>Hitler was a good man, even though he started a war that killed millions of White men, killed the best and brightest Aryan stock of Germany and subjected half of Europe to communism due to his militaristic incompetence.
Hitler was a good man, even though he started a war that killed millions of White men...
Who told you Hitler started the war?
>Hitler started a war
OH NO NO NO
NZ obviously had some Maori book burning ceremony for you to believe that shit
One could argue he saved lives by making ideological choices that expedited the loss of the war. However would there have even been a Nazi party or even a second war without him?
Started the war???
Source?
>Inb4 history channel
well germany started it atleast or are the schools teaching wrong?
Didn't Germany start it by pre-emptively invading Austria and France?
>hitler started the war
uhh lol
bro you're making us look bad over here
I just dont know maybe he was good maybe not honestly i think it was the drugs that ruined him
>every university in the world in teaching history wrong
There's a point where you have to face reality
>implying invading sovereign nations with your country's military is "starting a war"
that's like saying eating bread crust gives you curly hair because old people say it.
Exactly, I take the word of jewish historians and university professors as gods law.
cute
Getting baited into starting a war is still technically starting a war.
>be Germany
>constantly bitch and whine about post-war restrictions
>finally reach an agreement with Frenchies and Brits because they're tired of hearing you bitch and whine
>in exchange for not demanding anymore clay and threatening war, they give you the clay you demanded
>once again threaten war
>act surprised when war happens
really makes u think
His mum
There were a lot more than a single instance of appeasement. Hitler should have known the eternal Anglo abides by the three strike rule.
...
>still in denial the anglo has been ruled by jews for 600 years
I know, but the Munich agreement was the biggest one meant to stop it.
...
...
Hitler was a douche bag with tiny hands and leather shorts and a taste for big colourful lollypops.
He nonced his own niece (who shot herself) and then shot himself when he couldn't get his own way.
Waa waa. Reich of a thousand years. Try 12. ABBA was the only good thing to come out of the whole escapade.
So, who did start the war?
Are you realy going to tell me that poland invaded in a fit of suicidal overconfidance, but the Wehrmacht pulled off a perfect blitzkrieg despite beeing attacked, not having any surprise and just reacting.
Also the poles, a people that are used to russians and germans beeing interested in clay they held just somehow did not think through what the molotov Ribbentrop pact means for them in the event of war.
...
Just a reminder that Hitler put fluoride in water to make people docile.
>implying public relations and actual policy are the same thing
>ignoring the fact that germany first invaded their ally, Poland
>oh yeah let's just stop after allowing Hitler invade over half of Europe
*yawn*
...
...
This is a prime example of why gadsden libertarian niggers are cretins. They love what ever free market jew system lets them enjoy all their shit while being completely intellectually dishonest.
>Hitler declared war on Polen after clay returning negotiations hit a brick wall
>French and anglos declare war on Germany and start ww2 because they suddenly care about ethnic sovereignty.
Wait, seriously? Austria at the time was effectively still very 'German' in most regards. There were plenty of Austrians who were in favor of annexation. Pic related.
As for France- they (and the UK) declared war on Germany when they invaded Poland to reclaim territories. Hitler claimed the Polish were harming the German communities still there.
Although I'm sure in Hitler's eyes, all of these ceded territories dating back as far as the 1800's were subject to the German Reich, let alone Lebensraum.
...
Don't forget
>French and anglos stop caring about sovereignty as soon as Germany is destroyed and leave Poland in Soviet hands, along with the rest of eastern Europe
...
>I can't refute your statement so I'll just call you a jew!
Nice try faggot. Come back when you have a basic understanding of history and economics.
>libertarian
>any understanding of history and economics
Lmao
> the allied forces were good men, even though they allowed themselves to be pushed into a war in which they expressly fought and died for their own families' and descendants' systematic extinction
Nice try, comrade. But no. The Nazis fought for freedom from the capitalist chains, they are not to blame for defending themselves.
>Lincoln was a good man, even though he started a war that killed hundreds of thousands of White men, killed the best and brightest Yankee stock of the United States and subjected half of the United States to Reconstructionism and Carpetbagging due to his militaristic incompetence.
>Caesar was a good man, even though he started a civil war that killed untolg numbers of Legionnaires, killed the best and brightest Roman stock of The Republic and subjected half of Rome's colonies to military dictatorship due to his social incompetence.
>Napoleon was a good man, even though he started a war that killed millions of White men, killed the best and brightest Gallic stock of France and subjected half of Europe to Russian Orthodox absolutism due to his militaristic incompetence.
Straight from the "nobody ever denied the Holocaust thread" from a few minutes ago ..
