Aryan Europe

Would Sup Forums be in favour of a united aryan europe or not. As in one mono-state with one main european culture.

Other urls found in this thread:

thisisgeorgia.wordpress.com/tag/zezva-and-mzia/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>That small bit of Georgia in aryan land

110% ARYAN CONFIRMED

There would be a process to Aryan-ise Europe to reach a mono-ethnic state in this case. High birth rates of people with desired traits.

Yes! Unified Aryan Europe would be a splendid trading partner for Finland.

You guys would be part of the union

The retarded scientists of Hitler believed that Caucasus was the birthplace of white people

I'm pretty sure the reason why most of the uneducated craps use "Caucasian" to describe white people is because of that

Whilst I support cooperations between various European Nations....a European Federation is not a good idea. Primarily it'll lead to the extinction of various languages, cultures, ethnicities, etc
Plus, it'll be easier for someone to control Europe if it is Federalized.
Which means a greater possibility of someone taking over and forever destroying Europe and Whites in general

I don't bloody think Tengri allows it.
We are gonna restore the glory of holy finnish roman khagnate and become who we are.

pure fantasy, Schlomo

>Pan-Europeanism
>Not simply creating a loose alliance between European nations against nogs and asians
>Wanting to do an Austria-Hungary 2.0

Languages are usually lost over time anyway. The important part would be the shared ethnic bonds and shared cultural spirit. If we were one unified empire or union we would be unstoppable.

>lets create amerimutt 2.0

In all likelihood it'll fall apart years down the road...whether it is a peaceful or violent breakup is up in the air.

Why would that lead to being a mutt? If you had high birth rates of aryan or Germanic people over multiple generations it would achieve the desired result. Other races would be deported under this empire.

Indo-Europeans did come the Caucasus you retard.

>thinking you can replace the massive Slavic and Celtic populations

i'm talking about non-whites not deporting inter-european ethnicities.

>one main european culture.
This is globalism lite, fuck off mutt

Indo Europeans came from modern day Ukraine/Russia you uneducated leaf

We are unrelated and I hope to keep it that way. Western whites are degenerates

Would not deport european groups i should say. This is their homeland.

All countries were at one point part of different empires and had diferent borders/languages/systems change constantly. However what doesn't change is aryan sense of culture and shared European blood.

No one is sure exactly where indo-europeans came from exactly but the Caucasus is the most likely, and yes they could have come from ukraine/russia.

>aryan sense of culture
Visit Europe and you'll see that each country, province, village has their own culture and history. It's not like America.

Anyone who posts in favour of this is a new fag.
This is globalism, you fucking retards.
OY VEY BE A GOOD GOYIM AND DESTROY THE BORDERS

I'm not from America. I'm British.

Show us your real flag then.

I agree with the sheepshagger, the Europeans have too much culture to all be mushed together.

If that was the case you would at least look like us, but you dont. Even a small bit

We are indigenous people, we never left this place and those that got mixed with someone else are easily identifiable. The only reason, I take it, why Caucasus is considered the birthplace of whites is this

thisisgeorgia.wordpress.com/tag/zezva-and-mzia/

I mean there are already inherent differences between what you would call the "Aryan" people

Also, the purpose of the European Union is to create a Federation. And considering it's run by an Oligarchy that doesn't care about the people of Europe, your hypothetical Aryan Superstate will have the same difficulties

You could say that about any empire that existed. But they led to current European borders. My idea is just expanding that to the larger European/Aryan people as one unified state.

Yo

Most of European DNA is pre-Aryan. Unless you are Baltic/Slavic/Finnic you are most likely more genetically related to middle-neolithic west Europeans than to the steppe people who brought IE speak and culture in Europe.

I think I have seen you once or twice maybe even spoken to you unless there are two of you that live there.

Maybe

Anyway I see why you hid your flag now.

What do you mean?

Well, maybe people would focus more on your flag, it's not exactly common. So to avoid a derail of your thread you just hid it. Though I think it might serve you at the same as it would give you some free bumps.

True

I would be in favor of a United Anglo State aka(The British Empire) in which all the country of Europe obey The Queen.

In my desired state i would hope there wasn't a rich elite paying off politicians as it should be a very harsh offence (possible death depending if you're selling your countrymen out). All those serving the union would have to work their way up and not be put in positions of power just because of their social/elite connections.

I don't really think the current monarchy is doing much for either anglo countries desu. I would prefer a fascist state with certain constitutional right (guns, freedom to associate etc.)

Hail Europe! Hail our people!

STUPID IDEA. Europeans are not the same people. You'll make a mutt race like Americans.

>one main european culture.
never, our local cultures are the gemstones on the crown that is our european civilization.

>balkan aryan

>Europeans
>actually thinking theyre aryan

I have no Idea where you guys ever thought tjat the word "Aryan" came from Europe, but the word Aryan was used as a self designation by Iranians and indo Iranians thousands of years ago. White people arent Aryan. Look it up.

United but not as a federation, united by civilization, race and culture sure, but each nation with his own identity.
europe 4 europeans

>implying most regional differences aren't just down to language and political systems

Most European cultures are very similar. If you took two countries from Europe and compared them and then compared them to say somewhere in East Asia you would see there is a much larger divide between racial cultures.

