National Capitalists General

"Best System for the Best Race"

Other urls found in this thread:

research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/sofortprogramm.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falangism
lmgtfy.com/?q=biology
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

What do you believe? How do you differ from National socialists?

they like shekels even more than the (((them)))

We're more efficient at everything

basically the founding fathers

This

Jesus Christ just choose nationalism or capitalism. You can't have both

Is you who like more shekels since you steal it like (((them)))

That doesn't tell me much. How would your shit work??

the socialism in National Socialism is half of what keeps the state nationalistic. How does National Capitalism do the same with capitalism?

you cant have nationalism or socialism pick one
and what a disregard for history

throwing in jail traitors like always was during capitalism

> the founding fathers
were protectionists, which continued until kikes got full control after ww2
>According to Paul Bairoch, since the end of the 18th century, the United States has been "the homeland and bastion of modern protectionism". In fact, the United States never adhered to free trade until 1945. A very protectionist policy was adopted as soon as the presidency of George Washington by Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of the Treasury from 1789 to 1795 and author of the text "Report on the Manufactures, 1792 "which called for customs barriers to allow American industrial development. This text was one of the references of the German economist Friedrich List (1789–1846). This policy remained throughout the 19th century and the overall level of tariffs was very high (close to 50% in 1830).
>Beginning with the "Report on Manufactures", by the first US Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton, the United States became the leading nation opposed to free trade. The report advocated measures to help protect infant industries, including bounties (subsidies) derived in part from those tariffs. Hamilton explained that despite an initial “increase of price” caused by regulations that control foreign competition, once a “domestic manufacture has attained to perfection… it invariably becomes cheaper.
>Heeding Hamilton's advice, George Washington signed the Tariff Act of 1789, making it the Republic's second ever piece of legislation. Increasing the domestic supply of manufactured goods, particularly war materials, was seen as an issue of national security. Washington and Hamilton believed that political independence was predicated upon economic independence.
>According to Michael Lind, protectionism was America's de facto policy from the passage of the Tariff of 1816 to World War II, "switching to free trade only in 1945, when most of its industrial competitors had been wiped out" by the war

How would children and nature fit in? Adults can handle pretty much anything except scorched-earth Maoist bullshit.

national capitalism is heavily protectionist obvious is obvious Nat+Cap

Destroy all central banks
Allow no foreign based international organization to have influence in the country
Return the power of coinage to the people
No politician can set their own salary, vote for salary increases, pass laws which exempt themselves from laws for the common man
No one with dual citizenship can serve in government or

Right, I realized that after posting. I was in attack mode from seeing the yellow and black colors of the flag in the op. It registered to my reptillian brain as ancap.

What institution prevents large corporations from exploiting citizens by peddling them pornography and hormone pumped food, and paying them a minimal amount?

>national capitalism
>literally posts a black and yellow national syndicalist/falange flag
You ancaps really are fucking retards.

Nat cap = Nat soc
Read Feder

DUDE FREE MARKETS LMAO
Once everyone is a socially programmed drone they'll just realize it and stop buying those products.

Natural selection

what flag do you suggest for Nat Cap?

I've got the shit from the more properly formatted /ncg/ threads

Like National Socialism, without the socialism label, swastika baggage, and dictatorship.
Capitalism, but with Nationalism to prevent (((globalism))).
Like Libertarianism, without the faggots, drugs, and mass migration.

Thread for discussion of the Jewish Question, Race Realism, National Capitalism, Anti-Communism, Fascism, Traditionalism, Physical Removal and Ethno-Nationalism. Share links, PDFs, reading, videos, and propaganda.
> SMASH MARXISM!
> PURGE DEGENERACY!
> DISMANTLE (((INTERNATIONAL BANKING)))!

