Race Realism and God

>Some 3.3 Million Haitians are food insecure
>Around 25% of the children in Haiti are chronically malnourished
>These are the same indicators as Sub-Saharan Africa
>The same levels...

Despite living under a successful farming colony run by the French, the freed African slaves of Haiti were able to recreate the conditions of their native Africa in less than 400 years. This is despite the fact that the Domenican Republic, which is on the same island, does not suffer anywhere near the same levels of poverty. Why the difference? Race. Haiti is 95% African and Haiti is only 15%.

The blackest black pill I have swallowed during my time on Sup Forums is that of race realism. That our behavior, intelligence, preferences, predication to violence, and our very future are decided by an arbitrary pairing of 4 letters. Nothing that you do can ever change the fate sealed by these letters. If you are dumb, that is it. You are dumb and you will be poor. Genes are mechanistic, and care not for the feelings of the humans they influence.

For those of you who believe in God, how do you deal with this issue? Look at the levels of human suffering in places like Haiti and Africa. Starvation, genocide, poverty, famine. All of it due to the lack of a couple of genes. How do you justify this? How does God explain himself? For other race realists, how does this reality make you feel? Do you feel pity?

I am spiraling into a deep depression my fellow Sup Forumslocks. How do we deal with the problems posed by race realism?


youtube.com/watch?time_continue=290&v=s3337cj4sJQ

Other urls found in this thread:

bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-15/chile-weighs-impact-of-alleged-manipulation-of-world-bank-report
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

This. The surest fire way of measuring a country's prosperity is not religion, culture or anything like that. It's purely race.

The worst white country is still better than the best brown country, and the worst brown country is still better than the best black country. Nothing else comes into the equation.

As for the God question, it's actually this very matter that made me lose faith in religion. There's simply no explanation as to why a merciful God would create niggers and then doom them to destitution and starvation because of their own retarded intellect.

The worst thing is that race-mixing and admixture is possible, which means that we can't even dismiss niggers as some sort of animal or lesser being religiously-speaking, as unfortunately they are able to pollute our own genetic pool.

Easy.
A good life on earth is not the end goal of God according to the Bible. God's mercy is not that we have easy lives, but that we can come back to Him after living in sin and Rejecting Him. His mercy is that we receive eternal life from belief. I would also note that Jesus, Peter and Paul all had difficult lives and were killed. The prosperity gospel is dumb.

>The worst thing is that race-mixing and admixture is possible

That's what hits me the hardest too. If at least we weren't able to interbreed, we could hand wave it away and say they're some other species that has little to do with us. But despite the massive differences we have, we can still produce fertile offspring. That we can doom ourselves to their fate if our population tilts just a little too much their way.

I don't hate niggers, I pity them and I wish there was a way too help them. But from a distance. Every time I learn something new about the world, it i always the worst possible scenario. The worst possible thing you could imagine. I feel like we're in hell user.

>YHWH wants us to suffer and our race to die
>It's his mercy
The jews are mercy killing us.

What about if you are too low IQ to even understand the Gospel? People with IQs below the mid 60's range have serious problems understanding abstract ideas and principles. How can you teach a people about sin and absolution when they don't even have separate words for square and triangle? That is a serious problem. If people are so low iQ they can't comprehend and apply the Gospel's principles, how could it possibly be universal?

>how does this reality make you feel?
Good, because I'm white.
>How do we deal with the problems posed by race realism?
Remove the lesser races obviously.

The simple truth of the matter is ultimately that life is not meant to be fair, and humans are a byproduct of evolution and nature. Nature is a cruel, heinous process - evolution, for example, literally entails that organisms without the right genetics to survive literally die. That is how cruel the natural world is - the very process that drives all life forward needs unimaginable suffering and pain in order to function.

Because of our orderly civilizations, we believe there must be some form of order and justice in the natural world, and ultimately reality. But this is simply not true, there is no order nor justice in the animal kingdom, and morality is absolutely not universal.

The very best thing that we can do for blacks, and other non-whites, is to simply leave them alone. Most importantly, stop the military interventions that are killing them, driving them out of their homelands, and pushing them into white countries. Stop enforcing the spread of Western values and morality onto people who have lived perfectly well without them for thousands of years. I see many people on here arguing that Secularism, Christianity, Western Civilization, etc, these values need to dominate the rest of the world - but why? Each people evolved to its environment, and there's no higher arrogance or ability to cause suffering than imposing your will on those who don't want it.

That's not a Dawkins quote and it isn't in that book.

I'm well aware that races are real, and Dawkins does admit that. But he would never admit the obvious facts about IQ, crime, etc. and the different races.

