People who believe in anthropomorphic climate change are just useful idiots

People who believe in anthropomorphic climate change are just useful idiots.

Other urls found in this thread:

thoughtco.com/why-is-water-more-dense-than-ice-609433
breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/10/report-485-scientific-papers-published-in-2017-undermine-supposed-consensus-on-climate-change/
smithplanet.com/stuff/iceandwater.htm
youtube.com/watch?v=7-W92xs0iMY
oceantoday.noaa.gov/lakesinanocean/
youtu.be/ZwuVpNYrKPY
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isostasy
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Holy shit, it's the blue wave of legend!

Ice is less dense than water, so on a surface level, I suppose that makes sense.

this is the dumbest post on all the internet right now

>People who believe in anthropomorphic climate change are just useful idiots.
And the "useful" part is questionable.

>dumbest post on the internet right now
Lad, it can be worse. So much worse.

Ocean floor* to sink, sea levels still rising

Actually, they aren’t even that useful.

> thoughtco.com/why-is-water-more-dense-than-ice-609433

hmmmmm

i agree op
its a well know fact that you can change the chemical composition of a gas as much as you want, and it has no impact on the thermodynamic properties of the gas.

also we have no idea how gasses work in the first place. if we did, we would have things like steam engines, combustion engines, and large scale industry.

clearly leftist faggot fake news, like evolution, and anything besides the celestial spheres model of the solar system and stars.

and its not like any species has ever gone extinct when it environment became uninhabitable faster than it could adapt before anyway.

Well they do help maintain a narrative that can be thrown in at any time to distract from the important issues, so in that way they are a bit useful.

Clif High's report attributes sinking water levels to the extra amount of UV light from the sun on the oceans, leading to more precipitation and rainfall on landmass, which outweighs the impact of melting glaciers.

Everyone knows anthropomorphic climate change is a hoax.

Solar-cycle driven climate change, however, is real.

but there's no salt in the glacier because salt doesn't freeze so you're just adding pure water back to the ocean which rests on top of the heavier, saltier water and causes the sea to rise up.

>hey conservatives, if you don't stop driving big intimidating cars, the ocean level will rise
*ocean level doesn't rise*
>see, we told you, all that extra ice made the ocean sink

you fool! dont you know global warming causes hot weather, cold weather, storms, a lack of storms, rising water, falling water, less polar bears, and more polar bears!

YOURE GONNA KILL US ALL

had to explain how the sealevel hasnt changed somehow

>Ocean floor* to sink, sea levels still rising
Impressive mental gymnastics.

I see multiple amputations in his future.

>maybe if I call it gymnastics I'll look right
but probably not

How do we know that it is in fact due to green house gasses that that climate change and water level changes are occurring and not because of bored oil sheiks building artificial islands in the sea all the time?

>if i keep pretending that global warming is real, conservative white males will stop being nazis and we can live in a multicultural utopia where whites and christianity don't exist

You can be as mad about the concept of climate change as you want, the science isn't going to change

I dont care about climate change. I care who is paying for what. If government has to "reimburse" rich people because their waterfront houses get wet, I have to say no. I don't care why it happens.

>salty water and water don't mix
OK sure.

>what are glacial epochs
Tide goes in, tide goes out. Ice goes up, ice goes down. There is not constant state of earth's atmosphere, it is always in a state of varying change.
Earth has only had ice on both poles only 5 times in its history. It is much more "normal" only to have ice at one pole. So expect things to get a little warmer. Man is folly in the face of nature

What is 'Conservation of mass'? I'll take "Obvious things, stupid people should know, but somehow don't" for 900, Alex.

>the science isn't going to change
That's really funny because of how ironic it is. The science changes every year depending on how desperate (((they))) are. Modern science is as accurate as its atheist scientists are honest, i.e. not at all.

global warming is a jewish scam

>Report: 485 Scientific Papers Published in 2017 Undermine Supposed ‘Consensus’ on Climate Change

>breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/10/report-485-scientific-papers-published-in-2017-undermine-supposed-consensus-on-climate-change/

>According to Richard’s analysis, the 485 new papers underscore the “significant limitations and uncertainties inherent in our understanding of climate and climate changes,” which in turn suggests that climate science is not nearly as settled as media reports and some policymakers would have people believe.

>In this category, 12 of the papers documented the failures of policies targeting renewable energy and climate, 8 contended that wind power is harming the environment and biosphere, 13 argued that elevated CO2 levels make for a greener planet with higher crop yields, and 5 proposed that warming is beneficial to both humans and wildlife.

>The articles, in fact, are not written by uninformed “climate deniers,” but by serious scientists who believe that the true nature of scientific inquiry is not to bow to some proposed “dogma”—especially where significant ideological, political and economic interests are at play—but to see where the facts lead on their own.

