So let me get this straight:

So let me get this straight:

The Old Testament Jews (i.e. the Israelites) were the chosen people of God. They were given the command to take over other areas in the surrounding regions.
After some time passed, these Israelites started worshipping false Gods (like Molech) and sacrificing their babies into fire due to some (((occult practices))) they picked up when they were captured in Babylon. Overall, they started to become extremely degenerate. God then elected that they are no longer the chosen and had them spread out.
At some point, their degenerate practices continued through the (((Pharisees))) and they were the group responsible for getting Jesus Christ crucified. Later the (((Pharisees))) got BTFO by the Romans and they spread out once more.
Their degenerate practices were written into the Talmud. The Talmud was then mandated to the Khazars (a group of pagans who used to commit atrocities throughout their region) by the Khazar king - The Russians and Persians had previous bad blood with these Khazars . They thought that a monotheistic religion would calm them down from being such shitters.
After Judaism is mandated by the Khazarian state, these same Khazars then start LARPing as Israelites of the old testament but would combine their own previous atrocities with the degenerate practices of the Talmud to become the Jews of today.

Is this correct?

If this is the case, doesn't this make the Jews bad on both accounts? If they truly were the Old Testament Jews, then they would look bad for becoming degenerates and losing their chosen status. But since they're not, they look bad for being LARPers and liars.

Either way, the Jews look bad, don't you agree?

Other urls found in this thread:

soundcloud.com/florian-geyer-9/mf-011818-the-state-of-israel
scribd.com/document/351436519/Muhammad-s-Inspiration-by-Judaism
danielpipes.org/160/the-jewish-muslim-connection-traditional-ways-of-life
tzion.org/articles/EighteenBenedictions.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rulers_of_Edom#Governors_of_Idumea_under_the_Revolutionary_government_of_Judaea
youtube.com/watch?v=KI6e5j489a8
biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/a-brief-history-of-the-kingdoms-of-israel-and-judah/
beliefnet.com/resourcelib/docs/44/Letter_from_Benjamin_Franklin_to_Ezra_Stiles_1.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herod_Archelaus
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Lost_Tribes
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribe_of_Judah
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribe_of_Benjamin#Later_History
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judea_(Roman_province)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom#Classical_Idumaea
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Jewish–Roman_War
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sana'a_manuscript
youtu.be/e5aljapYRCA
menorah.org/tragicms.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_Kokhba_revolt
examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009/08/bar-kochba-and-christians.html
jpost.com/Local-Israel/In-Jerusalem/Massacre-at-Mamilla
biblehub.com/text/john/3-36.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterocanonical_books
web.archive.org/web/20080611131536/http://umsis.miami.edu:80/~medmunds/RSVCEdiff.htm
archive.is/A16Ch
youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=jWzkC1NnMIo
holytrinityparish.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Our-Catholic-Bibles.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>don't you agree
Yup

No user. The jews are perfect and cannot be criticised, Jordan Peterson told me so.

Sounds about right. If you want to follow this out a bit more, look up Lurianic Kabbalah, Sabbatai Zevi, and Jacob Frank(who was introduced to Adam Weishaupt of the Illuminati) and you'll see where things took another big turn for the "jews".

Jews are only one and a half of the 12 tribes of Israel

Thanks, I'll look into those since I do want to learn more about religious history.

Elaborate on the other tribes, please.

In the last Rogan podcast he basically points out that Christianity is the glorification of the individual. He says something about the old testament being about glorification of the State.

He leaves it up to us to see the connection that Jews are pathological in their drive to erase the individual and make the state a god. He's basically redpilling everyone to show them communism/socialism = god state= Jew evil

>Jews write their own bible
>It says they are the chosen and all others are cattle

Kikes in a nutshell.

Close.
>Israel = 12 tribes/states
>Nation splits in civil war
>Northern nation (Samaria) conquered by Assyrians and deported
>Samaria repopulated by foreigners, Samaria now "lost tribes"
>Judea (southern kingdom) conquered by Babylonians
>Also repopulated by foreigners
>LATER, some Judean allowed to return (2 tribes of the 12 and some of the priestly tribe)
>This REMNANT were called Jews, this is exactly what Jew refers to
Now take what OP said and combine it with this. By NT times, Roman political figures would claim Judaism as a religion to be a part of the ruling class. It wasn't just limited to the khazars.

