New Study Published on Arousal in Women

Link in pastebin due to spam filter:

pastebin.com/q1xgDcMW

In this fMRI study of female sexual orientation—the first to include bisexual women—we extended several key findings from the sexual psychophysiology literature1,2,47,48. Using the ventral striatum as a neural measure of incentive motivation, we demonstrated that homosexual women have greater gender bias in their responses to male and female erotic stimuli.

Direct comparisons of bisexual and heterosexual women revealed no significant differences, with the exception of bisexual women having more gynephilic subjective responses to erotic videos.

However, with one exception—bisexual women showing more gynephilic subjective responses to erotic videos than did heterosexual women, in a direct comparison—heterosexual and bisexual women’s patterns of results did not differ significantly.

Similar to the findings for erotic pictures, bisexual women were unique in the degree to which male videos produced activations in brain areas associated with more abstract (and possibly complex) processing79,80. Again, the significance of this pattern remains unclear.

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/gK3Si
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051088
journalistsresource.org/studies/society/public-health/teen-pregnancy-bisexual-lesbian-heterosexual-women
chaladze.com/files/publications/Chaladze2016ASB.pdf
scholars.northwestern.edu/en/publications/neural-correlates-of-sexual-orientation-in-heterosexual-bisexual-
psychologytoday.com/blog/real-healing/201208/overexposed-and-under-prepared-the-effects-early-exposure-sexual-content
archive.is/uPIbi
archive.is/9sqNr
discord
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535560/
stream.org/yes-childhood-sexual-abuse-often-contribute-homosexuality/
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X1500085X
familystructurestudies.com/summary
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/soej.12233/full
ibtimes.com/study-having-gay-parents-does-not-affect-childs-gender-identity-2579343
pastebin.com/PaAFXqQj
archive.is/gdhmT
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Everyone knew women are attracted to other women

bump2

bump

bump

>psychophysiology

So brain scans show that men and women who report being gay straight and bisexual have distinct arousal patterns, indicating that they are not "choosing" to be gay, but you know better?

Lol

"choosing to be gay" refers to *acting* on the temptation. Taking action is always a choice.
The causes of the inclinations and desires are probably not a choice and could be any combination of nature and nurture.
It's unfortunate that the word "homosexuality" can be used to refer to the urges OR the behavioral acts (eg: sodomy). It's the latter that is a choice.

what do you think about the whole gays are gays because they have been molested at a young age thing?

also arent there differences between males and females. Females like other women, but men dont want other men, making the study pointless when it comes to male sexuality?

The last two days of the luteal phase -- that's when the iron is hot, boys.

That's when it's very likely she might be willing to buy whatever it is you're selling, iykwimaityd

>they are not "choosing"
Doesn't matter, the purge will come soon.

So, at the very least, you admit that some men and women innately desire the same sex?

noxious religious propaganda thoroughly disproven by recent evidence:

archive.is/gK3Si

So basically we should kill all faggots because they're degenerate cancer? And you should go back to /lgbt/ with this non political gayness? Gotcha. Thanks for the heads up

This.
>"choosing to be gay" refers to *acting* on the temptation. Taking action is always a choice.
OP is a retard.

>higher physical/emotional/sexual abuse, mental illness, and substance abuse in gays

Hmm...

Why does that chart report such high percentages for low case counts?

Yeah, sucks to be shunned by society and your own family for your innate identity! If molestation CAUSED homosexuality I would expect to see 100% of gays and bisexuals reporting sexual molestation as kids, and that simply isn't the case.

When is that? Need to know NOW

So female heterosexuality really is a social construct?

No, literally the opposite.

What do you mean the opposite?

>you admit that some men and women innately desire the same sex
Yes, although I consider it to be an anomaly. A disorder among so many others found in nature. In short, the disordered-desire is not their fault.

Additionally, the distinction between desires (ie: temptation) and actions is the normal interpretation through Christian history. Many today are confused about this, unfortunately. When they condemn an individual for a disordered-desire outside their control it is wrong to do so. Condemning actions that spring from disordered desires is perfectly fine (and traditional) however.

That female heterosexuality is a biological, or at the very least has neural correlates beyond social renderings.

What if there were a combination of genes that made some women more fertile? Would you consider that an evolutionary advantage?

