Why do Americans believe climate change is made up?

Why do Americans believe climate change is made up?

Because we wan't backyard pools and we want Cali to burn to the ground, the whole state.

Climate change is fake and gay.

>global warming is now called climate change
kek

>climate change is made up
no one claimed that, climate change is a fact, the question is what causes it? human activity or MAYBE solar flares?

the public is getting redpilled and career regulators and clean energy companies are on suicide watch

Because it was fucking 24 below the other night.

Either it's fake, or it's real and we need 100x more of it.

Global warming is the biggest left meme fail since 2000.

Yeah, these events are man-made alright. Fucking CIA made.

>Caring about climate change

Australia is gonna be green again! BURN BABY BURN

because it is

Because you had to change it from "global warming" to "climate change" when all of your temperature predictions didn't come true. Because I actually looked into the science myself. Because in science, if your hypothesis does not make accurate, specific predictions, your hypothesis is falsified.

because it is
/thread

The general argument against it is its source and effect.

A lot of people are generally unconcerned about the effects. They don't see the link between CC and storms exc.

A lot of others don't think its from human behavior.

We don’t like being told things.

The incalculable amount of variables which factor into climate are impossible for us to comprehend much less measure, disseminate and discern each influence with every other corresponding variable affected. It is closer to chaos than picking out a handful of environmental flags and stating such a blanket explanation as fact.

Even the simplest of processes become near chaotic when examined in ever increasingly smaller scale much less planetary. Improvements in data collection with disregard to localized environmental and topographic variables (changed or underreported), coupled with the sheer amount of data collected for comparison antiquates previous data in scope and methodology.

Climatology is political party, which explains the wildly unreasonable reaction to qualified dissension in peer review, refusal of data sharing and dismissal of the need for reproduction when errors and falsifications are present. If it had remained in the scientific realm, it would still be called Meteorology. That every climatologist concurs, what they were taught and are now teaching is fact, means nothing. Experimenter bias can be attributed to much more than a salary in the prestige of fronting humanity saving research in our dire final hour, receiving awards and accolades and earning a prominent place in the regulatory behemoth established to counter the contrived results before they show no fruition. It might just focus data gathering at predetermined locations of concentrated production of the conformational data required.

The embedded politics are on display when all importance is placed on halting progress and limiting freedoms instead of countering the perceived effects through their own means of collection, disposal, or production of whatever they imagine will balance things out.

If man's influence on climate change was correctly represented as a hypothesis, it would not currently be the basis for the regulatory systems being devised, causing apoplectic opposition to the devastating economic ramifications and repression of civil liberties. Then research with the removal of politics being of foremost prominence in the exclusion of experimental bias would ensure the integrity of the studies and true consensus can be found.

>overbuild nigger housing and jew slave units near ocean and floodplains
>overbuild them in barren, earthquake prone, mudslide prone, desert next to flammable eucalyptus trees you planted in the 1920s

WTF I love new NWO jew climate taxes now!

Its snowing here in GA rn

its snowing here in southeast georgia rn. theres your proof.

>Hurrdurr climate change
>Post picture of floods and forest fires
Are you this stupid?

You mean global warming, right? Or was it cooling again?

You cunts. I've been surfing the same beach my whole life and we have more beach now then we did decades ago. Fuck you.

>live in a risky area
>blame the jews

now they are a fucking sneaky bunch but come on op don't be silly. all humans have the choice to ignore the easy(cheap*) option

Because none of the events you have pictured were caused by climate change.

Only millennials who think that the history of humanity started the day they were they born and it's gonna end when they die believe that climate change is something new and Trump related.

Why do faggots think that climate stood still until the 20th century

>build towns/cities in flood zones and other low land areas
>surprised when they flood
>build other cities in dry wooded areas an don't strictly enforce the use of defensible space incase of fires or do anything about all the dry brush/grass that accumulates over the years
>surprised when a small wild fire turns into a shitstorm
>blame global warming instead

amerimutt education fail to understand "global warming"

This is b8

>Why do Americans believe climate change is made up?
We don't you idiot.

We think AGW is made up to suit your Marxist needs.

Fuck off and learn some shit.

Well said. Here’s a (You)

Old enough to remember extreme weather events happened just as often before global cooling morphed into global warming which morphed into ambiguously vague “climate change”.

27 F in Gulf Shores Alabama

having two giant ass icecaps is a clear indication that there is still and ice age and it hasn't melted properlike.

if we want to keep this climate we must forever keep those around

We don't, we just believe climate change is natural and has occurred before on earth. Was the ice age started by pickup trucks and cow farts?

If the right wing had an extensive propaganda campaign that pushes free markets and less govt intervention, something I agree with, I would probably help spread the propaganda as well.

because those places are either below sea level (the gulf coast) or are a desert (california). if someone tells you that you absolutely need to put money into something its probably a scam, an elaborate one but a scam nonetheless.
why, why do you eurostan tards believe so blindly, even when data is brought forward to show that there's been a wave of tampered with and out and out made up data. that's in convenient isn't it.

The fact you even call it climate change and not global warming is suspicious in and of itself

>Why do Americans believe climate change is made up?

>Why do Americans believe climate change is made up?
Extensive FUD put out from PR groups like Heartland and Cato.

>Greening
Higher CO2 levels alone don't generally increase plant growth. More CO2 only helps if CO2 is the limiting factor, which generally isn't the case outside greenhouses. Additionally, water shortages and heat stress can significantly harm plant growth.

>CO2science.org
Hahaha no. Have you ever looked into who's behind those fucks?
Anyway: while I trust the Vostok ice data, the annotations on that graph look like utter horseshit. The "estimated current temp" particularly looks particularly doubtful, given the amount of warming since 1912.

>Old enough to remember extreme weather events happened just as often before global cooling morphed into global warming which morphed into ambiguously vague “climate change”.
I'm going to guess you're lying, given "global cooling" was never a serious thing amoung scientists, and the terms "global warming" and "climate change" have been used as informally interchangeable for as long as they've been discussed.

>If the right wing had an extensive propaganda campaign that pushes free markets and less govt intervention
If?

>we just believe climate change is natural and has occurred before on earth. Was the ice age started by pickup trucks and cow farts?
That's an absurd dichotomy. The existence of forest fires doesn't rule out arson.

>even when data is brought forward to show that there's been a wave of tampered with and out and out made up data. that's in convenient isn't it.
The "data" wasn't brought forward, there was a bunch of baseless assertions on random internet blogs. Theat's not even remotely the same thing.
Can you point to any specific allegation of data tampering that actually went anywhere?

>The fact you even call it climate change and not global warming is suspicious in and of itself
It's really not.