Hitler was against or in favor of capitalism?

Hitler was against or in favor of capitalism?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=kzIRG525l6s&feature=youtu.be
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Hybrid: he wanted to have a market that was centrally planned, but at the same time he wanted businesses to maximize productivity in order to reach autarky.

>what is national socialism

He was only in favor of thinly defined socialist doctrines that he could change on a whim.

Against corporations and supporter of small businesses

He was against the consumer culture of America and monopolization of the market which corporations could achieve if not given government oversight. In short, he was not in favor of capitalism.

He saw that it divided the people and made them work against each other for themselves instead of working together for all of the people.

Against.

For.

he was against international jewish run capitalism
but not capitalism the economic system

Neither; the idea was closer to mutualism than any other system that had been conceived. See pic related.

From wikipedia
"Mutualism is based on a labor theory of value that holds that when labor or its product is sold, in exchange it ought to receive goods or services embodying "the amount of labor necessary to produce an article of exactly similar and equal utility".

"If a farmer should ask me what is the value of the goods that he produces, I should reply, the value of the work that they enable a town labourer to do." - Adolf Hitler
>centrally planned
centrally directed, there's a big distinction

he was founder of socialist people's labor party and genocided an entire people because he viewed them as capitalists

He disliked a true free market. Used capitalism when controlled to his favour. Capitalists who didn't serve him would get shafted, those who served him benefited. Certainly not a true capitalist system.

>in favor of
in favor of obviously

>meritocratic populist socialism
That's how I'm reading that. Am I wrong in this interpretation?

He despised the bourgeoisie and plutocracy; have you listened to any of Hitler's speeches?
He didn't genocide anybody, but he did force the racists and tribalists to label themselves as racists and tribalists by wearing a giant star on their clothes.
They weren't targeted because they were capitalists, they were targeted because they didn't want to unify with the German volk, as the Jewish and Gypsy identities would disappear if they did.

It certainly wasn't meritocratic. More like cronycratic. Hitler really just picked the most radical Nazis for positions rather than upon merit.

>speaches
You fucking retard
Speaches=Propaganda
Mein Kampf =Ideology

He obviously was in favor of capitalism.
He wrote that worker and employer must have the benefit of the nation in mind.
Witch sounds like healthy capitalism to me...

>not true capitalism
Well its the best form of capitalism...
Capitalism is a tool, not the goal.

...

>Speeches=Propaganda
>Mein Kampf=Ideology
If your speeches and your ideology conflict, people will notice and point it out. They didn't however, and no, he was not in favor of the accumulation of capital. Did you read the pic I provided kraut?
>He wrote that worker and employer must have the benefit of the nation in mind.
No, capitalism would be that the worker and employer should have profits in mind, that quote is a National Socialist quote, not one in support of capitalism.

>best form of capitalism is having unchecked government authority over it
No wonder why your country has been dismantled twice in one century. This is nonsensical.

lol no

Your own profit=profit of your nation
If you love your nation.

And I dont need your pic, if it conflicts with Mein Kampf.

He even describes the differences of propaganda and ideology in Mein Kampf.
Dont talk about this man if you didnt even red the book...
He says that propaganda is oversimplified ideology and is used to motivate people to work towards the direction of your ideology.
That means that propagada and ideology may seem contradictional.

>Aristocracy is nonsensical
Ahahahahahahahah

Why not go the whole hog and adopt feudalism.
Aristocracy is idiotic. Smart, capable people will rise and be at the top always. No need to keep their retard kids at the top with titles.
Hitler basically held the whole Nazi thing together. I highly doubt that the Nazi regime would remain in good shape long after Hitler went if Nazi Germany remained. The whole thing was volatile and idiotic, easily used to define German 20th Century history.

>Your own profit=profit of your nation
Public need before private greed
>And I dont need your pic, if it conflicts with Mein Kampf.
If you believe everything Hitler ever believed was codified in Mein Kampf, then go ahead.
>Dont talk about this man if you didnt even red the book...
I have read that book, but that is not the be all end all for what Hitler believed, Mein Kampf too was written to convince people.
>
He says that propaganda is oversimplified ideology and is used to motivate people to work towards the direction of your ideology.
>That means that propagada and ideology may seem contradictional.
They're not going to directly conflict; you will not simplify "Capitalism is bad and must be destroyed" down to "capitalism is okay." Propaganda and ideology will be congruent, although propaganda will be easier to digest.

who gives a fuck shitler the socialist lost

jews are our best allies against mudslimes, globalists and nazi SOCIALISTS (like merkel).

we own your shitty countries anyway (USA#1

MAGA!

...

I love you

...

>this thread
bunch of brainlets, who don't know what is mixed economy

National Socialism does not promote capitalist values, and hence it is not a mixed economy. See pic

Where does it says that mixed economy needs to promote capitalist values, otherwise it's not mixed economy? What is mixed economy by your standards then?

Against.
Search for "Two Worlds Speech"

He was for a free market for businesses that stayed smaller than a certain threshold. If a corporation become too big it would be nationalized.

...

A mixed economy just uses state controls on capitalism, so it's still capitalism.
>Where does it says that mixed economy needs to promote capitalist values, otherwise it's not mixed economy? What is mixed economy by your standards then?
See the "Directed Economy" section
Usually a "mixed economy" refers to market economies with strong regulatory oversight and governmental provision of public goods.

>Usually a "mixed economy" refers to market economies with strong regulatory oversight and governmental provision of public goods.
Well, wasn't that the economic model of Fascist Italy and NatSoc Germany? Also, nice digits

Not exactly. In structure, perhaps, but in values, no. Mixed economy is too general a term for National Socialism, it's like calling calling a vegan someone who eats food. It's true, but it doesn't tell you about the motivations and causes.

I'm not denying that there are more things about NatSoc/Fascist economy, and that their motivation and reason for it is diffrent than for liberals, I just thought that you denied that they had something like mixed economy whatsoever

btw nice digits again kek

>I just thought that you denied that they had something like mixed economy whatsoever
In some senses yes, in others no. You weren't strictly speaking wrong, but I still wanted to make sure we were on the same page.

Against

youtube.com/watch?v=kzIRG525l6s&feature=youtu.be

Great, nice to see an actual American who can properly discuss things, not just spew shity memes, baits and shitposts.
Have a good day.