Two tribes: Judah, Benjamin, and part of Levi.

>The Old Testament Jews (i.e. the Israelites) were the chosen people of God.
Could you point out where exactly in the Bible it says that?

Where does the kabbalah fit into this?

It seems to be the common denominator of all (((secret societies))).

You are correct. Please note though, that in the Bible, Christians are the "spiritual Jews" so to speak. The actual Jews of the OT do not exist anymore, as their genes have been displaced and there is no unique Jew. All that we are left with are these Babylonian Talmudic Jews "that claim to be Jews but are not, for their father is of the Devil, and they are the Synagogue of Satan". Christians are the "Jews", or God's chosen people now, as Christ is the New Covenant made. Sorry I used a lot of quotations around the word Jews since I know Sup Forumsacks sperg out whenever I say that Christians are Jews for obvious reasons.

Ugh come on no. Real Jews keep kosher or are born into it.

Modern Christians should be keeping the Law too. Was never meant to go away.

Nah, they turned it into "God only cares if you don't have sex and steal stuff. Just 10 commandments and tithing and stuff we like. don't fucking tell me what to eat (kosher, or Biblical clean rather. Nothing in the law says a rabbi needs to bless shit) or what do with with my time (Shabbat, on Saturday. The 7th day of the week.)

Go back and reread your Bible again. God never told them they are no longer chosen as God doesn't break covenants ever. He punished them with the promise that He would bring them back. I didn't even read anything past there.

tldr You don't have it straight

To simplify things, the idea came about that good came from one hand of God while evil came from the other. Hence, you could hasten the return of the messiah by doing evil acts just as well as you could doing good - redemption through sin. They basically rationalized their most wicked desires. In my opinion, this idea progressed into atheism and the whole "do as thou wilt" philosophy.

Also, it's the flip-side of antinomianism. Protestants believe that you obtain salvation through faith and that all the good deeds in the world won't save you, if you don't have faith. Contrarily, these kabbalistic jews believe that all the evil deeds in the world won't damn you, if you're a Chosenite, of course.

Also, lookup "tikkun olam" - repairing the world.

Not sure, but this user seems to be on to something.

How does this reconcile with cultural Marxism and the promotion of the humanist (hedonist)?
Oh wait, I think I see it now. Jews don't have any truly religious/spiritual beliefs do they? They subverted Thutmose so his own brother 86'd his ass out the kingdom. Changed the story, invented their own God, hustled that shit to the masses and here we are.
Left out an extinction level event here and there but you get the idea.

>thinking you can outwit G-d with Pilpul

Are jews truly this niave?

He just

>wrent the veil
>destroyed the temple
>scattered the tribes
>took back the ark of the covenant.
>sent the spirit into all the world
>pronounced the deicieal curse.
>announced a new covenant and religion. Christ.
>said he could make children of abraham from stones.

Almost correct. Effectively all the answers you are looking for can be found in the Book of Ezekiel, the last prophet to appear before the Israelites. He spoke that only those brought into captivity in Babylon would be the people of God, those who remained behind (the remnant) were no longer the people of God and no longer had any claim to his kingdom in heaven.
Pretty sure that 'remnant' became the Pharisees and:
>killed Jesus
>revolted against Rome (and failed)
>caused the genocide of the tribe of Levi leaving 0 behind who could carry on the Jewish faith
>went into hiding for a few hundred years compiling (((oral traditions)))
>Shalom goy! We wrote a book called the Talmud. We (((Rabbis))) now
This ideology would later grow into communism and cultural Marxism which we are currently in a bitter war against.

Why did they revolt against Rome?

Pretty much sums it up, except Europeans are the house of Israel. Read about Assyria, the Khimbri, and The Pass of Israel in the Caucasus. Also note Seku=Scythians=Scots.

The House of Israel and the House of Judah split due to David’s sin. Assyria BTFO’d them around 720 BC and moved them north in their empire. They called them the Khimbri which is Assyrian for Cimmerian. The Persians called them Seku (or saka, I’m brain farting) which means Scythian. Europeans are actually Semitic peoples. Saxons (issac’s sons) claimed Shem as an ancestor. Denmark literally means “the land of Dan” (one of the twelve tribes). The Scottish claimed to be Scythians in their declaration from the Middle Ages. Japheth (one of Noah’s other sons) literally has a grandson named Ashkenaz. Modern Jewry not only is not the Israelites from the OT, they aren’t even truly Semitic people.

