Liberalist here.
I'm currently in the process of gathering information for a video on Sup Forums's holocaust denial, the threat of far right extremism and the radicalization of young white males on the internet, so I thought I'd ask you single a question for research purposes.
Given the weight of the evidence, how could you possibly deny the historical authenticity of the holocaust?
Other urls found in this thread:
today.yougov.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>evidence
history is written by the victors. any evidence presented can easily be faked, and access to it tightly controlled. your version of events (however sloppy) can be trumpeted ad nauseum from every available platform. you can make the literally-fucking-impossible seem like 2+2=4.
it's actually pretty basic stuff if you're not basically dead from the neck up.
Then why do you blindly accept copy pasta and memes
Yeah it was a real tragedy
I predict one post by this ID
Where's all the remains?
Nobody on Sup Forums is denying the holocaust. The stormfag refugees are ones denying it and giving pol a bad name. Sup Forums stood with our president and accepted Jerusalem as Israel’s capitol.
Not a holocaust Revisionist myself. But you Liberalists might want to give a hard think to the Alt-Right's point that the easiest path to your Libertarian utopia is through an ethnostate. Your own movement is majority white male, which you might not see as a problem back it's going to be for actually proponents of your ideas running for office, they're not going to win minority votes.
Gas yourself
Why were all the camps with a high body count in the former East and not West Germany, or Poland? Did they know to place the camps with respect to post-war borders?