IS there any way Germany could have won World War Two?

IS there any way Germany could have won World War Two?
Or not.

If they had stayed out of Russia...

Maybe if the Germans weren't the niggs of Europe then maybe. Its also a good idea to not have a kike in disguise leading the war effort for his Jewish masters.

By what criteria does Germany "win" the second world war then? By not fighting any of their enemies?

A more expansive time frame could have made the difference.

If it's supposed to be a thousand year reich, what was the fucking hurry?

kill every last britain at dunkirk and you eliminate around 300-400k soldiers and it would be impossible to retrain that many people. Recall that the final deaths from all military actions for britain was 380k or so. They could have killed or captured more at dunkirk but let them evacuate. It would be catastrophic and war ending. England would never recover. Europe would be won. There would be no staging grounds even if USA wanted to step in to aid them - it would be too late.

Instead, hitler thought they were humans and not conquered and owned by jews, so thought theyw ould help stop communists in the east. The mistake cost him dearly.

Alternatively, if Italy, so desperate to prove they werent fucking useless goombas, had not given allies reason to take the oil fields with their stupid attacks, hitler would not have bene forced to come down and clear it back out. This action forced the germans to delay the attack on the russians by about a month. This put them squarely in winter and cost them everything. They would have took moscow and bunkered up for winter before the rest of allies could come for them. Its doubtful they would win from this position with the full might of US coming in, but could possibly force the stalemate and give back europe and return to germany. seeing nukes would potentially force their surrender though.

There's many reasons why they lost and hindsight is 20/20, but had they successfully held Stalingrad and repelled the counter attacks, they would defeated the Soviets, effectively winning the War

1) Stop trying to bomb England into submission. Use your airforce to destroy Russia.
2) Continue to improve rocketry and radar.
3) Break ties with Japan. Give the US no reason to get involved except to ship material.

Move fast on Dunkirk instead of jerking off the Luftwaffe and gain a labor force of 400k.

Have the useless Italians take and hold Gibraltar to lock the allies out of the med.

Can't help you with Russia, other than take or encircle Moscow instead of fucking around with secondary objectives like the caucuses, Stalingrad and all that stupid ideological shit.

if they were relentless against the british and stopped "the miracle of dunkirk" from happening it would have (probably) knocked out the british empire from the war and stopped the russians from getting supplies from us. if germany could have convinced japan to hold back on its co-prosperity sphere plans and thus stop them from needing so much oil and therefore blocking pearl harbor keeping the us out of the war.
the success of blitzkrieg wasnt in their favor because germany thought it could knock out russia as easily as they did france but didnt anticipate general winter or the ferocity and burned earth tactics of the russians.
had they taken it slower and fought russia in a more straightforward war it could have gotten better for them as they wouldnt be stuck behind enemy lines but have more control

Fuck off with this ignorant pasta

Germany and the Soviet Union could not have coexisted peacefully even to Stalin's death in 1953.

The hurry was the Soviet Union had a vast population with limitless space and resources and was rapidly developing. Barbarossa had a good shot at success in 1941, but it was only a matter of a few years until the tables turned against them.

Barbarossa itself nearly succeeded. If the Germans had considered capturing Moscow to be the primary objective from the beginning then they almost certainly would have done it before the Far Eastern reinforcements arrived and winter set in. But even if we assume the Germans did not realize the importance of cutting the head off the beast until mid-autumn, they STILL almost won. If Germany had persuaded Japan to declare war on the Soviet Union in exchange for Germany declaring war on the USA in December then the Far Eastern reinforcements would have had to stay in Siberia and Moscow would have almost certainly fallen.

But even given the poor diplomacy with Japan and the failure to grasp the importance of Moscow, they STILL would have won if they had gotten lucky with the weather. Yes the impassable mud is normal Russian weather but if it had held off for just 10-20 days they would have arrived in Moscow before the Far Eastern reinforcements.

As many people in the US wanted to enter the war on Germanys side as did the other side. Had we entered on the good side (Germany), Europe wouldn't be run by Jews today and Germany would have won.

I believe there were only two potential strategies that might have worked to defeat Russia (or given them the best chances).

The first was to follow Barbarossa to the letter and make straight for Moscow with no delays in Stalingrad and no incompetent Italians in the Balkans. It is definitely true that Moscow would be abandoned and production moved to the Urals, but Moscow served as a far more important communication, bureaucratic, transportation and moral hub of russian civilization than it did during Napoleon's time (which was just the Tsar's big palace). Such a move would not mean german victory but at least a far better position than it did with the long route and destruction of the 6th army.

The second method would have simply been to rebuild the western slavic republics, trained the locals and wait for the inevitable soviet counter attack. Using places like the Ukraine as the scorched battleground and making up for the manpower differences. The nazis were initially welcomed as liberators but later scorned and harassed by the way they treated the 'untermenschen'.

Even if Germany stayed out of russia they still had a shit navy and no way to invade the UK, much less the US.

german efficiency

Could you imagine?

>Can't help you with Russia, other than take or encircle Moscow instead of fucking around with secondary objectives like the caucuses, Stalingrad and all that stupid ideological shit.

Stalingrad was needed to cut the Soviets away from the Caucus oil. The Soviets NEEDED the oil to compete with Germany, and they get most of it through the Caucus region. Had the Axis secured Stalingrad, then they would have completely strangled the Soviets, effectively crippling the armored divisions and ending any offense the Soviets could afford.