>listening to monkey man
>god tier retardation

The pharisees were mostly in babylon the talmud was written in the rabbinical schools of babylon at the same time as jesus

Why do you assume Molech is a flase god?

As opposed to what god?

Who is the Israeli one?

A rip off of the Canaanite El?

pretty mcuh 90% of the way there, listen to this for a more accurate picture:
soundcloud.com/florian-geyer-9/mf-011818-the-state-of-israel

Shem was Canaan’s uncle. They knew exactly which God.

yup you got it pretty bang on op

That’s about right. Jephathites larping as B.C. Sand-Niggers but essentially practicing Pharisaism and constantly lying about it.

Add this to your rundown. Those Pharisees that invented Judaism and wrote their Judaism in their Talmud also enticed Arabs to behave the same way and this led to the creation of Islam which is just Arab Talmudism

scribd.com/document/351436519/Muhammad-s-Inspiration-by-Judaism

The similarities cannot be anything else but wholesale copying
danielpipes.org/160/the-jewish-muslim-connection-traditional-ways-of-life

Didn't Mohammad start out by praying to Jerusalem? Oh that's right
tzion.org/articles/EighteenBenedictions.htm

The biggest irony in declaring them the chosen ones is that they were chosen for having Jesus Christ come to them because they required the most correction. Think about it. God would not send his Son into an echo chamber. He would send His Son where He is most needed. Where the people are the most lost.

LMAO, so Islam is another Jewish creation, in a sense.
Jews really have not brought many good things to the world.

On account that he requires his followers to sacrifice babies to him to keep his strength up because he's a parasite?

bump for visibility of digits of import to other anons

The Khazar theory is bunk. There is no historical evidence that the entire Khazar people converted to Judaism. We only have evidence that the small number of Khazar nobility did. Too few in number to be able to say "we are the ancestors of Ashkenazi Jews"

>also enticed Arabs to behave the same way
Sharia law is just a stalking horse for Noahide law, ya think?

>Too few in number
I seem to remember a report that told Ashkenaz Jews are related to a very tiny group of, humans?

Even if you read the Old Testament OP, there are plenty of instances where they were punished by God because of their rebellion and sinfulness. They practiced no fault divorce, would leave their wives and daughters on a whim, had roving gangs of rapist sodomites like you see in Saudi Arabia (read up on Judges and Kings. It was a turbulent time in ancient Isreal) and as you pointed out, practiced human sacrifice. In fact, the whole book of the Old Testament was a whole condemnation against the Jews and pagans and their practices in general. Despite the atheist and pagan larper claims that it's about Jewish supremacy, the whole Old Testament is actually a condemnation against Israel abd evil practices. If you read ancient sources, no other book actually writes scathing remarks against its own people, especially condemning them for their depravity and detailing their faults to a letter. Seems the bible is unique in this regard.

I actually don't think the Noahide laws are in any way a bad idea. I'm guessing you are referring to how Jews expect that Goyim follow those commandments as a general rule. As if Noahide laws are the same as the Pact of Umar.

Look at it this way
Jews abandoned even the commandments Moses brought down in their Talmudism.

Why are you so incensed with Noahide laws?

What kind of G-d says this is OK?

>Why are you so incensed with Noahide laws?
Ultimately, the forced and unequal application(jewish courts). Believing in Jesus is idolatry to Jews. The prescribed punishment for which is death. It's really no different than "kill the infidel".

>Is this correct?
You're not wrong but there are huge gaps in what you've put together. For example you're completely forgetting the Edomites.
>Judea revolts against Alexander's successor states and win
>Actual jews sit on the throne of David
>Judea conquers Edom and forces them to convert
>Esau and Jacob are under one roof again
>Herod the great's father is a scheming court official
>Manages to put his Edomite son Herod on the throne of David
>We've occupied the high places
>Herod is incredibly paranoid about the fact that he isn't really descended from Israel
>Marries a jewish woman and proclaims any child of a jewish woman to be an israelite in direct contradiction of God
>Spergs out and destroys the genealogies
>wants to kill babies that are rumored to be the real king of israel
>average jews hate these people and know it's all a farce
>Edomites feel like they've finally made it and have taken the blessing back from Jacob
>God says no and sends Jesus to take the blessing back
>Real jews convert to Christianity and the promise of Abraham now goes to Christians
>The remaining jews are all edomite mongrels and the lose the promise again
>Their house is ruined
There's so much going on spiritually and historically but people have no idea.

