Find a flaw

>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
>Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
>Unite humanity with a living new language.
>Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
>Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
>Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
>Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
>Balance personal rights with social duties.
>Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
>Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151119211415.htm
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3164163/It-s-official-Speaking-one-language-makes-smarter-Bilingual-people-grey-matter-know-mother-tongue.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-scarcity_economy
youtube.com/watch?v=xHiad18ZwcY
youtube.com/watch?v=L777RhL_Fz4
youtube.com/watch?v=7nUmEbjSoHs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

NWO sounds cozy desu senpai

...

FUCK ALL NWO NIGGERS

>>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

This won't work. A population this small would not be able to maintain a world government capable of population control.

Most of the rest is to vague to be of much help. Who decides what laws are petty or what reproduction is fit?

i believe the language part is actually one of the most interesting and deering aspects of those stones
allegedly you can pretty much mindcontroll people by controlling their language. if a certain language doesnt have a concept imbedded in it, if you are unable to properly express something with a language, then it is unlikely that someone thinks of that concept since he himself cant grasp it in his thoughts and much less express those to others. apparently people who speak multiple languages also seem to be smarter and have better cognitive functions meaning if suddenly everyone just speaks one language those will drop on a global scale as well. additionally this kinda supports my first statements as this person with multiple languages has now more languages to choose from to think of an concept widening his horizon.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151119211415.htm
dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3164163/It-s-official-Speaking-one-language-makes-smarter-Bilingual-people-grey-matter-know-mother-tongue.html
Now imagine why they want to try to make anything logical hatespeech? because if its forbidden to say it is forbidden to think and since people try to avoid social repercussions they abide to social customs.
also ask yourself why the georgia guidestones mention as a goal to unite all people under one language? because if they choose the which language the people speak they can also choose the mindset of the people.

also sage because NWO propaganda

I'd be down if I'm the one doing the culling.

>This won't work. A population this small would not be able to maintain a world government capable of population control.
Why not? What if they have some advanced zero point energy technology that allows it to happen?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-scarcity_economy

Sounds like some shitty sci fi utopian novel.

As long as there's money this will never happen.

Humans are educated chimps it'll take at least another million years to get that out of our system.

No I'm not a closet pinko

The idea is that they're going to kill 99% of the population and then implement new technology that will create a sort of utopia for those remaining. Without money or work.

Indeed. 500m vs 7bn chimps I wonder how that will pan out.

What is really spooky is when you start looking into language, units of measure, and the occult. Not only do some of the Imperial unites go back to Egypt and before but certain metric units appear encoded in structures like the great pyramid at GIza. So it would appear that metric was not discovered but rather reintroduced at a specific time by people in occult circles.

If you wanted to get a people to think in a certain way and rebuild a lost civilization what better way then to change how they think? The video is mathematical constants rather then unites of measure but it will give you a good idea. Spooky stuff is at work
youtube.com/watch?v=xHiad18ZwcY

>humanity under 500,000,000
sure will make absolute control and tyranny easy

>balance personal rights with social duties
you dont "balance" pesronal rights with social duties. those duties are the only thing making those rights possible. without those duties rights turn into retarded hand outs like we have today. sounds like a whoever made those goals doesnt have a fuckin clue on how the world actually works. wouldnt expect anything else from the Rosicrucian's. bunch of old men clinging to their dead dreams, time will stamp them out.

>500mil
Fine
>Diversity
They want brown to be the norm.
>New language
No. They want to destroy our history.
>Rule passion, faith, tradition, all things with reason
This is not advice for one's self but the ruling class. Those things are all anti reason. Once again, they seek to destroy our history and indeed our emotions.
>Protect people laws etc
Fine
>World court
Under whose authority? Because if UN resolutions were enforced the world would be nightmare right now
>Petty laws, useless officials
Under whose authority? Good in idea, terrifying in practice
>truth beauty w/e
It's fine but dangerous
>No cancer
Be not a cancer unto society, jews

Fuck off. Think even a little bit about these and they crumble.

ah yes, that video is really good, but it gets better
youtube.com/watch?v=L777RhL_Fz4
This one is partly about modern monuments and their meanings too, but at around 1:10:00 he starts talking about the pyramids, and how they encode the size of the earth in relation to the moon, as well as the speed of light with over 99% accuaricy.

