First, let's clear one thing up: while instincts exist, they are limited to PHYSICAL reflexes, including speech.
That is, one's disposition towards sexuality is entirely rational- from imitation to a fully thought out sexual philosophy- with most people being a compromise between these 2 extremes. If you shirk the notion that you choose your sexual philosophy, then you're doomed to living a sexual philosophy that you believe you can't change- when you can.
Given that Sup Forums skews towards both asociality and high intelligence, Sup Forums is predisposed to thinking in lieu of imitation. And given society's cost/benefit of marriage and family, a Pollack's sexual philosophy skews towards traps- traps offer a comparable sexual experience to that of women, without the detriment of children or the female temperament.
You are a man, be rational.
Mason Thompson
>a man
Jose Moore
/thread
Evan Watson
>traps offer a comparable sexual experience to that of women, without the... >...detriment of children or the female temperament.
Holy shit, I know you're a leaf and a soy shill but c'mon man.
Cooper Ross
>high intelligence >sexually attracted to traps
pick one, faggot
Jason Fisher
im a forever alone virgin never been on a date let alone have a girlfriend also...roses are red violets are blue traps are gay and so are you
Jordan Sullivan
Natalie proves men doe everything better. Including being a woman. Those freckles and grey eyes. Uff da. May she never hit the wall and become a Hon.
Luke Edwards
>you >argument Pick one
Lucas Evans
> men are better at being purely objectified divas based entirely around the male fantasy of what a woman should sexually be instead of embodying the true traits of a woman such as maternity, elegance, grace, humility, and femininity Buckangel is also guilty of this
Gavin Reyes
He'll just make it again tomorrow. Search 4plebs and see.
