Why didn't Russia took over entire Europe?

Why didn't Russia took over entire Europe?
French are defeatist cucks, Italy was already stomped, British had massive loses against Germany, Spain and Poortugal are irrelevant, Ameriniggers were still small at the time.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YAw2DBwtALQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>why dont they spread their forces so much that they could barely man the border?

>Spain and Poortugal are irrelevant
invade us nigger

Soviets coudn't held Yugoslavia under control, how could they rest of Europe?

Because fuck you, that's why.

>nukes

Cause (((they))) already did take over the entirety of Europe they owned soviet Russia and now USA so, in other words Europe since 1946 was under the same rule as it is now

A bombs,no defense against america and England a bombing all their main cities.
Also they were spread spso thinly they could barely send supplies to the front since all the routes had been destroyed by the germans advancing,tpby them retreating,then rebuilt,then destroyed by them advancing and the germans retreating and the allied bombing so it was basically a cluster fuck.
In fact patton rightly stated he could have fucked up the commie armies by simply surrounding them in the weeks after the german surrender

They barely managed to hold eastern Europe for the rest of the 20th Century, they wouldn't have been able to control the other half that had mostly all experienced far greater economic, social and political development.

As horrific as it was to do, how the West dealt with Stalin is a very good example of appeasement actually working successfully as a policy.

Also, Russia wouldn't have been able to invade the UK any more successfully than Germany.

cuz france, UK and USA had nukes

Portugal is really weak, but to get here you need to get past so much that when you arrive it would be a one side war. Search the three french invasions on Portugal.
But the final answer to your question is:
> not worth it.
Why try to spread your forces to conquer, with your own words, cucks, losers and poors?

Fucking /thread
Took way too long for this post I'm dissappointed

This.
Thread closed.

Our soldiers died for Stalin. He couldn’t ignore this.

>Ameriniggers were still small
Americans barely did anything in the war and barely expended any lives compared to Germany and Russia. The Soviets weren't willing to risk starting WWIII immediately after spending waves of human beings to push back the Nazis and take Berlin.

Then they just never got the chance again.

Nuclear weapons.
/thread

...

Because Moscow would be named Hitler City if it hadn't been for Allied help. Uncle Joe got his Georgian arse saved by Anglos.

>he thinks this is the actual reason
Nigger the real reason is because ZOG had already won, the USSR kike puppet state had no real intentions of forming an empire. Their Jewish masters were already busy creating a new dialectic called the “Cold War” to manipulate the goy.

They did tho. We literally chased Napoleon back to his fucking country.
We just aren't invasive people in general.
Don't touch our shit, and we won't touch you.
If you don't believe me, name literally one example in history where Russians invaded someone.

...

ITT: Uneducated faggots asking retarded military question with his alt-right meme filled brain.

No navy to speak of.

Also the USSR was bled dry at that point. They could've take over the rest of continental Europe and maybe even hold it, but they were on the verge of famine at this point because so few men were left back home. Since WW2 has just proven that western allies, at least the commonwealth and the us won't settle for limited peace, there was no way in which that temporary victory they could've won by taking over the continent would turn into something that lasts.

>Why didn't Russia took over
That grammar lel! Drop the meme flag Boris, we know it's you

Afghanistan

This.

this goy gets it, germany and japan were the last stand

>Why didn't Russia took over entire Europe?

Stalin was quite scared of nuclear weapons and the US had a monopoly on them in 1945.

I unironically hope russia conquers all of western europe today

America too if we keep being jewish faggots

>name literally one example in history where Russians invaded someone

Russia has invaded Afghanistan, Finland, Poland, Ukraine, Ottoman Empire, and strictly speaking China too. Maybe Germany and Austria-Hungary briefly too in WW1?

