Jawbone found in Israel pushes date of human departure from Africa back 60,000 years

>Modern humans were wandering out of Africa at least 180,000 years ago — some 60,000 years earlier than previously thought.
>The new migration date comes after ancient stone tools and part of a fossilised Homo sapiens jaw bone with teeth were discovered in a cave in northern Israel.

abc.net.au/news/science/2018-01-26/oldest-homo-sapiens-modern-human-fossil-found-outside-africa/9357276

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Subpluvial
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3174671/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635020/
nature.com/articles/nature22336?sf86030179=1
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0010648
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069156/bin/1017511108_sapp.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=wh0F4FBLJRE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

THAS RITE

>The current year, still believing in the jewish carbon dating

>Race isn't real!

>Oy vey! We can determine that we diverged from blacks 60,000 years earlier than previously thought simply from a 1/4 of a jawbone.

it's a 7 toed ALIEN FOOT

>thinking niggers walked out of Africa and somehow turned white.

But the earth is only 6000 years old.

>180k years, 0 cavities
>29 years, 2 root canals 8 cavities and an implant

where did i go so wrong bros

>Jawbone found in Israel pushes date of human departure from Africa back 60,000 years
Just making shit up as you go along. It's a counter to the recent news of theories of Europe being home.

drop the sugary shit

Industrial sugars

Lol the Annunaki genetically engineered us 400k years ago.

they are still pushing this nonsense

sugar

So what are those 200,000 year old human skeletons doing in Bulgarian caves?

Out of africa is bullshit anyway, Humans didn't just appear from a discrete hole in africa; niggers have no neanderthal DNA, we do. Ipso facto out of africa is jewish bullshit.

>180.000 years ago people already wanted to get out of this shitty continent
There's no hope.

Did they miss the memo that the Africa theory is wrong?

at this point talking about OOA lost all its meaning, sapiens may have evolved in north Africa/Levant, expanded everywhere, then moved around, again into/out Africa in various waves and so on, due to various events including the Toba eruption, which may explain why Y-DNA/mtDNA looks african in origin, while perhaps it was simply preserved better there while Eurasians went through much harsher bottlenecks that wiped out older lineages almost completely
I say n. Africa because I'm pretty sure few months ago they found a skull classified as sapiens and older than that 200k years old they had previously found in Africa

Yeah, the exact origin does not really matter that mich. Admixtures with other branches of hominids are much more interesting and even if we did originate in Africa the selective pressures we went through have shaped us into something completely different.

>modern humans have only existed for 200,000 years
>psychologically modern humans have likely only existed for ~60,000 years
>Africans have been genetically separate from the rest of the human race for 180,000 years
Holy shit how can anyone claim that the differences are only skin deep.

Just watch a group of Africans, see how strange they are. They aren’t like the rest of us.

Not sugar, caries infected humans from rats a while ago. Holes in teeth wasn't really a thing before that.

Well, if the israelis say so, mus be true

>over 200,000 years of human history
>3 sentence summary
>conclusion: jews

it makes sense that you want to get out of africa as fast as possible with all these niggers around

Humans were never in Africa

The oldest human (as in homo sapiens) fossils are still found in Africa. North Africa is part of Africa, you dimwit. The native North Africans who look like West Asians, came to North Africa during the late prehistoric era, which is why they have a lot of subsaharan African admixture. They probably outnumbered them and mixed, maybe killed some. Maybe the subsaharan looking ones died of disease. Who knows.

It was an out of Africa, then a back to africa migration for some people.

>n. Africa because I'm pretty sure few months ago they found a skull classified as sapiens

That skull doesn't look like a north African skull, despite it being homo sapiens. That person likely had dark skin and was some archaic form of homosapiens, not anatomically modern.

Are you just figuring this out now?

Zero sympathy for whites in shithole Africa

If the jawbone is matchable to a cro magnon man it means human racial groups are older than we thought.

n. Africa is something quite different from deep sub-saharan africa in terms of human origins even if technically is still part of that massive continent, makes it much closer to Eurasia given the geographical barriers
add to this the article of the OP and things get closer to Eurasia

>That skull doesn't look like a north African skull
who the fuck said otherwise? I simply said it was an homo sapiens, a sapiens older than the one found in sub-saharan east Africa, which wasn't anatomically modern either

yes brother my third eye is opening more and more every day thank you for showing me the way with your nuanced and subtle analyses

There's literally no reason to continue believing that apes came from Africa.