>Lend Lease
The US would never be able to give the Russians a sufficient amount of oil to compete with Germany

wtf are you talking about? America is a jewish erhnostate if the excuse to invade germany wasnt japan it would have been something else

In 1944, Sgt. Hans Hanke, 19, was in reserve with his tank division in Russian territory. That day was not supposed to go into battle, but an urgent call mobilized his group. Someone had to cover the retreating troops.

One week Hanke was fighting inside a tank until he was also ordered to retreat before the arrival of US troops. "There I learned that we had lost the war, we never thought that the United States was going to help Russia," he says. On the last day, when he thought he was safe, a surprise enemy shot pierced the side of his tank, killing three of his underlings. I could barely escape by getting into another car. "The bullets lifted the earth and whistled in my ears," he recalls.

Hanke is 84 years old, resides in Chile since 1951 and is an entrepreneur in the field of chemicals. Remember that in 1939, when Hitler decided to invade Poland, nobody in the country was aware of what it would cause. Two years later his life would change when he was forced to join the army at 16 years old. For his skill as a mechanic he was assigned to the tanks and sent to Russia. There he was when, in 1943, his parents died in a bombing.
After the withdrawal in 1944, Hanke returned to Germany to receive official status. There he witnessed the destruction of Dresden, which would mark him his whole life. A year later he returned to the Russian front. There, on May 5, 1945, he ended his military career: "The Russians and the Yankees ambushed us." Faced with the possibility of being captured by the Soviets, known for their harsh treatment of prisoners, Hanke opted to enter the forest on foot. Two nights he wandered until he found an American base. "I was imprisoned for 4 weeks and they released me."

When he returned to his homeland he had nothing, he had to start over and work at night. He was there when he saw a notice in Hamburg. "Wanted worker for chemical company in Chile." Fearful of the outbreak of a third war, he left.

Like what then?

Maybe if Burgers and Brits realized that they're fighting for the wrong side

They knew who they were fighting for. Eisenhower was a jew and churchill was propped up by the focus group after he piled up debt and became a drunk that was drummed out of all politics. this got him back in the game and owned by jews and into the leadership of britain.

If they had hit Dunkirk, the British would likely never recover. Convincing Japan to not kick the hornet's nest and instead focus on further raping and pillaging China would also have been a good idea.

They had a significant technological advantage over the Soviets. By focusing on victory in Europe first while restricting losses on the Eastern Front until their nuclear program reached the point of viable weapons, they could have broken Stalingrad in days, and the rest of the Union would have followed.

Literally this. Churchill was owned by Jews, his advisors were Jews, he got America involved because America also run by Jews

Watch a cool little movie called Fatherland 1964.

Shows how Germany beat the Allies early on in 1940 and THEN attacked the Soviet Union and won.

However, the main plot revolves around some journalist who gets tipped off by some high level nazi about the Holocaust so that she can show the US president who’s going to visit Germany.

You really think Dunkirk was that significant?

Yes Germany could have won world war two. Could they have taken over the world in that war? No.

The entire british army was at dunkirk and allowed to retreat by germans. They abandonned the french and their allies with a "strategic advancement to the shore" that they did not tell these allies about. Aka a retreat. Like I stated above - britain only lost 380k soldiers in the entire war. That many were at dunkirk. If you capture that many trained soldiers and military leaders and officers, there is no coming back from that. You cant just draft 400,000 people and have a military completely trained and ready to go again. almost your entire forces are gone. surrender would be the only possible outcome for the british at that point if they captured or outright killed them.

It was a spiritual victory for the UK. The Axis's mistake was humanizing the enemy. They should have massacred them

Powerful bankers already had a leash on the US government at that time, who also profitted off the first world war. There was absolutely zero chance of US entering the war on Hitler's side, no matter what some people "wanted". The USA hasn't been 'for the people' for at least a hundred years now.

if the british had made peace after the fall of france. other than that there was really no hope for the germans.

Easy, Germans win WW1 there would be no ww2.

>Fatherland 1964
Settling down for a comfy evening watching this. Thank (You), user.

I've always thought of a German "win" scenario as being defined by Germany gaining and maintaining control over mainland Europe with the obvious exceptions of their allies, Spain and Italy.

The Soviets would have to be defeated, as they represented a significant threat. Their land is valuable Lebensraum for the German people, so, once Germany developed its nuclear program by keeping several "Useful Jews" (aka any and all scientists, even Jews, who could support atomic development), the Germans could take Moscow and crush them at Stalingrad. The Soviets would have fallen after a nuclear strike and their capital city taken, but anything could have happened. The conquered Russian land would likely have been turned into several Reichskommisariats for German settlement.

The U.S. and Britain would have to be kept out of the war, so this is accomplished by absolutely annihilating the Anglos at Dunkirk. Maybe even go ahead with operation sea lion and actually take Britain. Then ease the Japs into not doing Pearl Harbor. Be mindful that there was a significant portion of the U.S. that genuinely either wanted the U.S. out of the war, or even supported the Nazis. These elements could be useful, but FDR was an unfortunate counter-balance that detested the Nazis.

This is laughable. Face it, the superior race one. And it wasn't the Germans...

It's really funny to watch the losing side theorize about how they could have won. So fucking pathetic.

Just remember, every year on May 9th we all celebrate those tiny, pink, German pussies get torn to bloody bits by the throbbing and raping Soviet cocks.

this

It would have been pretty easy. All Hitler had to do was not declare war on the US, and the commies wouldn't have gotten any Lend Lease gibs because Congress was pacifist as hell and disliked the commies just as much. Without Lend Lease gibs, the Soviets would have cracked at Stalingrad first and Hitler would have had Moscow by the end of 1942.