How accurate is this?

How accurate is this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Pg_M0SsBNTA
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Literally all of it is fake. Who gives a fuck.

I think huffpo needs to be even more to the left and while Fox news is absolutely bias, i think it's unfair to put it so far to the right.

Nyt and Washington Post also getting way too much credit, 15 years ago this was accurate but both of them are now much worse

Looks like it was made by the AP.

SAGE

OANN is literally the only news worth watching and it's not hyper partisan at all

>BBC
>NYT
>truth
top fucking zozzle

>green rectangle: news
>nbc
>cbs
>politico
>nyt
>wsj
>the hill
>wapo
>time
lol this is hilarious
>cnn on border of fair and unfair interpretations of the news
HAHAHAHHAHAH

washington post needs to go 3-4 sections lower at least

I think the concept is quite accurate, despite individual misplacements

All media is bullshit. You've got the BBC as trustworthy. Fuck off. The BBC is the queen of spin, it's incapable of reporting a fact without spin.

its literally so utterly wrong that i would permanently sage this thread if i was a mod.

>if you were a mod you would sage threads based on your personal opinion of their content
ok......

All fake and Jewish. Whether it's kike loving snake oil salesman Alex Jones, kike loving zombie Bannon, literally fake Jewish news like CNN, (((BLOOMBERG))), ABC, CBS, FOX, MSNBC, or leftist commie kike loving shit like literally everything to the left of CNN which by the way is in the wrong spot

Everything should be pushed down and to the left

>Drudge
>Fake
Drudge doesn't even have articles, he links to existing sites. Sure he's a Zionist jew but it's the number 1 News Aggregate.

It's accurate just nothing actually falls in the top middle.

WaPo is literally the CIA news.

>No NHK
>OAN is considered near propaganda level despite it's opinion and news segments being heavily segregated

It's shit senpai

What's NHK?

KEK

"All media is owned by Jews, once you get big enough they make an offer you cant refuse"

>CNN
>Mainstream, fair assessment

>Fox News
>hyper-partisan bordering on conspiracy theory, dangerous to public discourse

Gee I wonder who this person voted for?

Should be scaled left/right based on what % of Trump stories are negative vs. positive.

not

It gives them way too much credit. Only a handful deserve the yellow bracket and only 2-3 would I put in the green.

You actually put a foreign government's propaganda wing in the green area. Think about that for a minute

I'd say it were accurate if creator was a a "Hyper-Partisan Liberal" that thinks he's "on the right side of history."

CNN pre trump was literally boring as fuck. It was practially cspan half the time and the rest of the time was watching some 65 year old lobbist/political-analyst/author ignoring soft ball questions in favor of reading his talking points. They had a monopoly as the mainstream "unoffensive" news station.

Once they started on trump ratings cocain they decided they needed to focus on real "journalism" and suddenly decided that meant arguing with government officials in every interview and demanding they resign in every segment.

Fox on the other hand has 3 entertainers for every journalist and by far the least amount of news for any news channel I have ever seen.
They fall somewhere between conspiracy mongering insanity and legit propaganda arm of the conservative political movements.

CNN is just a ratings whore who decided news wasnt exciting enough and will likely return to being borning and unwatchable rather than infuriating and unwatchable as soon as we have trump out of office.

NYP, liberal as fuck not conservative.

New york post is literally a tabloid. I dont think they have a bias towards anything but flashy headlines that sell papers to idiots.

Translated: Japan Broadcasting Corporation

Think BBC but not POZZED, instead of your tax dollars going to shows about immigrants judging which of your women they'll fuck by looking at their naked lower halfs on a game show, NHK shows educational/traditional shows

BILL CLINTON IS A RAPIST INFOWARS.COM

But seriously, Alex Jones is a showman who presents factual information under the clever guise of being a madman. If he didn't present himself as crazy (and thus harmless) he would be targeted immediately even more than he already is.

but then how do you tell the difference between his craziness and his facts? he doesn't seem to draw a clear line
youtube.com/watch?v=Pg_M0SsBNTA

>it's ok for a magazine to call itself Jacobin but they try to take down neo-nazi sites

Hypocrites

>CNN
>fair and reputable

pick one

>bloomberg
>accurate and fair reporting
I got news for you kike.

Fixed your graph, cunt

But this one is better

As accurate as you'd expect from a wetback woman who knows as much about the media as your average cat lady.