Non Homo Sapien admixture is incredibly small difference between select few Asian, Europeans, and Africans. 1% due to Neanderthals and Denisovans. Of course these could thus be subspecies, but not different enough to call it a difference race/species. Would be a good research project though.

cromagnon is a much younger taxon referring to an anatomically modern sapiens that emerged in Europe ~40/30k years ago, represented by a much more progressive specimen compared to these sapiens, even compared to Skhul-Kafzeh hominins(100kBP, Israel)

It means whites Jews Arabs Indians are practically the same. From this to Alexander. Only races really are blacks us whites and Chinese. Every other race is just part of one of those 3.

Who the fuck cares when or how old these skeletons are lol

I only brush my teeth like once a week if that and I have nice straight teeth. Part of it is genetic, but I almost never eat sugary shit, unless I'm obligated (someone's birthday or something along those lines)

>stupidity: the post
Out of Africa theory is the most belieavable theory precisely because most subsaharans don't have neanderthal or denisovan ancestry, yet the rest of humans are mostly homo sapiens sapiens. This indicates common origin in Africa and waves of migration that led to mixing with different species of the genus Homo.
>carbon dating
>over 100k years
Amerimutts are increasingly becoming unable to science.
>hurr durr because that skull was found in north africa that means the population it belongs to is the ancestor of current north Africans
You're dumb desu.

North Africans look and are genetically closer to West Asians because they're the product of a recent back to Africa migration that most likely happened in the new stone age or close to that period. Scientists are starting to realize that early neolithic farmers migrated to that area and left a big impact when it comes to admixture.

But they are not "pure". They have a lot of subsaharan African admixture, about 20 to 25%.

>makes it much closer to Eurasia given the geographical barriers
That mathematically doesn't make any sense. North Africa literally borders subsaharan Africa land wise. IT doesn't matter if the desert (which wasn't even a desert at that time) borders the area. A desert is not as big of a geographical barrier as the sea. Of course there is a land connection to West Asia but that is small.

Anyway, the Sahara desert was green. The last desertification happened relatively recently 6000 years ago. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neolithic_Subpluvial

>who the fuck said otherwise?
Your silly attempt at setting a difference and relating it to modern times makes no sense unless you imply it looked like or closer to what North African skull would look like.

the jew is hyperbolic in usage, it's ultimately no different than targeting the (((bourgeoisie))) or something.

Both aims are to topple Financial Democracy.
Marxism is not a political doctrine, it is simply a revolutionary ideal.
Fascism is not a political doctrine, it is simply the political philosophy that argues we should rule through philosophy and not democracy.

That's why there are no examples of "true communism", your ideals are for revolution, they do not govern. The result is something akin to Fascism as it is clearly the proper way of doing things.

Communists are not on "the right side of history", they are merely the shadows of Fascists.

>hurr durr because that skull was found in north africa that means the population it belongs to is the ancestor of current north Africans
holy shit, how can someone have such a bad reading comprehension, I literally never said anything like this
I'm gonna ignore the rest of your post because clearly you have some serious reading problems

Mfw dumb asses on both sides of the debate think every new archaeological find is immutable.

You ignore the rest of the post because it complete destroys your statement. You're an idiot who thinks the Sahara desert was always a desert since the dawn of time when in reality it goes through cycles of desertification and greenery. People make fun of the bible thumpers but you're quite a moron in a comparison.

your post is laughable, and so is your intelligence, since you have trouble with basic english

>found in Israel

It's not. OOA isn't bullshit, it's probably true. What is certainly not set in stone are the dating of migrations and the relevant ones.

I mean you can draw a line with near certainty and claim homo sapeins are not older than 1 million years. But that's easy to do. Can they be as old as 500k? Maybe so. That's the more tricky part, and laying out exactly the major waves of migration.

Also, not all migrations give birth to people that exist today. It could very well be that modern humans who are not subsaharan Africans are descendants of but one or two migrations out of Africa.

You're a dimwit who doesn't know simple hydrography yet tries to engage in a topic that's far above your pay grade. You remind me of Kraut and Tea. He's a full retard just like you.

How old are you 11?

Israel is in the Levant and since that area was right between Africa and the rest of Asia and also in the middle of the road towards Europe (going to Asia minor, then entering Europe), there was people there. Also, Israel doesn't have a war in its land and the people there aren't people who deny human evolution, so they are willing to do research looking for fossils.

If the rest of the Middle East got its shit together, you'd be seeing an astronomical amount of findings. So much is being lost to science because of barbarism.

