You guys do realize that race is a social construct, right?

You guys do realize that race is a social construct, right?

Other urls found in this thread:

unz.com/jman/jaymans-race-inheritance-and-iq-f-a-q-f-r-b/
yournewswire.com/tech-guru-wikileaks-dead/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737365/
genome.gov/19016904/faq-about-genetic-and-genomic-science/
youtube.com/watch?v=OIinyYwmB04
youtube.com/watch?v=w3y2SDpIEhE
youtube.com/watch?v=yVzFOI0QpIg
youtube.com/watch?v=MOnQPXuU81Q
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

S ocial
A ssimilation
G oes
E thnocentric

...

this is what the white does
every other race will check off their box to get as many benefits as possible
what the fuck is wrong with us?

There are 5 major races. Mongoloid, Australoid, Capoid, Caucasoid, and Negroid.

...

If you play the usual liberal game of redefining terms to mean whatever you want them to, then of course they mean what you want them to.

Only wannabe smart 115 ish IQ brainlets get enthralled by such semantic games.

Die in a fire you worthless Jew.

Race is a collection related of genetic lineages streaching back through time.

>Implying skull shape is also a social construct

>Implying niggers aren't dumber and more violent than any other race

>gyppos are the same as nordics

>Implying genetic science is a social construct.

The more extreme postmodern critical theorists unironically believe just that.

You realize that the difference between a mouse and a hamster is a social construct?

>You guys do realize that race is a social construct, right?
Yes, of course it is.

But tables are a "social construct" too and you still use them.

Social construct never meant "isn't real", just that the thing emerged from society.
Race is both a "social construct" and a valid category.

Where do you think we are?
also >1 post by this ID
In all fields it goes...

In america speaking spanish makes you a member of a new race?

>implying races are based on genetic science
they're just arbitrary bullshit. look at africa - there's clearly two different black races. look at Asia. there's clearly three or four races. look at how europe and the middle east just ram into each other. there's clearly multiple native and oceanic races as well

but we just lump them all together into historical leftovers from when race was determined by skull shape and skin tone.

ORLY?

>1
Never said ancestry doesn’t exist
>2/4
>racial groups being genetically distinct on average does not mean that racial groups are the most basic biological divisions of the world's population. Nor does it mean that races are not – as the prevailing view among anthropologists and social scientists holds -social constructs, because the particular genetic differences that correspond to races only become salient when racial categories take on social importance.

And here’s a quote from the study you cited
>The fact that, given enough genetic data, individuals can be correctly assigned to their populations of origin is compatible with the observation that most human genetic variation is found within populations, not between them.

So are they elected because they can do the job or just because they have a vagina?

Saying race is a social construct implies that society has found some need for having and defining races
Might want to define that need before you think of disregarding it

>Every race filled in.
100% Muttt

Human is a species.

Human isn't a race, it is a species.

"Race" has a taxonomic meaning, also known as "Sub-Species", which is an identifiable change between two populations that occurs before speciation.

Race isn't a social construct, it is a set of identifiable phenotypes indicative of genetic drift between two distinct populations that have evolved independantly, usually because of a physical separation by some barrier (ocean, mountain, extreme distance, etc...)

then why does dna testing tell race?

unz.com/jman/jaymans-race-inheritance-and-iq-f-a-q-f-r-b/

Thanks for the message soros. Huskies and chihuahuas are the same thing by that logic.

race is a scientific attempt to classify subjects with different traits who belong to the same group which was first discoevered by a monk called Mendel
the fuck is your problem?

totes muh brown skin and muh vagina

>X is a social construct
First off no it isn't because a skeleton can still be identified as a certain race. But even if race was purely a social construct:

So are human rights
So is language
So is law
So is shitting in a toilet rather than shitting your pants

"An open mind is fine but watch that your brain doesn't fall out"

>First off no
wrong.

>ecause a skeleton can still be identified as a certain race.
That is irrelevant.
A thing being a social construct is independent from it being real, or having meaning in reality.

It really is just a word game by the left, so they can simultaneously pretend that race is meaningless and that it is extremely important.

So le 0.1%?

This is a bait slide thread
The shill are out in full force
They do not want us talking about
yournewswire.com/tech-guru-wikileaks-dead/
Fusion GPS
Uranium one
The Clinton Foundation
Congressional Dems all being hacked by Awan
FISA warrants against Trump being horseshit
Classified material on Huma and Weiner's personal computers
DOJ re-opening Clinton server investigation
even MORE sexual misconduct accusation coming out against Democrats

...

>5
That’s another topic altogether.

