Stop being an authoritarian

Stop being an authoritarian

What if I don't want YOU and your degenerate ways in my community? Can I have my own community?

>you

yes you can, be with people who have the same views as you problem fixed! no need for thanks

>What if I don't want YOU and your degenerate ways in my community?
You can remove yourself but I'm not budging
>Can I have my own community?
Yes but don't take away rights from those in the community

1. Find other people who like what you like
2. Associate with them
3. ???
4. FUCK YOU

Don't wanna bake a cake for gays? Tough shit.

What you don't realize is that faggots are indeed taking the rights of others.

Since when were any of those rights?
Within living memory openly being a poof would get you arrested, and now homo "marriage" is a fucking right?

Why don't you stop being a faggot?

...

Stop infringing on people's rights in the name of personal rights, it's far more dangerous

>don't want to hire degenerate faggots? Too bad

In order, I'll tell you why its bullshit..

>Spread Aids and other STIs in addition to high rates of pedophilia among Gays.
>Create labor shortages, public health crisis, and crimes.
>Drunk driving, impaired judgment, and hurts neurological devolvement of people under 25.
>Contains many Carcinogens, once again public health crisis.
>Causes obesity, especially childhood obesity due to their advertising practices.
>Has dangerous bacterias once again that primarily marketed to children.
>Causes cancer and heart problems.
> Dumps products killing small business and then undercuts the wages of workers.
>Causes severe psychological damage in addition to being legalized prostitution.
>Prevocatcive fashion shouldn't be encouraged.
>Companies that are using PUBLIC Airways like CBS, NBC, ABC can't use profanity because it's public airways. HBO is subscription based and could do whatever the fuck it wants.

>don't like Jews ruining your community and society? Don't let Jews ruin your community and society
libertarianism looks good in a vacuum but society is a continuously evolving system and all actions have consequences on others and on future generations.
this is why we have authoritarianism.

>Fuck you
What an argument, thanks for tilting my opinion your way

Yes, you can!

They are, but not by being fags. The issue is them taking away people's rights, not them being fags.

hippie Wiccan "just do whatever man" has proven time and again to be utterly ruinous to civilization

"Authoritarian" has come to mean anyone or anything who believes in the principle of authority. There is legitimate and natural authority.

>don't like cigarettes? don't smoke cigarettes
What I don't like is people being a fucking burden on our healthcare system. I also don't like having to go through a big cloud of smoke because everyone stands JUST outside the door and smokes. Sure is nice with some secondhand smoking
. If you're a smoker, go fuck yourself

>Don't want to follow the NAP? Don't follow the NAP.

lmao authority on Sup Forums

>ancap flag
>doesn't believe in physical punishment
>hasn't read Hoppe

The nazis were defeated by libertarian white supremacists
So much for your gay little flag

Would be great if idiots doing these things din't affect the society they're in and by extent, me.

But where will my community be?

>The nazis were defeated by libertarian white supremacists
Who?

...

...

Presumably on the property of you and/or the people who consent to you having your community on said property

>The nazis were defeated by libertarian white supremacists

This is your brain on lolbertarianism

^^^These

What is empathy? I don't want a fellow man to hurt himself doing drugs. So I support banning drugs (for argument's sake, banning drugs would, banning drugs would mean no people doing drugs).

>dont like raping children? dont rape children?
>dont like murders? dont murder
but dont take aways the right of others

>the property
But where is that? Specifically?

Free will is a satanic lie you fat faggot

How would I know where that property is?

“A man has as many masters as he has vices”

Both of your examples violate someone else's rights, the same logic in my OP cannot be applied there

You don't know the details of the terms you're setting?
You're leaving it up to me?

>expecting Le alt right part time philosophers to understand basic concepts

>Both of your examples violate someone else's rights
According to who?

I wasn't setting up any terms. Someone asked if they would be able to have their own community under the system proposed in the OP's picture, and I said yes.

But yeah, you can set up whatever terms of your community you wish as long as you don't cause harm to people who don't consent.

I know. Fascists being inferior at thinking as usual
The N.A.P.

luckily we have le smart meme flag who doesnt understand the simple concept of over exaggeration to make a point

>as long as you don't cause harm to people who don't consent.
Those are terms.
You're leaving the other details up to me, apparently. Namely, where the community is located.

Why should I care about that?

Libertarianism can only exist in a white moral community

...

Sure, I suppose that's a term. I'll grant you that.

Yes, you can set up your community wherever and however you want as long as you don't cause harm to anyone who doesn't consent.

>don't get gay married
Fucking kek

Alrighty, then I claim the entirety of the contiguous United States as the property on which my community is located.

Notice how this is the exact logic of SJWs.... why are libertardian and ancap scum considered right-wing again? They're just SJWs who hate taxes.

>hurr durr shit like kids being trannies, niggers, fag marriage and methheads should be tolerated because MAH FREEDUMBSSSS

You can't just take away other people's free will and force them to be white and "moral"

>dude you don't like pedophilia just don't molest kids bro lmao
>bro you don't like inhaling secondhand smoke from carcinogenic cigarettes and risking getting cancer from a harmful activity you don't even do just don't smoke or go outside rofl
>kid you don't like crack because your mom smokes it and passes out on the couch every day leaving you to care for your siblings alone just don't do crack lol
>man you don't like xenoestrogens in your water and food that give you prostate cancer and mutate your sperm causing infertility just stop eating and drinking haha
Libertarianism is the most retarded ideology there ever was. Fucking communism is more thought-out then this shit.

