What would the perfect gun regulation be for the U.S? It's obvious getting rid of illegal weapons is nearly impossible...

What would the perfect gun regulation be for the U.S? It's obvious getting rid of illegal weapons is nearly impossible, and disarming law abiding people is just dumb.

I was talking with a friend that said we should have to register and license every gun we own like a car and that sounded reasonable. It would only make private gun sales a little more complicated, as in going through the gov to register it's new owner. And make it easier to identify crimes committed by illegaly obtained guns.

But what about situations when someone not registered to the gun has to use it in an emergency? Will the justice system be understanding enough?

Looking for discussion.

Other urls found in this thread:

cdc.gov/men/lcod/2011/lcod_whitemen2011.pdf
cdc.gov/men/lcod/2011/lcodblackmales2011.pdf
brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2015/12/15/guns-and-race-the-different-worlds-of-black-and-white-americans/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Kill yourself commie faggot. Then you won't have to worry about scary guns coming to get you.

dat low bore axis

fpbp

> What would the perfect gun regulation be for the U.S?
none you jewish faggot, leading question, low iq tier troll faggot
look at how spastic your writing is
you weirdo

nothg

SHALL

Also, if you're too fucking thick to understand that a gun registry inevitably leads to a confiscation, then you're really, really, really fucking retarded and should remove yourself from the gene pool.

Thanks, your input to the discussion has been noted


You retard

SHALL

Why not go the opposite route and make it illegal to not own a gun?

this, but in a larger caliber font
i hope someone sperged out at font
CLIPS

Niggers are bared from gun ownership

>you wish

what part of kill yourself confused you, commie?
is it because you can't do anything for yourself?
fucking commie. this is why we need suicide booths
go dial 2 B R 0 2 B

The reason we don't have a registry is so that when Hillary Clinton 2.0 inevitably demands we turn in our guns, they cannot refer to aforementioned registry to come door to door taking your guns.

Rifle issued at birth.

Everyone is given a 2 bore and make dueling legal again

So registering every firearm to a specific citizen makes it easier for the gubment to inevitably take away said firearms. That makes sense. But would enough armed citizens causen enough backlash against disarmament to change that?

fuck you and burn in hell, OP.

Every birth cerfticate comes with a bare bones ar 15

Rule 1) it's just cool to shoot niggers whenever you see one

I really want one of these

If the state can call upon me to be militia shouldnt they subsidize my firearms and ammo? They give gibs for having shitty solar power or not being able to feed your own kids; I should get a handout to be ready to defend my country

No you fucking peasant. Apparently over half the country consists of pussies that voted for Hillary Clinton. I bet they would love the government to take their guns. Just shove that big old government cock deeper.

You need a license to drive a car, not to own one. Even then, people drive unlicensed and unregistered. How much easier to use an unregistered gun?

America's problem is not that the laws are too lax; they are too strict. The founding fathers would be furious that citizens can't purchase rocket launchers or cruise missiles.

Rightfully so.

in a perfect world I think it would be confiscation and seizure at gunpoint.

Not really understanding what makes me a commie, I understand that American citizens have a right to arm and defend themselves, and the last thing I want is a militant government to completely disarm me and take away my ability to defend myself.

>What would the perfect gun regulation be for the U.S?
A regulation stating that no other regulations on firearms may be made.

>I was talking with a friend that said we should have to register and license every gun we own like a car and that sounded reasonable.
Well, you're an idiot.
Driving is a privilege not a right.
Firearms are a right, not a privilege.
You don't ask the government's permission and jump through government hoops to exercise your rights.

> It would only make private gun sales a little more complicated,
Which is unconstitutional.

>and make it easier to identify crimes committed by illegaly obtained guns.
No it doesn't.
Our firearm rights aren't subject to firearm crimes.

>But what about situations when someone not registered to the gun has to use it in an emergency?
The laws and regulations would stop that person.

> Will the justice system be understanding enough?
No because gun laws are made to infringe upon firearm rights.


>But would enough armed citizens causen enough backlash against disarmament to change that?
Not if they take our firearms one gun, one accessory and one right at a time.

