What does Sup Forums think of him?

What does Sup Forums think of him?

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=qzjsSCfOlk8
youtu.be/lUH4RzAofv8
youtu.be/UrzyVt1lbpo
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitheism
twitter.com/AnonBabble

The same thing happens with all of these logicians, they either say they're Jews and won't debate the Holocaust or flat out refuse to debate it because of "decency" or some other emotional argument which ironically goes against their logical way of thinking.

Actually Hitchens had a great bit about why we should listen to holocaust deniers, and he was redpilled on women not being funny.
Also he had T-Rex arms.

f boy

probs some male e-thot celeb [youtube] shill. never seen him before.

He's my favorite of the whole debater 'intellecual' persona types.

faggot

His bro is probably most in line with my real beliefs. Not larping nazi or putting hope into a traditional western revival. Peter Hitchens is probably the most palatable strong conservative and serious realist on all a variety of issues.

Irrelevant old cuck that identityless bugmen used to look up to back before they had SJW shit to either rebel against or, more commonly, take part in

Legit got Smart Girls who were not SJWs but not bitches from hell either.

I thought very little of him. I got into an online discussion with him about radical Islam and he kept saying Hussein Ibish and the Saudi clerics were better people than Reagan and Bush.

He was a fucking turd.

Good entertainer, good writer, but not very heavy on the ideas and original thought.

Hitchens was a vocal defender of David Irving.

No, you didn't.

He's a retard

A cancer retard

Chris moslty won debates with charisma over substance. His brother was always a good foil for him in that regard but under his shadow, now hes gone the brother is finding his time to shine.

And if youre wondering if Peter is /ourguy/, he is. Whereas aside from some of his attitudes to women and such, Chris never was.

S

He’s good at the theology debate. He is so transparently under ((them)) however when they are brought up. Embarrassingly so. He speaks on the importance of writers such as David Irving but refuses to actually look into the data. He is a good stepping stone for intermediate thinkers who are just discovering the red pill. He is cast aside like an ex though once one delves deeper into the rabbit hole.

some dead jew.

Christ is the risen LORD

Also a degenerate beyond the pale. Alcoholic and addicted to smoking. It is ill to speak of the dead but your heroes should be pure of mind, strong in body, and thorough in all branches of philosophy.

>I first logged onto the internet 1 year ago

Eternal anglo who carpetbagged over to you and found erudite shitposting potential under your bill of rights, you mean.

Peter Hitchens’, his brother, is far more en pointe. His Copenhagen speech last week was one of the most powerful i think I’ve ever observed. m.youtube.com/watch?v=qzjsSCfOlk8

Smooth talking bullshit artist. I like him because he's clever and can turn a phrase, but he's all wet.

jewish bisexual antifa neocon

Contrarian and critical thinker, here he is way back then.
youtu.be/lUH4RzAofv8

I liked him.
One of the only celebrity deaths I was sad about. I actually disagreed with him on a lot but it was always fun to hear him speak or read his shit.

Sargon wishes he was Hitch.

Absolutely brilliant writer and bon vivant of the old school. Was the best essayist in English, now that belongs to Dalrymple. Miss this man dearly.

I think he’s dead

Yes but the amount of asterisks that go in each one of those is considerable. He was original enough not to be put in other people's labels

Is that Sargon?

Just another victim

He never claimed an accredited victim card, did he?

Yes, yes it is.

A quick witted shit talker

>It was her turn!
youtu.be/UrzyVt1lbpo

These. I much prefer his brother.

Which brother is he?

Christopher Hitchens

He was okay, but I do like his brother a lot better. He's way more practical and I've gotten really tired of fedora-tipping atheists.

He wasn't an atheist he was an antitheist.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitheism
>Christopher Hitchens offers an example of this approach in Letters to a Young Contrarian (2001), in which he writes: "I'm not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief, is positively harmful."

Based. We can see how harmful religion is with the current crypto-communist, pro-immigrant Pope and American shabbas goyim Evangelists. Sup Forums likes religion because it is against homosexuality but it seems to forget all the rest, the priests hosting muslims in churches and the bible thumpers advocating wars for Israel.