Was Hitler a beta?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

der-fuehrer.org/reden/english/40-11-08.htm
counterpunch.org/2015/06/26/carpet-bombing-history/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Warsaw_in_World_War_II
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligenzaktion
youtu.be/H2fwRolH1Vk
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

No, he had balls. He was wounded twice in WW1.
But he was semi-autistic.

Betas don't go to war with the whole world at once and almost win.

Betas do lose tho, and Hitler... well he lost so hard he blew his brains out in a bunker

No one who uses this website has the right to call anyone a beta without looking in the mirror first.

He was omega, and semi autistic yes.

he literally went to war because a woman rejected him. he was a beta faggot and he had a micropenis

That's factually incorrect. Hitler lived long after the war.
Source CIA JFK docs.

LOL are you mad someone is telling the truth about your uncle adolf?

Got Iron cross for being extremely savage
Killed his nice for cheating on him
Knew that women belong in the kitchen for their and the nations well being and not for being lesser
Was nice to Jessie Owen before anti-racism was cool
...

>(((Truth)))
>What actually happened.
Pick one.

Every post in this thread is a shill and/or retard. Hitler was the bravest man Europe produced in centuries.

Sorta related OC.

The truth is Hitler was a beta male who destroyed Europe and tainted white ethnic nationalism forever. Also for someone pro-white he killed a needless number of ethnic Europeans

Killed himself like a fucking pussy.

>Hitler was the bravest man Europe produced in centuries.

Was that why he blew his brains out instead of facing the Russians like a god damn man?

>war in europe
>white people die
hmmmmmmm makes u think

This quote is not from him, why do you post this?

Even in the last seconds of his live he did what half of the world dreamed of.
Even the normiest of normies would tell you that killing Hitler is fucking savage.

It's DIRECTLY taken from a fucking speech, why are you lying?

>Calls Hitler beta
>Blames others as the reason he can't express his views

Did google it did not find anything, got a source for this?

>millions of men fighting to capture and execute hitler
>they surround him
>he kills himself
AHAHAHAHAHAHA THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN

Did you expect him to crawl out of his bunker dual wielding MG-42s and mow down the Russian hordes?

That's one interpretation.
I wonder if you realise your intelligence agencies confirmed he lived long after the war and he didn't kill himself.

You seem pretty irrational and emotional but look into the history. For example the west started the war and we carpet bombed german civilians for months while Hitler refused to kill civilians.

Really oys my veys.

It's from a video on youtube, i'll try to find it

Military deaths are standard yes but the Nazis intentionally targeted innocent European civilians

>Blames others as the reason he can't express his views

I'm not a NatSoc or white national so I don't blame shit but you'd be lying to yourself if you don't recognize the tremendous damage the Nazis have done to such movements

That's wrong. You have no source and I think you are paid to lie.
Stalin and Churchill killed far more civilians than Hitler did. The Russians even dressed up as German soilders and killed civilians for propoganda purposes.

You are still working out of their playbook. Hitler was a good and decent man.

and so did everyone in like... all wars?

>Killed himself to hide his attraction to tall white blond guys

Hitler was a vegetarian, socialist, failed artist with short man syndrome. If he were alive today he'd be Antifa.

>the west started the war

Hitler broke almost every treaty he ever signed and the Allies declared war as a result. It was the Krauts sleazy behavior which led to the start of the war

>we carpet bombed german civilians

You act as if Hitler wasn't the one who started bombing cities to begin with

>while Hitler refused to kill civilians.

This is what Sup Forums actually believes

>When you're fighting against a government that genocided ukranians and ethnicaly cleansed latvians, finns, estonians and poles - and invaded more countries than Hitler before the war.

I couldn't find the video (they get shoah'd all the time), but here's the translation:

der-fuehrer.org/reden/english/40-11-08.htm
>Then they acted out of a boundless love for Germany. When someone came to join the Movement then, one could only say to him: “You can give up everything else, since you will be laughed at and ridiculed and persecuted. You must be aware that you will be without bread, that they will throw you out of everywhere. You will have nothing of which you can be certain, other than death perhaps.

