Sargoy is a pedophile apologist

Reminder that Sargoy is a pedophile apologist and is little too skeptical about about age of consent laws. why does he get a pass on this?

youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=WcsVF1QOt9M

Other urls found in this thread:

who.int/violence_injury_prevention/resources/publications/en/guidelines_chap7.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=9Wk2oaLzxXA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

The age of consent here is 16 but generally they start deep throating around 13 to 14. I can see why he would be skeptical.

...is there such thing as a british chad?
Chadwick..?
Chav?

Stop fucking making fun of my favorite youtuber.

Dude, just watch the video, the Justicar says he was molested when he was well below 11 and liked it and Sargon agree that it depends on child. we are not only talking about 14 and hebephilia here.

It's mainly just Alphas, Betas and those who hang around with both groups.

>a pedophile apologist

You guys think this is an attempt to shift the overton window in reguards to pedophiles before the hammer comes down on all of the Israeli/muslim spies who run the child sex slave networks?

ah, so they all lurk in packs, filthy collectivists

reminder this is part of the shill comments to bump threads. Don't reply in shill threads. dont reply in this this thread. instead go here to read about shill tactics on this board

im saging so my reply wont bump this thread. remember to sage with replies

The individualist collectivist isn't a meme here. It's a way of life.

Well if he liked it what's the problem?
In fact his opinion is worth more than all of the people who claim it was a bad thing.

When I was 11 I totally wouldn't mind a woman to suck my dick.

how different is it from Ireland?
I always imagine them as two different worlds

>being this desperate to frame Sargon

Just leave him alone. I get it, Sup Forums, you don't like him but this is just sad

Cuck Vibrations; Sargy Sarg and the skeptic bunch

> yo its about that time
> to pontificate with no reason and no rhyme
> got my u-tube bucks now you get yours
> talk til McFat starts comin out my pores
> strictly civ-nats how im bringin it
> my wifes son caused my thinkin this
> gonna cringe and cry against an ethno nation
> it should be black, yellow, brown, red
> fuck the white nations

>cmon can you feel it Kraut
> nor can i

>kraut and tea break it down

> kraut and tea on the back up
> logic free so put the facts up
> no need to think im anti w-h-i-t-e
> my face is all melty
> u tube made me wealthy
> and the skeptic bunch helped me
> to bring you a show with low information
> so cmon fuck the white nations

Ireland has more rain and they're quieter people. We have more sun and we're louder people.

ah, what a /comfy/ region

How is this a shill thread? fuck off retard

It causes long-term mental damage, victims can be deluded, Justicar might have not turned out gay if he wasn't molested. you are a retarded faggot, kys.

I'm not desperate or trying to frame, I just was suggested this video by Jewtube and just found it out and was surprised.

I just hate Sup Forums's ad hominem think. They think if they can bring a person down they destroy his argument, which is stupid.
>Oh look, Kraut was basically a villain therefore his anti race realism arguments fell apart

I think Kraut was stupid and his arguments suck, but Sup Forums thinks if they can bring down the person, his arguments also magically fall apart with him

>I'm going to let a pedophile apologist get away with it because I agree with his argument
Nice try retard, race realism is completely irrelevant here and I'm not going to start arguing about that. I'm not Sup Forums mate, I'm and individual.

Be fair, Kraut was more than just stupid. He was a lying, manipulating, two faced, shit stirring cunt with an ego problem. People like that damage the causes they fight for.

>I'm going to let a pedophile apologist get away with it because I agree with his argument

First of, what do you mean by get away with it? Second, I agree with little Sargon has to say. And I gave race realism as an example, I don't want you to argue about it. And fine, you are an individual, but you opinion is the majority of Sup Forums's opinion.

Yeah, he was full on dr. Evil

Sargon realized calling his new collective the Individualists would be too much of an oxymoron, so he decided to settle on Liberalists.

Now that he is the leader of a collective, arguing on behalf of this collective, he has finally joined the identity politics game he was previously against.

The man has no principles and should probably kill himself.

