When did you realize Marxism-Leninism is the ultimate Red Pill?

When did you realize Marxism-Leninism is the ultimate Red Pill?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=JO4iIjKNraw
youtube.com/watch?v=kQoEqBx70ts
youtube.com/watch?v=gS692MzFA7k
gunsandammo.com/politics/cdc-gun-research-backfires-on-obama/
washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/19/guns-in-america-for-every-criminal-killed-in-self-defense-34-innocent-people-die/?utm_term=.189866bc5d99
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likbez
ourworldindata.org/literacy/
ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty/
aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/08/exposing-great-poverty-reductio-201481211590729809.html
bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_rothschild04.htm
bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/hiddenevil/hiddenevil10.htm
politifact.com/global-news/statements/2016/mar/23/gayle-smith/did-we-really-reduce-extreme-poverty-half-30-years/
google.com/amp/s/nintil.com/2016/03/26/the-soviet-union-gdp-growth/amp/
youtube.com/watch?v=PaFklTLNy8c
amazon.com/Antony-C.-Sutton/e/B001K1S1ZE
npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/10/02/496099777/global-poverty-declines-even-amid-economic-slowdown-world-bank-sayshttps://www.economist.com/news/international/21719790-going-will-be-much-harder-now-world-has-made-great-progress
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Personally, for me it was around age 10.

I think the quote from Reagan was in response to The Black Panthers marching down the street with guns and threatening white people.

But unda gommunizm u starv!!1!1

Trolled le epic style

The Black Panthers were not an anti-white group, in fact they had white members and even asian members.

They were threatening the political establishment, not "white people", which is why most were murdered by police

Can we see the full context of those quotes?

When over 100 million people were killed under all applications of his theory, the latest failure being Venezuela, despite having what is estimated to be the largest oil reserves in the world. Just great shit, really. Check out Venezuela Doge, he's a fan, one of millions of people and domesticated animals starving.

The context is capitalist society, in which a small handful of mostly Jewish plutocrats control the lives and fates of billions of people.

To the plutocrats, an armed citizenry represents an existential threat, which is why Reagan, Nixon, and other pro-plutocrat liberals opposed the second amendment.

Communists, on the other hand, wish to overturn the existing social order and liquidate the capitalists as class. Only a heavily armed proletariat can achieve this.

You forgot to mention Chavez's masturbation torture machines.

>100 million people
The problem with communism isn't that it killed too many people. The problem with communist is that it didn't kill enough worthless human waste like you and your family.

edgy

Reagan was a republican.

And he actually said things like this about Liberalism:

youtube.com/watch?v=JO4iIjKNraw

>"If Fascism Ever Comes to America, It Will Come in the Name of Liberalism"

He was still a neoliberal.

Could it be, the power of the second largest oil reserves in the world?
Yet its per capita GDP is still worse than Saudi Arabia, who they match in reserves petroleum.

Roughly four years ago when Tyrone pulled his massive black cock out of my ass only to nut on my partner's breasts. It was at that moment that I realized the moral necessity of redistribution.

precomunism ideas were very progressive until (((they))) took over and used it to destroy russia

Give me 1 (one) reason that the general population should be armed, causing thousands of innocent people to die of unnecessary gun violence every year.
Pro tip : you can't

10 year olds aren't allowed on this website

I've been toying with the idea of creating a communist caucus within the Republican Party.

It'd be a blend of traditional social conservative ideas with hardline anti-imperialism and a splash of Marxist economics. Not quite as extreme as NazBol, but close to it and with some strategic retreats from socialism in favor of more market-socialist ideas like cooperativization instead of nationalization. The ultimate goal would be to capture the new working class character that some parts of the GOP have accidentally managed to tap into, and to take advantage of the natural anti-elitism and anti-liberalism within the party.

have a (you), fellow elite memer

>Raegan was a shitty president
Wow, anything else to say Einstein?

>communist j00z destroyed russia by turning it into an industrialized superpower
really makes u think

marxist leninists arent marxists. good try though

youtube.com/watch?v=kQoEqBx70ts

youtube.com/watch?v=gS692MzFA7k

orthodox marxists aren't even human

arguments : zero

Here's 1 good reason: an armed citizenry makes it easier to overthrow the government and liquidate the capitalist class.

...

>I can't defend my political belief so I'm going to resort to violence and threats
Classic liberal / communist.

>reminder that Obamas CDC study was swept under the rug because the results were not in favor of gun control
gunsandammo.com/politics/cdc-gun-research-backfires-on-obama/

>commie larpers and rednecks ACTUALLY believe that they can overthrow centralized governments with drones, jet planes, atomic bombs, etc. using their pawpaw's shotgun
ok kiddy
Also please tell me why you claim to champion the working class, but are against the ideology that has brought the most people out of poverty(capitalism).