The only person who is shilled against harder than Hitler, is Jesus. Really makes you think about who controls the information we get.
Oy vey.

>Allies declared war
Yes that's what I said, I'm glad you know some history.
>Hitler wasn't the one who started bombing cities to begin with
Yes, that's also what I said.

>You have no source

Well ignoring the Einsatzgruppen things like pic related wasn't too uncommon in Nazi Germany

It is not standard in war to target civilians in the way the Nazis did. Look at the civilian casualties in the USSR alone, no other western nation came close to those numbers

>pic related
No pic

Seriously do they even train you shills anymore?

>Yes that's what I said, I'm glad you know some history.

I like how you ignore all the nuance, no one side was innocent and you'd be delusional to believe Hitler had no part in escalating tensions which led to war

forgot pic

Hitler was made up to be the fall guy for Germany not paying workers for rebuilding. The Holocaust was a lie, they were killing Jews to get out of owing them anything.

Oh thank you very much, i am sorry for the accusation. I just did not expect their situation as this repressive in Weimar
But as the text says back in the year 1923 it seems to have been this way.

>Yes, that's also what I said.

I like how you ignore the full sentence:
>You act as if Hitler wasn't the one who started bombing cities to begin with

Why so dishonest?

Most of the civilian casualties in the USSR were caused by starvation and Stalins Gulags, Stalin shot soilders who refusef to fight and put their families in Gulags.
This was the guy who we sided with against the NSDAP even after peace was offered multiple times.

His views were already attacked by the left and their stooges in the western governments, even if the US was in the prime of the segregation years and up until to 1938 german jews had more rights than american blacks.

((They)) hated Hitler because he was a threat to their planned new world order not because he was some racist, ethnonationalist dude.

Churchill himself, when was independent, he praised Hitler's willpower and the transformation he bought to Germany. After he was bought up by ((them)), he even admited that Hitler had not to do with the war and that the business was the destruction of Germany, even if it were controlled by a priest.

Stalin did kill plenty of his own yes but even the most conservative estimates place the number of civilians killed by the Wermacht at 4.5 million

also:

>This was the guy who we sided with against the NSDAP even after peace was offered multiple times.

Can't imagine why they wouldn't accept peace with the guy who violated almost every agreement he signed

Source on Hitler bombing civilians first or stop shilling.
counterpunch.org/2015/06/26/carpet-bombing-history/

Ye verily, Hitler lived in fear of his genealogy and lashed out against the Word of God in action. He currently resides in Hell alongside the Jews he killed where he is their servant.

...

No worries m8. Dumb people or shills post a lot of disinfo and fake quotes here, so when someone accuses me of that I get a bit triggered, lol.

>((They)) hated Hitler because he was a threat to their planned new world order not because he was some racist, ethnonationalist dude.

lol maybe they hate him for starting a needless war which killed millions, just a thought

>lol maybe they hate him for starting a needless war
lol

Hitler didn't start the war.
Hitler asked Britain for peace multiple times.
Try again.

A few examples I could post but Warsaw is the most obvious

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Warsaw_in_World_War_II

>5'9"
AAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHH FUCKING MANLET AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHA GIT FUCKD CUNT AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHAHAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAAAHAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH FUCKING SHORT STACK WITH THE SMOKE STACK AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH FUCKING MANLET SUICIDE CONFIRMED AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHHHAHAHAAAAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHA

It is a well know fact that the soviets requisited food from the civilians to feed their army, which resulted in starvation - as well as the working condition of soviet factories. The soviets would accuse the germans of genocide if their 10+ million civilian deaths were solely caused by german actions.

Oh so three months after Britain started carpet bombing german cities, very good then.

>almost win
No.

I didn't claim that nor even imply it

I was referring to operation Barbarossa my man

Yes, total pansy painter boy. But he redeemed his manliness later by picking up fights with people who annoyed him.