>long term damage
Nobody has ever studied voluntary relationships like that without violence or abuse.
Everybody is jacking off to porn at that age and they are Ok. Why would somebody elses hand suddenly braindamage me if my own hand is OK.
Its about violent abuse.
But for me no violence no problem I wouldn't judge.
>gay
Well thats a thing.
I do believe it's a learned preference.
But well if it was voluntary "he said yes" then i don't judge anybody. Ifhe said no got raped but liked it anyway thats a whole different story.

Anyhow, I myself was drinking stealing and vandalizing shit when I was a kid and I generally do not believe in the idea of children's innocence.
Children are even worse than adults, not better. If anything with ago one gets more social and concerned about others, not less.

There is literally nothing wrong with being a pedophile. Prove me wrong. (Pro tip: you can't)

I'm just saying that even if I agree with his arguments, people require advocates with authenticity and good character. The first thing I want to know is WHO is talking to me, not what they're saying.

You don't want me posting this here and are complaining about it, why? was it wrong when Milo got condemned for endorsing pederasty? was it just a an ad hominem attack?

Individualists would be better of without Sargon anyway, he is embarrassing himself, he has already been beaten in the argument game.

Yes, my opinion that child molestation in any case is wrong is majority on Sup Forums and I'm very glad and proud about it.

No, I am just saying it is ironic to want to punish people for wrong-think when we ourselves are fighting powers at be who want to punish us for wrong think. Do you see how ironic this is ?

I wasn't sarcastic, I was agreeing with you. And I am not agreeing with you. Why who is saying something and what are they saying has a relation, in the sense of giving you an idea about their competence, if a math genius was also a pedophile, that wouldn't cancel his equations right?

>And I am not agreeing with you. Why who is

And i am not agreeing with you on why who is*

There are no voluntary relationships like that, children well below the age 11 don't have sexual desires and fully functioning sexual organs.
no you fucking retarded, physical force is only used in minority of the cases. just kys

who.int/violence_injury_prevention/resources/publications/en/guidelines_chap7.pdf

yeah, it is already self-evident that you are an utter subhuman.

>it causes long term mental damage to have your dick sucked

*thinking*

>was it wrong when Milo got condemned for endorsing pederasty?
Yes it was.
He got completely trashed for saying "I am ok with what happened to me, in fact I loved it".
>was it just a an ad hominem attack?
No it was worse, they bashed him for a thoughtcrime.
He expressed an unacceptable idea and the intolerant majority trashed him for wrongthink.

>Yes, my opinion that child molestation in any case is wrong
Well I am in no position to argue for or against that. I have not molested or been molested so I just dont know what am I talking about.
Right? Wrong? Could be either way. We need to experiment on people to find out what is right.

But MY opinion however is that nobody should be punished for having certain ideas even if they are wrong you correct them with your good arguments.

The treatment Milo got was hortible after everything he did for us.

Maybe back on R/donald you are fighting for not being punished for wrong-think, here we are fighting for the survival of the European Race and culture.

>I don't want anything I say to have consequences

>R/donald

Oh yeah, because freedom of thought is such an old fashioned idea, Sup Forums is too edgy for that. How is punishing people for wrong think going to help and culture or race? Isn't the whole reason we are fighting for it is because we ourselves are punished for wrong-think? Not believing the holocaust is illegal in several countries. Why? They are afraid. We are correct because we can discuss and have solid arguments. If we can discuss freely, why bother punish people for wrong think when we have the facts?

What consequences? Like be specific

I clearly remember that when I was 11 I found porn and I got massive hardon and figured out how to jurk off and came.

Note that I came transparent stuff rather than white stuff so there probably was no sperm in it but I loved it none the less.

And even before that age even very young the sight of female tits was very captivating, and I was getting boners (I didnt even know what sex is but the dick would go up anyway).


So yes a 11yo boy can be horny and get off. I prove it.

If the left wants to legalize pedophilia, and the right wants to ban it, then of course the radical centrist would allow it on a case by case basis. SJWs and Right-Wing SJWs get rekt!

Yes.
Absolutely.

Nothing you say must have any consequence, only what you do.

It is very important so we could tslk about everything and discover the truth, advance knowledge and find out about things.

Without free speech theres no political or scientific freedom.

Remember The Bell Curve book so much loved by /pol? Well it was persecuted as a thought crime too. Race rwalism is a thought crime. Being anti-immigration is a thought crime.
That is why free speech must be absolute.