They found no significant difference between straight women and bisexuals though. All women seem to exist in two categories, both of which must be attracted other to women, because there were bisexual women in the same group as 'straight' women.

That isn't entirely true. They found that bisexual women have less specificity and more intensity to their attraction. The authors have both anticipated and address your arguments if you actually read it.

There almost certainly are combinations of genes that make women more fertile. Whether that's advantageous would depend on the environment. eg: In times of scarcity, it could be an evolutionary disadvantage for instance.

Can you imagine a combination of genes that makes women have more kids and men who have the same combination have less kids? That appears to be homosexuality.

Female relatives of male homosexuals have 1.3x as many kids:

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051088

-
Bisexual females have more teen pregnancies:

journalistsresource.org/studies/society/public-health/teen-pregnancy-bisexual-lesbian-heterosexual-women

-

Straight males carry gay genes:

chaladze.com/files/publications/Chaladze2016ASB.pdf

In ENGLISH, professor....

Distinct patterns are seen in the brains of women who self report being straight, bi, and gay. Bi women have less specific arousal (aroused by a wider variety of images) but also more intense arousal.

>We found that homosexual women’s subjective and neural responses reflected greater bias towards female stimuli, compared with bisexual and heterosexual women, whose responses did not significantly differ.
Homosexual women had more specificity. But heterosexual women and homosexual women were much the same.

How the fuck is this political ya fucking raving bender?

The advantage here is for bisexual women. Possibly correlating to a heterozygous advantage in reproduction due to more intense and vague arousal in response to erotic stimulus from both men and women.

Yes. I would not be surprised if the root cause is genetic. There can even be advantageous aspects to the mutation. Disorders sometimes have benefits. eg: Anemia has the beneficial side effect of malaria resistance. This poses no conflict with the traditional Catholic worldview.

>Heterosexual women’s arousal does not appear to favor erotic stimuli of either sex, and thus may be considered to reflect a bisexual pattern.

It isn't really disordered to have gay males, they are just selected against by sexually antagonistic combinations of genes and perhaps are more effective at other things like helping care for large families. Shunning people for innate attraction is both harmful and goes against our nature.

(We do not mean to imply that heterosexual women are confused or in denial about their “real preferences”; rather, the findings in need of explanation are why heterosexual women show non-heterosexual arousal patterns in the laboratory). The implication of women’s non-specific arousal patterns for their sexual orientations is difficult to interpret. Most women, like most men, behave and identify heterosexually13,14,15,16,17,18. However, men are more likely than women to identify as completely heterosexual or completely homosexual, and women are more likely than men to identify as bisexual or “mostly heterosexual”19.

If arousal patterns are similar between heterosexual and bisexual women, the question remains what distinguishes the two groups. One possibility, supported by some research, is that bisexual women tend to have greater sexual motivation, which may increase the likelihood of exploring a capacity for attraction to both sexes20,21. Or, bisexual women may be more aware than heterosexual women of their non-specific arousal22, which could partially contribute to bisexual sexual motivation. Alternatively, bisexual women may be more likely than heterosexual women to interpret their non-specific arousal states in sexual or romantic terms.

It is also possible that bisexual women’s arousal patterns differ from those observed in heterosexual women. Consistent with this possibility, recent studies suggest that women with bisexual interests tend to be more aroused by female than by male erotic stimuli23,24,25. Perhaps for some women with female-biased arousal patterns, this bias can motivate non-heterosexual feelings, behavior, and identity.

Homosexuality is the symptom of a disease. They should have also done DNA tests and checked which viruses they have in their systems. Heterosexuals would have either lacked the pathogens that caused homosexuality, or be largely immune to them. Homosexuals would have lacked the immunity and the pathogens would be present. No scientific study will do this because then they can prove that homosexuality is curable.

None of which really contradicts the point, does it? There appear to be no truly heterosexual women, ie women who are only stimulated by men. That is what I mean.

>Shunning people for innate attraction
You said that, not me. It would be wrong to shun someone over a disordered desire. There are many others, such as the urge to eat dirt, or kleptomania urging one to steel. Those who give in may gain an advantage. It is wrong to give in and *act*. It is NOT wrong to have an urge.