How would such a thing not be stealing (we're going to assume that such an acquisition would involve people not consenting)?

Take off that flag right now faggot

Actually you can, just do like SJW and left wingers, bully everyone that doens't agree and the ones that don't suicide are sent to prison.

Because it's mine. Like taxes, I can't steal what already belongs to me.

And whichever people you're talking about that might not consent, why would they get to have an opinion? They're not a party in the arrangement.

No.

I think you'll find they stole those tactics from us.

Why do you think the entirety of the US belongs to you?

EMPATHY? EMPATHY?

Call it what it is: weakness and narcissism by proxy.

...Because I just claimed it? You said it's up to me where my community is.

Oh look, the distinction between 'libertarians' and Hoppe-libertarians emerges. In a libertarian social order, all land is private, and thus the collective owners of that land can set rules for living in the community they own. If they don't want alcohol, there is no alcohol. If they don't want abortions, no abortions. If they want no homosexuality, then there will be no homosexuality.

Those who dislike these rules are free to move to the community next door, where these things are deemed acceptable.

The idea of having a large number of competing societies each with their own rules and regulations to see what works and what doesn't is a very sane idea. The idea of having no rules whatsoever except those banning an 'aggression' with a direct victim and direct perpetrator, totally ignoring all tragedies of the commons and class action suits, is not.

Does your country subsidize healthcare or social insurances in ANY way? Then most of those points are bullshit, because people doing them are wasting tax money (that means - your money).

Don't like pedophilia? Don't be a pedophile. Checkmate bigots.

Poppy is Mexican you dumb snow nigger

Don't matter really, it's effective so no wonder people would copy it, for all we know someone may have used it before we just stole it from them.

>The idea of having a large number of competing societies each with their own rules and regulations to see what works and what doesn't is a very sane idea.
These are called "countries", and I agree.

As long as people consent, yes

I know I made the assumption that there would be people who would not consent to you taking their property. Do you actually think everyone would consent? If so, why?

Bro I want all of that shit legal I guess but since we will never have an ancap society it is best that we try and make our countries good and not shit with homos marrying eachother and shit man

There's more detail to it then that, and more then a few distinctions between Hoppe's ideas and the ideas of DUDE WEED LOL libertarians.

I'm not even a libertarian, but if you wanted the sanest possible take on their ideology you should probably read up on Hoppe.

But they don't have anything to consent to if, like you said, the decision is mine.

The decision is yours if they consent. If they don't consent, it's not yours.

>when your whole ideology of complete individualistic freedom evidently ends up harming your own population.

I have, don't worry.

You've changed the terms, then.

Where is my property?

Fuck off statist. Get off my property.

"Through thy precepts I get understanding: therefore I hate every false way."
Real Liberty is not doing whatever you want, real Liberty is being free from sin. That includes the sin of tolerating sin.

The requirement has always involved people consenting.

How would I know where your property is?

We can't tell what foods are GMO because Monsanto's army of lawyers and special interest lobbyists control the GOP Congress

And for decades we didn't know that cigarettes were dangerous because the tobacco industry's army of lawyers and special interest lobbyists controlled the GOP Congress.

You accidentally left one off your list. If you don't like abortions, don't get one. Don't try take away the rights of others.

>you can set up your community wherever and however you want as long as you don't cause harm to anyone who doesn't consent

I'm not forcing anyone into my community, therefore nobody has anything to consent to.

>don't like taxes? don't pay them

Is this how it works?

>build proprietary commune
>explicitly state terms in agreement all must sign to live there
>physically remove all that violate terms
gg ez

>faggots are indeed taking the rights of others.
Anti-abortion rights-grabbers might be weepy emotional assholes for the most part, but I don't know if they're all faggots.

You're trying to steal their property.

>their property
You can tell me where their property is but you can't tell me where mine is?

Don't like authiantainism
Don't be an authoritarian

its your job to know where your property line ends

rekt

The contiguous 48 states

I don't know where the property of other people is, unless you're wanting me to say in the US . . .?

You just said I was stealing their property.

The problem with this non-argument structure is that it arbitrarily acts as though there is a "solution" to a given position.

"Oh, you think this? Well, do this about it."

Only problems have solutions and my positions are not problems. Not for me, anyway. If my positions are a problem for you, fuck off about it.

The fact that I know it's their property and not yours doesn't mean I know the specific location of the property.

Dirty kike . (((Satan's Spawn))).

>I know it's their property
Again, you can define theirs but not mine. It doesn't matter if it's specific or not. This is inconsistent.

>But yeah, you can set up whatever terms of your community you wish as long as you don't cause harm to people who don't consent.

That's how you took over his old community and forced him to move though.
>he lives in a community with certain moral rules
>he prospers
>people like you want to live in his prosperous community
>refuse to consent to his moral rules or move to a different community yourself and insist that HE moves rather tham cause harm to you in order to enforce his rules

That's how we got where we are today.
What's stopping you from doing it again?

>Don’t like rape? Don’t get raped.
Fascists BTFO!!

what happens when homosexuality, drugs, alchool, GMOs, fast food, raw milk, cigarettes, wal-marts, porn, baggy pants and cussing on tv are left to permeate so much society that it becomes impossible to live a life away from them even if I wanted to?

I define it as theirs, just as I define your property as yours. I'm not specifying the boundaries because I don't know them.