How does condemning Phedophilia apologist limit freedom of though, you moron? Am I propose for the government and corporation to persecute and censor him? No.
sorry but endorsing pedophilia is not going to have good reactions from the public, do you want the reaction to be banned then? is that your freedom of thought?

again, you are try to ignore that he said "well below 11" not even 11. fuck off you pedo piece of shit. you can't boners as a young child, that's just a lie

You are advocating to silence everyone who is outraged by endorsement of pedophilia, that's not free speech your moron, that's the opposite of it.

>here we are fighting for the survival of the European Race and culture.

Yes.
And the Jews are punishing you for wrongthink.
You fucking idiot lol.

You are the first victim of thought police.
Why are you supporting y
thought police when they are bashing YOU more than anybody else?

I don't feel punished, so they are doing a bad job at it.

No, react all you want. Condemn him all you want. Just know that that doesn't tie up with his arguments about his other stuff.

Thanks for pointing that out. Not sure why I was ever subscribed to that justicar faggot.

Like I said this has nothing to do with his arguments or his political views, you moron. get it in your head, you retarded Bulgar mongol.
am I not allowed to criticize him about anything moral at all, just because he is opposed to me in other ways?
just fuck off retard

Does he advocate for child rape a lot? Or was that just a special Sargon thing?

Silencing?
No. You can say that you disagree, you can even correct me if you can.But you cant burn my house down for disagreeing with you.
>I disagreee!
>Ok

Milo got fired and displatformed and even lost journalistic Visa fpr that shit.
I'm glad he is getting back on his feet and giving speaches again.

Still what was done to him is unacceptable.

If brietbart had any balls they would issue a statement like
>Milo has some extreme views, we disagree, but we respect his right to have an opinion and we won't fire him.
That is the right way to do it.

Sargos is leftist
>soyboy
>cuck
>pedo
He's more on left then SJW.

>Still what was done to him is unacceptable.
Milo said fucking little boys "prevents their suicide". He can eat shit.

Again, you keep strawmmaning in a desperate attemp to defend a perverted, cocksucker retard you look up to.

Oh you're in Georgia so you dont have the westetn shit yet.

In Germany, Great Britain, Australia or Canada police would arerst you for talking shit on Facebook.

I dont remember that.
I remember he said he got fucked and loved it.

>liberalist
>read: libertarian
Nah nigga I don't understand
bbl gotta read moar Locke

Go back and watch it again if you want, it's there. He's a pedophile trying to justify his sickness. In this case framing it as an act of compassion.

Do you see me advocating to arrest or censor Sargon in any way?

>age of consent laws
Where's he from? He might just be sick of places where age of consent is 18+. Liking 16and 17 yo doesn't even make you a hebephile, much less a pedophile.

Age of consent laws should be re-examined if the law restricts until 18.

...

oh, sargon, you've really FUCKED up now.

Did you watch the video? They were talking about boys "under the age of 11" being able to "date" older men.

This was nearly an year ago, it's not NOW. why haven't I heard about this before?

A year ago he was "based sargon redpilling the normies", so it got swept under the rug most likely.

>ad hominem
Well he clearly is not stupid, he is highly intelligent.
He sucks dicks and that is disgusting but it doesnt diminish his achievents and merit, he is fuighting the lismftism and that is what matters.
If he likes lityle boys that is disgusting but unless he is convicted of rape he is not a criminal and not a subject to persecution.

>somebody likes disgusting things

Well OK, but unless he actually raped anyone I can tourn a blind eye to him.

Where are the victims? Who suffered?

I see you justifying the treatment that Milo got.
Also
>why does he get a pass on this?
what did you mean by this?

Nope, no pass from me.
>there shouldn't be an age of Vincent
Anyone who says that kind of shit or anything along those lines is most likely a pedophile and they need to be eradicated

Sargon is two apes in a costume. The fact he doesn’t peel the bananas he eats is proof.

If we lower the age of consent, we force teens into learn how to behave like an adult and socially mature at a more appropriate age than they do now.

>ad hominem ad hominem ad hominem
Insulting someone is not ad hominem , you utter moron, viewed Milo as someone who has achieved anything and someone who has merit shows what kind of retard you really are.
he doesn't have to be a criminal to be criticized.
you seem to literally wan to ban moral criticism

>what did you mean by this?
that he was not challenged about this and nobody was outraged, even though many were about Milo.

