82% of the wealth created in 2017 went to the 1%

82% of the wealth created in 2017 went to the 1%

ktla.com/2018/01/21/82-percent-of-wealth-created-in-2017-went-to-the-1-percent/

thoughts?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilfredo_Pareto
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Stop being anti-semitic you fucking nigger.

the billionaire globalist shill board known as Sup Forums is upset that their gods Soros, Buffett, Bezos, etc didn't get 99% of all new wealth

Imagine how many children we can feed, how many students we can send to college, and how many homeless people could get a house if the government would just tax at least half of that unnecessary wealth that they have (like yachts, second homes, jewelry, etc)

>global

Damn the top richest 75 million people in the world

>taxing wealth instead of income

shhhhh don't let the goyim hear you, otherwise they'll start asking how Warren Buffet has $30 billion in assets and somehow only made $2 million in income last year

clearly we need to spend more. We need that infinite growth.

This is literally a non-issue. People with the most money to create more money created the most money. Wow. Shocking.

Capitalism in action.
We need communism!

>Jewish control of the world's financial system is a non-issue
Brilliant analysis faggot

>today I will remind them

>income
they cant cause Swiddish accounts
Taxing stuff they hold is easier to track unless they decide to :hide: em too and never use em

Average westerner is considered the 1% in this metric.

What are the tax payment breakdowns? On average it's about 78 percent of taxes paid by the top 15 percent.

look at this shill for the rich lol

sheeple so easily programmed

>t. (((1%)))

STOP POKING HOLES IN OUR LOGIC

Literally every year.

Cleverly worded jew article. The numbers used are for the entire world, and just for a bit of perspective 71% of the global population lives on less than 10$'s a day. So by the articles own metrics you are the 1% who is stealing money from the poor.

So the jews got richer in other words

Who gives a shit? I don't need a billion dollars I need maybe 60 grand a year and that's more than enough. Quit bitching because others are doing better than you, worry about yourself and your state.

Class hatred for the 1% mostly comes from envy, and the rationalization that most people come up with is the belief that the wealthy do not "deserve" their wealth, that the wealthy have just been handed easy lives. This is simply speaking, not true - 90% of family fortunes are completely gone within 3 generations. The vast majority of the rich got rich through nothing but their own hard work and talent. They really do deserve their wealth, and therefore I see nothing wrong with this.

newfag

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilfredo_Pareto

we need national bolshevism

you tell me it's a meme, i tell you these people are fucking you in the ass and you swallow it with a smile because you get all your dopamine needs taken care of and certain material comforts. you're getting fucked and you're not willing to fight.

>imagine how many niggers we can feed and send to school by taxing highly productive whites at criminally high rates

nah

and they should pay their fair share to help make society function better instead of the costs falling on the majority workers. besides, after a certain amount of wealth you have more than enough to live comfortably.

.
Yes they should pay their fair share.

Flat rate income tax NOW.

This. Anyone else getting sleepy? Let's all go to sleep. No need to look up the panama papers.

If you make minimum wage in America you’re the top 1% in the world.

1% of the population created 82% of the wealth. Why wouldn't they deserve it?

But they can't even afford the newest luxury goods. :/

Wow stupid. You have no idea that this is a by product of how we look at society and economics? Why would we let so few people suck the value of the economy that we are all responsible for creating? Ya some more than others but to let the gap exist like this is tantamount to calling for our downfall

>The vast majority of the rich got rich through nothing but their own hard work and talent.

LOL. Look at the Forbes list, a bunch of people in the top 50 are literally Wal-Mart heirs, and heirs of heirs.

>90% of family fortunes are completely gone within 3 generations

Bullshit. That "statistic" came from several decades ago. Nowadays, wealth tends to stick around. "Professional wealth management" replaced personal money-management a long time ago. And it works.

Like anything else, tax policy and so on should be designed to serve society. Right now, the wealthiest classes are actively harming the country by funding leftist "think-tanks" and "NGOs" and need to have their finances taken down a few pegs.

umm excuse me, but what about Trans Rights?

or Trans Undocumented Citizens?

Hey rabbi watcha doin?

Would have thought it to be 99%. We should thank them for sharing.

>thoughts?

This is something that can only be fixed by more tax cuts so that the wealth will trickle down.

>Top 1% globally is an annual net income of 34k or higher
>someone getting paid more gets a larger amount of money with a 1% raise than a dirt biscuit maker

Real hard hitting news today, wow

Flat tax is idiotic and especially so if you're talking about actually being fair. Money has become a relatively arbitrary way to liquidize human effort, but like any other system, it's been exploited. Sure we can let some people do better than others, but not like this.

...

>thoughts?
That's way down from what it was under obama

>>imagine how many niggers we can feed and send to school by taxing highly productive jews at criminally high rates
fixed

If we didn't have immigration, the bottom 99% will begin to see wealth equality.
The rich will still have more, but at least the common people will be able to afford more.

Is it because they created that wealth?

That's utterly wrong unless you're using some utterly worthless definition of wealth, since most goods and services go to - you guessed it - most people and not a tiny fraction of people.

43% of all gdp goes to pay. assuming, only 8% under 70 years ago

you are using fake statistics

This user is correct. Spending money on goods and services is the same as increasing income. We're literally all billionaires. Wake up, sheeple.

but who did the actual physical work?

Who cares your quality of life has still gone up drastically

This is just a subversive communist plot “the 1% can’t have all that wealth we need to spread it around”

Fuck off if you live in the USA you are in the top 20% of the world

If you make $34K/year you're part of the 1%. $24K, the 2%

>implying this is something new

The point of spending money is to GET goods and services.
That's what all currency is FOR - having a billion dollars in cash does you no good whatsoever if you can't use it to get the things you ACTUALLY want.