>*slaps your fat face*

Listen up porky. When people talk about the "aryans" they are referring to the proto-indo-Europeans, of which Europeans massively descend from. Nobody really knows what the first indo-Europeans called themselves but "arya" (meaning noble) seems to be a self designation, hence the use.
They may have originated more in the "central Asia" area rather than the European area, but they were undoubtedly White Europid Caucasians.

A White European empire would be great.
What's funny about the EU is that racial solidarity and racial nationalism would probably be the ONLY thing that would make a united Europe work, but that is the one thing the globalists and the Jews can never, ever, ever, ever, ever accept because it would lead to their loyalties being questioned.
Jews are biologically compelled to want civic nationalism for everyone else and ethnic nationalism for themselves.
Due to their inbreeding, their mental illnesses prevent them from negotiating. They, like arabs, are terrible business people with a reputation for dishonesty, swindling and greed.

If Jews were not so mentally retarded due to their traditional practice of incest they could EASILY secure the existence of the Jewish state while making a friendly neighbour out of White race.
Jews are basically going to get themselves exterminated due to their stupidity.

>Most European cultures are very similar.
no they arent you illiterate. you have simply forgotten what our local ethnocultural identities are.

Lol, funny hearing that from a Belgian, you can't even decide which language to use and are a mix between French/Germanic/Dutch and yet claim to have a strong ethnoculture. Can't you realise the differences are so minor and and the only real divider between European countries is language.

>the only real divider between European countries is language.
i dont think so, we have rich local folklore and traditions stemming from that folklore.
>to have a strong ethnoculture
what is the opposite of identity? anonymity. you want all our local ethnocultural identity to merge into an anonymous grey mass. its just as bad as multiculturalism that seeks so bring in loads of cultures outside of europe, both result in a loss of identity, thus forcing anonymous people who dont know who they are.

No, I don't think that would be right. Almost every state existing in Europe today has a unique history and culture that is different from their neighbor's culture. The only reason a united form of government like that of America works is because Americans have a common history and culture shared with each other. Merging the EU, for example, into a huge super state would be a horrible idea, as it would be for other supra-national organizations like ASEAN (which has the intent of merging all members together and created one large bastard state)

Because my point is European/Aryan blood is our identity. I don't want people of other races to be part of the union. Most modern countries are a result of empirical expansionism and breakdowns of former empires, yet people claim that those minor identities are important to the larger European people. I just don't think they are to be honest. What matters is the people/race. If we stood as one unified state, there's no reason that your day to day life would be drastically different because we as a people produce similar cultures and have similar sensibilities.

Have you ever left your bedroom m8

Are you implying they are not similar? From personal experience i've been to England, Scotland, France and Spain. Yes there are some differences but ultimately they are all European in character and sensibilities.

Only if we adopt a mix of Danish, Swiss and Austrian culture after Germany, France, Sweden and the UK were annihilated.

Everything east of Austria brings nothing to the table. Why would anybody team up with slavs for anything?

Indo-Europeans came from the area of modern day Kazakhstan/Uzbekistan/insert-stan.

Our ancestors were pushed out of Central Asia either due to their own overpopulation, climate change or losing a vent for the excess population I.e. Chinks finally started guarding their borders instead of getting fucked up by white horse-archers.

The area of Central Asia only became mongoloid after Turkic migrations into the area and finally G.Khan and his rape-squad stormed the area.

What you are talking about is the Kurgan Hypothesis, and it's
wrong. Indo-Europeans can't have come from a mountaineous area. Mountains lead to dinarization+armenoidization (racially).
Indo-Europeans , especially the elites of the modern ones, are always unreduced aurignacoids.
Indo-European ancestral place must have been in a warm climate or at the very least a temperate one.
The Kurgan hypothesis is so widespread, because Eastern European archeologists are shilling for themselves. There is no actual evidence for it.

No way. Too many differences in cultures. Especially North vs South. Unacceptable.

I'm talking about the people and language group that spread the Indo-European culture into Europe.

Don't act like natives in Europe didn't exist before the Indo-Europeans came (into their women).

Funny that you mentioned"Dinaridization".
The Dinaric population is probably the oldest native population of Europe besides the Basques and lived/still lives in one of the warmest areas of Europe.

Not to mention that Central Asia is a pretty fucking hot place for most of the year as well and people in the mountains usually get MORE exposure to sunlight.

>70 millions people speaking English
>80-90 million people speaking German
>80 million people speaking French
>And so son....
>5 million people speaking Finnish and 1,4 million people speaking languages that are somewhat related to it so I can understand few words.

No thanks, we'd be cucked the second such union existed.

Sunlight has nothing to do with your race, only with your complexion.

There were many natives in Europe, but most important fact about Indo-European is the following:

1. They always burnt their deads (and they still do in Indo-European cultures like India) , so you won't be able to find any remains of them; Kurgan cultures left behind many remains (which were either not Indo-European or very low class i.e. slaves)
2. Their religion and culture was spread by an oral tradition paternalistically from father to son ; the lack of a remaining Indo-European culture in Europe is equal to a lack of the priestly caste ;
either it was eliminated and replaced (possible but unlikely since IE tend to dominate with both their culture and also physically) or it was never existant in the first place (very likely)


About dinarization: it's simply an overspecialization to high altitudes and you can only dinarize unreduced cromagnoids. Aurignacoids can not be reduced or dinarized.

That's why it is impossible (racially) for Caucasus and also places like Ukraine to be the ancestral home of the Indo-Europeans - because the people living in these places today are all cromagnoids or cromagnoid derivatives.