>>156776301

looks asian

Other urls found in this thread:

nature.com/articles/nature25173
google.co.uk/amp/www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/
pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ancient/americas-bog-people.html
rawstreetjournal.com/trump-acts-on-divine-duty-to-restore-the-biblical-lands-of-israel/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Cause indians are asians

>posts pic of Tarim mummy
>claims it's "Beringian"

fake and gay

Fucking Mormons were right.

The florida bog mummies which died over 4,000 years ago were found to be white too. The funniest shit was scientists were all excited because they wanted to prove that the indians had sophisticated tech like tools and woven materials thousands and thousands of years ago. NOPE. It was white people.

WE WERE NATIVES AND FECAL MATTER

/thread

Native Americans originated from Hapas in central Asia, and hence have some white DNA.

>native americans were an ancient kind of mestizo

This has been known about for ages. They are mestizo/hapa, not white. And they're only distantly related to modern white people in America.

WE WUZ INJUNS N SHEEEEIIIIITTTT

>raw street journal

I literally look into one more article, and immediately you could tell this site was just click-bait, except geared towards a hoaxey interpretation of race realism

Thousands of years ago We Were Indians.

>people who migrated from Russia
>not white

>inb4 slavs aren't white

Slavs are white.
People from Russia are mongols, tatars, eskimos and turkic tribes that were conquered by slavs at some point.

Citation needed

Makes quite a good deal of sense. Native Americans from all regions of North American don't have a universal quality to them, there's lots of ethnic differences in them.

Siberian were red haired white people in the age before they became Mongol looking. They went to the USA first in both directions. That's the real redpill

>original natives were white
>NuNatives (injuns) killed white previous natives
>whites went back and killed them all for great justice
Yes. Let's push this narrative.

I heard that the America used to have fairly advanced villages with civilised people. But some tribes were much more violent than others and as such, the peaceful evolved ones were eradicated and the ones left when the Europeans arrived were the primitive aggressive ones.

The most advanced civilizations in the Americas were brought down by European war and diseases, not prior.

raw street journal making news great again.
Jesus fucking christ. Fucking retards.

There were deserted villages in the southwest. The climate change that collapsed earlier central American culture collapsed theirs. Half of them went nomadic because they were living in their own post apocslypse

They may have also been pushed out by mesoanericas, who built the most impressive civilizations in the Americas anyway. And then the Mississippian mound builders were still around in the east.

East Indian culture does share some interesting similarities with ancient European, north African and central Asian cultures.

No. Fuck off. This is delegitimizing the recent debunkings of Black Egyptians and and the Out of Africa theories. You are literlally playing into nigger mentality here. "WE WUZ EVERYTHING"

Just a note op when making a claim you really should use the original source as well as not using a none related picture

nature.com/articles/nature25173

No mention of europeans and clearly related to modern amerindians

Out of Africa still stands, as does the Nubian dynasty. Pharoahs were every color depending on the dynasty you're looking at.

>Out of Africa still stands
No, it does not. I don't have the source but I do recall Europoid remains being found in Europe that predated anything out of Africa by a long shot. Combine this with our massive differences with Africans and what you get is liberals doubling down on pushing their narrative to make up for it.

I'd love to know more about the interactions of the great central American civilisations with the tribes in north America. As the Scythians interacted with Athens and Persia so the Indians must have traded or interacted with them

Our differences with Africans arise in part because we bred with neanderthals after leaving Africa, while sun-Saharan Africans did not. Plus we continued to adapt to newer, colder climates.

Sub-Saharan*

Personally I'd love to know more about the interactions between Norse Vikings and paleo-Eskimo "skraelings" up in Canada.

