Absolute Monarchies

With or against?
Why?

They're shit tier compared to military dictatorships

Monarch must be, but not absolute. Democracy is an important mechanism to stay in touch with society for the ruler.

The purpose of monarch as part of the nation is to forbid the cancer of importing voters.

they are not excluding ideologies, you can have a fascist monarch
ok, but if you give too much power to the people they will abuse it or make a revolution to reduce the powers of monarchs

>the monarch gets in love with cute jewess that become the real power behind the throne.Now what?

Against

They should be semi absolute ala Britain after the Restoration but not completely absolute (in case you get a real dumbass like James II).

What? Who said that the monarch can't fuck the jewess bitch while having a proper aristocrat or royal wife?

I want the kind of monarchy that built the 13 colonies, and if you consider that to be a constitutional monarchy instead of absolute then at least it will be most of the way, so then give it a chance, but if it still needs more power then I'll help you to give it more juice.

...

But once you have a constitution it can't be violated, or the people would start whining about muh rights and we all know what happens then