youtube.com/watch?v=7nUmEbjSoHs
this video talks about how different monuments, from the pyramids, to stonehenge, to stuff in south america encode mathematical knowledge as well as functioning as a GPS telling people where they are currently if they know how to read the monuments, again showing that those "cavemen" were far more sophisticated than we care to admit as well as showing that there was some kind of global communication going on (not like the internet, but information where exchanged through traveling, trade or whatever despite southamerica not being discovered officially until thousands years later) since they all use the same system

>Unite everyone.
>Force different people to live under the same ideology.
literately opposite of what should be done. What if there were different places for all different types of people, everyone would be happy. Even nignogs could get there own island where gang assassinations would be legal. Nobody would ever break any laws, they could just move to a part where their exact wish is legal.

Don't see anything wrong with this.

Also lol these stones troll the fuck out of conspiracy fags. Money well spent.

>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

The fools that support this will not want population reduction to include their family lines.

Because it is darkness masked in light. Wolf in sheep's clothing. While it seems logical it contains no heart or spirit and does not honor creation. It seeks to control it. The nature of the author is one of a bad actor.

Source offers infinite abundance in all moments. The notion our world is broken until we achieve the items carved in stone is a falsehood. This is a representation of someone's dream, but not representative of truth.

The universe manifests and fosters life in all layers and dimensions of existence. They intertwine and seamlessly occupy the same space.

Humans can operate and should operate in harmony and balance with nature, but placing a hard limit on the power of creation and using your energy to maintain control is a fools errand.
Fear. Control. System.

Jump into a wading pool full of gasoline, and light a match!

Why hasn't this been destroyed yet?

>supporting (((diversity)))
>supporting (((globalism)))

1. Who decides which 500M? How is this enforced?
2. Who guides it? How is diversity measured within a small world population? How is fitness improved?
3. Who decides what works? When do we make the change, who has the most say on the structure of the language?
4. Tempered reason by whom? Compared to what? Who decides the balance, which is more important in an either or scenario?
5. Who determines the fairness of the law? And how is that different than what we currently have?
6. How does one become a member of the world court? How can ruling internally have any use if such fundamental aspect of society or dictated to us and intervened by the world court?
7. How is a petty law determined?
8. Is this something to strive for or something that is regulated and possible punished on failure to do so? Again who determines this?
9.Eye of the beholder, etc.
10. Is nature an entity that can be defined and quantified without our conclusion? Are we to act on the potential of a rising species or a dying one? Or is that more about seeing the earth as sentient, low pollution etc?

You see how I've answered these with mostly questions, that's because you're too vague and subjective and ask more questions than you answer.

God : stop lying and only laws you need are 10 commandments

Idiot rock guy : blah, blah, blah bullshit. Look, I made a rock. Bullshit bullshit look I made a rock. A rock. I write on it and stood it up. Rocks. Be non-fruitful and die off. Like my rock?

You're being culled. Just last.

>Maintain humanity under 500.000.000 in perpetual balance with nature.
This doesn't sound too bad but I'm pretty sure the world could handle 100 billion if it were all whites + japs and would live in a perfectly organized manner, and with that I don't mean a cold bureaucracy.

>Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
Sounds good.

>Unite humanity with a living new language.
English works just fine as the majority of the (relevant) world already uses it, so it would be kind of a wate of resources, but in the long term it might be beneficial.

>Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
Sounds good.

>Protect people and nations with fair laws and courts.
Sounds good.

>Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
This will inevitably lead to disagreements and tension as well as inefficiency. However, since culture shouldn't be merged and every ethnicity which deserves nationalism and pride should have it, then perhaps something like the states of USA could work, with a supreme government but other than that reasonable autonomy.

>Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Sure, but easier said than done.

>Balance personal rights with social duties.
Same as above.

>Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with infinite.
Just prize virtues, "harmony with the infinite" sounds vague and too mystic.

>Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature
Believe it or not, should be possible with my first proposal in mind.

...

Fuck EU niggers

Stonehenge is far superior. Nobody cares what Ted Turner has to say.

If the Aryans are 100% of the 500,000,000. Im in!

diversity means that people stay in their own countries and only breed with each other. multiculturalism is the death of diversity

>implying they won't depopulate the planet first before anything else

There's a reason why its the 1st commandment on the stones

Desu senpai, you sound like a fucking brainlet.