>6/7
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737365/
>chimpanzees are indeed subdivided into races but humans are not. Adaptive traits, such as skin color, have frequently been used to define races in humans, but such adaptive traits reflect the underlying environmental factor to which they are adaptive and not overall genetic differentiation, and different adaptive traits define discordant groups. There are no objective criteria for choosing one adaptive trait over another to define race. As a consequence, adaptive traits do not define races in humans.
>Humans have much genetic diversity, but the vast majority of this diversity reflects individual uniqueness and not race.

genome.gov/19016904/faq-about-genetic-and-genomic-science/
>All human beings are 99.9 percent identical in their genetic makeup

>8
Correlation =\= causation

>The fact that, given enough genetic data, individuals can be correctly assigned to their populations of origin is compatible with the observation that most human genetic variation is found within populations, not between them.
Ah, the classic Lewontin's Fallacy. Any more non-arguments?

>they're just arbitrary bullshit. look at africa - there's clearly two different black races. look at Asia. there's clearly three or four races.
All of which are shown in genetic distance testing, dummy.
>but we just lump them all together into historical leftovers from when race was determined by skull shape and skin tone.
Nope. You're just embarrassingly ignorant of modern genetic science.

>le colorblindness

Nice internalized racism faggot

>>All human beings are 99.9 percent identical in their genetic makeup

It's actually around 99.5%, but the amount of genetic similarity says nothing about the difference. You're making a non sequitur fallacy commonly called Lewontin's Fallacy. You can stop now.

You're also bad at responding to posts. What is this in response to?
>Correlation =\= causation

you realize social construct is a social construct right ?

>Lewontin’s fallacy
No. The study in the chart that cites proves that

Yes that's why we don't need any immigrants. We're all the same so we can't possibly be more diverse!

Species are a social construct.

I really don't want to debate this shit, but it is clear that you have absolutely no Idea what you are talking about.

>>All human beings are 99.9 percent identical in their genetic makeup
Is enough to lmao at your understanding of biology.

There is only one race. The white race. All others are sub-human.

so I guess the real question is "What isn't a social construct?"

if race is a social construct, then that means that black people, jews and hispanics don't truly exist.
if blacks, jews and hispanics don't exist, then there are no minorities.
if there are no minorities, then there is no such thing as racism/antisemitism.
which means that the left is literally complaining about nothing.

You seem to be pretty new at this whole genetics thing so I'll explain again. Saying that 'humans are 99+% similar or "there's more variation within than between"' are logical fallacies, because they say nothing about the significance or type of variation between racial groups. African blacks having an average IQ around 70 compared to the white average of 100 is colossally significant, even if they share 99.5% of the same genetic information.

>It's actually around 99.5%
I’ll be sure to let the NIH know that a /pollack/ w/o s source proved them wrong

>but the amount of genetic similarity says nothing about the difference.
See ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3737365/

>What is this in response to?
>8
>Correlation =\= causation
The eighth point on the chart

Blacks with European DNA succeding =\= they are succeding because of x amount of European DNA

Are you retarded?

The problem it's that they repeat that race it's a social construct but every white should pay the price of what someone done in other centuries.

If "race it's a social construct" can create a world without WEWUZZING and call for reparations I'm on it.

It's kind of like how what constitutes a dog breed is a social construct but you're still going to get yourself a dead dog if you treat them all the same.

Fuck off nigger. Your bait was ruined since these posts
Now do pic related and gtfo

>I really don't want to debate this shit
Don’t get yourself arrested

>You seem to be pretty new at this whole genetics thing
My bad professor

>African blacks having an average IQ around 70 compared to the white average of 100 is colossally significant, even if they share 99.5% of the same genetic information.
You have a source indicating this to be genetic? Chop chop let’s see it

wow. just wow. 2018 and race-deniers still exist.

sage

Considering the amount of logical fallacies and over-simplification in your previous ncbi link, it seems to be more a political source than scientific. Don't appeal to authority when you present a poor one.

>Blacks with European DNA succeding =\= they are succeding because of x amount of European DNA
Considering it's proven to vastly raise their average IQ, it's the by far the most likely reason.
>Are you retarded?
I'm not the creationist making anti-science threads.

STOP REPLYING TO HIM YOU NIGGER

its true race is just a social construct until a bunch of niggers and a bunch of muslims group themselves together by the color of their skin, their subserviance to their ideology, and the language and dialect they speak, and henpeck one another into perfect conformity of these ways all while tearing down the any society kind enough to show any compassion toward them. then race becomes a military uniform.

...

>You have a source indicating this to be genetic? Chop chop let’s see it
Yep, you're definitely new here. Sources have been posted for years around here.