BASED Jay Electronica user

I have always wondered where the jews are based off of the female progenitor, scheme came from. Originally thought it to be feminism tricks. I have learned something incrediby informative and informing, user. You have my thanks.

Tarot (communication with divine entities) is derived from Kabbalah. Get green pilled

>You have my thanks.
Not a problem my friend. If you want the source read Josephus for starters.

kabbalah is just one of the many permutations of Bablyonian demon worship cults. Some say it's even older than Bablyon, but it's important to remember that demon worship goes by MANY NAMES, and constantly tries to infiltrate any other religion and wrest control of it.
common trademarks that help you spot it are their obsession with "mysteries" and "esoteric/gnostic" knowledge that only a few are privy to after being initiated. Needless to say, it's usually only the elite that get initiated, or those willing to sell their soul (by committing the most heinous actions) to rise in rank.

or for plebs

spiritual Jews, or "spiritual Jews" are those who keep the commandments of Jesus/God, regardless of their DNA or ethnic background.
(((Pharisees))) tried to claim that they were Jews "no matter what they did" because of their DNA, and Jesus rebuked them and said that God could make "Jews out of rocks" if He wanted.
It's like what Paul said about circumcision, and that it is better to be "circumcised in the heart" than to just go through the outer motion of getting your penis circumcised. "Circumcision of the heart" is just another way of saying "follow the commandments of God".

...

this
or at least partially wrong, ashkenazi obvioulsy have israelite blood

>Jews today are an offshoot of the Jews in the bible who came into existence hundreds of years after the creation of Christianity.
>Jews today do not consider Jews who only believe int he Torah to be real Jews, even though such sects can trace their Jewish lineage back to pre-Temple Destruction
>Jesus wasn't a Jew. Christianity is not a Jewish offshoot. "Jews" are newer than either Christians or Muslims
All these are verifiable facts.

Losing too many shekels to taxes.

that would explain why so many "Jews" hate white people, they're antisemitic

> Old Testament Jews
>the Israelites

I do not agree at all

There is no such thing as Old Testament Jews, Jews are cumskins larping as Hebrews.

King Herod was an Edomite. That is FACT 100% The Entire House of Herod was Edomite (Idumaean in Greek)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rulers_of_Edom#Governors_of_Idumea_under_the_Revolutionary_government_of_Judaea

Now look there and see that the Governor of Judea was an Edomite appointed by Herod.

The Bible tells us that king Saul waged war against the Edomites and that King David gained supremacy over the Edomites.
Remember that Jesus was of the House of David. David was from the house of Judah. Judah was one of the 12 houses of Isreal.
Saul and David were Judahites (Hebrews from the house of Judah)
Edomites were never Hebrew and were over taken in 8oo bc by the Assyrians and basically ever since then they were Assyrian/Edomite mixture.

So Jesus was a Judhite. A descendant of the House of Judah.
Judeans (Citizens of Judea) were Edomites that took over the land from the Judahites (Hebrews from the House of Judah) during the Maccabee Wars.

2 Kings 16:6 (today Eilat,Isreal)(then Elath,Judea (home of the Hebrew Tribe of Judah or Judahites)
"At that time the king of Edom (Jews) recovered Elath for Edom, and drove the Judahites (Hebrews) from Elath,(Judea) ; and the Edomites came to Elath,(Judea), where they live to this day."(and are called Judeans which is translated after 1611 as JEW)
You have to have an old translation of the Bible or after King James it says Jews.

Redpill

youtube.com/watch?v=KI6e5j489a8

So where ever you see Judah or (house of) in the Bible change it to Judahite and whenever you see Jew change it to Judean and know that Judea was Ruled by Edomites (Jews) who were NEVER Hebrews.