Based leaf

Move to Canada. Every rule you want is in place. Nobody’s rights are infringed upon.

Also, answer your question it would cause irreversible rift in our country in which the South would probably secede. However, Chicago, most of California, and New York would probably stay in the f*****-up Union that tried to enforce that. The majority of the population of the country or in those three areas so there in would lie the issue.

>Not really understanding what makes me a commie
You're willing to accept gun control and give your rights over to the government.

>and the last thing I want is a militant government to completely disarm me and take away my ability to defend myself.
Yet you want to sacrifice your rights to the government for some reason.

yo, kike, you must be new to Sup Forums. we understand how incrementalism works.
in case (((you))) haven't noticed, Sup Forums used to be liberal, then it was libertarian, now it is Sup Forums.

we had to dislodge the young thinking man from his rut, let him float freely and then groove him into the channel he was always forbidden -- national socialism.

how bout this, OP.
let's make it a law that every white citizen not convicted of a felony MUST own a gun...if you, as a White American, do not own a gun, you lose your right to vote and your status as White.

wanna keep playing the incrementalism game with, Sup Forums?
guess what the next step after that is?

that's right, kike -- ethnostate.

ethnostate now.

This is the system we have in Canada. It works alright. Getting a licence isn't even that hard; we have about the same percentage of gun owners as America.

Well then don't give them an inch, faggot.

I'd have no problem with a registry or requiring an FFL for private transfer. Only thing people shit thenselves over it for is "but den da gubmint knows i got guns!" as if the FFL calling in a NICS check or people sharing their shit on Facebook wasn't enough of an alert.

But the vehicles still need to be registered to a person. In my neighborhood the niggers talk about going into the rural areas and buying guns from Farmers or any poor white person and bringing them back to the hood. If the guns are registered to a specific person, private sale without the right paperwork would be punishable ,thus cutting down on niggers buying guns from random people

getting rid of all gun laws would solve all gun crime

How about we have no gun laws at all and let anyone over 18 freely purchase them? Owning firearms is a fundamental right in a free society. There should be no gun free zones, and people should be encouraged to carry them everywhere. Make harsher penalties for using your firearms against people, and niggers will just be executed all over the place for their crimes and by other niggers. It's a win win.

Things like driving a car or flying large aircraft require licenses because using public property like a highway or airspace is a privilege, not a right. You are your own property, and therefore you have a right to:
A) Live
B) Do whatever you want to your own body
C) Defend your own body

any government that denies one of these things has denied your human rights and is illegitimate.

Kill yourself.

Nice argument, Cletus. Go to bed, adults are talking.

>I'd have no problem with a registry or requiring an FFL for private transfer.
Would you be okay with having to register with the government before chatting anonymously on the internet?

>Only thing people shit thenselves over it for is "but den da gubmint knows i got guns!" as if the FFL calling in a NICS check or people sharing their shit on Facebook wasn't enough of an alert.
So you want to make it even harder for the people to hide their firearms from the government and make it even easier for the government to be able to track firearm owners down?

what is that piece of dog shit

>What would the perfect gun regulation be for the U.S?

READ THE FUCKING 2ND AMENDMENT YOU GODLESS SHILL

GO FUCKING READ IT

WHAT PART OF SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED IS NOT FUCKING CRYSTAL CLEAR

Civilian tech is 60 YEARS OUT OF DATE behind military tech. It's barely a deterrent at this point, let alone still qualifying as ARMS. Civvies get small-caliber single-shot guns. Criminals get full-automatic weapons, small powerful handguns, armor, etc. And that's not even getting started on whatever horror-tier tech is kept under wraps.

BEARING ARMS ISN'T JUST RIFLES

ARMS = CREW SERVED WEAPONS

ARMS = DRONES w/ AI GUIDANCE

ARMS = PIC RELATED

OP, grow the fuck up and get a real job.

Yeah? And any farmer with an ounce of self-respect wouldn't sell a gun to a fucking nigger.

One rule, if you commit a violent crime with a gun you are shot with the same gun.