What is National Capitalism?
National Capitalism is the recognition that all economic activity is practiced through the reality of capitalism. One cannot choose to participate in capitalism or not, they can only modify the position they participate in capitalism from. In National Capitalism, the nation works as a unit to compete with other nations in the global free market, preventing multinational corps from running the nation into the ground in favor of profits for the international cliques.
>Capitalist economic systems exist to provide private individuals with profits
No, economic systems exist within the reality of capitalism. There is no 'capitalist economic system'. There is no choosing whether or not you want to be a participant in capitalism. Every time you compete in the dating game you participate in capitalism. National Capitalism is the choice to compete within capitalism as a nation rather than as an individual. Socialism is the idea that you can circumvent capitalism through the state via wealth distribution, which is going to be inefficient 100% of the time, as opposed to the state working to compete more effectively within capitalism, thereby creating more wealth. In a socialist state, steel workers will look to the state for subsidies, in a capitalist one, the state will just help those workers find more competitive jobs doing something else.

>But Capitalism is about profits, Nationalism is about Nation, those things can’t go together right?
National Capitalism is about profits for the nation.

>Don’t we already have National Capitalism right now?
No, our current system is one of Globalism.
International Capitalism or Globalism: A system where national sovereignty is broken down in favor of international business organizations, meant to serve business interests. Examples of this would be outsourcing, low or no tariffs, the destruction of labor unions, and open borders.
National Capitalism: Sovereignty is put ahead of international organizations, tariffs are applied, and borders are closed. The nation works to out compete rival international organizations and nations, and the profits are kept within the country. In National Capitalism, materialism is not the end goal, the betterment of the nation is the end goal.

>But this sounds a lot like National Socialism.
It is a lot like National Socialism, because the modern understanding of Socialism is radically different from the NSDAP definition. The NSDAP would be radically capitalist by modern standards, slashing welfare programs and requiring all citizens to work. ‘National Socialists’ should be calling themselves ‘National Capitalists’. If you don’t believe me, read the official policy of the party here: research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/sofortprogramm.htm

>What about race?
National Capitalism recognizes that real nations can only be made up of a single people. Multiracial societies will inevitably be balkanized by politicians that drive wedges between the groups, this cannot happen in a society with a single-race supermajority. America was explicitly built by Europeans, for other Europeans, as per the views of the founders and the Immigration Act of 1790. The solution to the race problem is simple, close the borders and increase the White birthrate to 3-4 children per family until the demographics have been reset. This is the nonviolent solution to the racial question that can be implemented without government policy, it is purely a cultural shift in Whites through free association.

>What about Aesthetics?
Libertarianism is basically a dead ideology, just like the altright is dead, and National Socialism is a dead label. National Capitalism places all these groups, who already agree with one another, under the same label and flag. It is also a much more accurate label than any of these groups currently use, infinitely more advantageous to appeal to the public, and it drives the left to attack American imagery and ideals even more. Remember, the founding fathers would have agreed with us.
>Altright is obviously dead since Charlottesville.
>Libertarians decided become ethnonationalists since non-whites keep voting to destroy the Constitution
>Natsocs are not actually socialists. Every time someone brings up the socialist label they shirk from it.
The 1930's National Socialists were not even Socialists. They either adopted the label to appeal to the atmosphere of the era, or at most the used a radically different definition of 'socialism' that in no way matches the modern understanding of the term.

Non-existent system. Forced meme, and poorly at that.
FTFY!

Well I think it's a retarded ideology so I normally wouldn't suggest any flag for it but if you're going to use a flag it doesn't make much sense that you're using a fucking syndicalist flag.

Bump for this ones

>The most successful and practiced form of nation governance is retarded
Stop posting please
That flag is authoritarian, the only syndicalist about it was the red color and I turned it yellow
Just stop please

The Alt-Right is already an umbrella term that unites differing ideologies for a common cause, and to say its a dead label is to have your head in the sand. Just like Nazi became so pervasive in Germany with the rise of the NatSoc party, Alt-Right is the polarizing term of our era. It can't be escaped. Running away from it is showing your back to the enemy. You can call yourself anything you'd like, but the enemy will simply call you Alt-Right.

Hitler knew an important lesson that the author of this copy pasta has yet to learn, and its that you do not run from the enemy. You don't apologize to those who hate you, don't give them any ground, you never go on the defensive. Hitler chose to use red, white, and black because those were the colors that Communists were using. He chose to appropriate something from them, and he never ran away from it. They took the insults as a badge of honor.

The second you start trying to distance yourself from the Alt-Right is the second you become a cuck, and that is the second that you immediately lose. You're admitting that the enemy is right, you're giving them ground, you're forcing yourself into a defensive position. Your entire position becomes an exercise in saying just how not Alt-Right you are.

