>A beach boy, Leonard, spends his summer with girls, preferably a new one every day. He's HIV positive and has been told that the probability of infecting a woman is 0.01 for each instance of intercourse. Leonard thinks the probability is so low that he can't be bothered to tell the women about this and insists on enjoying the company without a condom. The summer is long and during the summer months he manages to sleep with 140 women. What is the probability that at least one of them will contract HIV?
What the actual fuck... This is considered normal?
John Lopez
1.4% chance a woman is infected
Gavin Robinson
What's the public reaction? Is this fake news or trolls? Give us sources, man.
Angel Brown
No! Just No! This must be a joke.
Normalization of the bug spreaders.
Jeremiah Cox
But 0.01 means 1%
Adrian Taylor
Another example from the same textbook
>During the winter war, six Russians are fighting for five sleeping spots in a tent. They decide who gets to sleep in the tent by playing Russian Roulette. What is the probability that Igor dies?
Jackson Hernandez
I thought you were probably lying but I saw the paragraph has HIV in it. What the fuck this must be what sodom was like.
Caleb Hill
Kek
Eli Cruz
>Normalization of the bug spreaders. it's actually the opposite, retard
Isaac Kelly
But in all seriousness. It is 1 - probability that none of them get HIV.
1 - (0.99^140) = 75.5%
Ryder Russell
yes and he had sex with 140 women so 0.01 x 140 = 1.4.
People are upset because it's sexist and discriminates the HIV positive
Levi Jones
1.4 means 140%, not 1.4%
Asher Taylor
Bong education, everyone.
Caleb Cooper
Yes I suppose so. It shows that he should tell them so that he doesn't become a dirty bug spreader.
Sebastian Green
>discriminates the HIV positive
Luis Perry
>What’s binomial distribution
Make way for the REAL nordic intellectual nation.
Jaxson Long
1-(1-0.01)^140
Such a lame problem
Luke Barnes
no lol
>he has a 0.01% chance of infecting a woman with HIV >he has sex 140 times with a woman >0.01 x 140 = 1.4 >so he has 1.4% chance of infecting a woman
how can you be so dumb?
Landon Carter
the answer is 1 - (0.99)^140
Joshua Campbell
Binomials, binomials, binomials...
A trick question anyways, they get ambushed by one finn.
Evan Fisher
Came here to post this.
Basically, a 75% chance.
Ryan Peterson
No source either in Swedish or english. FAKE NEWS
Nicholas Cooper
Isn't this implying that HIV is bad and is therefore actually redpilled though? If I'm not mistaken one of the kike agendas seems to be "there is literally nothing wrong with HIV".
Carson Myers
This is the only correct answer you retarded fucks.
Nathan Sanchez
So if he had sex with 20,000 people the probability that he would infect someone would be 200%? kek, fucking bong education
Julian Taylor
It's not even English but some cucky pre arabic, looks real good if its fake
i dont think chance percentages go over 100, ivan.
Nolan Edwards
well yeah that means he would have infected everyone twice over
Noah Ward
Holy fuck is this real?
Joseph Perry
Sup Forums confirmed mathematically illiterate
Ryder Jackson
Sweden was a mistake
David Reed
Wrong.
Alexander Jones
fuck you sweden.
Easton Barnes
are you retarded? 1.0=100% which means that 1.4=140%
Ethan Flores
Ivan mad his failed communist state never taught him simple maths.
Andrew Reyes
Top kek, even you had the wrong answer.
William Lewis
Stupid bongs, if you write 0.01 it means 1%, if you write 0.01% it means 0.01% You can check it in ms excel
Henry Collins
now multiply by herpes and syphillis and common core math becomes easier
Tyler Harris
Hey swede, why don’t you compute this:
Integrate tan^3(x)
Grayson Thompson
Dumb ass.
Hunter Hall
~75% chance >t. swedish educated white male
Owen Green
bad translation
here is the real one (which shows why they said it was "sexist":
A beach lion, Leonard, spends his summer break together with girls, prefferably a new one every day. He is HIV infected and knows the fact that the probability of infecting a woman is 0.01 evry time he has intercourse. because of the small likely hood he doesn't care about telling the women he's infected and he insists on enjoying the "togethernes" condomless. the summer break is long and during the summer months he conquers 140 women. [etc]
I think they are mad about the "conquering" part
Jace Fisher
i think people are just working it out differently here some people are considering 1 to be 100% and others are considering 100 to be 100% we're not really taught it like that, as far as i remember from high school still pretty sure chance percentages go over 100% ever tho famalam
Daniel Wilson
Wrong.
Ethan Foster
(sin(x)*cos(x-x^2))%x
Nathan Morgan
dont go*
Gabriel Edwards
This
Dominic Richardson
From another example that people are upset by because it's sexist:
>In a school class there's 13 girls and 15 boys. 6 of the girls and 10 of the boys know how to use a computer.
