Evolved Sexual Preference

First, let's clear one thing up: while instincts exist, they are limited to PHYSICAL reflexes.

That is, one's disposition towards sexuality is entirely rational- from imitation to a fully thought out sexual philosophy- with most people being a compromise between these 2 extremes. If you shirk the notion that you choose your sexual philosophy, then you're doomed to living a sexual philosophy that you believe you can't change- when you can.

Given that Sup Forums skews towards both asociality and high intelligence, Sup Forums is predisposed to thinking in lieu of imitation. And given society's cost/benefit of marriage and family, a Pollack's sexual philosophy skews towards traps- traps offer a comparable sexual experience to that of women, without the detriment of children or the female temperament.

You are a man, be rational.

traps are still gay

having sex with gay men with a mental illness that dress and look like women is still gay, op.

Detriment of children?

The quality of being a trap, requires the presequite of having been born with XY chromosomes. Since these set of chromosomes determine a member of our species to be male, you are having sex with a male. Having sex with men as a man is gay, ergo traps are homosexual.

>while instincts exist, they are limited to PHYSICAL reflexes.

explain hypergamy.

Bitch.

Furfags are better than trapfags these days. At least Furfags are not promoting their degenerate shit as normal anymore.

They both deserve the rope though.

>women cannot consciously pursue high status males

>costs $300,000
>gives nothing
How are children not the definition of detriment?

>they are limited to PHYSICAL reflexes.
Yeah, like the gag reflex. Fuck off trapfag.

Guess you don't want to pass on your genes then?

Also you decide the amount of money you spend on your children yourself.

>pass on your genes
>your

Highly intelligent???? Well i guess in Special Ed there is one Tard slightly smarter than the rest.

Alright dude just tell me the sauce

?

this is a false premise. your entire argument is based on a lie.

This is the biggest back packing tier mental gymnacism to self validate being a faggot I've ever seen.

It's a bait thread this leaf has already made a bunch of times. It's an excuse to spam traps on Sup Forums by some antifa dork.

>>women cannot consciously pursue high status males

>Instincts are only physical
>Hypergamy don't count.

>posting the same thread
>with the same pic
>twice a day
>for at least the last two weeks

If you want to fuck a ladyboy do it, we don't care.

>If you want to fuck a ladyboy do it, we don't care.
What I want is for casual gay sex to be the norm for all men. Just like most men lick girl's cunts.

Yep, all true.

>What I want is for casual gay sex to be the norm for all men. Just like most men lick girl's cunts.
go fuck a pussy you fucking leaf. 90% no i'll up that to 98% of today's problems are caused by your idea of "casual gay sex" yeah that's right we know what you are up to. it is pretty easy to see that you just want more dick. i say it again go fuck a pussy you pussy

It’s the same Jewish/CIA psyops and sad thing is people are stupid enough to fall for it

checked and correct

>Sup Forums skews towards both asociality
not socialising with scum isn't asociality

>whines about white genocide
>still a virgin