None of that accounts for the greedy shitlord humans and retarded edgelord Sup Forumstards.

You sound like a commie faggot.

He has spoken. Praise KEK.

>Humans can operate and should operate in harmony and balance with nature
That's impossible. "heart and spirit" exist in man, not in nature.

a bunch of hopelessly impractical utopian shit that would result in a dystopia if someone were to try to implement it in the world we live in

There are a handful of people who would never be controlled by such a state due to geography.

>>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
How are you going to reduce the population of the planet to that number without forced sterilizations and forced abortions? If not just flat out murder?

Bullshit. Just because a language lacks a word doesn't mean it can't be described. Eskimos has like 9 different words for snow. Since my language only has 1 word for 'snow' does that mean I lack the ability to understand or describe all the different kinds of snow?

That is only true for you because you fail to see the spirit in the ALL. Belief defines your box user. Separation is an illusion.

also (((who))) decides who is allowed to breed or live? surely only the gooddest of goyim will make it

>lso (((who))) decides who is allowed to breed or live?
Exactly.

We'd see in short order a mass amount of the population control would be pushed not onto the races that have the highest replacement birth rate (ie blacks) but the race with one of the lowest. (ie Whites)

>There are ≈500,000,000 whites
>perfect

Checked

newfags on the right?

I'm fine with just about everything the elites want. It's the tactics they use, the constant deception, the animalistic cunning - which makes them my target.

The world will be what they wanted but none of them will be around to see it.

That's the buttered up, spin version of the globalists plans.

Leme translate:

>>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

Kill 7 billion people, keep the survivors as dirt farming serfs.

>>Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.

Eugenics for "Diversity"

>>Unite humanity with a living new language.

Newspeak

>>Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.

LAWS FOR ALL THE THINGS!!!

>>Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.

World courts = World government

>>Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.

Same, world court = world government.

>>Avoid petty laws and useless officials.

No national leaders = global government.

>>Balance personal rights with social duties.

Slavery.

>>Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.

"Enrichment", and "seeking harmony with the infinite" = Death/Dumbing people down to basically animals.

>>Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

Feifdoms, restricted travel, depopulation, etc...


This shit is basically media/lawyer speak.

>get baby
>someone has to die

>>Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

ATWA.

>proclaim lofty ideals that will create an utopia society
>under the guise of implementing said ideals enact a power-grab that leaves millions dead and you in charge
>now that you killed the opposition there is nobody to ask why the utopian society isn't happening

Where have I seen this before.

The new language isn't esperanto right?

You are trying to use reason with someone who obviously thinks with his emotions.

People overthink this thing way too much, it's pretty clear that it's meant as some guy's message to a post apocalyptic future on how to prevent another disaster.

i'm not fond of the part where i and over 6 and a half billion people get killed off

the part where we entrust the government with reproduction, faith, tradition, and basically all aslpects of human existance also seems dangerously naive

>diversity
>Balance personal rights with social duties.

sounds cucked

except he doesn't include binary on it so the computer archeologists wont have a rosetta stone and be confused as fuck as to what the squiggles meant.

Quads of turth.

>just give us all the power it will be great we promise
>peace and love? sure, whatever you want goys. just do as you're fucking told

You really think a society rebuilding from the apocalypse would know binary more then the languages present?

Kys

Sounds like jewish bullshit to me.

But if reduce the world population to 500 000 000 means just white people and the rest of the shit isent double speak your all for it amirite!

>Kys

No U

>trusting globalists rocks
Jesus christ -and i thought i was dumb.

>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Sounds good, let's kill those who have an IQ under 90 and want to enslave Humanity( i.e the Jews)
>Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
Sounds good but...diversity. Like Japanese, German, Italian, Finnish, and 10% of Nigerians?
>Unite humanity with a living new language.
Speaking more than one language is good, but only speaking one reduces your intelligence.
>Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
If you mean not allowed old ways of denying evolution or thinking Earth is the center of the Universe then fine. But if it means disrespecting your ancestors or being ashamed then no.
>Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Agreed, but those are considered racist towards Leftists.
>Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
No, just no.
>Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Petty laws like what? Banning heroin? Useless officials? Like what the Nazis did?
>Balance personal rights with social duties.
Yep, like Nazi Germany.
>Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
I hope actual truth, beauty, and love. Not like the "beauty" with Miss Helsinki, or the (((truth))).
>Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.
Like....the Nazis? Okay.