Hitler is a beta cuck. Stop worshipping a guy who didn't even have kids.

>Oh so three months after Britain started carpet bombing german cities

Citation Required

>bombing of Warsaw
>three months after Britain started carpet bombing german cities
Are you on drugs or something?

Neither did Hitler you fucking idiot lmao

Again, Soviets were brutal but that does not excuse the Nazis own crimes

Hitler was sigma.

>>three months after Britain started carpet bombing german cities


Citation required

>Goebbels
>unsuccessful with women
Quite the opposite actually.

>However, according to the laws of war in 1939, Warsaw was a defended military target and the Luftwaffe raid a legitimate military operation.

According your own article.

More where that came from btw

>The following is from Spaight's The Splendid Decision. Compare with the above, ch. iii, p. 74:
"Adolf Hitler only undertook the bombing of British civilian targets reluctantly after the RAF had commenced bombing German civilian targets... It gave Coventry, Birmingham, Sheffield and Southampton the right to look Kiev, Kharkov, Stalingrad and Sebastopol in the face. Our Soviet allies would have been less critical of our inactivity if they had understood what we had done... Hitler would have been willing at any time to stop the slaughter. Hitler was genuinely anxious to reach with Britain an agreement confining the action of aircraft to battle zones."

Yes still does not change the fact that Hitler was the one who started bombing civilian centers

...

According to laws of war, intellectuals, priests, officers, civil servants and such aren't military targets, yet Nazis shot 100,000 of them as soon as they occupied Poland.
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligenzaktion

Well actually it does as it wasn't a civilian centre. Nice mental gymnastics tho.

I'm don't care about who was in the wrong in the war, but you can't deny the mofo was 100% correct. This quote is from Mein Kampf.

More than one sexual partner is wrong.
A real man does not measure his worth in the number of souls defiled, but in the number of souls saved.

Would a beta paint pictures like this?
youtu.be/H2fwRolH1Vk

...

Yes...

>British civilian targets
Damn didn't know Warsaw was in England.
Main difference here is that Hitler literally ordered his aviation to bomb British historical monuments for example.
British didn't really want to bomb German civilians, it was simply the product of the technological aspects of air bombing at the time, namely imprecision.
Only way to reliably inflict damage was to send masses of bombers and bomb a wide area.

...

see image here sweetie

>it wasn't a civilian centre

Dresden was justified as a military target as well but I take it you don't find it any less appalling do you?

...

That civilian center in particular was occupied by the polish army and, again, according to your article, was a legitimate military target. Not only, although there were civilian casualties, almost all german air raids had the objective of giving CAS to the german troops in the ground.

That's quite different from bombing cultural cities with no troops.

>was a legitimate military target

refer to

Did we move the bar from killing civilians to destroying monuments now?
Back to >>reddit.

>go to war with the whole world
no
>almost win
lol no

...

Germany was the first to start bombing civilian centres. They did it in England and were calling it a war against morale. Not all the nazi leadership agreed and even had the hindsight to say the Allies would do the same

Well, if we want to debate we should debate with facts instead of fallacious appeals to emotion.

The bombing of Warsaw was in 1939, well before the first raids of Germany

And we have concluded that Warsaw was a military target. From your own source.
Very good.

Are you implying Nazis didn't kill civilians in WW2?
I literally gave you an article about their death squads murdering some 100,000 Poles right after the occupation.
Later on, V1 and V2 use was nothing but terror bombing. There was literally no way to aim those weapons at any particular targets in any reasonable way. They could hit a city at best.

>fallacious appeals to emotion.

Yes which I haven't done

...

who are the faggots making these images? even throwing in his signature to the quote lmao holy shit

Germany only targeted british civilian centers after the british bombed a residential area of Berlin accidentaly.

Military target or not he was still bombing civilians which is what we are arguing about to begin with. Hitler was the first to start bombing civilians and that's a fact

>The germans took over poland
That they did.
>war is bad m'kay
That it is.

Why use terror bomb against the allies in wrong when they're using it against you?