The current theory advocated by scientists is that humans didn't leave Africa until 70,000 years ago, period. Genetic evidence has suggested an older date;

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3174671/
>>Extensive simulation results reject the null model of no admixture and allow us to infer that contemporary African populations contain a small proportion of genetic material (≈2%) that introgressed ≈35 kya from an archaic population that split from the ancestors of anatomically modern humans ≈700 kya
>taxon that may have lived in central Africa
>We estimated an initial split time of 1.25 Mya (95% CI, 0.7–2.1 Mya) and an admixture time of 37 kya (95% CI, 1–137 kya

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1635020/
>The gene microcephalin (MCPH1) regulates brain size during development and has experienced positive selection in the lineage leading to Homo sapiens
>the lineage leading to modern humans was split from another Homo lineage, and the two lineages remained in reproductive isolation for ≈1,100,000 years
>Furthermore, the worldwide frequency distribution of the D allele, exceptionally high outside of Africa but low in sub-Saharan Africa (29), suggests, but does not necessitate, admixture with an archaic Eurasian population
>an archaic Eurasian population
>an archaic Eurasian population

Whites and Asians don't come from Africa - we existed over 1.1mil years ago, and when we moved to Africa we bred with local hominids to create blacks - just like we made Europeans by mixing with neanderthals, and Asians by mixing with neanderthals/denisovans.

I've prepared a visual aid for the archaic genetic introgression, it always pops up in these threads.

I read that as JEWBONE

You need to consume lots of sugar to make the cavities go away. Trust me I’m a biologist I know.

look at the forehead of this nigger, now look at a german forehead, notice anything?

You can see that Hitlers forehead, over the eyebrows is much bigger, but this is not a bad thing, because it makes the frontal lobe bitter, now look at the niggers eyebrows they are prominent like in the homo erectus, and the mittle of the forehead is small and narrow,, the forehead of white people in the middle is big and wide, giving the frontal lobe more place, pic related

Nothing in your post suggests humans didn't originate in Africa.

First part just says central africans have a ancestry of a different population that split from the ancestor of homo sapiens sapiens 700k years before present.

Second paragraph clearly says
>suggests, but does not necessitate

And you didn't quote the beginning of the paragraph sentence before :
>Speculation about the identity of the archaic Homo population from which the microcephalin D allele introgressed into the modern human gene pool points to the Neanderthal lineage as a potential (although by no means only) candidate. Anatomically modern humans and Neanderthals shared a long period of coexistence, from as early as 130,000 years ago in the Middle East (39) to as late as 35,000 years ago in Europe (40), consistent with the estimated introgression time of the microcephalin D allele at or sometime before ≈37,000 years ago

Estimate introgession is 37000 years ago. So that Eurasian population is estimated to be of that time which doesn't go against the OOA theory.

This one pushed it back 300,000 years.

nature.com/articles/nature22336?sf86030179=1

no

race realism

>modern human
>implying we're not the same ancient savages
>implying the bogs aren't the real modern humans

It could be 400k years. I wouldn't be surprised if they found a fossil that old. Hominin fossils are very rare.

Enjoy you high blood pressure and heart attack.

It was indeed H. erectus, H. habilis or H. naledi.

Black skulls are very gracile - very small brow ridges. Blacks are the result of humans mating with local African hominids 37,000 years ago - they aren't actually that archaic. Blacks have more genetic heterogeneity than non-Africans - pic related.

Topkek. You have shitty genetics. I only brush my teeth around 8-10 times per week and have never had a cavity in my life

since the last ice age ended 12k years(ish) ago, wouldn't that mean that africans developed darker skin AFTER?

Wouldn't that imply that the kangz were the descendant of white kangz?

mee 2, everyone else i know has holes and caries, i only eat carbs, protein and fat, no real sugar, because i just don'T like it. I hate cookies, snickers, nutella and all that other shit. Also i think that the yellow shit you get on your teeth helps your teeth regenerate. I literally never have problems with my teeth ever.

I once had an inflammation on one of my wisdom teeth because there is a hole in my flesh, because there is not enough place in my mouth for the wisdom teeth. I know why, because ive got the sucky toys from my mother waaayy to long, making my jaw weak. Normallly wisdom teeth fit into your mouth, thats propably the only thing i have to get removed, sadly.

