Is Sup Forums a Libertarian or a National Socialist board?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
...
Depends on the circumstances.
Its a Christian board.
It's a Trump board. And anyone who disagrees is a Shareblue democrat shill!!
>Current year
>not being a NAZI
user please
We want to preserve the white race because we are the only race who gives a fuck about freedom
Divide and conquer shill, fuck off.
This is the only true answer. Both ideologies are right on various topics.
I'd say most of us are a mish mash of the two
...
National Libertarianism
depends on the disposition of the left, but Sup Forums actually isn't NatSoc/fashy, because most here are free market on the economy.
It's a nazi board with a healthy portion of libertarians who are only fooling themselves and don't want to believe their ideas aren't popular here.
This is perfect.
We should be a libertarian board but these gay ass nazi loving statists think they need to control every aspect of society like communists.
I like Sup Forumsls
Here's one I did a couple of month's ago.
Both and neither. Those are ideologies that belong in the 20th century. They have had a surge in the public consciousness throughout the last decade because the future is a synthesis of the two.
Our memes are 10 times better than anyone.
Americans have a hard time thinking like a NatSoc. They are afraid of the word socialism. They also hold a very unhealthy lust for revenge against black people for ruining their neighborhoods.
The same hold true for Bongs, scary word socialism and they want to kill all blacks it seems.
All those two countries have to look forward to is a libertarian Nationalism or an ethno nationalist state which would require a race war and complete destruction of society to make it happen.
Canada and most of Europe will be National Socialist by simply embracing nationalism.
National "White Power" Libertarian
there I fixed that for ya
lolberts make this poll every month and always get angry when NatSoc bros BTFO of them
the truth is that Sup Forums is neither however. it's a right wing authoritarian board in the broadest sense, not necessarily just NatSoc
This
...
Neither. This is Juche board.
I like fascist snek
FPBP
Pol is an Islamic Prayer Rug Weaving board of peace
>that schnozz
they know
Both
Libertarians will not have their nap violated by the NS state. Unless they are traitors or paracites.
National Libertarianism.
It's pretty evenly split right now.
I thought it was a pemmican recipe sharing board.
1 part Lard
2 parts dried field berries
2 parts dehydrated meat
I'll take fascism over 100% distilled gay any day
Everything on Sup Forums is exactly half and half. This is what drives the left bonkers because how the fuck can we function in such chaos let alone thrive?
Why not both?
me on the left
A bit more "National Socialist" than Libertarian, but most of the "National Socialists" are white nationalists who don't usually care much about the specific government system or economic system.
The fundamental differences between the two are on the liberty-duty axis, whether wars are solely defensive or possibly offensive, and whether production and consumption is a good in itself.
thats... that's not a very good recipe.
Natsocs are pathetic larpers who are such delusional pussies they wouldn't dare mention that they're nazis in public
Nazism is truly the basement dweller's ideology of choice
National Libertarians
noice
better thread here
Its why we share recipes, to discuss better and tastier versions
Both
>Northern forest nigger cuisine
Libertarian Socialists
Nazis are Germany and they are all dead now. I am a proud National Socialist and dont ever hide that. White Nationalists are the basement dwelling LARPers
Bannock Master race here, we must secure the existence of our Bannock Recipes, and a future for fried dough
this
Neither.
Cultural appropriation is a gud thing
>because how the fuck can we function in such chaos let alone thrive?
this, and every once in a while it forms the perfect autism storm
>pic related
Forever and always. Unsere Hitler
I'm a proud SJW and I'm not afraid to admit that in public! If the majority of the room are not something other than me obviously...
+1 Like
Sup Forums is a "Roman Repvblica", it is always national-socialist the only thing that changes is authority, a dictatorship for 6 months in time of need.
Its both. Sup Forums has no definite ideology, all ideologies are free to post their ideals here. Whether they stand up to criticism is another matter.
We just ride out the raids, then return to periodically dump our Counter-Semitic infograph folders
...
It's a nazi-libertarian board.
Yea, but responding to OP natsoc is a philosophy, libertarian is a system, so they fit quite well together.
...
...
I think most NatSoc agree with a Libertarian system, assuming that the Ideal has been reached. That which is white supremacy within our countries. As long as that has not been achieved there is no sense in having a libertarian system. Freedom of association and free speech, as long as Jews and their useful idiots are around, will result in the exact same situation that is happening at this moment for white populations. That is, the deracination, the "post-national, post-racial" civilization that is promoted by insidious Jews.
lol
A fasces made of sneks. Interesting
someone should draw a bundle of snakes.
There can be overlap, but the difference between libertarianism and natsoc comes down to the foundational principles.
Libertarianism boils down to the NAP being the only real moral axiom
Natsoc is about doing things that are a net benefit to your people/society/etc.
