These statistics show her love for you, Sup Forums

Now, how do you scientifically respond to these evidences?

"y-you too"

Post peer reviewed sources if you expect me to believe this bullshit.

The artist draws some of the most gorgeous legs I've seen.

How many times have you been published?
I'm gonna need to know your methodology and other details about the experiment.
get me a formal write-up by next wednesday and then we can talk.

isn't that NTR?

>I want you to smell my scent
Lewd as fuck, I love it

If "I want your dick inside me" doesn't make up more than 75% of the chart I'm not interested.

What does the percentage correspond to?
Is this the weight she gives the elements? Like, "You appeared in my dreams" makes up almost 20% of the evidence? Based on what?

>think of these as estimates since I cannot calculate the exact numbers
you have a real question now

Okay, so they're estimates - estimates based on what? Why is "being together is fun" 15%, and I want to smell your scent 2,2%?
Does it represent the certainty with which these statements are true? Or the certainty that they only apply to you (as opposed to being together with friends and family is also fun)?
There seems to be no basis for any of this.

>How many times have you been published?
This should never be the question and it is exactly what's wrong with the scientific community of the present.

the pie chart above is composed of the basic elements of which shows why Himuro
Ayame loves Yukimura Shinya

I reject her and continue shitposting on Filipino Fingerprinting boards

My name isn't Yukimura.

That has to be the nicest thing anyone has done for me

Agreed. Science should be about the science, not the scientist.

Sauce?

This nigga speaks the truth

Rikei ga Koi ni Ochita no de Shoumei shitemita.

I can only say that you don't have very good taste in men if you truly love me.

...

Why I don't see any sexual activity in this chart? What you feel can't really be called "love"

Seriously, a pie chart? That's one of the worst ways to display data.

Uh. O-okay.

Not an argument

>statistics

That's the "Other" element.

I want to receive pity kisses from her for being dumb.

Since there is apparently no discrete data set, the scientific validity of the chart is questionable. The experiment should be repeated with more disciplined data collection.

That's lust user. Not love.
I can point out countless girls I ant to put my dick inside, but that doesn't mean I love any of them. Same is true to some degree in reverse.

I bet your results didn't even satisfy inside your huge confidence intervals but my cock certainly will.

Data collection underway

Who is translating this? I just keep finding indonesian and spanish chapters

Cat Scans

Thank you!

I have countless sources that reviewed the paper and said that we made a cute couple.

It seems a control study is necessary

>pie charts

Opinion discarded.

how can you make graphics using that data, it doesn't makes sense

They can't be estimated, as she said

"Others" include wanting to fuck?

Or shlick,