8-10 times

thats alot

Isn’t the rule supposed to be twice a day one in the morning and one at night? That’s what my dentists have always told me but I’m too lazy to brush my teeth at night

yes once in the evening once at night

I haven't been doing either, the cops haven't arrested me yet

>Second paragraph clearly says
>suggests, but does not necessitate

They suggest a Eurasian origin because the derived MCPH1 allele is almost non-existant in sub-Saharan Africans. Neanderthals, who split from humans 765Kya, also had the ancestral MCPH1 allele;

>journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0010648

If non-Africans have neanderthal DNA and Africans don't, and humans and neanderthals split 765Kya, and both neanderthals and sub-Saharan Africans have the ancestral MCPH1 allele, then the population ancestral to non-neanderthals and non-sub-Saharan Africans had to split from both over 765Kya.

Since the date of the emergence of the derived MCPH1 allele and the other introgressions into Africans are 1.1Mya+ years old, this means that the population ancestral to whites and Asians had to emerge over 1.1Mya.

>Estimate introgession is 37000 years ago. So that Eurasian population is estimated to be of that time which doesn't go against the OOA theory

Yes - before then, no sub-Saharan African had the derived MCPH1 allele. Since other introgressions date to the same time, we can concretely say that sub-Saharan Africans didn't even exist until 37,000 years ago.

Why to the Khoisan display the Y-haplogroup R1b at a 10% rate;

>ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3069156/bin/1017511108_sapp.pdf
>pp8 - Khomani San - R1b1b2a1a: 10% (2)

Science is accumulative by its procedural structure and fallows the data onward, impervious to the barking of imbeciles.

Modern diet. Indoor life.

> only cleans his teeth once a week

clean your teeth you disgusting faggot, the yellow shit is placque

>implant
Yeah, a breast implant

The earth was one giant continent. So out of Africa just means the middle of it. Like bears we evolved differently and adapted to climates.

>inb4 further evidence pushes African departure back 6 gorillion years
Post yfw you find out your ancestors have probably been non-nigger for 50000 generations.

FYI I don't get why we get angry about the OOA theory

Who gives a fuck if we came from there, it has no bearing on modern race relations at all

>non africans are even further removed from whites than previously thought
>le all one race: the human race

meant "africans"

Is there any other scientific field more cucked and pathtic than human history and genetics? First it was historians getting so utterly BTFO by Gobkeli Tepe that history books literally have to be re-written (with massive omissions), and now they're getting '''early human''' history wrong. The most despicable part is these fucking cunts don't care to correct themselves, because it would mean their entire lives have been a lie. They're the very subhumans they believe in.

...

acidic lymphatic interstitial fluids specifically in the jaw area.
do some fasting you bloated nigger.

Yeah, but y'all niggas still came out of Africa, doe...

>out of africa

Or that's why the area is getting the special treatment
Maybe they found loads more gobleki tepes and older

It's completely unproven and it's not likely true. It's more likely we all evolved separately.

>Fat
>Nigger
>Do-rag
>Star of Solomon
>Patchy beard
>Useless rings
God could not have created a more perfect specimen

It's pretty much nailed now; sapiens started at Abbo

>FOUND IN ISRAEL.

>retard.

I thought all science was settled?

They were trying to leave their shithole countries.

>found in Israel
They would never lie to us, right?

Niggers are homo erectus.

"wez all Afrikangz n sheeit" is a Jewish psyop, but Hominids are all native to Africa. People tend to conflate modern humans with those of the ancient past who left Africa; we weren't all Black skinned woolly haired Negroes

>found in Isreal

All legitimacy lost

Idiot here, why are blacks dumber than every other race if we all came from the same place? What created the differences between Asians and blacks?

I personally don't buy it. The fossil record is absolute shit, and in general all of the theories are literal guesses based on the tiniest bits of evidence. The whole reason they think this is that the oldest bits of humanoid remains they've found have been in Africa... which happens to be mostly where people have (extensively) gone looking for it, mostly owing to the assumption that black people are less evolved (horrifically racist, of course).

This is one finding, probably weighing a few ounces, which revised the estimate of when we "left Africa" by literally 50%.

So clearly we're not talking about a super-reliable Science here.

So instead of Africans, we're all descended from Jews? That's not much of an improvement.

the good ones explored and did something with themselves and the world, the retards stayed behind
exposure to challenging environments forced other races to continue advancing or die out, Africans face no challenges in their general group survival

>homo gasolinus sniffus

I find your lack of empirical science disturbing

youtube.com/watch?v=wh0F4FBLJRE