The ones who are controlled by their urges are to be pitied. The ones who have mastery over themselves, despite disordered desires, are in fact heroes. In short a gay person has and deserves all the dignity of anyone else, and can be heroic when they succeed at not acting on the disorder that afflicts them.

Women don't claim to be fully heterosexual as often as men do though upon self report, so that fits with that pattern. There's also a study like this but done with males:

scholars.northwestern.edu/en/publications/neural-correlates-of-sexual-orientation-in-heterosexual-bisexual-

I don't think you can prove it is "disordered" whatever meaning that is intended to convey as a vague aspersion.

Why should I have to deny what my brain tells me but not you? Homosexuality is not inherently harmful to the bodily autonomy of ourselves or others so false comparisons to sexual fetishes fall apart.

When people go through puberty, their brain is developing and cementing neurological pathways around sexual gratification dopamine response or our lifelong modus operandi. This is one major reason why young men shouldn't be developing to high speed internet pornography as a gratification outlet.

I agree that I cannot convince of that. "If it feels good, do it" is the zeitgeist of our age.
We likely differ on more fundamental things that would need to be resolved first:
- Does objective truth exist?
- Can it be discovered?
- Is there objective truth to morality?
- How is it derived?
- Does all objective truth emanate from an origin?

I will not try to convince you of those things today. I wish you well however, and have enjoyed this conversation.

Sometimes people aren't 'giving in to desire' they just choose to act on their natural and ehalthy desire for things that make them happy.

Bi chicks confirmed goat

Can’t open the study, but have they checked whether or not the individual subjects were in a steady relationship, how many sexual partners they had and whether or not they suffered sexual abuse as a minor?

...

Homosexuality is a symptom of one or more diseases. Even before this was known there was an active campaign to stop it from spreading. It's the reason muslims throw fags off roofs. Now there's an active effort to spread it as part of a depopulation agenda.

correlation does not imply causation

Yes and they still deserve the gas chambers.

Also remember the study that found epigenetic tags is 70% of self described gay men? This gives credence to the idea that children can be conditioned to be "gay" as not all of the Homo's had the genetic condition

More reason for the eradication of this filthy culture.

Faggots need to be used like faggots.

So indoctrinating kids can turn them into fags?

Uh I don't think you understand how cells work. Epigenetics means methylated tags that alter the function of DNA. It doesn't mean that if you tell people to be gay, their DNA mutates and they turn gay. Epigenetics just tells us the cause of homosexuality might be involving other cellular processes than just the raw DNA code.

You clearly never bothered to even read a summary of that actual study.

No, kids are less afraid to come out now than ever before.

The fact that your identity revolves around what you stick your dick in is the real problem.

Are you an idiot? I never said that there is a change in genetics. What I said is that only a portion of the tested self described gay men were born with the epigentic tags, activating the homosexual genes.

Meaning ~30% of the fags DID NOT HAVE THE TAGS CAUSING HOMOSEXUALITY. Thus giving credence to the Idea that people can be conditioned to certain sexual behavior by their upbringing.

IE degenerate faggot culture can rape little boys into being gay.

Work on your reading comprehension

Then go burn you filthy sodomite.

Yeah we need to conduct more research to fully understand what is going on. Doesn't mean there is proof of any of your claims that sexual orientation is voluntary, malleable, or triggered by trauma directly.

Nobody ever said there was one gay gene which 100% of gay people share, lmoa.

Yes exposing children to this in a positive context has no effect goyim

Please hang yourself faggot.

>thread about sex
>gays all over the thread
>yay finally my opinion matters

it doesnt

Prove that it does. Positive claims require evidentiary support.

This is totally not learned behavior right?

Did you pay any attention to his post?

That kid was already a flamer. You can keep rotating through your set of inflammatory anecdotes, it means nothing in a larger context.

I don't know why you find it so shocking that male effeminate gay children exist. They always have.

I never mentioned correlation or causation. Homosexuality is a curable disease, but you fight that idea because it's part of your identity. Curing it would be akin to killing a part of yourself.

psychologytoday.com/blog/real-healing/201208/overexposed-and-under-prepared-the-effects-early-exposure-sexual-content

>High-Risk Sex. The earlier a child is exposed to sexual content and begins having sex, the likelier they are to engage in high-risk sex. Research shows that children who have sex by age 13 are more likely to have multiple sexual partners, engage in frequent intercourse, have unprotected sex and use drugs or alcohol before sex. In a study by researcher Dr. Jennings Bryant, more than 66 percent of boys and 40 percent of girls reported wanting to try some of the sexual behaviors they saw in the media (and by high school, many had done so), which increases the risk of sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies.