You morons don't fucking have anything because you don't understand the simplest matters. White Nationalist and White Identity groups have grown to tens of thousands of members and we're all in contact with one another because we have something real. You see this, think its bad optics because the enemy says so, and you try to scatter like roaches under a light.
This is why random autist posters on Sup Forums will never amount to anything. Get with the program and unfuck yourself. Stop cucking, start having some balls.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falangism
>The manifesto supported a social revolution to create a national syndicalist economy

Closest thing to national capitalism=America 1940s

The symbol is a well-known monarchic authoritarian symbol, as I said there's nothing syndicalist about that flag once the red is gone. Also is an appropriation

well shit that was a nation so powerful it could defeat nazi germany and give welfare checks to starving russkies
we wont make THAT maistake again eh?

yeah fuck capitalism and status-obsessed fat fucks

For nationalists like me Eugenics is mandatory.

hehe makes sense also it proves they never had gas chambers provably executed by guns or died of diseases

>in a capitalist one, the state will just help those workers find more competitive jobs doing something else.
So not capitalism then? If a power exists that is allowed to use force to extract value from other peoples labor to then use that labor in hopes that it may ultimately benefit the tax-payer, that is not capitalism, that is socialism.

The state has no obligation to be as efficient as free-market businesses since they have the use of force. In your posts, you are actually describing National Socialism with less global intervention.

If you want to maximize the effectiveness of capitalism, then you must rid the state. "National Capitalism" is oxymoronic, capitalism works better under near or absolute anarchy.

>b-but the state will be efficient, trust me!

So basically you want National Capitalism but you want it to be named National Socialism because muh larping?????

You are mistaking Capitalism by Zero or almost zero state which is not, obviously

It seems to be the other way around.

>So basically you want National Capitalism
No.

I want less degenerates to flourish and those who work hard to build their fortune as they see fit with no govt interference. This will ultimately allow America to become a 90% white country again, and most niggers and spics will be filtered out through natural selection.

And no government is needed in order for this to happen.

t. White Nationalist by virtue of Anarcho-Capitalism

Everyone accepts thats bureaucrats are inherently less efficient at accomplishing a given task that individuals following their own motivations to similar ends.
The justification for that state is to protect the people collectively from threats with preemption. Law and regulation put in place restricts or enforces certain business practices to protect the people.
In a stateless society a fishing company could sell product contaminated with dangerous levels of heavy metal, or radiation. No one would find out until the symptoms started appearing. The state can pass laws and force that company to test their product before its sold, so that no one inadvertently gets radiation sickness in the first place. That doesn't happen in the free market. Businesses will do as much or as little as they can get away with, even if its detrimental to the people.
AnCap spastics argue that this will hurt business, and customers would simply stop doing business with them, so its in the company's interests to be virtuous, but human beings and numbers don't work that way. All all the protests and corporate boycotts of that last 100 years only a few notable ones have been successful. Some people simply don't care about the issue, or they will put their moral qualms aside and simply pay for the cheaper product even if they take issue with corporate practices.
Walmart has gotten endless scrutiny for harming small business and small towns. Dozens of boycotts have been attempted in the past two decades alone, but it hasn't stopped Walmart from growing. The outrage of a certain part of the population wasn't enough to hurt their business, because people choose to shop with them despite it, because they have cheap products. Walmart sells subsidized Chinese goods, and Americans ignore it.

States are needed in a society. AnCaps are literally incapable of perceiving reality because 100% of them are autistics detached from reality.

>"In a stateless society a fishing company could sell product contaminated with dangerous levels of heavy metal, or radiation."
>The state has effectively prevented this from ever happening in the past

>"but human beings and numbers don't work that way."
It must be nice to simply say things you want to be true and they come true.

If people don't care about the issues they deal with in supporting certain businesses, that is their own fault, and they shall face the repercussions from their negligence.

/thread

In Japan the government mandates fish be tested for radiation before its sold. Its even printed on some labels. This wouldn't be happening unless a law demanded it. Following the law is the price of business in a functional society.