Anthropogenic (Not "morphic" that's not a thing) is very much real. We burned X tons of hydrocarbons releasing Y tons of CO2 into the atmosphere which heats the atmosphere. We know from gas samples and oxygen isotope ratios from ice cores what the composition of the atmosphere and sea level in the past was, and we know that the rate of increase is relatively very fast.

There's very little to argue about - it's a bit like claiming that asbestos is safe; yeah, a certain percentage of people who have no knowledge of the matter will believe it, but virtually everyone who has some won't. There's not a global conspiracy among climatologists and geophysicists, it's just true.

2nd dumbest post, still doesn't get it.

PAY ME GOY

>look at me mommy i can use big words too

I'm not mad at all. The earth has existed for billions of years, in these billions of years all landmass on the earth has formed from one super continent (Pangea) into multiple fractured continents, I am fully aware that in these billions of years humans have not affected climate change as they didnt even exist yet. Aside from this, I just question climate change dogma.

Brainlets listen up, Al Gore and Reddit have been warning you about this for years. Obama, Clinton, Oprah, etc. The glaciers are melting and the water level is going down like we've been saying OVER AND OVER AGAIN. Your beaches are going to go miles further into the sea. You retards even elected blumpf who exited the Paris Agreement further exacerbating the problem of global warming.

>>salty water and water don't mix
>OK sure.

There are oceans underneath the ocean. Where the water is so salty that it doesn't mix with the water above and forms a new thick ocean where there are waves and beaches.

Yup

Who would win in a fight?

Every single modern scientist and leftist?

or

The truth and simple logic.

Floating ice displaces the amount of water equivalent to how much it weighs. Therefore, floating ice that is composed of the same density of the water it is floating on will cause no rise in sea level when it melts.

This is one of the first things I learned in my fluid physics 101 class. Here's some information: smithplanet.com/stuff/iceandwater.htm

This means that when the arctic ice cap entirely melts, nothing bad will happen!

HOWEVER!!!!!!!

Antarctica is an actual continent of land. All of that ice in Antarctica? Most of it is on land. When antarctic ice melts, sea levels will rise. And they will rise a lot.

You can even calculate it yourself! It's not too hard of a calculation.

So you are saying super saturated zones? How is that possible without heat? What are brackish zones?
You would be right if you were saying there is an ocean of ground water beneath the ocean, but an ocean in an ocean? How could a salty solution, which boyant, sink below other water? Where are these super saturated zones?

There are CO2 fixing bacteria locked inside the glaciers that will be released slowly and in great numbers as the melting gradually happens which will eat all the extra CO2 and balance things out so that the ocean won't rise up.

>sea levels will rise. And they will rise a lot.
Coastfags BTFO. I hope modern Sodom (California and Jew York) get wiped out.

Anthropomorphic climate change is real.
Its effects are so abysmally puny, that one might as well discard it.
Be less strict and include agriculture (methane-shitting cows), and we still don't contribute anything.
No, climate change is out of our hands.
Best we can do is plug the ozone hole and make sure we don't repeat that mistake.

The thing about science is that it is real whether you believe in them or not you fucking retard. The globe is warming and there is no satisfactory natural explanation for WHY the globe is warming. It's not solar cycles. It's not Milankovitch cycles. It's not geological cycles. It's not the magnetic field, it's not cosmic rays, it's not heat pixies farting on glaciers.

SOMETHING is causing it, and no explanation deniers have managed to put forward can explain it. You have no proof, at all, that climate change is natural. You just really really want it to be. But you are still SO FUCKING SURE that it isn't greenhouse gasses, despite the science behind it being solid and despite overwhelming scientific support for greenhouse gas theory.

Just die. Just fucking die you subhuman piece of shit so we can solve climate change and survive the next hundred years.

More like little ponds comparatively

[citation needed]

youtube.com/watch?v=7-W92xs0iMY

I fell the lobby groups in my neck.

>Science isn't going to change
Lol
No one's mad at the climate, little man. We're mad that people on one side of the aisle say if you don't vote for them we're all going to die, like they do with so many issues.

the oceans are under the sea in the trenches of maryannis, there are beaches and the water is so thick you can't even dive into it, it doesn't raise the sea much because it's always been down there but the glacier water floats.

I think you underestimate the ability of the left to refuse to accept logical thought processes unless the 'logic' was said to have come from an unnamed study by 'scientists'. Logic is only useful when it is understood by someone, when it isn't then you could go on forever and not manage to make the other person understand.

>climate catastrophe wouldn't be the best thing for this over populated rock

Weren't we all supposed to be dead anyway by now?

That's horse shit. Got proofs?