Jew is a term that came about in the Middle ages. It means the Edomites that started to worship the Talmud after the fall of the Second Temple.
biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/a-brief-history-of-the-kingdoms-of-israel-and-judah/
"In the ninth year of Hoshea, the king of Assyria captured Samaria and deported the Israelites to Assyria. He settled them in Halah, in Gozan on the Habor River and in the towns of the Medes.” 2 Kings 17:6

Hence, all 10 tribes of Israel were scattered throughout the nations of the Assyrian Empire which didn’t include the Caucasus region, as many in our time are peddling in order to make converted Jews of today, who originate from there, appear Hebrews when they’re not.
Judah was divinely protected in the midst of the nations of the Assyrian Empire.
Out of the 12 tribes only Judah pulled through as a tribal entity with land, the tribe of the Levites sheltered therein.

“There was none left but the tribe of Judah only.” 2 Kings 17:18

However, the great majority of the tribe of Benjamin escaped the Assyrian scattering, and took refuge between the shoulders of God’s anointed tribe, Judah.
“This is what the LORD Almighty says: ‘In those days ten people from all languages and nations will take firm hold of one Judahite by the hem of his robe and say, “Let us go with you, because we have heard that God is with you”.’ ” Zechariah 8:23

The Judahites were the only Hebrews left. Jesus was a Judahite. The Jews of today are Edomites. Edomites were NEVER Hebrew. So yes, Jesus was not a Jew (Edomite) like King Herod and all the Jews (Edomites that followed after him). Jesus was one of the last Judahites (Hebrews)

The New Bodhisattva...

We know that Saul was the first king of Israel and that John was the first man called Baptist, but who was the first Jew? Neither Adam, Seth or Noah are called Jew. Nor were Abraham, Isaac or Jacob. Moses was not called a Jew and neither were Saul, David or Solomon called Jew. In fact you will not find the word Jew in the first eleven books of the Bible. The first time Jews are mentioned in the Bible, is in II Kings 16:6 (and then only in translations revised in the eighteenth century) where we find Israel was at war with the Jews (Edomites)! and the Jews (Edomites) drove the Hebrews (tribe of Judah) from Elath! The Edomites then stayed in Judea every since and were/are called Judeans. Jews.
Isn't it interesting that we can read over five hundred pages of the Bible before we find a Jew anywhere, yet those who call themselves Jew today claim the first five books of the bible and call it their Torah. Do you not find it rather strange that those who claim to have written the first five books of the Bible and call themselves Jew, can't find the word Jew written anywhere in the book they call their own bible, and claim to have written?

Jesus Christ tells John in Revelation 2:9 "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews and are not, but are the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN". We know that God changed the name of Abram to Abraham in Genesis 17:5, and that He changed the name of Jacob to Israel in Genesis 32:28, but nowhere in the Bible do we find where God changed the name of Israel to Jew! There is therefore no authority by which those who say they are Jews can claim to be Israel!

By the time of Jesus the word Edom or Edomite had been translated by Greek and Latin into Ioudaios, Idumaean and Iudaeus meaning a Judean or person living in Judea. The original KJV of the Bible, 1611, translated Idumaean-Judean into Iewes. It wasn't until the revised editions of the King James Bible, that the word Jew appeared. The word Jew does not mean Israel, Hebrew or Israelite!

There is no reason to dismiss ancient Noah because he precedes Abraham. Just because Pharisees when out of their way to twist those ideals to Pharisee advantage does not mean that those ideals are without merit as a general rule

would you throw out Christ with the bathwater just because of His tangential connection with Pharisaic gangsterism?

That's sees to me what you are intimating

I suggest you read what Franklin has to say and maybe you can take another look through your microscope
beliefnet.com/resourcelib/docs/44/Letter_from_Benjamin_Franklin_to_Ezra_Stiles_1.html

I see you are attacking the foundation of what makes our lives so bearable in these new times. What kind of society are you fighting to exist in?

>Jews are cumskins

the children of Jacob, specifically were taken out of Egypt where they were supposed to take over a parcel of land promised to Abram, iirc.

They were told to genocide the people living in and around the area b/c they were Nephalim and Rephaiim. No one really knows exactly what that means, some may have been giants. But they didn't actually do this and the whole thing turned into one gigantic clusterfuck along the way with God killing thousands of them, trapping them in the desert for 40 years, and constantly shit talking them, all while openly wanting to genocide every one of them multiple times (see Numbers).

The finally get their so called promise land and basically it was a giant shitshow with God eventually having other nations rape and pillage them, saving only a remnant which became even more corrupt subsequently. They become so wantonly evil, Jesus shows up (claiming to be the voice of the burning bush, i.e. the guy who wrote the tablets, took them out of egypt, etc,etc), he shit talks them, mocks them to the point the kill him.

