Consent is a white male construct

>The presumption of innocence is "strictly" a legal construct that shouldn't stop Canadians from believing women who come forward with allegations of assault, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said Thursday.
FUCKING BASED

Other urls found in this thread:

cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-resigns-ontario-pc-1.4503040
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

I haven't heard a peep from this guy since he won his leadership. But as I remind everyone when allegations of sexual misconduct come up, never forget Gian Gomeshi

I did a quick scan of the "allegations" against Brown and they don't seem to even rise to the level of those against Aziz Ansari.

I can't believe this isn't a parody headline in the Onion or something.

Canadian politicians being complete cucks, as usual.

Y-you're not going to elect him as your next Prime Minister, are you Canada?

NDP are such fucking losers. I'm just going to vote communist at least they have some balls.

cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-resigns-ontario-pc-1.4503040

>By the time the party moved to Brown's house, the woman asserts she was "very" intoxicated.
>She says Brown invited her into his bedroom and began kissing her. She claims she didn't kiss him back, and instead froze up. Finally realizing it was "awkward," the woman says Brown stopped kissing her.

She was 19 at the time, and stayed working with him for years afterward.

I'm not saying he shouldn't be canned for aggressively trying to pick up an underling - IMO he should be - but that doesn't in any way make him a "rapist" as he'll surely be labled.

...also if I understand his statement, he's denying this in its entirety, which makes it extra dicy. If he has any balls (and isn't lying) then he should sue her for defamation.

based bro-tier sikh

>bring drunk co-worker home
>start kissing her
>realize she's not into it at all, probably didn't realize what was going on
>get massive blueballs, still stop because she's not into it and you're above that

>still labeled a rapist

You can't win, can you

No.

They are communists, you dipshit.

is this retard saying we are all guilty until proven innocent of whatever crime someone accuses us of? and he writes laws?

World is 8% white stfu. It’s a nig nog stinky bog. Looks like we gotta rise again

No they aren't you stupid fuck. NDP are Democratic socialists if you think these are the same you are a retard who shouldn't be allowed to vote.

He's saying "innocent until proven otherwise" is a legal concept, which is about what you can expect out of a stone throwing sandnigger, doesn't matter what flavor religion

No, he's saying that "innocent until proven guilty" only applies to the courts, we don't have to hold ourselves to that standard in opinions.

Jagmeet is not really wrong its just how you interpret it. Presumption of innocense is purely a legal thing and there for due process. You can still believe someone is guilty and support the accuser if you so wish.

So commies.

I did not think blue balls were a thing until recently. Boy a chick turning you sown after fingering her or making out will literally make your balls physically hurt. Thats why you should have your way with them, strangle them, and then discard their bodies in a wooded area.

I never said they were the same thing, I just said NDP are communists. I don't care what they call themselves so normies and boomer retards think they're a good choice, they're communists.
Besides, if you can't draw massive similarities between "democratic" socialism and communism, then you should be the one not allowed to vote, retard.

Extremely retarded and dangerous. People before a case gets to the court system should take the stance the person is innocent until found guilty, to say not means people will already accuse and treat the person as guilty, possibly attack and harass them.

People don't decide if somebody is guilty/not guilty, the Judaical system does.

That's why up until that point the are legally innocent.

Every person accused will be treated as guilty right away if you follow this idiots chain of thought.

>b-based towel heads

I hope not, or it's a fate worse than LEAF.
>SHITTED

This is the first leafmutt meme I laughed at. Well done whoever made this.

As long as you're willing to face the consequences to fire someone should that someone be proven innocent, like giving the job back plus paying extra to make up for the loss.

The difficulty of "leave it to the courts" in this case is he's accused of something that's no crime, but would seem to be disqualifying in the present age from a leadership position (taking advantage of that position).

>The presumption of innocence is "strictly" a legal construct that shouldn't stop Canadians from believing women who come forward with allegations of assault, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said Thursday.

So if this is his position, he's already told his opponents how to defeat him. What's stopping anyone from lobbing some sexual accusations at him?