Humans adapt. I don't care whats happening and why. I only care who pays for it and its not me. If there are five 1 billion dollar damage hurricanes every year, then move the cities. They don't need to be repeared every year by the taxpayers. Nobody forces anyone to live there and develop property.

If the sea levels rise, will Africans finally be able to discover water?

CHINESE HOAX #MAGA

Looked a little into it, appears to check out: oceantoday.noaa.gov/lakesinanocean/

How can someone makes up so much shit in so much anger and honestly expect others to listen? We all literally have access to google right now. Everyone and their mother can look up how the earth has gone through cooling and heating cycles to balance itself out. We are literally in the heating cycle right now. That's it.

BUT NO, WE NEED TO GIVE MONEY TO THE POLITICIANS BECAUSE OTHER WISE YOU'RE DUMB.

Jesus christ. The paris accord literally took money from ciitizens and gave it to the elites. At some point you have to realize how much of a fool you've been played for.

You are literally telling someone to die because they are using evidence to prove your shit wrong. How fucking juvenile can you be.

In the other news, Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.

Fascinating, thanks anons. I stand corrected.

I would love to believe in what you believe, because it would also mean that you will die soon as well. Although it's more likely that your cause of death will be of the stress of believing every single unsubstantiated claim about the climate made by online articles with no citations in them just to continue feeling like the fate of the world rests on your opinions alone.

This.

ice floats and takes up more volume than water does
fucking leaf

Hey guys if I put ice in a glass of water and measure the water level when the ice melts will the be more water, less water or will it remain constant?

Newsflash: Falling sea levels are caused by rising sea levels!

there was an awesome clip of that in blue planet 2
youtu.be/ZwuVpNYrKPY

Put a giant icicle in it and see what happens. The water will get saltier and form a new continent under the sea next to the underwater oceans.

No one said the sea level is falling

We should pump these out and use the salt to lower global warming and also for our food which will lower the sea level eventually because the ocean will pour into the hole we leave under the water.

Now tell me about 6 day creation.

>Ice floats
Exactly.. What you need to be thinking about is the amount of water that the ice displaces while frozen... If ice is floating on water the volume of the water will NOT change as the ice melts.

This is what I don't get from the article. They say that the excess water is making the ocean deeper and this somehow will make sea levels rise more. Or at least is worded in a way that makes a normie reader think that.

>anthropomorphic
It's anthropogenic you anthropromorphic animal porn watching leaf-fruit.

We burn X and release Y, but have no idea how much energy is trapped? KYS shill

having sex with the ocean is also legal in canada.

When are you going to invade that hellhole already?

correct, why solve a problem if it will kill all the Africans and towel heads

what this really shows is just how shitty science journalism is
the fact is that the science hasn't actually changed very much, it's just been refined over time
it's the media that has portrayed it as if scientists are changing their minds every five minutes
mainstream science reporting is just awful

because they'll all want to move here
africans are good at running. they can run faster than the seas can rise

I read that article, sad to say. It was more AGW doublespeak.
>the oceans are sinking
>this will cause the ocean to rise
Climate change alarmists are the dumbest and most easily led of all the sheep. They're like cultists.

we would but it might cause a refugee crisis and mexico would be forced to take in legions of 20 something soyboy bluehair leafposters posing as 12 year old girls.

>the science isn't going to change

Top fucking kek

>africans can outrun bombs, jets, missiles, and bullets

That sounds like it would solve all your problems.

Ocean floor sinking
Sea level rising

Only sounds retarded when you dumb both down to "the ocean"

Glacier sheets in Greenland and the south pol aint floating on water my dude

what a hot load of BS
Most Ice is on land, if it were melting the water levels would rise

Except that the whole time the narrative has been that sea levels will rise uncontrollably. Now it’s pulled a 180 and you’ve gone right along with it

They are rising. Read past the headline.

...

that's a good point actually

Funny, the science on things as fundamental as genders seems to change pretty easily once it has enough social support.

man is probably the primary driver in climate change

Explain yourself

No one is discussing gender. Or does all the trans-pan- shit lead you to believe evolution and a spherical earth are BS too? Quite a leap.

Anthropogenic climate change IS real.

But the only way we're going to address it in time is if we massively depopulate developing continents.
That means Asia and Africa, hell if we just remove India and China we should be in the clear.

"Gender" is a bullshit made up term derived from latin languages with gendered nouns, used to mean whatever you need atm to win an argument.
If you need it to mean personality it means personality. If you need it to mean behaviour it means behaviour. If you need it to mean biological sex, that's what it will mean.
This is not science. It's stupidity.

crustal isostasy you useless fuck
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isostasy

Ok Archimedes ... if that were true it would be obvious, the climate is defined by change, #equalityforraindrops

The only stupidity here is that shit smear of a comment you defaced my screen with.

>anthropomorphic climate change