Should we kill off people with really low intelligence?

Should we kill off the bottom 10-20% of the population seeing as they just hold back the advancement of society? Then we’d also probably get closer to that white ethnostate you all want so much as well seeing as a lot of non-whites wouldn’t make the cut.

Those who want a white ethnostate also wouldn't make the cut, so the effect would be neutral.

oh sweeeeeeetie x1000

Starting with you?

They should be terminated in the womb.

No one wants a retarded baby. No one wants to be retarded.

We need people to do retard work. Like being trash men or working at mcdonalds.

Depends on the race in question, just like in the question of abortion.

obviously, or at least chemically castrate, as they used to do in the 50s 60s

Just kill niggers.

No, only those who think it's okay to murder others for silly reasons like 'hurr not smart enough'.

t. Ameritard

Isn't it more a question of morality and ethics. I would feel bad if I killed a large amount of humans
just because they were born with something that they had no choice over.

That's what the robots are supposed to do before they kill us all.

Yes. Fucking yes. If they're a little slow then it's alright since you can't win them all, but why actively keep someone full potato? Willing to bet most of those fuckers never actually had to deal with them outside of controlled spaces where people show them off to signal how much of a goody two shoes they are.

No. You put them to work where they can be of use and be somewhat satisfied. They hold back things when they're handled by retards such as fucking Ancaps or socialists or capitalists.

That's where you're wrong kiddo

Killing is a bit extreme, but forced castration for the the bottom 10-20% of the population seems like a good idea.

In it's current state natural selection has pretty much stopped, there's not darwinistic based improvement of the human race. Actually it's the opposite. If you have weak genes or any kind of disease, it doesn't matter. With the current medical advancements we can keep pretty much everyone alive.

it is a question of morality and ethics. But in the grand scheme, do we value the life of an individual more than the quality of humanity as a whole?

Half the US population would be gone...

Yes, I am completely for this.

A snappy and ineffective comeback, youngster.

Canada would be entirely left to the bears and moose.

Ofcourse not user, Jesus.

They should've been terminated in the womb itself before they gained any consciousness but taking their life away after their first breath is straight up murder and no one has the right to do it.

I'm all for eugenics but I take ethicality into consideration too.

Its a different case with people with severe physical or mental disadvantages as they should be given a choice to be euthanized out of their own free will, but not by force.

What is "intelligence" and how do you measure it? Normies seem to think "agrees with whatever opinion I espouse" = "intelligent" We barely have any objective measure of intelligence and the ones we do have seem to be meet with animosity and hostility when invoked. Like for instance, trying to prove one's intelligience by saying you've been officially educated and passed with a degree, meaning some OTHER PEOPLE have decreed you intelligent through rigorous testing, is STILL going to people telling you that's easy and you don't need to be smart to do that...

So where is our measurement? It's the fact that "smart=good" and normies want "me=good" so they assume "me=smart; everyone else not me=dumb." We never actually acknowledge people we don't like have brains. So we're not giving ourselves any objective measure of intelligence.

Again, what IS intelligence? Some people seem really smart on some subjects, but complete dolts on others. Are those people intelligent or dumb? My personal take is intelligence is relative. It's relative to whatever you're applying it too.

So no, I don't approve of getting rid of anyone simply because they don't meet an arbitrary metric we have difficulty even measuring. There is a place in this world for everyone willing to live in it. As long as the "not smart" person is being usefull, helping out, not hurting anyone, then their lack of intelligence is not problem by itself. We don't all need to be geniuses.

Says the leaf

Sounds good. When are you committing suicide then OP?

No Eugenics is a dream and a totalitarian one at that. What we should do is except, vaule and tolerate people woth disabilities.

34Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. 35For I was hungry and you gave Me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave Me something to drink, I was a stranger and you took Me in, 36I was naked and you clothed Me, I was sick and you looked after Me, I was in prison and you visited Me.’

37Then the righteous will answer Him, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry and feed You, or thirsty and give You something to drink? 38When did we see You a stranger and take You in, or naked and clothe You? 39When did we see You sick or in prison and visit You?’

40And the King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of Mine, you did for Me.’

Are you a sheep or are you a goat? Yeshua is watching.

Nice middle school-tier morality there.

No. Deporting non-whites removes the need to do that. The lowest IQ whites deserve a shot at happiness and fulfilment, and a functional white ethnostate would provide that without having to kill anyone.

IQ, maybe, you fucking retard?

Send this shitnigger to the gas chamber first.

Lol, most don't date or have kids. The problem essentially solves itself.

Nobody finds legitimately mentally handicapped people attractive.

The mentally disabled do cost a lot of money, however, but I doubt that justifies killing them. There are a lot of essentially useless people that cost a lot of money, such as children, the elderly, pets, people who are incarcerated, etc. It's generally not a good idea to start killing civilians. Who knows, someone in your family might be next.

Can't even do basic math... Still posts.

>Literally a leaf.

I think parents should acquire a license by providing proof that they can raise and provide for their child. If you can't do that then your fetus which is nothing more than a ball of cells you are carrying (the words of women today, not mine) should be removed and destroyed.