People not caring about issues is the natural state of things. No one can be perfectly informed about everything, some people may not even be aware of an issue with a given product when they make a purchase. Society either exists to protect the people, or there isn't a society. There is no alternative.

>People not caring about issues is the natural state of things. No one can be perfectly informed about everything

Then those people can die off and smarter/more informed people can prosper. Why are you so interested in conducting dysgenics?

>Sees flag

Ohhhhh

Sage this shit

>totally unregulated company sell poisoned product to unsuspecting good person
>hurr durr they're supposed to die, survival of the fittest!

Hating your own people is a clear sign that you're a brainwashed kike drone.

>I have a very poor understanding of selective pressures, eugenics, evolution, game theory, economics, group behavior, and biology in general therefore YOUR ideology is bad

Would be perfect with a worried jew head on the left and a happy merchant on the right

>there is no way a company can regulate itself, this does not already occur in the free market

You are the one who hates their own people since you wish to impose your will onto them whether they consent or not.

>b-but my will is a net benefit of them since they don't know better

>the more things I list in sequence, the less dumb it makes me look!

would be very eugenic but having your own lab for each time you eat is exaggerated

Oh maybe if you had a 6th grade education r higher you'd understand why every single one of these things are very relevant to your brainfart.

There you go being a kike again.
Exactly as I said, companies will do as much or as little as they can get away with it. We have seen this in every single industry. We see automakers who know they have defective cars on the road, but refrain from issuing recalls, because their accounting departments calculated that paying out death settlements will be cheaper than issuing the full recall. That is the level of self regulation you get from a faceless corporation.
Those people would not become moral actors if you removed government from the equation. The average person, the average business owner especially, is not going to be altruistic to the detriment of their own profits.

Money isn't a God, you miserable money worshiping semite. The lives of our people have worth.

Well since I don't have that education, as you so wisely and perceptively declare, how about (You) explain them for me?

>hurr you wouldn't understand them anyway

Except that isn't eugenics. "good"*** eugenics would be tailoring your people to an environment that is itself optimal to the survival of you species.

Evolution isn't a bad to good gradient. If you waste your times pushing for selective pressures selecting for traits that are only relevant because you're forcing them to be, that's not productive. Forcing the selection of pointless traits is counter to the idea of building a civilization completely.
The flag should be green, not yellow.

read the first half of again. And really try your best to wrap your head around the idea that the state will not be able to wholly prevent bad business practices from ever happening.

You can do it, I believe in you!

Do you know how much teachers are paid nowadays? And all the benefits? Yeah, working for free is a violation of the NAP.

here's a start. lmgtfy.com/?q=biology

Forcing the selection is the next step in natural selection as people who don't do it will be wiped out.

"national Capitalism" is just fascism.

Free market capitalism with national pride and no jews allowed.

>The average person, the average business owner especially, is not going to be altruistic to the detriment of their own profits.
Except it's NOT a detriment to have your business succeed, which is what would happen if your company doesn't have to RECALL its products by holding itself to a higher level of R E G U L A T I O N.

>Those people would not become moral actors if you removed government from the equation.
>Government is a moral actor

You're so fucked it's not even funny.

Your fallacy was already addressed, kike.

I didn't say the government was a moral actor. Trying to strawman when you lack a real argument is the hallmark of an AutCap kike.
If a company is harming the people while earning a profit is society as a whole benefiting from it? Should private corporations be absolved of all misdeeds so long as they positively contribute to GDP? Thats the crux of what you're arguing. I was right when I called you out, money worshiping semite.

>I didn't say the government was a moral actor.
Then what would be the point of govt putting regulation on businesses? To make businesses make less money for no reason whatsoever? Can you please at least try to be consistent with your """"logic""""?

This is getting embarrassing for (You).

This level of infantile shitposting really is sad, semite. The government is not moral, it is an abstract, and at best it is impartial. The purpose of the state is to legitimize laws and a court system which among another things can pass regulations to protect the people with preemption. I've stated this already.
You're a kike. Anyone reading this thread can see you're a shitposting kike.

Nothing you can do will save face, schlomo.

>The government is impartial.
>pic related
Yea I think we're just about done here. But go ahead and call me a kike for the 15th time already. That's the only thing you know how to do consistently, unlike making good arguments.