Are romans/greeks proof that liking boys and fucking man's behinds isnt actually gay/bad?

Are romans/greeks proof that liking boys and fucking man's behinds isnt actually gay/bad?
They were the most masculine bunch
Dont bring semitic morals into this.

This is native european culture


"Weep, you girls. My penis has given you up. Now it penetrates men’s behinds. Goodbye, wondrous femininity!"

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=t4OlMRH6wQY
discord
youtu.be/gXGlawiibK8
eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtml
archive.is/gK3Si
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

liking little boys is wrong you fucking moron

Why though?
Our ancestors did it.
It doesnt have to be carnal

There is always been gays, this is not a jew invention, what we must do is stop the gay propaganda and stop promoting the LGBT bullshit, but if you have a society without this propaganda, without this cultural marxism and someone is gay then that has no solution

Almost all of the roman emperors fucked men.
Pederasty was also seen as part of the education of the youth

God, you sick, sick fuck. I seriously don't wish ill will on anyone but people like you make me rethink that stance. You are the lowest of the low.

These are lies

This is native european culture.
Fuck off mutt

my ancestors weren't faggots

stinky poohole

Not an argument

>liking boys and fucking man's behinds isnt actually gay/bad
No it means this shit never goes away and we can't let it get normalized again to where they make sculptures of it in tribute.

What is wrong with it?

>dont bring semitic morals into this
>christ cucks trumptards enter the thread

Boys confirmed for most beautiful of aspect of mankind.

>girls and women are stinky and bleed all the time.

>t. boyloving pedo

all these things as words were invented by a fake jew named freud in 1880. hadrian. sacred band of thebes. david. alexander. every time you see a clobber passage in the bible it refers to pagan shrine hookers. gays are masculine as fuck. it only makes sense. of course screwing men is not gay. everybody is at least bi

The roman empire collapsed for a reason.

>liking shota
Disgusting now lolis is fine but any male fucking is not ok.

Inferring Greeks are European. They're lower than Turks and other Arabs, idiots.

>Someone else did it, so it must be ok.
That's your argument. Lacking and lazy. You deserve a slow death.

44% of men have anal. truvada. box pox. smeg. piss. etc etc etc. g spots only in men
hi fake jew mason. all seeing eye is a divine vagina. 88.7% of "heteros" are pedos. grab my jewvankas, "fags". and etc etc etc
>t moore and pence and putin and epstein

hmm

Yes it’s the natural order. Heterosavages with their primitive tribalism wouldn’t understand.

usury. fake kikes. san francisco seems to be doing fucking fine

>Are romans/greeks proof that liking boys and fucking man's behinds isnt actually gay/bad?
how are these two going? oh, yeah, one has turn into historical dust and the other is a german propety

>romans/Greeks being gay
>civilization collapse
Fuck off marxist faggot it was one of the reason their societies collapsed

Dead Jew on a stick morals are not an argument

monkey soup and trannies and huge hairy woman asses and a fish language. congrats

>christianity enters the roman empire
>suddenly cant fuck boys
>collapses

It's proof of the power of degeneracy, opulence, and lack of self-discipline

Honestly, I'm glad that we have a forum here that is uncensored and allows us to express free opinions about sexuality. The Ancients show us that sexuality is very diverse and also that tyranny isn't always bad.

kys clam digging pussy worshipping bagel fucking hooknoses. blood libel. baby dick sucking

It's not culture, you fuck. It's degeneracy. Nothing more, nothing less. You're a pedophile degenerate. Nothing more, nothing less.

yes tranny is bad. it resembles your baphomet and marriages you corrupted with rings and cakes. just like the garden. marry Christ and use turkey basters :)

That is a muslime thing!

As far as I know Greeks and Roman's had adult male relationships as oposed to musilmes throughout history to present times!

kys freud

So U spend UR days and nights fantasizing about smearing another man's shit on UR cock and then gobbling down his seed?

Leave me out.

