 2016), some of the most likely Judaean progenitors (Finkelstein and Silberman, 2002; Frendo, 2004). In a principle component analysis (PCA), the ancient Levantines clustered predominantly with modern-day Palestinians and Bedouins and marginally overlapped with Arabian Jews, whereas AJs clustered away from Levantine individuals and adjacent to Neolithic Anatolians and Late Neolithic and Bronze Age Europeans. To evaluate these findings, we inferred the ancient ancestries of AJs using the admixture analysis described in Marshall et al. (2016). Briefly, we analyzed 18,757 autosomal SNPs genotyped in 46 Palestinians, 45 Bedouins, 16 Syrians, and eight Lebanese (Li et al., 2008) alongside 467 AJs [367 AJs previously analyzed and 100 individuals with AJ mother) (Das et al., 2016) that overlapped with both the GenoChip (Elhaik et al., 2013) and ancient DNA data (Lazaridis et al., 2016). We then carried out a supervised ADMIXTURE analysis (Alexander and Lange, 2011) using three East European Hunter Gatherers from Russia (EHGs) alongside six Epipaleolithic Levantines, 24 Neolithic Anatolians, and six Neolithic Iranians as reference populations (Table S0). Remarkably, AJs exhibit a dominant Iranian (88%˜) and residual Levantine (3%˜) ancestries, as opposed to Bedouins (14%˜ and 68%˜, respectively) and Palestinians (18%˜ and 58%˜, respectively). Only two AJs exhibit Levantine ancestries typical to Levantine populations.
This research also shows that most Palestinians have been living in the land of Palestine for at least 5000 years (Early Bronze age Levant).
Yes Khazars are likely from ancient Iran, just like Armenians and Georgians, very similar part of the world. The Russian Jews are closer to Iranian than Levantine? Sure.
Still from 1000 or more years ago.
Xavier Sanchez
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars As you pointed out its more modern Turkey than Iran, but it would have been ancient Iran and you're comparing Ashkenazi Jews to ancient Iran here, thus it's likey the Khazar genetics, they're mountain Jews, not really Persians. Iranian yes (greater Iran, ancient Iran) but not ethnically Perisan. Like i said closer to Armenian
Carson Williams
Dont you like jews Mr Kike?
Mason Harris
The Bible said this 2000 year's ago, leaf. Semites are the sons of Noah's son Shem(shemites). This is where Abraham comes from. Shem's brother Japeth had a grandson named Ashkenaz, which is where Ashkenazis get their name. They are neither genetic offspring of Abraham or spiritual seeds of Abraham. They are the Synagogue of Satan.
Noah had 3 sons, Shem, Ham, and Japeth. The 1611 Authorized King James Bible has detailed family trees.
Easton Ross
this fucking leaf again? FOR THE LAST TIME:
Ashkanazi were dwindled down to 350, the recovery obviously introduced behavioral issues. BUT the issue with jews has been the same since 80BC, meaning that while the ashkanazi are the worst jews, they are still the average jew. since khazar split well after 80BC, the origin of the problems is still in jewish blood.
So fuck off kike, you aren't helping your case.
Grayson Long
kike james bible
> Dutch VOC in 1605 (full of jews) >OFFICIAL KING JAMES BIBLE IN 1605
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
Kayden Parker
>bunch of non-Israelite larping Iranians Persian cowards
Maghrebis actually plot(pic related) near Natufians by the way.
Mozabite Berbers plot nearly identical to Morocco_IAM but that artifact of PCA. Basically West African in Mozabites makes tchem cluster similar to IAM with high Basal and Para Eurasian but not Wrst African with Basl Human.
Dominic Morales
with high Basal and Para Eurasian but not West African with Basal Human.
Zachary Torres
>So fuck off kike, you aren't helping your case. What is my case? What I'm trying to imply is that Palestinians are native to the land of Palestine while most Jews aren't.
I don't now wtf you are going on about, you should get checked.
James Stewart
(You) >Arabs are rape babies of Iranians/Mesopotamians More like Mesopotamnians/Levantines/Arabs were conquered by Northern Africans who forced their language upon them and became their nobility.
No, copper age Iranians conquered levantines and Arabic is probably a hybrid of Afro-Asiatic and whatever prehistoric language(probably many as we know Elamite and Lullubi but most likely were many more) Iranians were using at that time.
Owen James
Well that explains why Iranians have horrendous noses
Cameron Moore
>Well that explains why Iranians have horrendous noses
Semites got hooked noses from their Iranian admixture.
Nathan Martin
Daily reminder that the Khazar "Theory" was dreamt up by a Jewish playwright who kind of preferred the fantasy that his ancestors ruled a great steppe empire from horseback to the reality that they were a bunch of petty merchants crawling like maggots in the rotting carcass of the declining Western Roman Empire.
Lincoln Watson
Palestinians are semi-native. Jews aren't native at al. Samaritans are most native out of modern populations.
Jason Murphy
BedouinB has only ~50% natufian. Max 58%
Eli Lopez
This is not exactly the Khazar theory though.
>Palestinians are semi-native. Much more than just "semi." >Samaritans are most native out of modern populations. Possibly but what evidence do you have? If this is true it's because they are less likely to have mixed with Arabs.
Daniel Lewis
>This is not exactly the Khazar theory though. It's the historical origins of it. Anything else is just extra layers of bullshit. Ashkenazim came to Russian from the Rhineland via Poland. They're the result of mongrelisation of Levantines in the Roman Empire.
Hudson Cruz
155333975 >fucking migrations You can thank house of Saud for that. >Possibly but what evidence do you have? If this is true it's because they are less likely to have mixed with Arabs.
Palestinians are mixed with Egyptians and thus have SSA. Samaritans are already significantly Iranianvadmixed but they haven't mixed with anyone for 2000 years.
Camden Young
...
Adrian Powell
>It's the historical origins of it. Anything else is just extra layers of bullshit. That's because there's actually something behind it and people are trying to narrow down the actual explanation which we have now done via genetic research. >Ashkenazim came to Russian from the Rhineland via Poland. They're the result of mongrelisation of Levantines in the Roman Empire. No and even if they did come from the Levant why would they go the long way instead of going directly through North Eastern Turkey. You make no sense and have nothing to back up your claims.
Ian Wright
first: checked
second, I honestly read ashkanazi and thought you were trying to jew sephardic jews at non jews.
That being said, I don't give a fuck if the jews have israeli blood. All the kikes should be gassed, anyone down with that is cool.
Charles Sanchez
>All the kikes should be gassed, anyone down with that is cool. I'm down.
Hunter Nelson
They look partly Western and speak German, while hailing from the Mediterranean. Honestly, you'd have to be a pretty thick cunt to fail to see how this had come about. Jews spread into the Western Empire, specifically into Italy and then Gaul, and then into the Holy Roman Empire. They amazingly managed to fuck off everyone who ever had to live near them, and ended up having to flee to Poland. Russia then conquered the Polish territories in question in the late 1700s.
The only Jewish communities with a slight likelihood of a connection to the Khazar state are the Karaim and Krymchaks of the Crimea, and the Mountain Jews of Dagestan and Azerbaijan.
Lucas Kelly
>Refutes actual scientific evidence >Counters with "They look partly Western and speak German"
Benjamin Campbell
Genetic stuff is all about interpretation. It's very susceptible to political spin of various kinds. The linguistic facts are there in your face, whenever you meet a BERG, STEIN or BLATT. Please don't hurt your brain trying to figure out how steppe nomads came by surnames like Dreifuss or Fischbein...