So I can agree with libertarians on 95% of policies. Not necessarily because I'm a diehard fan of >muh NAP, but because a lot of free market policies are objectively better. But I also have no problem using state force to deport shitskins, keep mud people out, banning porn (or at least killing the big porn industry, whether or not people upload homemade stuff isn't something I care about), etc. The main point is to not be ideologically shackled and loyal to an idea rather than YOUR PEOPLE. Theoretically if there's a particular policy that's socialist but would be a net benefit, I'd have no problems implementing it. Likewise if there's a free market policy that would be a net benefit, I'd have no problems implementing that either.
I also believe that more/less authoritarianism is needed depending on the situation. In dire times you might need to resort to more authoritarian practices, whereas in times of peace and prosperity, we can dial shit back. All theoretically, of course, but you see what I mean.
>88
nice numbers Mr Hoxha
I can't be a natsoc since I'm antisocial.
> Is Sup Forums a Libertarian or a National Socialist board?
I'm thinking Libertarian by the way some people behave.
...
See .
We started out as lolbergs and started moving more to the right.
This.
Libertarians assume that all will fall in line with the NAP morals.
NatSoc knows they will not, so builds a society where it could happen.
They are kindred.
I think there are fundamentally two types of people who get drawn into libertarianism
1) those who are drawn in by the economic arguments, who just want to be able to do various ventures but keep meeting brick walls of red tape bullshit and such
2) those who are drawn in by the social arguments. You know, the people who are into libertarianism because they don't want to be judged for their dragon dildos and whatever the fuck.
The ironic part is that #2 don't actually understand the consequences of libertarianism. In a true libertarian society, degeneracy would be defacto purged because nobody wants to do business with or associate with fucking degenerates. People could easily band together to keep degenerates and undesirables out of their communities, in the same way we used to do before the civil rights movement bullshit. It's not like we ever needed laws enforcing policies like no women in the workplace, no fags traipsing around, etc.
i ment a better one, but its still pretty good
Also forgot to say that #1 includes all the people who are consciously/subconsciously tired of paying tons of taxes and other hidden costs for welfare programs that siphon money to niggers. That's a huge part of it.
I think a ton of people become libertarian because it's a way to rationalize not wanting to support niggers without outright stating such.
Both. Most people want a combo of Hoppe and Hitler on here. Actually I'm convinced that if you took this board and morphed it into one leader, that person would probably be a racist Pinochet who argues about Traps, faps to anime, and wears Hugo Boss.
we have our flag... but the colors are shit
>yellow?
This
I'm in the first category because my dad is a professor of economics and we used to debate things when I was a kid. He kept the Marxist mind virus from infecting me.
Natsoc is winning the poll, and that is with likely many non-whites voting libertarian. If it were only white people voting, the margin of victory would likely be much greater for natsoc. It is also possible that some non-whites are also natsoc though.
Is there a name for half Spanish half German other than 'Fuentes'?
I think that's wrong, most of my friends that lean towards libertarianism do so because of the moral arguments. That it's wrong to initiate force against people, everything about libertarianism can be extrapolated from one core principle, the NAP (Non Aggression Principle)
It's likely in a libertarian society that you'd get many disparate communities which buy up land and come to some mutual agreement about how that community will behave and self moderate, and no doubt you'd get the anti-degeneracy communities and then you'd get communities of accepting people who either aren't bothered morally by dragon dildos OR who simply don't want to pay the extra cost of having that bias (in libertarian communities, biases that aren't based in any way on some kind of value would merely make your life more expensive.
In fact that's part of why libertarianism would lead much more quickly to irradiating irrationality such as moral outrage at harmless things, because competing against people who don't hold them irrational views would be harder and so individuals bear the impact of that bias, it cannot be a socialized cost.
It's my perspective that if non-whites voted just like whites and we didn't have state education, then Natsoc really wouldn't be needed; however, we know that this isn't the case.
And the thing there is that national socialism isn't even *necessarily* a white nationalist ideology. Theoretically you could have national socialism or fascism (broad sense) in a multiethnic society and have it structured more like an empire. People naturally self-segregate anyway, mind you.
I'm not even shilling for "civic fascism" or anything like that here, but I'm just pointing out that all the nonwhites out there could still theoretically argue for a third position rather than defaulting to pure libertarianism.
Too many redditors. The ratio should be 90-10 for NatSoc, but libertarian sjw fags from the_donald are ruining it.
Good analysis user
Pol is a nazbol board.
this
Both.
We're supposed to be a redpilled board. People are more concerned with propaganda than truth now a days though.
Natsoc and lolbert are ideologically contradictory.
So, there is a political correctness to Sup Forums?
Where is the brainless, cancerous faggots that can't stop watching BLACKED options? You fucking losers are nothing more.
>civic fascism
What the fuck is that? Maybe something like Chile under the General.
R A R E ?
>is the brainless, cancerous faggots
>are