>Afghanistan
Fellow government asks THEMSELVES for Russian help: please help us beat up those terrorist assholes in our country
>Mfw when some see this as an intervention or invasion

>Germany was the last stand
>borrowed tons of money from Rothschild to create fake economic miracle in the 30's and give legitimacy to Keynesianism
>every time they caught Rothschild or other big banking family jews they let them go(1938 in Austria) or gave them very light treatment(1940 France)
>set up French puppet regime that served as a proxy for contacting with jewish businessmen
>last stand of anything

>stalin couldn’t ignore thousands of foreigner deaths when he caused millions of deaths among his own people

Jesus Christ have you even taken history lessons
>Afghanistan
See >Finland
They attacked first
>Ottoman empire
They also literally attacked first
>Germany
Same here

>Fellow government asks THEMSELVES for Russian help: please help us beat up those terrorist assholes in our country

LMAO you realise that the Russians ended up having to fight and remove said government because they were too batshit insane?

Poland doesn’t count. Who hasn’t invaded Poland? I even invaded Poland one night after I drank a couple to many mai tais.

Cont.
>Ukraine
>China
When did we do that?
>Poland
The only legitimate contender
But only because Stalin was retarded

Because Russia was controlled opposition of US
Murica funded everything in Russia prior to ww2
America owns Russia

>Finland
They attacked first

>fake economic miracle

lmao

>Finland

>I unironically hope russia conquers all of western europe today

So all of Europe can enjoy being a shithole like Russia?

You attacked first and most of the Finnish people wanted to join USSR during winter war. Besides, Finnish independence is illegal as Lenin wasn't the proper leader in 1917.

they needed to recover after the horrible losses of ww2

also those european countries hadn't attacked them, you couldn't justify to your population going through another world war with tens of millions of casualties just for fun

also nukes

America was vastly more powerful than the Soviet Union at the time, in fact we gave communist Russia much more credit for strength and competence than they deserved throughout the Cold War. We evidently forgot that the only thing they provided in WW2 was bodies to use the lend/lease equipment we shipped them

Idiot. There was never something even close to a majority in Finland for wanting to join the USSR.

Afghanistan was.

The Continuation War wasn't, but the Winter War that preceded it was a Russian invasion.

Russia declared war on the Ottomans in 1877 you ape.
Russia also declared war on them in 1914 and began offensives first. So that's an invasion too.

Germany might not count, but it's a technicality.

>Poland is a contender but Ukraine isn't
You're a fucking cretin. Russia invaded Ukraine in 1920 following their invasion of Poland the year earlier.

They also invaded China along with basically every other global power in the Boxer Rebellion in 1900.

>have you even taken history lessons
I'm a history graduate

They couldn't. Russia would have gotten bogged down near the rhine and had zero counter to the US army air corp and depended on the allies to feed not only their army but their own citizens.

Eastern Europe was pillaged first by the germans, again when the germans retreated and again by the soviet advance. There was nothing left, their supply chains were stretched thin and easily destroyed.

Neither side had a real stomach for war. The Allies would have lost thouands, yes, but the Russians would have lost millions, mostly to lack of supplies.

Ussr couldn’t have supplied its troops that far and the allied bomber fleets would have been ass.

More than 70% wished to do so. It's just that ruling Finnish capitalist elite sold their country to Germany.

Even if they didn't (they did) Finnish independence declaration was illegal by international law. The paper was irrelevant.

Without muh shekels how can life be worth living?

The only winning move is not to play, and this went true for both sides.

>Why didn't Russia took over entire Europe?
1. USA wouldn´t like that for numerous reasons
2. Russia lacked the ressources
3. The russian military was only capable of fighting due to USA giving them a shitload of ressources
4. Controlling that much land would have been impossible for the soviet union
At that point nukes where still in development, but they would have played a significant role during a further russian invasion

Man you dumb. Who would want to join drunk snow niggers getting shot by their own officers.

> in fact we gave communist Russia much more credit for strength and competence than they deserved throughout the Cold War.
>we
>not jewish subversive fifth column in the west

>Americans barely did anything in the war

Except defeat Japan singlehandedly lol. And if it wasn't for our trucks the vodkaniggers would be relying on dead frozen horses to haul all their shit

Source

>America was too small at the time
We were powerful enough to totally BTFO Japan with only 1 branch of our military, while the other branch spearheaded an invasion of occupied France. Soviets had 0 nukes at the time as well, attacking the US at that time would have been suicidal.

The debt was enormous and it had to be paid off one day, then the whole bubble would burst. That's Keynesian economy for you.