>Sex, Love and Relationship Addictions. Not every child who is exposed to sexual content will struggle with a mental health disorder, but research shows that early exposure to pornography is a risk factor for sex addictions and other intimacy disorders. In one study of 932 sex addicts, 90 percent of men and 77 percent of women reported that pornography was a factor in their addiction. With the widespread availability of explicit material on the Internet, these problems are becoming more prevalent and are surfacing at younger ages.

>Sexual Violence. According to some studies, early exposure (by age 14) to pornography and other explicit material may increase the risk of a child becoming a victim of sexual violence or acting out sexually against another child. For some people, habitual use of pornography may prompt a desire for more violent or deviant material, including depictions of rape, torture or humiliation. If people seek to act out what they see, they may be more likely to commit sexual assault, rape or child molestation.

I hope faggotry becomes illegal and you disgusting shitlickers are given the death penalty.

That said nothing about trauma CAUSING homosexuality.

Except "gay cures" have been proven only to be a form of psychological torture and cannot alter innate neurological properties causing people to be attracted to the same or opposite sex. At least be honest that you just want to torture gay people for being different.

Does conversion therapy work:

archive.is/uPIbi

>women get more turned on by other women

a vagina's role is to take dicks, that's all it does.

fuck these people publishing this shit expect us to be dense.

>Concepts can't apply
>Early exposure
>increase the risk of a child becoming a victim
>or acting out sexually
I thought fags were supposed to have higher IQ.

That's because "gay cures" have never focused on treating viruses, bacteria or other pathogens, but instead on trying to fix the behavior/brain itself with terrible results.

Curing homosexuality should be like trying to cure any other disease, with simple, humane medicine.

Yeah we are smart enough to realize your vague claims are not directly supported by any evidence.

[citation needed]

It's saying that homosexual women have the same strong gender bias as men. A lesbian has a man's brain and is attracted only to women. Heterosexual women have a more elastic sexuality.

>[citation needed]
Why are you so afraid I might be right? Oh wait, I already said it:

>simple, humane medicine
>medicine
>Zyclone B
>KLEK

>Refuses to admit their culture has an adverse affect on children.

Faggots need to suffer. I think the Tepes treatment would be adequate. As well as provide a warning to others.

>x is true
>prove it
>you're just afraid im right!!!
Very sad.

Science on gays as parents:

archive.is/9sqNr

Lotta bullshit words to come to the same description of human nature thats been true since the beginning of time. Everything is some mix of nature vs nurture. Ancient greece and rome encouraged boy fucking so there were alot of boy fuckers. If you kill all the gays there will be less gays but there will always be some element of homo faggots.

Gays and trannies fucking disgust me. I wish they hadn't have got so good at making retrovirals for those faggots, AIDS was killing off the fags at a good clip. AIDS/HIV is practically nonexistent in the hetero community because regular sex doesnt cause tearing and blood transfer.
Its a fucking shame that the fags and trannys are allowed to flaunt their degenerate behavior in public.

discord gg/7dJybrm

add a .

fMRI studies are not real science. Come on.

I'm not believing this shit until there are AT LEAST three other independent groups that manage to find the same results.

Go to table 1
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535560/
Notice how rates of faggotry goes up with sexual abuse.

This is the most disgusting picture I have ever seen in my life. No kid should ever be raised by queers, EVER.

one of them has his mouth open in the soyboy smile too, disgusting trash

Gay kids are easier to take advantage of. Correlation does not imply causation. Nowhere in the study do the authors suggest anything like what you are implying.

Prove that homosexuality happens without any identifiable cause at all. Saying it's caused by a pathogen makes sense, since it presents an obvious reason why so many people would deviate from the genetic norm for seemingly no reason and to no benefit. Homosexuals always support the idea that homosexuality is not a choice, but when pressed to explain what the cause is, they act offended that it has to have a cause at all. They act as if it's exempt from causality, as if homosexuality simply occurs out of thin air. Because if a cause can be identified, then it can be stopped. They don't want it to be stopped because it's a part of their identity. They see themselves as an underdog, or worse as "right" and that the heterosexuals are the ones that need to be fixed. The parasites that infect their mind will not go down without a fight.

