So which piece of news is worse?

So which piece of news is worse?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bMUgNg7aD8M
washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/03/23/frank-marshall-davis-obamas-communist-mentor/?utm_term=.6bfde4cacee8
huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/08/barack-obama-gay-hustler-_n_4242447.html
mobile.wnd.com/2016/12/10-experts-and-analysts-who-doubt-obamas-birth-certificate/
businessinsider.com/ndaa-legalizes-propaganda-2012-5
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

None of these have been proven to be true.

On the one hand we have a report with no evidence that has been denied by the President and several people in the room at the time of the meeting.

On the other we have a report with no evidence that has been actively denied by one of the women in question, and you're always supposed to listen and believe women about their sexual experiences.

Weren't there republicans condemning the language and not denying what he's being accused of saying?

>which pice of (((news))) is worse
>implying either one has a shred of truth to it
kek you'd think after literally using forged evidence to start an investigation (((they))) would lose any shred of credibility left but I guess not

it's a never ending cycle, when will the media stop attacking him.

I don't recall him mentioning "non-white".

they won't stop until they drive liberals to insurrection or somehow get Trump impeached, in other words it will never stop

>(((news)))
lugenpresse?

What's up with lefties and latching onto fake news so easily? There is no evidence of either of those things.

It’s not even been proven he said it

True.

If Trump was legitimately everything libshits said he was (Nazi, antisemitic, racist, white supremacist, misogynist, ext.} then I'd be the happiest person in the world. Constantly trying to claim those things just makes them look retarded. Normal people will not see any of those things either and people like me will be disappointed he's not but still vote for him because it makes liberals absolutely rabid so it's pretty funny.

>Implying right wing idiots were any better under Obama
He's a Muslim! He's a Nazi! He's a communist! He's the anti-christ! He's gay! He's married to a tranny! He's not even really black! He's a Kenyan! Etc, etc.

neither matter

Jess Dweck if these places are so great why don't you move and live there then

Everyone knows what he means, and what's more everyone knows he is right. Only White and East Asian countries are decent places to live, because only Whites and East Asians can create and maintain decent countries.

>Republicans
it’s always the same 2 Lynsey Graham and John McCain

neither of those things happend, so....

It's not that the statement is true or false, it's that it's racist.

That's the thing. If you push them to answer the question they will have to give a racist response.

When did anyone claim Obama was a Nazi? Your rabid libtardiness is showing.

>youtube.com/watch?v=bMUgNg7aD8M
>washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/03/23/frank-marshall-davis-obamas-communist-mentor/?utm_term=.6bfde4cacee8
>huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/08/barack-obama-gay-hustler-_n_4242447.html
>He's not even really black
What? He's half black.
>He's a Kenyan!
But he actually is a Kenyan.
>mobile.wnd.com/2016/12/10-experts-and-analysts-who-doubt-obamas-birth-certificate/
Most of those things at least have proof in some way. And the people who actually believe those things are way smaller than the massive amounts of leftists that actually believe the propaganda.

They're both uranium one slides.
So is this thread
>Sage

Also the only reason that only a small amount of people believed those things or spouted them off was because they actually legalized propaganda. The whole Jewish left wing media is entirely Democratic.

>businessinsider.com/ndaa-legalizes-propaganda-2012-5
Of course you think most of those things didn't have any kind of evidence or proof towards them, you never heard about the actual evidence because they got buried by the media.

There's more than that.

What's wrong with pornstars? I thought the left embraced them.

Are these fucking hypocrites porn shaming now?

Do you think it would be wise to advocate a false flag strategy of encouraging liberals to become more hostile and in doing so, throw themselves into situations where they will be defeated very easily?
Liberals don't ever seem to study warfare and combat.

Did you not see what Nixon said about the Jews?
>wew

More hostile? Where the fuck have you been, the 30's?

I asked a Haitian guy I work with about all of this, and I quote:

"I don't know why white people are mad... Haiti is a shithole, it is why I left."

Me, now. Fuck it. Nazi as fuck.

What's your point?

They only care about morality when they can disingenuously use it as a weapon against decent human beings.

>Do you think it would be wise to advocate a false flag strategy of encouraging liberals to become more hostile and in doing so, throw themselves into situations where they will be defeated very easily?
Not only would it be wise, I think that's exactly what Trump is doing. He's triggering them to make them look stupid.

Fake news awards, coming soon.

yes they have

"Dweck is a common last name in the Jewish Community. It belongs primarily to Sephardic Jews. Its meaning in English is "vessel maker."

Because Jews.