The entire history of the jews is them getting their shit pushed in and mocked. they are the prime example of what not to do. i.e., what they were "chosen" for. It's not a surprise why they don't like goyim knowing their history/religion since it's basically a list of indictments and warnings against them.

It's simple once you get the terms correct.
The problem is everything is grouped as Jews today because of bad translations.

In Jesus' time:
Israeli (Anyone of ANY religion living in the Kingdom of Herod Archelaus)(The land of Israel was no longer Hebrew, it was mostly Samarian and Edomite)
Samaria occupied the centre of Iudaea (John 4:4)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herod_Archelaus

Israel (The 10 lost tribes of Israel, Never returned from Assyria, lost to the Ages)(Hebrews)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Lost_Tribes

Judahite (The 11th Tribe of Isreal)(The House of Judah)(Hebrew)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribe_of_Judah

Benjamite (The 12th Tribe of Isreal)(The House of Benjamin)(Hebrew)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribe_of_Benjamin#Later_History

Judean (Anyone of any religon living in the Kingdom of Judah)(Samarian. Edomite, Gentile, Pharassie, Sadducce, Essene, Karaite)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judea_(Roman_province)

Edomite (The Rulers of the Kingdom of Judah)(Originally from Assyria)(Pharassies, Sadducces, Karaites)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom#Classical_Idumaea

Jew (An Edomite that survived the Roman slaughter of Jerusalem after the falling of the Second Temple in 72 AD)(The never followed the Torah, they followed the Phariasses (Rabbinic Judaism) and the Talmud and Talmudic interpretation of the Torah, which they co-opted)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Jewish–Roman_War

>WeWuz

So what was a Hebrew ? A Hebrew was from the line of Moses. Descendants of Moses.
12 Tribes. 10 were lost to time. 2 Survived; The tribe of Judah and Benjamin.
Jesus was of the Tribe of Judah. David was from the tribe of Judah. Jesus came as the Messiah for the Tribe of Judah. Jesus was a Direct descendant of David. So do we know anything about them ? Well King David is described thusly in the Bible.

1Sam. 16:12 And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he.
1Sam. 17:42 And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance.
Song 5:10 My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.
Lam. 4:7 Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire:

They were Fair and Ruddy. Fair as in Fair Haired, skinned. What's ruddy ? Ruddy means that red shows through their skin.
So they were white, unless any other race shows red through their skin and is fair.

>Yemeni Hebrews
They are a minority

Most Jews are Askhenazis and Sephardis aka cumskins

Your god Kike.

are you familiar with what the new testament says about the jews?

The last Jewish King of Yemen was Mohammad

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sana'a_manuscript

>>Israel = 12 tribes/states
is this antisemetic youtu.be/e5aljapYRCA

what I meant is that they come in all shape and color
also sephardis are berbers mixed with israelite blood , they look somehow whiter compared to nowadays berbers because they weren't mixed with arab blood

jew-worship is fucking retarded

Jews of the bronze age were bloodthirsty and genocidal.
They exterminated numerous other tribes

Pretty much, except for the old god worship.
Muslims just worshipped money.
As for being God's chosen people that stopped at the new testament.
Now they are children of Satan.

If the Jewish religion is false what does it matter if they are "chosen?"

>tikkun olam
Fascinating breakdown, Is the Edomite Esau connection, anywhere in the old testament?I was never taught much about Jacob and Esau after the transfer of the birth right, but i was raise d in a pro kike Protestant church

Modern Jews are products of the bar Kokhba revolt and Rabbi Akiva (they were descended from the Pharisees, the Rabbis.)
Jesus was a Pharisee of sorts, tho he called them Children of Satan. The Pharisees were upstarts, outsiders kind of and so Jesus primarily dealt w/ them, e.g. Nicodemus was a Pharisee. So was Paul, obviously.
tl;dr the Jews killed Jesus Christ and were destroyed by the Romans. After that they've been the enmies of Jesus Christ, of the redemption and salvation of their host populations.
The worst enemies are the Gnostics, those who say creation itself is flawed, crated by a demiurge. When it's mans ideas towards creation that are flawed and create a demiurge (think man eating from the tree of good and evil,) and they craft a perverted will to counter it, deny it, conquer it, have dominion over it.

