Would Pol rather

Would Sup Forums rather live in a communist country that is five or take 95% - 100% white, or a fascist country that is 65% - 75% white. Ethnic cleansing isn’t an option in this scenario.

Other urls found in this thread:

nytimes.com/2016/03/13/opinion/sunday/stalinist-nostalgia-in-vladimir-putins-russia.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I'd rather live in a communist country that is 30% white.

The one with food.

commies are niggers

>fascist country then

Well the numbers remain the same permanently? In that case I go with the communists. As would any nationalist. Who cares about the system? What matters is the race

What kind of shitty fascist country doesn't have ethnic cleansing as an option, get that pop warner tier shit outta here

this desu, the system of government is much easier to change than the demographics

When your this jewish they call you schomo

So would you rather live in a nazbol eastern bloc or the american empire?

The answer is easy, eastern bloc any day of the week.

The other 5% of the communist country are obviously jews. I would go to fascist country, the nonwhites would be slaves or lower class work force.

Also this. Whatever happens, if these numbers are going to stay the same permanently I don't have to fear my people dying out completely or being absorbed by masses of brown people no matter what stupid shit happens

Fascist. I like food what can I say. Hopefully the mix is 75% white 25% Italian.

>ethnic cleansing isn't an option in this scenario
that literally makes zero sense, i'd still pick the fascist country though

No you faggot what matters is how many kikes are in your country.

you forgot about stalin and the whole doctor's plan and note spiel

tldr; in the years before stalin's death he figured out what was going on and was removing jews from all positions in the state - this was a year before he arrested a ring of jewish doctors who was planning to assasinate him, and he was literally drafting up plans to deport jews in the USSR to siberia before he (((mysteriously))) died.

There's a reason he's so universally vilified and smeared, even to this day.

anything but communism you fool, because it doesn't matter what everybody's skin color is when you're being to the gulag, starving, and the state itself is going to [collapse]

>but muh racial purity!
sadly economics doesn't care so much for racial purity: communism is inherently self-destructive -- it can't even answer the Socialist Calculation Problem lmao -- and so collapse is inevitable independent of race if you are a commie. although shitskins ARE more likely to be commies than not (see chinks and south america)

>nazbol flag
huh?

>muh starving meme
>flag

instantly disregarded

There are no kikes in the country if it is 100% White. So problem solved

Fascist, there will be marginally more food.

Fascist. It’s only a matter of time until we remove the darkies.

what the fuck would be the point of a fascist country if it's still a negrified melting pot?

Facist. What are you, some sort of cock gobbler? That’s an easy question

You can pretend it was a meme or not, your historical revisionism doesn't account for the fundamental flaw that a socialist system would have a hard time determining the price of something as simple as BREAD

and why is determining the price of bread so significant? Because prices are nothing more than signals: what is expensive tends to be scarce, so people privately make more of it. Meanwhile, what is cheap tends to be plentiful so people focus their resources elsewhere. In a communist system, the state says bread is always plentiful for propaganda purposes without letting people know the truth, hence mass starvation

the state cannot afford to lie, it needs the moral unlike private property where the truth is painful but there: bread is X price, if you can undercut it to be cheaper then start a bread business. If not, then the bread market is oversaturated as it is and so businessmen can focus creating resource abundance with something else. No mass starvation.

basically you are economically illiterate as are most commies and their sympathizers

>Well the numbers remain the same permanently? In that case I go with the communists. As would any nationalist. Who cares about the system? What matters is the race
is this is joke?

Which stage of Communism? The early part where its super nice or the later part where im starving and government has decided that my city has too many dissidents so we need to be exterminated by gunfire? I am going to assume you meant Totalitarian Fascism. The only other Fascism i can think of is Communism/Socialism.

Some jews can be considered white but not many

>Ethnic cleansing isn't an option
Ethnic cleansing is always an option

>the only other fascism i can think of is communism/socialism
>flag
ebin

i forgot that breadlines appearing in the final years of the USSR, when it was in a state of freefall due to Brezhnev's inability to reform and Gorbachev's half-assed attempts at reforming when it was too late was amazing proof that everybody was starving all the time and that >muh free markets always provided

Depends on how livable they are. Tito's Yugoslavia and post-Stalin East Germany would be better than a Nazi Reich.

In a truly Fascist society, with no handouts or gibs me dats or affirmative action for the lazy, the non-white riff-raff will slowly sink to the bottom of society and become irrelevant. So to answer your question, Fascism, because under Fascism niggers don't matter.

east germany was a meme by the end of the 80's and they were always the most progressive retards in the eastern bloc.

they were the only ones who really gave a shit about >muh african liberation or the fags

tldr; g*rmans can't do ideology right

If the goal is to have a 100% White nation then naturally I pick the option that achieves this goal. That is called realpolitiks and is actually one of the pillars of fascism anyway. So really the 100% White communist state would be more fascist than the 70% LARP-state

oh user. ethnic cleansing is always an option.

Nice argument.

Communist because it will fail btfoing all socialists for a good 100 years then be a 95% republic again and any democrat at that point that tries socialism will be crucified.

this

>Stalin or any other commie leader getting smeared
Yeah, that's why russians still suck his cock in 2018 and holding socialist views are more acceptable than nationalist/fascist ones?

nytimes.com/2016/03/13/opinion/sunday/stalinist-nostalgia-in-vladimir-putins-russia.html

Fascist figures like Hitler, Mussolini or Codreanu are the ones demonized just because they never wanted kikes or niggers in their countries, while your commie figures are even praised, despite starving and killing their population.

my ultimate paradise is a world without jews

See if you had any critical thought, you should ask WHY is it that communist systems try to implement free markets eventually such as in regards to the USSR and China. The "free market" isn't magic -- it is just people trading with more private property. But when you have distorted market signals for so long, of course the adjustment period will be painful as people have to determine the natural real price of things from scratch

Removing band aids hurts, but at least the real foundational problems can be examined instead of just covering it up with more band aids -- meaning it will hurt even more upon removal. The USSR may have treated some of its symptoms, but not the disease of communism at its final stages: always a return to free markets, because you have strangled prices to mean nothing but propaganda

understanding economics is the key to understanding politics, not the other way around. Economics is what makes resources, politics is what can only take and redistribute it i.e. divide, instead of multiplying like with free markets

>implying stalin doesn't get smeared

>>I don't have to fear my people dying out completely or being absorbed by masses of brown people no matter what stupid shit happens

What if they turn into ghetto hoodlums? Looting, loose pants, breeding without rearing, broken dialects, etc? If race is all you care about, than what if your race devolved into hoodlums under that system? Might as well bring back the niggers.

The only reason Stalin gets smeared, is because he wasn't like Lenin( who allowed degeneracy, destroyed gender roles and nationalism, and permitted faggots), not because of his murders or failures.

Now compare that to the smear fascist leaders get. 6 million holocaust movies from Hollywood as well.

That wouldn't happen. Even if it did, there would still be a chance to turn things back around. With niggers there's no hope.