Except that the slavs conquered the Far East waaay later, around the 1600's to 1700's
By the time the injuns ancestors crosses the bering strait the slavs haven't even set foot in the region, they were still in Europe back then.

pic is a Tocharian girl, they were IEs and died out after the Turks raped them about 1200 years ago

google.co.uk/amp/www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/05/22/europe-birthplace-mankind-not-africa-scientists-find/amp/

They make out like it wasn't a friendly interaction but Vikings already interacted with Sami people so they must have traded. Also I don't believe they didn't spend more time in Canada as it's so close

So interesting though. I hate that it's all mired in political correctness too

Tiwanaku and the Mayans were the most advanced civilizations in the pre-columbian Americas, yet they collapsed for other factors before the Europeans even arrived.

While yes the Euros are certainly the ones responsible for the collapse of the Aztecs and Incas these two were not the most advanced civs.

no they did not
the original inhabitants of north america came from europe accross the atlantic ice sheet

read the "Solutrean Hypothesis"
they came from south of france

So that less than 4% (at best) of neanderthal genes in some Europeans made us magically different, huh? And I suppose that the ancient whiteys found in Europe doesn't mean shit. We all niggas & "refugees welcome"
Out of Africa is the most bogus and contradicting theory out there, there are tons of reserches countering it while there are almost none to make up for it. What you are spouting in your post there is plain and simple liberal talking points with no substenance whatsoever.
Africans are the most alien(as in unrelated) race on the planet, while most others are related to some extent, like Asians and Europeans for example.

That's the point. There was a huge range of people like that across Asia before Turkic people spread everywhere. If 'siberian'' went to the US that long ago they're not going to be the same siberians as today

from (((nature)))
thanks for sharing rabbi

Fair point

Its the place where the original study was posted dumbass. I'm sorry but the facts trump your feels.

Same thing happened with Asians.
Euros and Asians interbred with neaderthals.
And injuns are descendants of asians.
And interestingly enough all of these groups were the only ones to build civilizations, all of them did.
Africans didn't
Interesting...huh?
>inb4 ethiopian empire
>inb4 Mali empire
These shits can barely classify as "civilizations" they actually arents.
Ones was an area controlled by an upper class of semites, the other was a glorified tribe with muthuts that got rich by selling their own kind into slavery ans then spent and burned all their money in frivolous shit, just like all nigs lmao

>This is delegitimizing the recent debunkings of Black Egyptians

Thats never been debunked its a fact that Egypt was a black african civilization not white,Its literally a part of Africa

pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ancient/americas-bog-people.html

>They have also discovered, at least so far, no biological affiliation between these early Floridians and modern Native American groups.

I know I was just sperging

You mean the single tooth that leaves the vast majority of scientists unconvinced? It's not meaningless, but not as significant as you seem to think. These are hypotheses, out of Africa still being the leading hypothesis, they aren't "disproven" by the tooth fairy, they gain or lose adherents based on current and developing evidence.

And the most "alien" races are probably those with denisovan DNA. By the way, you conveniently ignored the part about our (Eurasian) adaptations to new environments.

this
asians and europeans have little or nothing to do with monkey people
niggers havent evolved for 500k years

the most interesting theory ive ever read on this is the "out of australia" theory, based on the fact that the very oldest and most commonly shared genes are australian abbos, and there is only five genes this old shared by virtually all humans
the abbos never evolved, and niggers havent for a long time

user if thats the case then where did the mongoloids who now reside there originate from

Only the Nubian dynasty was black, the later Ptolomaics were basically white (cleopatra et al), but most were brown, not too different from the modern population.

Asian DNA though, nothing to do with Europeans

Stop shitting the thread about people with frontal lobes by talking about people with none

Blacks in egypt were slaves and dickwashers.

>
The link is dead user

The original Egyptians were Black before the foreign invasions, Egypt was created in Africa by Africans,

I swear Lauren Southern is ageing like shit !