Anyone claiming or having claimed to be a Jew deserves death.

>Is the Edomite Esau connection, anywhere in the old testament?I
Yes. Genesis 36:

>Now these are the generations of Esau, who is Edom.

>2 Esau took his wives of the daughters of Canaan; Adah the daughter of Elon the Hittite, and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite;

>3 And Bashemath Ishmael's daughter, sister of Nebajoth.

>4 And Adah bare to Esau Eliphaz; and Bashemath bare Reuel;

>5 And Aholibamah bare Jeush, and Jaalam, and Korah: these are the sons of Esau, which were born unto him in the land of Canaan.

>6 And Esau took his wives, and his sons, and his daughters, and all the persons of his house, and his cattle, and all his beasts, and all his substance, which he had got in the land of Canaan; and went into the country from the face of his brother Jacob.

>7 For their riches were more than that they might dwell together; and the land wherein they were strangers could not bear them because of their cattle.

>8 Thus dwelt Esau in mount Seir: Esau is Edom.

>i was raise d in a pro kike Protestant church
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

>They exterminated numerous other tribes

The thing is, those other tribes are worse than Jews. Gotta remember that. Can you imagine worse than Jews?

>really think about it

I've been appreciating your posts so far. Do you have any criticisms of modern judaism in terms of the reasons why their religion can't legitimately rebuild the temple or provide the priests to attend to it?

The (((Oxford University Press's))) reported Scofield annotated bible is the root of the problem.

>The (((Oxford University Press's))) reported Scofield annotated bible is the root of the problem.
It's a big problem. If you've ever compared some of the changes they've made over the decades it's downright shocking. The fact that people will say in one breath that they will never have anyone between them and God like a priest or the pope and then immediately turn around and let Oxford University Press do just that by telling them what to think about the bible has always struck me as crazy.

Because whatever Judahites left either became christian are mixed into local populations.

The ones that remained after the Bar Kokba revolution were either killed by the Romans or ran away.

Simon bar Kokhba the Jewish Messiah
menorah.org/tragicms.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_Kokhba_revolt
Fought circa 132–136 AD

"Cochba [bar Kochba] ... tortured and killed the Christians who refused to aid him against the Roman army." - p. 42, Greek Apologists of the Second Century, Robert M. Grant, The Westminster Press, 1988.

"Another Christian apologist, Justin [Martyr], tells how ... Bar Kochba, the leader of the insurrection, ordered Christians alone to be executed if they would not deny and curse Jesus the Messiah." - Ibid.

"After the war the Jerusalem church, once Jewish, consisted only of Gentiles" - Ibid.

If anyone can be accused of turning Christianity into a Gentile religion, it is not Paul, nor the church leaders in Asia Minor, but rather Bar Kochba.
examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009/08/bar-kochba-and-christians.html


Even if they do rebuild the temple, they aren't hebrews. They are rabbinic edomites.

What English translations you consider the most accurate?

They hated him first
jpost.com/Local-Israel/In-Jerusalem/Massacre-at-Mamilla
>How many Christian prisoners of war were murdered by the Mamilla Pool? A precise number is of course now impossible to verify, but Israeli archaeologist Ronny Reich puts the tally at 60,000 before the Persian military stopped the carnage. One eyewitness, Strategius of St. Sabas, wrote: "Jews ransomed the Christians from the hands of the Persian soldiers for good money, and slaughtered them with great joy at Mamilla Pool, and it ran with blood.

This is the origin of Islam

>After some time passed, these Israelites started worshipping false Gods (like Molech) and sacrificing their babies into fire due to some (((occult practices))) they picked up when they were captured in Babylon
No. Leviticus came AFTER the ancient canaan religion, where El is also the supreme God. Modern judaism worships the same deity but without the others.

Juneau Alaska is the Khazarian Jewish Cabal stronghold.
Russian Federation and Israel own Alaska and intend to make a Gulag State.

The best translation is easily The 2005 Revised Standard Catholic Version (Oxford press Edition) although they are out of print and expensive. Second The Jerusalem Bible NOT the New Jerusalem.

