Prove me wrong

Prove me wrong
you can't

Who pay for roads?

>He thinks his stolen money just disappears into a black account used to fuel drug wars, human trafficking and violence

Wait..

Well at least here my tax goes to the gubment so I can have a 1-year long hospital waiting time for free while incentivizing scums to leech of gibmedats since the amount they receive is equal to someone earning the standard of living wage.

But.. muh roads man! Check mate lolbertarians.

Road tax. You guys should be swimming in money with the amount of tolls you are paying.

Depends what they're doing with it desu. Corruption and inefficiencies just keep adding up in governments and there's no real mechanisms to correct it.
Flying cars.
Check mate statistfags.
BTW you sound like you'd support violence against me. THAT'S FUCKED UP.

>implying government does a good job with roads
>Implying the government does a good job with any infrastructure
>Implying private sector can't into road

>implying both the government and the private sector isn't corrupt
We need a third option

why private companies shouldn't own public infrastructure

Socialised medicine creates shitty systematic jobs and promotes immigration.

People who work for the NHS are jerks too.

What kind of third world shithole do you even live in, where taxation is enforced with guns?
The taxman is the easiest kind of government enforcer to avoid, even if you just refuse to pay you don't even get incarcerated unless it's a matter of millions.

Unless you live in some kind of jew-controlled backwater hellhole where for some reason they throw people in jail for minor white collar crimes. In which case I can't help you.

Those are your two choices faggot, deal with it
You could settle for any mix of the two if you want though
Living inna woods may have been an option at one point, but it's not very feasible without less humans

>Prove me wrong
How fucking stupid are you.
Go to another fucking country, don't like the State taxes move to another state and get the fuck out.
There is no double standard because getting shot by a black teen is different than fucking moving to some place that won't tax you or taxes you less.
Problems is you're just a fucking little bitch that lives a sheltered live and has probably never seen a day of violence.

>BTW you sound like you'd support violence against me. THAT'S FUCKED UP.
hahahaha this made me laugh way too hard
9/10 post

ROADS

>a mine is the primary source of income for a small town
>but it is across a major ravine
i stopped reading here. why the hell did they build the town on the other side of a major ravine? this is the stupidest hypothetical scenario i've seen in a long time. i'm guessing the solution is to simply drive on the 10 mile long road. i drive 20 miles to and from work every day, it's nice to have time to listen to music and smoke some cigarettes.

>taking the image literally.
The state of absolute taxcucks.

Private sector is voluntary

The roads aren't that great condition.

Name 1 thing the government can do better than the private sector?

>pro tip: you cant

>you're just a fucking little bitch that lives a sheltered live
>fagflag
Top kek

>even if you just refuse to pay you don't even get incarcerated
Umm sweetie

Not a single person on the entire Sup Forums board can even argue against my points.
Sad.

Don't know why this is so confusing for so many people.

In case the white field makes you uncomfortable.

...

It is a hypothetical scenario. Maybe they discovered the mine later, maybe they used to have another source of income before the market pressures changed. Or maybe they just preferred to have the town in that spot.

It's a thought experiment. Basically it demonstrates what happens when you give a natural monopoly to a private company

Yes?

i knew a guy who went to prison for 7 years for tax evasion. he didn't even evade taxes he just didn't pay them right or some bullshit. he was an auto mechanic.

The government owns public land and for you to inhabit it, it costs a fee to maintain. It is basic philosophy to justify statism, it is replacing what would be a private entity with a democratic one which can be affected by the public's social change, much more preferable than living in my Coca Cola apartment complex.

the private sector can exclusivise services, the problem with the government is that they don't have as much money as the private services in proportion after tax money is distributed, without massive taxation, you won't see the same results, do you want higher taxes to provide some economic science to you?

The government can fuck your girlfriend/wife better than you ever could.

They do on all fronts in my country, dumbfuck.