>Thats never been debunked
It literally has plenty lf times, just because afrocentrists refuse to accept the truth and make up shit all the time doesn't means it "hasn't been debunked"
>its a fact that Egypt was a black african civilization not white
It was neither black nor white, they're semites in north africa, except for the rules of two dynasties.
The nubian dynasty were certainly black, and the ptolemaic dynasty was certainly white but we're talking just rulers, that overall population was the same.
>its literally a part of Africa
Not all of Africa is populated by blacks you moron, there's no division between Europe and Asia, by your logic "its on da same continent!" So they're all the same.
Besides, there's a clear population difference between north africa and subsaharan africa.
In subsharan africa live the different "black" ethnic groups like Xhosa, Bantu, Khoisan and thousand more
In North Africa live the semitic and semitic related group, like the Berbers, Arabs and thousands others.
This has been like this for millennia.

you are so full of shit
"out of africa"
the nubian "dynasty"

please dont make me laugh, niggers never were pharaohs, not even close, ffs modern niggers still cant built a functioning road system, they have been obsolete for last ten thousand years, an embarrassment to modern humans

What if at one time, they world was mostly White?
Until the Jew used Dark Races to attack and kill Whites driving them back into Europe?

What if Goys, what if?

Nope whites and meds moved away from Egypt into Europe, all empires fall and new ones rise, why do you think Europe is the most civilised place on earth.

That "toothfairy" is a fact countering the liberal "we're all Africans" theory, while there is still noting solid backing the OoA theory. And even more so Africans are the least related to any other race in existence, so tell me how are they related to us in any way? They arose from feaking tree monkeys as far as I'm concerned, this theory holds as much water as the Out of Africa one.

Groups of humans expand and contract and move about. What do you think everywhere looked like pre Mongols? Pre Turkic expansion? Who lived in turkey first? Who lived in the area of what is now eastern china. What do you think it'll look like in a thousand years? The same? Do you think all of Africa looks the same with the same types of blacks staying in their original areas?

>This is a white man according to pol

In north Africa by north Africans
If Bantu looking people in America can hop on the band wagon can the khoisan?

So what was the Nubian dynasty? Black pharoahs. Short lived, so don't REEE too hard over it. Give a better explanation if you have one.

A ruler is the same as the population. Please please google North africans you silly prick.

That is an ancient wall drawing, not a photograph. Try harder.

Wait so you literally think Africans don't share the same common ancestor as the rest of humanity? That our most recent common ancestor is a monkey rather than a hominid? That's next-level retarded.

You do know that Nubian are totally different human than anything in America that's from West Africa?

Also fuck off this is not a kangz thread

Did you know even native Americans had black slaves

Lmao what a shitty strawman, literally nobody said they were white.
They weren't, but they certainty they weren't black.
Just look at how they depicted Nubians ffs

another "interesting" article from that (((site)))
>rawstreetjournal.com/trump-acts-on-divine-duty-to-restore-the-biblical-lands-of-israel/

>fuck off this is not a kangz thread
>we wuz pharoahs n sheeeeit

Low melanin count in humans living in north hemisphere ?
This makes no sense it must be some white sorcery.

Praire niggers btfo

Yes one of the twenty dynasties of egypt was sudanese. A very shortlived one i must add, egypt collapsed not long after.

believing in (((evolution)))
nice one goys

Why did Napoleon blow the noses off of the ancient Egyptian sphinxes? Its because he was trying to whitewash history just like you guys are trying to do, a man who tries to steal others history has none....

You are literally posting images of the Nubian Dynasty which is no were close to the ancient Egyptian period , the Dynasty that is well known for two things.
1.Taking over Egypt via a military campaign from the kingdom of Kush (Sudan today)
2.Running Egypt it into the fucking ground which resulted in a War with Assyria which was effectively the end of Kushite power in Northern Egypt and the conquest of Egypt by Assyria.

Africans are th most likely to be be descended from what we know today as monkies, the same cannot be said for the Eurasian tree. Our ancestors are probably long extinct by now.

Michael Jackson was proof enough

I'm winng to listen to anything else apart from "Gawd put us here!"
>strawmanning this hard
But of course, even dung the Napoleonic times the evil whitey was doing his best to steal everything from the deveopled black man. Got it.

North africans I said not northern europeans

Anyway back to native Americans

We wuz indeed kangz.

Nah it means the Indians killed the white people that orginally lived in America.

Probably been the case for tens of thousands of years desu senpai

It could just be an example of an ancient roastie