Shitposting aside, I agree. In a strange way we're lucky as hell some place like Sup Forums exists. Our history as a species is significantly more diverse than most people today thing.

ok kardashian. mmm. dirty tampons

...

>"Weep, you girls. My penis has given you up. Now it penetrates men’s behinds. Goodbye, wondrous femininity!"

youtube.com/watch?v=t4OlMRH6wQY

It has nothing to do with Jesus, pedophile. It has to do with you sticking your dick in a little boys ass. Everyone knows that's wrong. Everyone, except mentally ill pedophiles like you, that is.

>tfw i got a (you)

s-senpai... anata wa sugoi desu

pink swastika. haavara. nice arguments. this pathetic shekels grabbing lies disguised as comedy. and then you suck dumpster dick and cut yourself. and the masons win and lord over you with their witch pussies. you cunt

only kikes are nut bars

>fucking man's behinds isnt actually gay
Completely agree OP. That's why here in Brazil this kind of stuff is so widespread: we're trying to emulate the roman empire.
You shall hear from us in a few decades when we come to fuck your men's behinds!

>isnt actually gay/bad?

At what age were you molested? Just because someone hurt you, does that rationalize you hurting someone else? Someone weaker, smaller, younger, and incapable of defending themselves properly. Does that make you feel like a big man?

And you too... at what age were you molested?

I was never molested.
Im just trying to learn and live like my ancestors did.
Im finally done with worshipping a dead kike.
You americans wouldnt understand,

>Romans
bunch of late greekaboo degenerates
Cato was right about everything

That degeneracy you're talking about is jewish.

>of course screwing men is not gay
You sound like the liberals that try to redefine everything.

discord gg/7dJybrm

add a .

like freud
noice

Little boys get no pleasure from cocks in their assholes maybe their mouths but not their assholes so it should not be allowed. If you want to be faggots at least fuck the dude when he is like 16 or older.

It is gay, not bad if legal.

>Our ancestors did it.
No they didn't do it.
That is your years worth of poisoned mind talking. Lay off the porn, now.

I don't really know what that's supposed to mean. Are you saying Freud just came up with terms like 'gay'? I actually think all these categorizations are stupid as fuck. I only say I'm gay because it's the easiest way to convey that I like men. I'm sure a lot of "totally straight bro" guys would love getting fucked if it was in a cultural vacuum.

>Almost all of the roman emperors fucked men.
no but some did
>Pederasty was also seen as part of the education of the youth
false. this was only for slaves.

Though, i also got to add that it's unproductive but natural considering evolution (brain stimuli based on many other factors).

They werent exactly little boys usually.
Most were between 12 and 18 and not always there was penetration
It was more like a male bond a friendship

>Dont bring semitic morals into this.

ancient greeks were part semitic/near eastern m80

>44% of men have anal.
wtf. this is obviously untrue

>muh haploshit
Greeks were and will always be european.

Im talking about jewish customs.

Find a rope, a sturdy beam, a chair, and do the rest of the world a favor, disgusting faggot.

Book/article reference?

gas yourself stupid neopagan faggots

youtu.be/gXGlawiibK8

...

near east, kinda, but hardly semitic
J2 is anatolian/caucasian

wouldn't be surprised though if pederasty is another one of the things they imported from (((Phoenicians)))

Can you even imagine how bad ancient Roman man ass fucking must have smelled?
Sounds pretty fucking gay to me.

well to be fair the romans weren't into sodomy. it was illegal and you could be put to death for fucking a man in the ass, but they did other gay shit like fucking young boys between their thighs

queer

Romans 1
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Chill bra

J2 haplogroup is near eastern like this guy said

maybe semitic is the wrong choice of word, but J2 and J1 are really closely related haplogroups and Greece is like 1/3 J2 and J1
eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_haplogroups.shtml

This is why I hold to "semitic morals" OP. The Greeks and Romans were a great people, but succumbed to their animal passions and God gave them over to a reprobate mind.