Long Answer:
Real quick way to know if your bible is up to par.
Compare this Greek with John 3:36
biblehub.com/text/john/3-36.htm

If it's wrong, get another Bible.
Correctly translated Bibles for John 3:36
-------------------------------------------
American Standard Bible
Amplified Bible
English Standard Version
1599 Geneva Bible
Good News Bible
Lexham English Bible
Catholic Revised Standard and New Revised Standard Version (Ignatius) Bible

Secondly your Bible Must contain all the Deuterocanonical Books or it is not a Bible.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterocanonical_books

It is important because if you don't have such a Bible you will not understand that the Jews are Edomites and not Hebrews because you cannot read about the Maccabean Wars. Protestant Bibles (KJV etc) do not have it.

I'd get a Douay Rhiems for the Old testament and a Revised Catholic Version (Oxford Press if you can find one) or (Ignatius Bible) for the New Testament.


Thess pages break it down.
web.archive.org/web/20080611131536/http://umsis.miami.edu:80/~medmunds/RSVCEdiff.htm

archive.is/A16Ch

youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=jWzkC1NnMIo

>Even if they do rebuild the temple, they aren't hebrews. They are rabbinic edomites.
And as such they have no viable candidates to establish an Aaronic priesthood. Not to mention the fact that things like the Cohen modal haplotype is found widely in Arabs. All their attempts at reconstructing their genealogies have been farcical.

>Modern judaism worships the same deity but without the others.
I'm trying to piece together the nuances of what exactly you mean by this but I don't think I'm fully grasping it.

Needless to say modern judaism flat out worships satan. Anyone reading this may be thinking that this is hyperbole but it isn't. If you query a rabbi and they're honest with goys, yeah I know, they'll tell you interesting things. For example in the book of Job where God has a conversation with satan, jewish thinking says that God is actually having a conversation with Himself. Therefore, in judaism God is satan. There is no difference between the two. This is an example of their traditions making the word of God be of no effect.

>Not to mention the fact that things like the Cohen modal haplotype is found widely in Arabs. All their attempts at reconstructing their genealogies have been farcical.

That explains what happened to Medina

Some more info for you

Bibles containing the Deuterocanonical Books.
Douay-Rheims Version (DRA), New American Bible (NAB), Jerusalem Bible (JB), New Revised Standard Version(s) Catholic and Anglican, Ignatious (NRSV-Catholic), Revised Standard Version (RSV) Catholic and Anglican, (GNB) Good News Bible Catholic Edition.

"The Council of Hippo in 393, and the third (according to another reckoning the sixth) Council of Carthage in 397, under the influence of Augustine, who attended both, fixed the catholic canon of the Holy Scriptures, including the Apocrypha of the Old Testament. It did not change until Martin Luther changed it 1200 years later. Catholics still read bibles with them 1900 years later.

Jesus and the Apostles read the Koine Greek Septuagint (LXX) - which include the deuterocanonical books.

Catholic Bible - The Septuagint - Deutercanonicals
holytrinityparish.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Our-Catholic-Bibles.pdf

>There is no reason to dismiss ancient Noah
The Lubavitchers fully intend on applying the Noahide Laws in a way I don't think you're going to like. For instance,
>a goyim kills a goyim or a jew he is put to death, but a jew killing a goyim is not murder because non-jews are not human
Same with theft, sexual perversion, etc. They intend on being a priestly class with the sole authority to enforce the Noahide laws onto the goyim, but have no intentions of applying them to themselves. Like I said earlier, it's not the merit, but the compulsory aspect, and yes, the perverted application that I take issue with. Further, I think you're reading far too much into my posts.

Dude that chimp could tear you to shreads

bump for a good thread

To be fair, even the Old Testament makes it known that God has "chosen" them to occupy the land not even because of their own righteousness but because of the sins of the inhabitants of the land.

Deuteronomy 9:5
>It is not because of your righteousness or your integrity that you are going in to take possession of their land; but on account of the wickedness of these nations, the LORD your God will drive them out before you, to accomplish what he swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

The Old Testament is one big book about the condemnation about the acts of Jews and the sins of humanity in general. Read

What part of pre-Jew Noahide laws are owned by Pharisees?

>>a goyim kills a goyim or a jew he is put to death, but a jew killing a goyim is not murder because non-jews are not human

A Liberian kills a Liberian or an American he is put to death, but an American killing a Liberian is not murder because Americans are not Liberians

same thing


>compulsory aspect
I'm reading in just fine, that's why you commented about it