>having white members meant you weren't anti-white
Have you been to 2018 yet time traveller?

>some policemen used justified means to keep a rioting mob in control, this justifies thousands of innocent deaths in a year!
Not an argument

>all those fallacies

If you're wondering about Reagan, it's because black people were open carrying in California. And when black people get uppity in USA, laws get passed faster than you can remind conservatives they should have principles.

>not seeing the big picture
OK time to move.

Read washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/19/guns-in-america-for-every-criminal-killed-in-self-defense-34-innocent-people-die/?utm_term=.189866bc5d99 .

Name one
>can't actually name the "big picture"

Why even make a distinction for gun suicides?

kill yourself shill rat

why is it called marx-leninism when lenin rewrote the whole bitch?

how do you deal with the innately inferior among the working classes.

cmon, sell it to me, commie.
sell it!

Marxism-leninism is utopian avant-garde tier ideas that is as practical as ancap. All comunism will eventually turn into stalinism

>innately inferior
Those don't exist.

Why not? They are still deaths caused by gun violence...

But the cost of life. It would have been better if Russia wasn't taken over by authoritarian Bolsheviks.

So nobody can be inferior or superior to anyone else?

> vietnam actually believes he can hold off usa with some old rifles against choppers, napalm and tanks
Wow

>suicide due to gun violence
>not due soul-crushing alienation caused by capitalism

wtf? i hate capitalism now

>what is Soviet/Chinese aid to North Vietnam
Oh yeah, modern capitalism is so oppressive and horrible! We have the lowest work hours since the Industrial Revolution began, the longest length of life in history, the vast majority of people die not of violence but due to natural means, the percentage of those in absolute poverty is the lowest it's ever been, but yeah, it's absolutely horrible! Theres reason that emo fucks like you didn't exist under other systems. It's not that capitalism made you sad, it's that under any other system, you probably wouldn't have even made it to adulthood in the first place.

>rising consumption of anti-depressants, anti-anxiety and opioids is an accident
Opium is also the opium of the people. :^)

...

kike commie go home you're not welcome here

yea in fairness industrialization has had little to no apparent benefit to the people of russia if you really look at life over there since the thirties

Based marx

Oh, that meme. No I'm pretty sure Reagan was a leftist pretending to be conservative, he did national gun control and amnesty too

Correlation does not equal causation. Consider that before industrialization/globalization, the average peasant/hunter-gatherer/whatever would have no way of obtaining anti-depressants, anti-anxiety pills, or opioids even if they wanted to. If you want to claim that the root cause of drug use is capitalism, you need to equalize the time period's levels of industrialization and globalization, making this whole thought experiment nothing more than an autistic alt-history scenario.

Neoliberals aren't leftist.

>leftists would give Wall Street tax breaks

WTF I love communism now. Only one problem though OP: no food.

Economically? They are right wing.
Politically? They are left wing.
Socially? They are left wing.

>the average peasant/hunter-gatherer/whatever would have no way of obtaining anti-depressants, anti-anxiety pills, or opioids even if they wanted to
That's what religion is for.

>Economically? They are right wing.
Therefore, they are not left-wing. Simple.

If you think Venezuela is better off today than it was in 2000 I have a bridge to nationalize for you in exchange for murdering my political opponents.

Yea, the no true scotsman fallacy

Imagine being so stupid, you think tens of millions of people getting access to things like healthcare, education, and electricity for the first time in their lives "had little to no apparent benefit to the people of russia"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likbez

Literacy rate under the Czar, 1914: 20%

Literacy rate under Stalin, just 20 years afterwards: 90%

Healthcare under the Tsar: literally did not exist outside of major cities

Healthcare under Stalin: expanded country-wide, even the most remote village had access to basic healthcare

Electricity under the Tsar: reserved only for wealthy elites

Electricity under Stalin: made available for free to everyone

Economics have primacy.

Good one. Hitler sacrificed millions of white people and drove his country into total destruction, all so his oligarch financiers could get more profit.

damn dude how many millions of deaths did you just gloss over to make this post

Fuck Reagan, and double fuck all the socialist retards.

muhhh gorillionzzzzz

Congratulations, the USSR had greater production at the height of the Western Great Depression. Really turned-on muh walnuts.

>Oh yeah, modern capitalism is so oppressive and horrible! We have the lowest work hours since the Industrial Revolution began, the longest length of life in history, the vast majority of people die not of violence but due to natural means, the percentage of those in absolute poverty is the lowest it's ever been, but yeah, it's absolutely horrible!
The reason why you live a good life in a 1st world capitalist country is because hundreds of millions of people live lives of absolute misery and brutality.