I shouldn't need a government form to give a piece of MY property to someone else. Its MINE goddamit, keep government out of it.

>A) Live
You lose this when you abuse it.

>B) Do whatever you want to your own body
You also lose this right temporarily when you abuse it, because it's unethical to allow mentally ill people to try to off themselves, or allow drug users to stay addicted.

>C) Defend your own body
Yep.

>But the vehicles still need to be registered to a person. In my neighborhood the niggers talk about going into the rural areas and buying guns from Farmers or any poor white person and bringing them back to the hood. If the guns are registered to a specific person, private sale without the right paperwork would be punishable ,thus cutting down on niggers buying guns from random people
If those niggers are so dangerous that they'd kill innocent people, why aren't they (still) in prison?

Why must the law abiding have to deal with more restrictive firearm laws just because some criminal doesn't give a fuck about said laws?

kys or we will.
the 2nd amendment will be expanded if anything.

How does that boot taste?

No guns for criminals
No guns for niggers
Over 18 adult white male no restriction

There I fixed America's gun death problem

this.

I’d be for that actually. That’d be the most American shit ever.

It's a liability issue.
>Lets just sell this AK to this nice melanin enriched individual! Surely he wouldn't do wrong by it!
>Ja'Qwande shoits a nigger a week later
>But officer, that's not my rifle sold in my name by the local FFL! I sold it last week!
>slapped with a charge for strawman selling a firearm to a felon

Glad you asked, friend. No regulation at all would be perfect.

and this.

The shot heard round the world was the American colonists telling the British "We are not giving you our guns and instead we are going to kill all of you."

Retards like you are why people hate gun owners.

your rights can be infringed if you infringe the rights of others, that makes sense. However Things like mental illness and addiction are more like the body hurting itself than the 'person' hurting themselves.

>No guns for criminals
If a criminal has served their time in prison for their crimes they have the right to self defense like everyone else.

>No guns for niggers
As long as niggers are citizens and the USA exists, the constitution protects their right to own firearms. As much as I might disagree with niggers being here, that is.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

That is the only acceptable "regulation" for US gun rights. If you don't agree then take your shitskin ass back from whence you came.

>and that sounded reasonable
I wonder who could be behind this post

No it wouldn't you retard. Forcing you to do something awesome is exactly as authoritarian as forcing you to do something shitty.

>Retards like you are why people hate gun owners.
Our firearm rights aren't subject to other people's feelings.

When you need money or no longer need an item you sell it. If the nigger can't get the gun, they can't bring it back to the ghetto and raise the crime rate. Or if they get violent about not being able to get the gun. The owner uses said gun, kills the nigger, and the problem solves itself.

Whoew not sure if shills or just mad americunts

Here's a good regulation: every citizen is required to own at least one weapon.

>18 years old white male buys gun and sells it to his black thug buddy
great solution friend :))

>And make it easier to identify crimes committed by illegaly obtained guns
I want you to think very hard about why this sentence is absolutely fucking retarded.

>its my fault that someone else fucked up
Nobody with good conscience would sell a gun to a gangbanger, but its ultimatley the gangbangers fault someone died, not the seller

is that a 30mm or 20mm?

Found the nigger

Unironically this


White males leading cause of death 2011
15-19 #3 homicide 9.2%
20-24 #3 homicide 7.8%
25-34 #5 homicide 5.7%
cdc.gov/men/lcod/2011/lcod_whitemen2011.pdf

Black males leading cause of death 2011
15-19 #1 homicide 50%
20-24 #1 homicide 49.2%
25-34 #1 homicide 34.2%
cdc.gov/men/lcod/2011/lcodblackmales2011.pdf

FACT: Gun deaths, Blacks are 82% homicides (mostly caused by other black males) while White gun related deaths only 19% homicides

U.S. firearm death by type and race
White firearm deaths
77% suicide
19% homicide
Black firearm deaths
14% suicide
82% homicide

brookings.edu/blog/social-mobility-memos/2015/12/15/guns-and-race-the-different-worlds-of-black-and-white-americans/

I already own my mind.

>It's a liability issue.
So what?

It's the farmer's property. He can do with it as he wishes.