I'm not going to respond any other of your stramans anymore.

Healthy relationships between consenting men, independently of their age, was what allowed the Roman Empire to flourish.

I think there were like four emperors in a row that didn't have children, instead, they taught their adolescent lovers how to rule and they were the ones who inherited later.

It was only when semitic religions started getting big that it became something evil and taboo. That puritanism and destruction of the civilized Roman's way of life is what caused the empire to fall.

Jews have been at it for thousands of years.

I think we found an argument even dumber than Milo's "it prevents suicide" one.

Not as dumb as you think.
Your society is suffering from manchildren and soyboys who act like children in their late 20s so maybe there is something too it.

Overprotected children is the reason the west is falling. Both Peterson and Moullinex say that.

What is this guy's shtick, even? Never watched any of his videos, his tone of voice and attitude pissed me off within the first 30 seconds

>in fact his opinion is worth more than all of the people who claim it was a bad thing.
thats bullshit and justicar even says this himself

Chev Chelios

Sargon sounds like this guy:
youtube.com/watch?v=9Wk2oaLzxXA

Not on that side here but dude... have you never changed a diaper? Even babies get boners

So you think how well you can suck dick is a good measure for how well you can rule an empire?

>recolor simba
>glue a bloodstained mop to it
>m-muh fursona oc

Age of consent laws are for adults. They affect children, but they're FOR adults. Dropping them wont make them grow up any faster, let's not pretend like teenagers aren't hooking up because they're scared of being arrested.

he should have killed himself when he pushed the kekistan bullshit

To be fair, what else is there?

It's called Muhammad in reality.

gas chambers

No, changing diapers is for women, faggot. kids can get erection but not for sexual attraction reasons.

Woes is unironically the average european Sup Forums user.

Well it is they just don’t know that’s why

Obviously not, it's not the sexual acts that make a good emperor, but that kind of thing deepens the relationship between the tutor and his pupil and makes it more likely that the tutor will pass on all of his knowledge to the pupil.

It's no wonder that the word for a relationship between men, fraternitas, was created by the Romans. Nowadays its descendant, fraternity, is a word readily attacked by Jews and leftists. It's just part of a divide & conquer tactic aimed at making men fight men, by classifying every act of affection or kindness between men as faggy.

True, but I meant within the subculture of people with "fursonas", they're all just recolors of existing characters. Sonic, Furries, and MLP are just veiled art communities for people without artistic talent.

Sargon is a literal, real liberal.

Unfortunately the term "liberal" was hijacked by "liberasts" who argue against freedom.

Individualism is just one principle of liberalism.

And yes Individuals are free to associate into groups voluntarily or dissociate from them at will if that is what suits their individual interests.

If it is bebeficial for ME we can voluntarily join a grpup.
Collectivists would make me work for their collective benefit or else.

Well i've had some great teachers but I never got ass-raped by any of them, so I guess I can't compare.

You forgot your smug chuckle, sargoy

>Collectivists would make me work for their collective benefit or else
If you don't, on some level, work for the collective benefit of society then you are useless. Just like Sargon.

you have no proof for your claims, pedophilia was always very rare.

That's all made up bullshit, Romans hated every kind of men who took any kind of submissive position in sex, Romans only tolerated Hadrian fucking boipucci, because his lover was Greek, not Roman. nobody liked faggots, that's why they commonly accused each other to being submissive in bed.

Where's the source of modern pedohysteria? Is it post religious syndrome? Or last goverment tool of oppression? Or is it (((part of the plan)))? 18 or even 16 is ridiculously high. People learn about sex and act following their instincts much earlier.

So what if I am useless?
What if I dont benefit you? Do I have to?

Do you think you can make me by force?
Then I would voluntarily join a group that opposes you just yo keep myself free.

Speaking of Rome, There’s a certain social theory that prominent “transgenderism”, cross dressing, Homosexuality, pedophelia etc are signs of cultural decay preceding imminent governmental and societal collapse.

Political virtue signalling backfired.

Politicians were raising hysteria "WOULD SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN?!" to get popularity and to justify censorship and control.

Now it seems that this hysteria got out of hand and turned the people on them