The clothes you're wearing are made by little girls who work 14 hours a day with no breaks, because the CIA assassinated every workers' rights activists in that country.

The luxury and wealth you enjoy would be impossible without the brutal exploitation of Third World workers. It would be impossible without constant invasions and bombings of countries which refuse Rothschild-IMF domination.

Historically, capitalism has uplifted the most people out of poverty and illiteracy. I suppose capitalism must be the best ideology, then, right?
ourworldindata.org/literacy/
ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty/

Technically, 2017 Venezuela resisted an international pressure that was even bigger than it was during Chavez, yet Chavistas managed to win 3 major elections and make their opponent looks like the brutal looters they are, while at the same time complete economic blockade organized by the USA failed completely to bankrupt the country (which paid back a whooping 74 billions $ of their external debt in 2017 in due time).

700,000 landlords, banksters, exploiters, speculators, and other waste were justifiably executed by the Stalin regime. I say good riddance, the people killed under Stalin were people like Hillary Clinton, George Soros, Lord Rothschild, etc.

no actually gorillions live in filth because niggers, not because our economic system is an elaborate pyramid scheme

Do you have any citations or publications to back that infopic?

I already know you don't, i just wanted to discredit you and then mock you in this line.

Sweetie, capitalism has uplifted more people out of poverty than EVER before. To claim that it creates poverty and misery is laughable, when it does just the opposite.

Actually, that's fake news.

aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/08/exposing-great-poverty-reductio-201481211590729809.html

Ohh i'm sorry, i found the citations myself. I feel bad now.

bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_rothschild04.htm

>by David Icke

Line 6
>

The Rothschilds are one of the top Illuminati bloodlines on the planet and they are shape-shifting reptilians (see The Biggest Secret).

LOL

How come Ghana has a higher GDP than Ukraine then?

I wonder why the Soviet Union was not affected by the Great Depression, unlike literally every other country on earth?

Most of these statistics for global poverty alleviation come from China, a capitalist economy run by the Communist Party. Remove China from the equation and you'll find that the global poverty rate is actually increasing. See countries like India, Philippines, Indonesia - malnutrition and poverty has increased in those countries in the past decade.

Oh right, the Soviets hated bankers, that's why they were funded by them, right?
bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/hiddenevil/hiddenevil10.htm

I never did. Thinking the State would ever voluntarily give up its power is beyond moronic. I could go on and on about the logical fallacies of Marxism, but simply put, Communism is a doctrine for kids that could never get over themselves.

Technically, it's the German that ignited the eradication of the illiteracy, because their religious doctrine wanted to have all the pple (in fact all the men) capable of reading the holy bible.

That was what triggered the movement of literacy.

Eradication of poverty is also a consequence of widespread literacy

Then after you've convinced they soys to revolt u take their guns.
Why is communism so trendy amongst people that patronize starbucks and have no value to society?

>bibliotecapleyades.net
>hiddenevil10.htm
lmao

Actually, that's fake news.
politifact.com/global-news/statements/2016/mar/23/gayle-smith/did-we-really-reduce-extreme-poverty-half-30-years/

Kill yourself.

So you admit that capitalism dragged China out of poverty?
>the global poverty rate is actually increasing
Wrong! politifact.com/global-news/statements/2016/mar/23/gayle-smith/did-we-really-reduce-extreme-poverty-half-30-years/

google.com/amp/s/nintil.com/2016/03/26/the-soviet-union-gdp-growth/amp/
I hope you feel embarrassed; it's not often I read something so stupid on here I'm left with so few words to say.

Okay, the correct response is to NOT post the data being debunked already by the post you're responding to, and holy fuck, not Politifact.

>aljazeera is a legitimate source, yet politifact isn't
Maybe turn 18 before posting?

Okay, I will assume you're pretending to dumbpost like a liberal.

Professor Antony Sutton good enough for you?
youtube.com/watch?v=PaFklTLNy8c

> Using tools invented by capitalism for capitalism to compare what's not capitalism

Definitely not. The guy is a nutcase. See the rest of his writings:

amazon.com/Antony-C.-Sutton/e/B001K1S1ZE

In what autistic fantasy land is fucking aljazeera a legitimate source?
Is NPR good enough for you? Is THE ECONOMIST good enough for you? No, because you're a brain-dead idiot. npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/10/02/496099777/global-poverty-declines-even-amid-economic-slowdown-world-bank-sayshttps://www.economist.com/news/international/21719790-going-will-be-much-harder-now-world-has-made-great-progress

>Professor Antony Sutton

Dengism is not capitalism. Read Deng Xiaoping.

>I don't like his opinions, so he's a nutcase!