However, in real policy, I'm with you by the end, no need to kill them. Deport low IQ nonwhites, leave non criminal white/Asian low IQ people alone.

Violent repeat offenders, just start offing them en masse, let drug offenders and the like go.

And how many times we do we hear that IQ isn't a good measure of intelligence? And now IM the "retard" because you apparently didn't think of IQ being an example of a metric we use but have problems with... without me spelling it out for you.

Intelligence is relative, retard.

Intelligence is simply the ability to grasp ideas. The more complex the ideas one is capable of grappling with, the smarter one is considered.

Smarter people also tend to grasp ideas quicker than their dumber counterparts.

(From an average intelligence poster who has met many high intelligence people at universities.)

>they don't date or have kids
Niggers Mexicans and jihadis crank out kids like nobody's business, dude. Somali families in MN all seemed to just have kids in fucking litters

Yes kys op with sage

Why bother? We are going to need some mindless drones to do all the shit jobs anyway.

That's a soothing fantasy, but it's not true. IQ is the closest thing we have to an objective measure of intelligence.

>ignores the fact AI and robotics are getting real good at making mindless drones to do repetitive bullshit as we speak

sweden has sterilisation of people with low intelligence and look where it is today

You first

...

>are getting
Until ai and robots are advanced enough well still have plenty of use for the not so clever individuals.

They aren't retarded. Sexually selection basically weeds out all real mental disabilities from the gene pool. What you are talking about is "dumb" thugs siring many children, while hard-working people sire fewer. Truth be told, a lot of these thugs aren't actually that dumb, they just rank high on the dark triad of personality traits. Nobody gets sexually successful without having something to offer--street smarts is something, something that often comes with good looks and sexual prowess.

>Should we kill off people with really low intelligence?

what would the world look like if the exact OPPOSITE was happening?

yeah we should kill all the stupid white goyim
t. jew

Yes, of course we should you stupid cunt. Next question

nah, they do less harm to society than violent criminals, so they'd be a better choice.

Lmao man, i'll go a step further.
I, as i am the best man in the universe, will become supreme leader.
I will kill everyone that has

Exactly. Even violent criminals deserve to live, for the most part. It's not like we don't have the death penalty for particularly heinous crimes; to move the death penalty forward (so to speak) so that it encompasses armed robbery and the like doesn't seem like a very good idea. People being useless, or much less useful, than others doesn't sound like a good reason to kill them.

It's a fine line. Once you start finding reasons to kill people sooner or later people are going to start killing people for political reasons. There is no saying that the government will be your "right-wing friendly" wet-dream-come-true government, either.

That guy in the picture spreads joy.
The iq 65 somalians don't

So you're going to kill your mom then mate?

I wouldn't feel bad doing it, mom - ok she spent half of her life for me and spent money, but that's it, i wouldn't feel bad after killing her
and i don't have friends and dont enjoy my life, i hate my life so it's not like im greatful to my mother for having me born

>killing everyone instead of forcing them into manual labor jobs
You aren't as smart as you think you are

i agree, lets start with you OP

HAHAHAHAHHA
> spent half her life on me, but that's it.

I want to make world a place without suffering so what would be the point in it if 99% of people would suffer becaause of labour jobs?
Just fucking kill them

STARTING WITH

The southern half

Good job Timmy! You tell 'em! You're so smart! Nobody's gonna kill you while I'm around!

>Should we
Who is "we"? You faggots don't even have any power, nor would you ever leave Sup Forums to do anything.

>kill off people with really low intelligence?
So you're an IQ supremacist and you'd kill thousands of Whites because they don't meet your personal views of IQ?

All the while you'd allow muds and jews into your country just as long as their "IQ was high enough?"

What kind of faggot are you?

>1 post by this ID
Oh. One of those type of faggots.

Most people that claim IQ is a poor measure of intelligence are people with low IQs. I suspect anyone with a high IQ saying it's a poor measure are doing so because shitskins score abysmally on IQ tests and they would rather avoid being racist than be realistic.

That said, you CAN influence the outcome of IQ tests if you teach the person how to take them. Ideally the person taking the test is supposed to figure out all the rules and patterns themselves, so if they have some foreknowledge of the test then it can inflate their scores slightly.

IQ tests are the most accurate thing we have available though. General intelligence, also known as IQ or the g factor, is one of the factors that best predicts success in various aspects of life. I suspect the importance of measures of intelligence has been downplayed due to rampaging social justice since, as stated, measures of intelligence do not pull punches when it comes to race.

>most of Sup Forums and tumblr would go

I'm for it

Idiocracy is not a fictional movie; it's a biographical one.

>Idiocracy is not a fictional movie; it's a biographical one.
A direct result of diversity, multiculturalism and tolerance.

>Idiocracy is not a fictional movie; it's a biographical one.

I know.

>I know.

9435381

oops...

damnit...

No, but we should get rid of all of the government's forced protections. Give natural selection a chance!