Other than that:
>durr 0% unemployment
when you count inactive reservists(for example - all WW1 veterans) as employed it's hard to have any unemployment at all
>durr autobanh
For military use
>hurr great industry
By 1939 German industry was so tightly into Nazi Party pockets that they skipped Q&A. You can read British and Soviet reports from the early part of the war where they've captured some German vehicles and checked the quality of steel etc. they were built of. It was all over the place. The same vehicle could've had armour plate that cracked under machinegun fire and another, of the same thickness that was way stronger than you'd expect.
Not that they were happy about it - they weren't even paid in money at this point but in government bonds because German mark was worthless already after 6 years of rapid government spending on margin.

Our trucks, food, aviation fuel, most of their explosives were US made.

Russia lost more tanks in the war than they built. Lend Lease was not overstated.

Because Russians don't need that shitland. And never wanted to conquer it.
We could took France after we defeated Napoleon. We could take it after we defeated Hitler.
We could take Georgia in 2008.
We could take Ukraine in 2014.
But we don't need that shit.
We want to live peacefully, don't listen the buthurted belt's lunatics.

>Americans barely did anything in the war
>what is Lend-Lease

>What is the shelling of mainila

But you didn't defeat Napoleon. The weather did, same with the Nazis. Russian soldiers are shit and have to rely on snow to win.

>More than 70% wished to do so
Proofs please. Also, it didn't really seem so, as in -39 300k Finnish men were willing to risk their lives fighting against soviet aggression.

And if you are trying to refer to Finnish civil war in -18, that war was fought because of our oppressed working class who simply wanted better conditions for life.

>he says while living in Earth's largest country

Nice bate, but fuck you, retard.

Because they were afraid of Greece.

So this is the power of post-Soviet propaganda...

>When did we do that?
>Ukraine

Other than a few years ago when you annexed Crimea, also the many times in history when you annexed and then genocide Ukraine.

>China
He's probably referring to the Russo-Japanese war

It’s true. There were literally no russian soldiers at borodino it was just weather only and marching french troops gave up and went home when it got nippy

Ural Moutains .

Spain is so irrelevant that during the Civil war in the place there was Soviet troops trying to secure communism in the area. They all died to the right wingers with the rest of the communists. Russia couldn't conquer western European country because they tried with the weakest and still failed.

>Russian historian Pavel Aptekar analyzed declassified Soviet military documents and found that the daily reports from troops located in the area did not report any losses in personnel during the time period in question, leading him to conclude that the shelling of Soviet troops was staged.[9]

Years after the incident,[when?] Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev wrote that the Mainila shellings were organized by Artillery Marshal Grigory Kulik.[10] In 1994, Russian President Boris Yeltsin denounced the Winter War, agreeing it had been a war of aggression.[11]

Try harder

You're overestimating your power projection which is frankly shit. You couldn't even hold on to your own neighbors after the Cold War. Nobody in their right minds wants to live under your boot..coy

Finnish people did. And Finnish independence is illegal by international law. I want them to accept that Finns and Russians are part of the same family. We are unified.

Capitalist ruling class was and still is the traitors of your country. Those men you are talking about are German proxies.

You're just a fucking moron who don't even know any real Finns. My experience from Finland is being told stories about how relatives clobbered Russian infiltrators to death with firewood. There seems to be few things Finns are more proud of than how many commies their relatives killed during WW2.

youtube.com/watch?v=YAw2DBwtALQ

You are stuck in the jewish economics system.

In a national socialst society noone is unemployed, everyone fills a role. The system is based on WORK not speculating. For every hour of work 1 mark was issued. This way you dont need any (((loans))) or other outside influenses. The economy is dependent on WORK and nothing else. Ever seen "arbeit macht frei"?

>The debt was enormous

Have you even read about the jewish question?

>Yeltsin
Hahahaha
>Muh annexation

Can you give any sources? Also what international law are you referring to?

But it isn't bait. Russia loses when ever it doesn't rely on weather to win.

Coldwar - lost
WW1- lost
Finland-Russia war - stalemate
Russia-Poland 1921 - lost badly
Russia - japan - lost
Crimean war - lost

Anytime you try and invade the west without having the west die to frost bite first, you lose.