...

>this faggot shill again

sage

Seriously, once we can start doing eugenics for real in the next 20-60 years the faggots are gonna go extinct, why burden your kid with being in the outsider group when you can just edit the fag genes out. Same is going to happen with the MAOA gene, down syndrome gene, etc.

stream.org/yes-childhood-sexual-abuse-often-contribute-homosexuality/

The outcomes

1. A non-negligible number of respondents were miscounted as having been raised in LM or GF households. The sources of these potential errors—which we estimate to exceed one-third of Regnerus’s subsample of LM and GF—were the inclusion of individuals whose highly implausible responses to other questions call all of their responses into doubt, individuals who reported living in these households for a very short period of time, and individuals whose responses in the calendar data were incompatible with the original categorization of being raised in a LM of GF household.

2. A number of other methodological and modeling decisions made by Regnerus—decisions that have plausible alternatives that at minimum should be checked to assess the robustness of the patterns—appear to artificially inflate the differences between LM/GF and IBF households.

3. Once corrections to these potential coding errors and alternatives to these methodological choices are made, the putative disadvantage in the outcome profile of respondents from same-sex parent families (both single-parent LM and GF house- holds and two-parent LM and GF households) decreases dramatically—with some of the remaining differences not ‘‘sub- optimal’’ (e.g., whether or not the respondent identifies as entirely heterosexual and the number of other-sex partners) or a function of one or two influential cases.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X1500085X

stop replying to fagposters

No proof. Sad.

It's sad how they always post the same study when there are plenty of studies showing otherwise.

Fags are biological dead ends that try to bring the rest of civilisation down with them.

The big issue is that there's no group looking to find a connection between genetics and homosexuality. Finding a connection between downs or retardation and DNA is simple enough, but when it comes to determining a genetic cause for homosexuality the scientific community flinches because they're afraid of being threatened or accused of a hate crime.

And what proof have you presented?

>damage control
You are adding your own opinion to the data

The fact is
Children that are abused are more likely to be gay

>Taken together, the findings of the NFSS strongly suggest that there are differences between children raised by a parent who had a same-sex relationship and children raised in an intact, biological, married family when it comes to social, emotional, and relational outcomes. By drawing from a large, random sample of the American population rather than a small convenience sample, by interviewing the children in their young-adult years rather than their parents, and by comparing them to the children of intact, biological families rather than only to children of divorced, stepparent, adoptive, or single-parent families, the NFSS found important and wide-ranging differences between young adults raised by their own, biological, married parents and young adults who reported having a mother in a same-sex relationship, and to a lesser degree, those who reported having a father in the same.

Fags make poor parents and force their "gender fluid" ideology onto their children.
familystructurestudies.com/summary

The main issue is gay marriage has been around for, at the longest, 17 years now in the Netherlands, so we have zero data comparing gay and straight married couples on raising kids. So Christians do these disingenuous studies mainly comparing single gay parents to married straight parents and claim that's proof gays shouldn't be allowed to adopt or hire surrogates, which is really a silly argument as it is stuck in a paradox.

see image

Can I read the article without purchasing it?

Prison proved that heterosexuals can become homosexuals. Homosexuality can easily be acquired via environment.

I already responded and explained why Regnerus conducted poor quality research. He merely compared gay single parents to straight married parents in a failed effort to try to stop gay marriage from becoming legal.

Gay kids are vulnerable to abuse. Correlation does not imply causation.

Gay men and lesbian women earn 10% more than their heterosexual peers:

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/soej.12233/full

ibtimes.com/study-having-gay-parents-does-not-affect-childs-gender-identity-2579343

Link to above study: pastebin.com/PaAFXqQj

type that link into sci-hub.tw

I figure eventually even without explicitly looking for it there will be enough information and processing power that it could be figured out by process of elimination. For instance imagine if in 40 years a premier DNA-typing company is going to have a massive database of millions of DNA profiles, running a regression on them with regards to faggots are going to turn up some genes.

Genome-Wide Association Study of Male Sexual Orientation:

archive.is/gdhmT