>and who will decide what is to be kept, and what is to be discarded?
>m-me and my friends, of course. It's only natural that we should be in charge of everything

Collectivist, socialist, globalist. They never change

Not Biblical. God will destroy it.

>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000

>7,600,000,000 people in the world
>80% live in poverty
>7,600,000,000 * .8 = 6,080,000,000
>6,080,000,000 Live in poverty
>1,520,000,000 Do not
Thats about 3x more then your shit prophecy.

A concrete population cap is stupid. It completely fails to recognize the advances of technology that allow the creation of more with less. As you advance you could support a billion, two billion, ten billion, etc etc. with the same amount of land / resources as you increase the efficiency of production or distribution.

A common language is potentially a decent idea. There's something to be said for the ability to understand anyone in the world and the amount of cooperation and good will you can engender in a person that can understand you vs someone that looks at you blankly. Beyond that it's simply efficient to have everyone speaking the same language vs having to learn multiple.

The rest of these are so vague they border on meaninglessness, because based on your interpretation they can mean radically different things. What is a 'petty' law? What makes one fair? Who defines what balance in personal rights vs social duties is ideal? Everyone thinks they are reasonable. Genghis Khan and Stalin thought they was making decisions of 'tempered reason.'

All in all it's a mixed bad, some is stupid, some not, and most is simply feel good nonsense so a couple anonymous idiots can circlejerk themselves about about much better humanity would be doing it they were following this vaguery.

>Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
the 500,000,000 will just be a degenerate mutt race. If the NWO going to cap population like this theyll have to crush all forms identity because otherwise people will naturally want to breed

>Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
(((Guide Reproduction))). This is just a jewish eugenics program

>Unite humanity with a living new language.
Newspeak

>Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
i.e. no genuine human feelings and interactions. Everything will be moderated by official experts because the institution science is infallible

>Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Sure

>Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
Literal global government

>Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Good goal

>Balance personal rights with social duties.
The "Social duties" part implies that your personal freedom can be revoked for the greater good. I mean I personally think all """rights""" are a big meme but this is obviously commie-tier state servitude

>Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
K

>Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.
Easier said than done. Ill all for fixing the environment but im opposed to literally every environmentalist movement/outrage/policy/whatever. Its aways just hippies and progressives being tricked by jews and globalists into undermining our own countries

You're right to think the language part is important, but wrong with where you're going. Clearly humanity isn't going to just create a new language. That would be impossible. I think it has something to do with unifying science math law philisophy and all the other domains under one commensurable language (similar to E-prime).

the planet can sustain another trillion births before we need off world resources.

this is copy pasta. If you want to learn more of the idea of the 3 latin languages and English being created by the phoenecians then look up Santos Bonacci

there will always be work. However we do not need to exterminate people capable of making the choice when properly informed. The key is to not waste a persons work by inflating the purchasing power of his time spent.

We can create a real community if we choose to be brave and boycott money and taxes.

Phoenecians became the Venicians. The Phoes created the alphabet symbols we use today. el is the sound of God. Its all about attatching frequencies to symbols

Maybe the world should pick up greek/latin as their primary second language

I struvgle to find flaw the intent is perfect. It all depe ds how it is executed and that will not be easy or as I love to say not for the faint of heart.

Most importantly we have to remember tbat mantaining lur achivments is much harder than aquiring them noz matter that is always seem harder to achive them than mantain them!

I long for that kind of humanity and am willing to consider all avenues will not be easy, virtue can be faulty!


I

The total numbers of minds in the universe is one.

Mind is Care. Care is the binding principle to which life exists to carry out manifested actions

it doesn't say whites only

Flaw: No free will. Fuck that.

kek has spoken

They do have nice ideals, but they're divided and mostly limpwristed pussbags that aren't heartless enough to begin the culling. They think you meatbags have the right to live. There's a growing number pushing for genocide right now due to how bad you mindless animals have ruined Earth, so have fun knowing that the clock is ticking.

>diversity

so "more niggers"
sage