There is a reason why classical ideals mixed with Christian faith made the greatest nations on the planet. Christians took the best of the classical world, and threw out the garbage.

Also OP, the only faggots who are black and white rabid antisemites are shills. If you cannot see individuals but abstract groups and ideas, you are infected with the wicked postmodernism.

they are quite old though, J2b was even found in bronze age Croatia, as well as among Minoans
J1 is the only one you may really link to Semites(although it was present in bronze age Anatolia too)

Do people not understand how rare and how taboo this was in Rome? Romans were conservative as fuck. It was considered disgusting and degenerate for men to have sex with one another. Greeks had laws against this. Don't get your history from TV.

guise check out this book I found

Consider replying with some links though, I need to read

Its true J2 is indeed old my friend, interestingly enough J2 originated in ancient mesopatamia iraq , and these first farmers later spread to europe

>Romans were conservative as fuck
What does conservative even mean.
It was only taboo if you were the passive male

I just gaave you that eupedia link, theres more info in that site about J2 and j1

So disgusting they immortalized it with all kinds of art. Totally taboo.

Are gays more likely to be pedophiles?

archive.is/gK3Si

Art is full of taboos. Always has been.

Remember #FusionCollusion guys. This is the most important topic right now.

nah you're citing old stuff, European farmers descend from a completely different stock, neolithic Anatolians, who were mostly G2a and I2a
the westward expansion of J2 and Iran-related ancestry came later, probably copper/bronze age, and affected mostly SE Europe only

J2 among neolithic Euros was pretty much noise, like 1%

I'm afraid that is bollocks look at the frescos they found in pompei they are outrageous...

It is desert religion shit to be anti sex. The Romans considered basically all sexual practices fine provided you were the dominant partner. Julius Caeser constantly was dogged by allegations he'd been on the receiving end of a gay relationship and this was a grave slur, but bumming men was considered a fairly normal activity. There was no such thing as "gays" though. Greeks were more conservative but still WAY WAY less so than say the victorians.

Tbh even medieval Britain was pretty raunchy, It was always a middle class thing to be a prude

This logic means there are no such things as gays. If everyone is bi then how can there be? Your flag is therefore a meme and represents nothing but degenerate lifesfyle choices.

Oops, didn't related that as I thought it was for another user.
That's quite far-fetched though, indeed that was the wrong word, you're being quite objective.

Just don't fuck boys under 16 and everything is fine.

>but bumming men was considered a fairly normal activity

No, I'm afraid you need to do some research.

They were uptight and not sexually liberal at all. Orgies were not common, extra marital affairs were considered a serious offense.

Relate*

I don't get why people want to make out the Romans were a bunch of Christian faggots who were scared of their own willies, its always been one of the things that ruins an otherwise very good religion.

"muh degeneracy" is for muslim and jew apologists. We should be Dionysian. That's not the same as fake modern degeneracy which is just an ego trip and narcissistic hedonism disguised as sex.

Stick your head in an oven pedophile.

Listen you fuck.

Pedophilia is wrong because the child's brain is under developed. You would be fucking up that child psychologically. Homosexualism and the myriad of other fetishes are degenerate because they offer nothing but an enslavement to ones carnal pleasure. There's nothing high minded about sexual deviancy. Referencing bad translations of Greco-Roman culture is a pathetic excuse to justify your perversions.

There is no such thing as gays until the 1960s... Even when Christopher Marlowe came under suspicion of shilling for gay relationships (he was) there was no concept of being "a gay". It was considered a vice and a pre-christian hangover of a messier society

ok interesting, but why does italy have so much J2? did that come in copper and bronze age? and is it true that etruscans were mostly J2?

Also Im a bit confused, you said J2 is neolithic mostly and it came in bronze age, but isnt neolithic and bronze age in the same time period?

Obviously paedophilia is reprehensible but you cannot deny European culture is much more tolerant of homosexuality than all others. So if we are really the euro-supremicists we claim to be...