>implying the Jew didnt control both sides
D-Day was launched on the 6th hour of the 6th day of the 6th month (((666))) just to extend the war so they could grab more territory

After they got heir shit fucked in Afganistan they knew they started some serious shit with the muslim world and it was time to hang up that hammer and sickle flag or prepare to have moscow burned to the ground.

>Those men you are talking about are German proxies

Now this is just plain desperate. You don't even master the art of trolling

Securing communism in a country that already was at war with itself and weak (Spain) - lost.

Stalin had a deal to split Germany and actually meant to honor it. For some time. After all there were still allied soldiers there so he couldn't just invade the other part of Europe. Meanwhile Greece and Finland nearly got under Soviet sphere of influence. Stalin had plans to invade the other part of Europe but needed edge over the West. Like the hydrogen bomb. The first test took place only weeks after Stalin died. Dodged that bullet.

Hes a Pole, dont waste your time. Their massive inferiority complex towards Germans makes it pointless. Like arguing with a Jew.

Red army couldn't march further because cocks were swollen from all the raping.

Typical. You can't deny any of these facts, even acknowledged by russian historians and also Khrushchev himself so you just resort to mocking a single persons sayings. Off yourself.

That was the plan, initially.

As so much around us, the truth is hidden, but the Soviets had Operation Groza (Thunderclap) ready to commence by 1941. This was to be an invasion of all of Europe, so that Jewish Bolshevism would reign from Lisbon to Vladivostok. Soviet troops were placed in an offensive position along the western border with Europe before Hitler genuinely surprised Stalin by breaking Molotov-Ribbentrop.

Without Barbarossa, Jewish Bolshevism would have consumed all of Europe before Amerikwa would have even stepped in. (Also remember that in 1941, Roosevelt was very much alive and very much sympathetic to Stalin).

>As horrific as it was to do, how the West dealt with Stalin is a very good example of appeasement actually working successfully as a policy.
that's only because, while Stalin was a psychopathic sadist who fed on the pain of others, he wasn't a megalomaniac like Hitler. Stalin knew the limits of what his empire could accomplish in its post-war state, that is why he went to work internally fixing political power purely to him and bringing the Warsaw States under even more direct rule.

Statin's Russia couldn't have taken the rest of Europe without collapsing in the process. Khrushchev could've done more but by that point the bombs were too big to warrant heavy expansion and Khrushchev was pro East-West coexistence (until the US fucked it all up by letting a spy plane crash)

>a brit

>talking about massive inferiority complexes

HOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHO

Haha gtfo vatnik shill

>Germany was the last stand

>20's: 1 Fascist state
>30's: 6 Fascist states
>40's: 9 Fascist states
>50's: 2 Fascist states

Fascism was the fastest growing ideology after WW1, had Hitler not done anything, Europe would've become completely Fascist in decades

How can you justify borrowing money from the jews to fund it all you idiot?

You're dodging that question whoooole the time.
Germans - specifically Hjalmar Schacht(freemason btw) - pioneered deficit spending in the 30's mostly to fund military. The British in 1938 decreased their military spending because they knew they couldn't do it without falling into enormous debt and were convinced Germans(who spent around twice the percentage of their GNP Great Britain did) will do the same or go bankrupt. Well Germans were smarter and went to war instead of paying it back.

Just because you liked their particular brand of communism doesn't mean it wasn't as much of a failure as the Soviet one was.

Poland right before WWII?

this basically. also if America saw them trying to expand in the same way that Germany did they would've been in trouble

Oh I didn't know we were talking about nazicomics?
Yeah it was shit, huge spending, war economy, debt, some other keynesian tricks. Had to constantly move forward and invade in order to survive. Schacht wasn't the worst. He actually advocated for normally balanced system while Goering insisted on war economy autism.

If we call USSR Russia (we shouldn't but whatever) then a bunch of countries like Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Finland. Later Baltic states, Poland and Romania and Finland again. And I'm only at 1940 I'm already exhausted.

This has to be bait.

Russians are inherently expansionist because the core of their state lacked any natural fortifications/borders besides distance and forest. The story of Russia, from Kiev to present, is of expansion ostensibly to provide protection.

>implying the ussr wouldnt have attacked anyway