Did you experience no empathy when you learned about rr? I mean your own group's intelligence is not of your doing, its completely and totally genetic. Random. Does that bring up any questions about the nature of reality?

God hates niggers.

Thank you user for the kinds words. You make a lot of sense. I'd love to go back to how things were, but we're entering a brave new world of technological global integration. Can we really keep people apart? That's my greatest fear right now. There's almost no real way to stop global integration short of building massive walls around our countries and cutting all outside contact. But if we allow integration, it's going to create race mixing and pollution with inferior genes. We're in a unique situation in human history, travel has never been easier - and it has serious implication on genetic populations.

>Did you experience no empathy when you learned about rr?
No, I don't really know why I would.

>I mean your own group's intelligence is not of your doing, its completely and totally genetic.
How could one's intelligence be of their own doing?

>Does that bring up any questions about the nature of reality?
No, since it fits perfectly within the theory of evolution.

I'm not saying it doesn't fit the the theory of evolution, but it's not exactly obvious that would be true. Before we thought that evolution took place over millions of years. I mean the Manatee has not changed in 45 million years. Great whites unchanged for 16 million years.

But humans on the other hand have seen rapid evolution. Just 6 million years ago we were literally apes. And in 70,000 years all the separate races came about. Those are rapidly fast changes, not at all intuitive to our previous thinking on evolution.

There are still plenty of ways to stop global integration. If Islamists won in the Middle East for example, they would ban immigration to Western countries and make their regions more isolationist. This in fact is why Western countries launch interventions against Islamist groups - they don't want their source of cheap labour to be dried up.

There are similar movements in Africa, India, China and other places that want to separate from Western influence and stop globalization too, although they are smaller so they are not as reported on by the news.

The problem is that most of Sup Forums is just simply too stupid and have knee-jerk reactions, so when they see a Black Nationalist or an Islamist, instead of co-operating and helping the people to separate, they want them to be bombed/killed/arrested because they see them as the boogieman enemy. And yet on the other hand, some "based Trump-supporting black", who is far more likely to pollute and destroy the genetic pool by race-mixing with white people, is heralded as a paragon of virtue by much of Sup Forums. That's the inherent problem we face today.

If all the people who wanted separation worked together, tomorrow the existence of every religion, every culture and every race would be assured. But because these groups do not work together, they will invariably lose until they learn to co-operate.

Blacks have existed for 200,000-300,000 years actually. Caucasians and Mongoloids only formed about 40,000-50,000 years ago, splitting off from a group of Negroids that left the African continent circa 100,000 years ago, and then split in the Middle East 70,000 years ago to head in two directions - one to Asia, this group ended resulting in Mongoloids, and one to Europe, this group formed in Caucasians.

I should also note that the process of formation didn't complete until 12,000 years ago for Caucasians and Mongoloids. For Caucasians, the final step was the evolution of light skin, and the blue eye mutation which spread across Europe. For Mongoloids, it was the destruction of the proto-Mongoloid type (see Ainu for the last survivors) by the Neo-Mongoloids.

Ukraine isn't better than Chile.
Pakistan isn't better than Trinidad and Tobago.

Trinidad and Tobago is a mixed country, not pure black. And they benefit immensely from their position as a tax haven and tourist resort. I am excluding natural resources, otherwise Gulf Countries for example would be classified as more developed than many white countries.

As for Chile, it never suffered under Communism.

Trinidad and Tobago is actually a very interesting example, because its almost completely nonwhite. Half thecountry is African, a third Indian, and the other third a mix of other smaller minorities. Yet it's the richest country in the Caribbean. It's crime rate is high now, but in the 80's it was quite low. I guess that is an good example of what a successful black country would look like.

Stop being a fag and maybe good will love you

Shill thread.
THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
>THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
>THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
>THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
>THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
>THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
>THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
>THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI
>THE CLINTONS RAPED HAITI

The Clintons stole money from Haiti, but they didn't literally eat the forest like the Haitians did. You can't blame the Clintons for how bad Haiti is right now, the problem is long standing and more complex than that.

Can always count on good discussion from the perfidious leafs.

We are under socialism now, and the world bank has to lie to make it look like we do worse than what we actually do.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-15/chile-weighs-impact-of-alleged-manipulation-of-world-bank-report

I was planning on moving to Chile is shit hit the fan, is that something I should reconsider? I heard Pinochet's grandson is starting a new political party, so I have great hope more communists will be thrown out of helicopters.

They are following Gods plan. Their purpose is dreamed in the mind of God.
Just like the butterfly that lives for a day.