Assuming you actually care about the truth on the matter, here's someone who actually knows what he's talking about debunking common anti-science talking points about race differences. He cites all his sources in the desc, btw.
youtube.com/watch?v=OIinyYwmB04

>on heritability:
youtube.com/watch?v=w3y2SDpIEhE

>on racial heritability on many traits:
youtube.com/watch?v=yVzFOI0QpIg

And here's one with anti-science Norwegian researchers being embarrassed by UK/US genetic researchers:
youtube.com/watch?v=MOnQPXuU81Q

Shills and/or idiots (like OP) still serve a value to educate new lurkers.

So racism doesn't exist.

>racial differences like bone structure and skin color are just social constructs
>if you believe hard enough, your skin color will change
>if you believe even harder than that you will think you deserve reparations
>if you believe even harder than that, social constructs almost sound legit

>Here’s my source
>Youtube
Lmao

>Considering the amount of logical fallacies and over-simplification in your previous ncbi link,
Example?

>it seems to be more a political source than scientific.
Which is why it’s in a respected scientific journal

>Don't appeal to authority when you present a poor one.
But Jared Taylor is a legit authority amirite

>Considering it's proven to vastly raise their average IQ,
No it’s correlated. That is not the same thing as being caused by.

>it's the by far the most likely reason.
I don’t care what you think is likely

You don’t even understand what I mean do you?

>Here’s my source
>Youtube
Cool, now you've added a genetic fallacy to your accomplishments. He cites the academic sources from the videos in his description. And here I thought you wanted to know the truth instead of shill disingenuously.

>No it’s correlated. That is not the same thing as being caused by.
Raising average IQ by mixing with higher IQ groups is literally a causal, proven fact. It's not a correlation/causation, dummy.
>I don’t care what you think is likely
You don't have to, because all statistical data agrees with me.

Feel free to watch the videos filled with academic sources. You may actually learn something.

i think you misunderstand what 'race' is. to quote wikipedia
>Race is a concept used in the categorization of humans into groups, called races or racial groups, based on combinations of shared physical traits, ancestry, genetics, and social or cultural traits.
and to define a social construct so we are on the same page
>a social mechanism, phenomenon, or category created and developed by society; a perception of an individual, group, or idea that is 'constructed' through cultural or social practice

now, by implying race, the defining characteristics of different sub-species, is somehow influenced by social phenomena, you are implying that if you believe hard enough, you can effectively become another race. that somehow evolution doesnt exist, because secondary racial and sex characteristics are constructed not through biology or genetics, but through social phenomena. that is what "there is only 1 race" means.

>theres only 1 race of birds, the avian race
>owls dont exist
>crows dont exist
>hawks dont exist
>only avians
>never mind the fact they all have different dietary, enviromental, behavioural, genetic, bone structures, social and medical needs. they are all exactly the same because they are all avians
bravo, you glorious fuck up, bravo.

i think you misunderstand what 'race' is. to quote wikipedia
>Race is a concept used in the categorization of humans into groups, called races or racial groups, based on combinations of shared physical traits, ancestry, genetics, and social or cultural traits.
and to define a social construct so we are on the same page
>a social mechanism, phenomenon, or category created and developed by society; a perception of an individual, group, or idea that is 'constructed' through cultural or social practice

now, by implying race, the defining characteristics of different sub-species, is somehow influenced by social phenomena, you are implying that if you believe hard enough, you can effectively become another race. that somehow evolution doesnt exist, because secondary racial and sex characteristics are constructed not through biology or genetics, but through social phenomena. that is what "there is only 1 race" means.

>theres only 1 race of birds, the avian race
>owls dont exist
>crows dont exist
>hawks dont exist
>only avians
>never mind the fact they all have different dietary, enviromental, behavioural, genetic, bone structures, social and medical needs. they are all exactly the same because they are all avians
bravo, you glorious fuck up, bravo.

Civilized society is also a social construct. Just because it's a social construct doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It means that the definition changes with changes in society.

t. nigger who suffers from sickle cell anemia

>Capoid

>The Capoid race is a historical racial category proposed in 1962 by anthropologist Carleton S. Coon

Cool. Does that mean we can get rid of affirmative action?

>separated across the globe in vastly different environments and climates for millennia
>"we're all the same"

you do realise that social constructs are just social constructs?

Human races are actually subspecies. Race = subspecies. Never forget

Rape is a social construct

so are species then because selection pressures dont exist

>there's no such thing as "races"
>but you have to embrace "diversity"
liberals in a nutshell

This. I despise it when retards with zero understanding of genetics or biology pull out Lewontin’s Fallacy.