This. The more you spend, the richer you get. Everyoyne is wealthy.

there are roughly 94 million people in the labor force of america, roughly 1/4 of the total population

the pay they earn is 43% of the entire gdp

each individual laborer earns MORE than their share of the total economy

60 grand a year is the top 1% dipshit.

Don’t you realize that wanting to take money from Jews is National Socialism?

>the chart extremists don't want you to see

maybe in your poor country

here you need to earn 90k or so to be i nthe top 1%

How does a region that produces Hoppe produce you?

>here you need to earn 90k or so to be i nthe top 1%


Uhm sweetie, 60k is almost 70k, which is almost 80k, which isn't far from 90k, so 60k basically equals 90k.

I fail to see what libs find so hard to understand about that.

They created that wealth through regulation, destroying competition.

Well then that means 82% of the wealth went to like, a staggeringly large number of people, billions probably, I'm fine with that.

just fyi 90% of the reduction in poverty has taken place ONLY bc of china

absolute poverty has increased in india, s.am, niggerfrica, the middle east, and large parts of s.e. asia

small parts of s.e. asia improved or kept their place. large parts of e. europe improved but e. europe is tiny.

almost all of europe has become terrible. america is deteriorating.

china is more or less the only place that has more than 20 million people that got better

So it has been, and so it will be

I was literally agreeing with you. OP commented on the distribution of wealth growth, positing that the majority of it remained with the 1%, and you called his statement "utterly wrong".

I don't understand why me agreeing with you causes you so much anger. This is a new form of masochism.

Stop buying iPhones

>82 Percent of Wealth Created in 2017 Went to the 76 Million Wealthiest People in the World.

Congrats, if you are in this thread then the wealth went to you.

The article specifically says world's population you illiterate mutt.

This. iPhones are for billionaires. As are avocados.

Good. Why would any wealth have to go to billions of africans or indians who do fuck all every day? Not my fault they can't into civilization and create wealth.

This. We must keep 3rd worlders poor, or else they'll have the means to migrate to Europe.

Doesn't fucking matter. Employers are the ones who put in money, they take the risks. They beg and borrow to keep the business running, while employees blissfully work without a care in the world.
If the workers wanted to start their own business, no one's stopping them. Not the employers fault if they don't want to. But wanting the employer to share hard earned and smartly earned profits with his workers is a pile of rubbish

It's not even that. The fact that me or you generated wealth that allowed us to have earnings above 34k$ a year (1% threshold) has no impact on the wealth generated by 3rd worlders.
Income inequality is a meme issue. Economics is not a zero sum game.

>while employees blissfully work without a care in the world.

This. Workers literally lead a cary-free life, they have it way too good. Won't no one think of the billionaires?

You know what happens when they stay poor? They have more kids because they need their kids to support them. And since they're poor, some of the kids will die most likely. Hence they'll have even more kids. So an even bigger population. Africa shouldn't stay poor. Letting Africa stay poor means they'll have even more kids.

>Income inequality is a meme issue.

This. Income equality is a meme created and perpetuated by the powerful, powerful poverty lobby in order to punish the billionaires for their success.

And?

>And?

This.

>Africa shouldn't stay poor.

I disagree. For an intelligent, thought-out rebuttal, please see:

not entirely true. some economic schema is 0-sum. everything becomes malthusian at scale and 100% of status goods are 0-sum and veblen goods make up 90% of the market.

the 0 sum compontent of the market is limited only to tech and materials

Trump is President of the USA not president of the world.

Pro tip:. Ktla is fake news (CNN affiliate)

Yes goy. Be jealous of those who have earned their money. Join with us Bolsheviks and we will take the fruits of their labor. Then you can come to us and dance for your shekels like a good Shabbat goy.

>Trump is President of the USA not president of the world.

This is why I come to Sup Forums. Where else would you get redpilled truths and new insights that no one else dares to express?

This. Billionaires are self-made. If their workers want a share of their success, maybe they should have contributed to their success.

he's explaining to you that we aren't all creating it, and that the people in the 1% are.

And when u say 1%, u actually mean (((1%))), right?

>Ktla is fake news

This. Everything that goes against my narrative is literally fake news by definition.

Because if they don't increase their wealth and overall living standards, they'll keep on sending people to Europe and the US because that's the only better place they'll be able to go to instead of their own country.

Oh. I didn't know that.

What is inflation?

>not realizing that 100% of the wealth is created by 1% and then circulated to the rest of the 99% debt insert they will never be able to pay to keep the enslavement going to further generations

if people have money and they don't invest, it sits in a bank and loses value (they NEVER do this)

the % of ealth that the rich have is the % that laborers spend instead of investing

And how much of that went to the Jews?

Thank you merchant! You're truly our greatest allie!

Why should the government do that? That people made their wealth only with their work and effort. Why should they finance more graduates than society needs?

he is correct, though

if you accrue savings, you invest it. that investment NEED create jobs. if it doesnt, the investment is lost bc there is no profit

the 1% have only investments

kill all the kikes. that'll be good. but their crime isnt investment

fpbp

...

That's why you need strong borders to keep them out.

Are you saying that luxury goods comprise 90% of the market? Where did you get that figure? I find that very hard to believe.

>money goes to the people that deserve it.
its a beautiful thing isnt it. africans, poos and spics dont deserve the wealth that we hard working whites and jews create.