>mfw even with a one-tailed fisher's it's just a p-value of 0.2 >mfw people are literally upset by an example saying that women are stupid when the conclusion you reach if you know statistics is that we cannot say there's a difference
Angel Ortiz
0.01
no matter how many times he has sex, the percentage of infection chance does not either increase nor decrease. Each act of intercourse doesn't affect the previous nor future encounters.
Wyatt Parker
> What is the probability that at least one of them will contract HIV?
Zero. They already got it
David Hill
Unless that’s some weird notation wrong.
Nathaniel Cook
lol
Thomas Moore
-> -> make up your mind Binland
Zachary Wood
Don't worry guys, I have a bachelor's degree in math. Let's see... Hm, plus one, carry the two...
Aha, looks like the answer is roughly 8 meters of rope.
Jaxon Price
Slav > Bong
Ryan Lewis
100% sage
Ryder Brooks
The answer is 35 %.
Henry Thompson
For one spesifically, for X>=1 then 75 %.
Joshua Long
Answer is 1 - (0.01^140)
Bentley Cook
gimme a couple minutes to roll some dice and i'll tell you fuckers the real answer
Adam Russell
For the russian question it’s just one. So 6*(5/6)^5*(1/6).
Wyatt Sanchez
(0.01 x 0.99^139) x 140 = 0.34, so 34%
Luke Robinson
If I'm understanding the question correctly, 1.00 would be a one in one chance, so 100%, so 140 women infected, 0.10 would be a one in ten chance, so 14 women infected, 0.01 would be a one in one hundred chance, so 1.4 women infected, as a percentage, there's a 1.4% chance of any woman being infected with HIV.
lmao all you had to write was "1-(.99^140)=.7551". Why are you so fucking retarded that you had to write that all out?
Carson Ramirez
Oh it said 'at least' nvm.
It should be 1-0.99^140=0.76 then
Tyler Mitchell
Sadly yes...
Parker King
> Leonard
At least it wasn't Mohammad fucking 140 tight swedish pussy.
Hudson Fisher
It depends on the rules of the game. If they're only spinning the cylinder once before the game begins, the probability for any single person to die is equal: 1/6. If they're spinning it before each person pulls the trigger, it depends in which order they're sitting. Not sure why anyone would agree to the latter though.
Camden Williams
top kek
Robert Bailey
Seriously someone nuke swedistan
Bentley Morales
you already did
David Ortiz
>secretly has nukes >someone plz do x to y
do it yourself
Wyatt White
Nope. Define the Bernoulli random variable X(j)=1 if the j girl gets the bug, 0 if not
Then random variable of the number of girls contracted is Y=X(1)+...+X(140), which follows the Binomial distribution as other autists have mentioned above.
You can find probabilities for Y based on the formula
where y=0,1,...,140 is the number of girls infected and Combinations means the fraction of factorials 140!/y!(140-y)!.
To get at least one infection, P(Y>=1)=1-P(Y=0) by complementarity, so the probability is 1-P(Y=0)=1-Combinations(140,0)*(0.01^0)(0.99)^140=1-(0.99)^140
Connor Gutierrez
Kikes leave their mutt puppets to do their bidding
Benjamin Morales
Do it yourself, you have nukes
John Long
Kek. Is my flag that triggering to you 'alt righters'? Go suck on dick spencers cock
David Perry
Don't get mad Shlomo. Concentrate.
Carter Smith
You were never taught this. You were taught P is between 0 and 1.
Yes, there's a 1% chance of infecting one person. But this happens 140 times and you don't just add them up.
Dominic Scott
Swedish should be holocausted.
A society able to involve in self distruction so dramatically is a proof they are nothing but low IQ subhumans - at par with any average nigger tribe in africa
Dominic Martinez
Is the answer "Black Lives Matter"?
Adam Ortiz
I Dont eat kosher
Thomas Baker
I guess he is from a public school
Jayden Taylor
...
Andrew Stewart
>implying that someone tells you to do shit yourself is 'alt-right' >implying spencer isn't a shill anyways >implying anybody actually gives a damn about you, your flag and your country
as a lolbertarian i am against persecuting and killing you, but damn you really make it easy for nazi larpers
Jaxon Sullivan
how many intercourses
Alexander Smith
>Probability Thank you for have brought my worst memories of math classes, user.
Asher Foster
Is that a satire book swen??
Jaxon James
I don’t see how spinning it would change the odds, unless you mean that they reload the gun.
Robert Rogers
How many girls
John Wright
dealingwiththegeneralpublic2018.gif
Nolan Brown
Spinning it would create better odds after the first shot.
If the first shot was a bullet, games over. If not, then the chance of getting it next would reduce from 1/6 to 1/5. Spinning the barrel would increase the odds back to 1/6.
