What country creates the best soldiers?

What country creates the best soldiers?

you tell me

UK.

I'd definitely say Serbs or Croats. They average a 2.0 KDR, and in past wars had very few people NOT willing to go to war.

lol threadly reminder the US has the best KD: in human history

This
If we joined the Nazis we'd rule the world

LOL the Serbs suced.

Tried to put the rest of Yugoslavia under it's yoke and ended up not even be able to keep Kosovo and Montenegro.

Fucking failures!

Your role in ww2 was minimal compared to UK and USSR. Sorry mate, you waited to see who was going to win and then hopped on their dick like a 2 dollar prostitute.

sucked^

Funland obviously.

Greeks imo

Yeah man! That's exactly what happened. NATO had nothing to do with it. They were just on vacation!
Check KDRs for all 3 wars. Croats and Serbs are the only ones somewhat on par. I think the Bosnians and Albanians had 0.25kdr even with the help of NATO.

Irish led by foreign officers

Sexy fucking war.

Sparta

>joining 2 years into a 6 year war is waiting for who would win
Stop reading soviet propaganda

If we're going by K/D then IDF. Sitting in a truck murdering 10 sandchildren a day

Legoland

Rather difficult to judge presently unless your country has been involved in a war recently.

Finland was very impressive in the winter war; but the culture has changed a lot since the days of Simo Haya.

United States military has gone down hill during the Obama years when we lowered standards. Trump and Mattis are trying to reverse this; but they're facing resistance from Obama appointees and judges.

On average the Ruskies may be the best at this point. They still have military involvement from time to time and they've managed to avoid the liberal bullshit that has deteriorated western militaries over the past two decades.

The UK's contribution to WWII was basically just getting their asses kicked off the continent then waiting for the US to take charge.

The Ruskies did the heavy lifting when it came to defeating the Germans taking over 10 million casualties and inflicting over 5 million on the eastern front with an assist from some particularly brutal Russian winters.

However that doesn't diminish the US contribution in WWII.

1: We enacted the Lend Lease act that allowed the British and Russians to get their militaries running to resist the Germans.

2: The Normandy invasion and allied bombing campaigns made the Germans fight on two fronts and made their defeat inevitable.

3: We took down Japan.

4/5ths of the German army casualties died in Russia. You nukes Japan because the Soviets were at their doorstep and you didn't want the Soviets to take Japan. You then quickly nuked them into submission but it wasn't for that. It was to stop the Soviet march into Japan.
Of course USA contributed. Just not as much as the history books say. War was over quicker because of USA. But likely the results would have been the same regardless, just with more casualties.

The country that has soldiers that are willing to fight to the death for their beliefs out of the necessity of fighting. Soldiering is determined by the ego, and your mental understanding of why you fight; a soldier fights out of necessity.
A warrior fights with emotion instead, out of contingency.
A hero fights for a transcendent purpose, out of imperativity.
The perfect person is a combination of all three.

I understand it took the Finns a lot to kick the Russian's asses but wasn't most of their win attributed to the weather? Then again the Finns knew how to best utilize it for an effective defensive war

Polanball is never wrong

America. Theres a reason why the nazis lost (stfu britfags)

>America
>the ones who's military history for the last decades has been struggling against rice farmers and muzzies using wwii tech

you don't even belong in the options