ITT: Art Evolution

...

...

...

...

...

digital is cancer

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Where do you think the images are from, newfag?

Devolved

Why does digital look like someone put lard on the camera lens?

1995 == 2009 (different colours different lighting conditions)
1989 > 2013 (the shading in the new version makes no sense, the proportions are weird)
1992 >>> 2014 (obviously)
1999 == 2011 (mostly stylistic changes, no qualitative change)
1993 < 2014 (the proportions in the old version are odd and the shading makes no sense given the light conditions in the image)
1998 > 2010 (odd proportions - elongated face - and poorly drawn hair for the new version)1974

a shit

It's like they learned to draw anime from an American "How to Draw Anime" book.

Kubo's facial proportions were absurd for anyone besides Don Kanonji or real square jaws.

You know what's an actual unpopular opinion? Saying that digital is better thal cell.

How about Slayers? 1995 Lina Inverse or 2008 Lina Inverse?

>odd proportions
not just proportions if you ask me.The drab collors makes 2003 stand out more.

Is anime as creatively bankrupt as hollywood?