>>Lets just sell this AK to this nice melanin enriched individual! Surely he wouldn't do wrong by it!
It's the owner's right to sell it and it's the buyer's right to purchase it.

>>>Ja'Qwande shoits a nigger a week later
that's the nigger's fault, not the farmer or the firearm's.

>>But officer, that's not my rifle sold in my name by the local FFL! I sold it last week!
>>slapped with a charge for strawman selling a firearm to a felon
Doesn't matter. If the nigger is so dangerous that he'd kill innocent people, it's the government's sworn duty to get and keep that nigger off the street. Otherwise he's afforded the same rights as every other citizen of this country.

Where in the Constitution are car rights described? You are comparing apples to oranges.

Says the noguns statist. I'll let you know when we care.

No, you can buy a vehicle on kijiji (for example) and not register or license it. It can sit legally on your property. Even in Canada.

And an unscrupulous farmer can shave off a serial number pretend he lost his gun in a boating accident.

You've solved nothing.

2 bore is a little over 30mm

It would be a shitty grace period for sure, but once people realize that guns they sold to niggers or spics can come back and bite them in the ass, they would stop.

Unless maybe they sell said gun and then say it was stolen.

>. If the nigger can't get the gun, they can't bring it back to the ghetto and raise the crime rate.
If a criminal nigger wants to buy a gun illegally, all the laws in the world won't stop him.

Meanwhile all those laws will stop someone who wants to abide by the laws to buy a firearm.

>Or if they get violent about not being able to get the gun. The owner uses said gun, kills the nigger, and the problem solves itself.
Or the State keeps the nigger off the streets until he's no longer violent. Fix the rehabilitation system AND LEAVE OUR FUCKING FIREARM RIGHTS ALONE GOD DAMMIT!

There should be no limit for law abiding citizens to purchase any personal weapon.

>What would the perfect gun regulation be for the U.S?

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

Why should I be charged with a crime if a gun I sell is used in a crime? I didn't do anything wrong, the criminal did.

OMG!
the fag doesn't like me.
whatever shall user do?
how will i win your favor, faggot? is there any possible way you'll be my buddy? i'm so desperate for your approval...if user works really hard, believes everything you demand, starts eating soy for breakfast, lunch & dinner, will you give me a like on kikebook?

do you think gun owners care who hates them? no, faggot, we have guns. if the hate starts to translate into actions, we will shoot you.

hate on, cuck-faggot.

Why can't you get it through your thick skull that our firearm rights aren't subject to others abusing those firearm rights?

>There should be no limit for law abiding citizens to purchase any personal weapon.
Tanks and artillery included.

Irrelevant.
The seller is 100% liable when choosing who to sell their guns to. Read the law, dumbass. Someone steals your gun and you don't report it, you are liable for anything that happens with it. You sell a gun to someone you're not supposed to and something happens, you could get fucked.
>See: Dylan Roof
FFL transfer of private sales is a way to absolve yourself of any liability due to the government being the ones approving (or not disapproving) the sale.

>Irrelevant.
Actually it is completely relevant. Just because some anti-gun faggot hates firearms and firearm owners does not mean firearm owners do not or should not have firearm rights.

Because if you has gone through the proper paperwork, the gun is no longer yours or your problem.

Not an argument and false assumptions.
>that's the nigger's fault, not the farmer or the firearm's.
It absolutely is the farmer's fault for showing a clear lack of awareness of the individual.

Second Amendment to the Constitution of United States of America 1789

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

If i sold the gun its not my gun anymore, what about that is hard to understand?

>Because if you has gone through the proper paperwork,
"proper paperwork" according to a government that wants to infringe upon the rights of the people to own firearms.

Should we ask the government's permission before posting anonymously on Sup Forums? We could say some very naughty or even illegal things after all. Registering with the government would stop us from saying those things.

>does not mean firearm owners do not or should not have firearm rights.
Quote me where I said that. Stop making assumptions because you're talking out of your ass and you sound retarded.

I shouldn't need permission to do whatever I want with my own property. That's not what government is for.

Spoons made me fat.