LOL
Fucking OP essentially admits that there is no such thing as a "denial", because "I didn't know about that" is not a "denial". Well then what the fuck would a denial be?
>New Zealand is a country, even though it is heavily dependent on international trade and never had an internalized economy.
>can't even get a real flag
>maybe we should finally learn from history and only send betas and our worst to fight the jew wars.
...
The clay claims gemany had were valid, I give you that but everybody has valid claims one one another in Europe due to the constant moving around of borders we used to do.
You realy can't expect to enforce those claims by war and not have your rivals join in, especialy not if they have a written public pact with the Nation you want to attack.
Hitler hoped that England and France would pussy out and lost his bet. It's absurd to claim that he was a good boy and didn't so nuffin. France and England joining in is valid by the same rules of power politics that justify Hitler claiming the Sudetenland and Danzig.
not sure if the slide is for (you)s or just another shill
(OP)
>subjected half of Europe to communism due to his militaristic incompetence
>subjected half of Europe to communism
>communism
kek wut
And then there is this idiot, that can not understand even simple greentext
>a cucked german is going to tell us how hitler is a bad goy
The jews really destroyed you
i mean it's not his fault EU got communist.
He just lost the war. I believe communism would come earlier if it wasn't for him and germany
Because you're not even worth debating with.
Do you have any evidence for that at all?
Top notch arguing and text comprehension skill champ, did you ever consider becoming a radical feminist? you would fit right in
So how does this equal Hitler starting ww2?
The Allies were the bad guys in WW2, user.
> Taking back territory that was formally yours makes you the aggressor.
Unironically kill yourself
He attacked a Nation that had a written public assurance of defense by England and France, how is this not starting the war?
>wars are inherently bad
Treaty of Versailles. If a country decided to just start killing Germans today in the hundreds of thousands, including yourself and your family, would you like it if Merkel just ignored it?
>waaaawaaaaa hitler is responsible for everything waaaaaaaa its not like he sued for peace 5+ times or anything waaaaah its not like jews are problematic in modern age waaaaah its not like we are losing our countries because our grandfathers picked the wrong side waaaaaaah let in more shitskins to replace me god i hate nazzis
Is this a meme?
A boycott is not a war
>not wanting to suck Hitlers cock
>on Sup Forums
m8
Just read the responses. You should have known they will not let anyone criticize their daddy.
every meme is a meme.
This still does not invalidate what said.
New Zealand is rightful Dutch clay
WELL ZIP ZOP ZOOBITY BOP GUMBO CHOP PUDDING POP
Fake quote
Yeah, of course, we're telling you exactly that. Look at this through the lens of an overconfident Poland - Poland, which had only just very recently become a sovereign nation of its own after many years under others' boots - thinking that its alliances would provide adequate protection for a low-level guerilla war against the Nazis, and badly, badly misunderestimating the Nazis.
He meant the Soviet Union dumbass
youtube.com
>the reality
It's you that isn't facing it, the world has been under 70 years of propaganda against germany and german people to the point where it's even extrapolated to every european that all europeans are bad and all germans are bad. When you finally realize this it will blow your fucking mind. Do you know why? Because the nazi's were some of the first in modern history to accurately point out what the jews were doing. They had already taken over russia with the bolshevik revolution and hitler didn't want it to happen to germany aswell. He had good reason to be afraid of it because germany was clearly next. They had already setup socialist and communist parties in germany and attempted an armed revolution in 1918. There was an intent of jews to destroy the german people way before hitler. And nothing makes that clearer than today. They got germany involved in wwI and then gave hitler no way out in wwII, when what he wanted was the communist jews out of germany so it didn't turn into russia 2.0 and save western civilization and european peoples which they had intention to destroy, so two back to back wars, crippled them with reparation debt, and now flood an already weakened germany with mass immigration to finish them off.
It's all so very clear, be it allies or axis, every european based country is under deliberate demographic attack because there is no reason for not closing those borders or for allowing these people in to such an extent that they displace europeans in their homelands for the first time in world history. US is under attack this way since 1965, at the same time UK is under attack, france is under attack germany is under attack, and virtually every european based or european ancestral homeland is under attack. Here let a well respected jewish rabbi explain it to you. youtube.com
That was and is Europe's fate anyway. At least Hitler *tried* to reverse it.
He didn't try to reverse shit, just to reestablish German imperialism.
Read his table talks: it is obvious of what he thought of independent states and had in mind for most of them.
Also at the same time, they make hitler and the nazi's out to the the worst people in history for this reason. The total casualties of wwII on ALL SIDES, in a MILITARY CONFLICT was about 80+ million. stalin and mao alone killed that many of their OWN PEOPLE. stalin 24 mao 60. They also lie about the holochaust number, it was not 6 million the official number is like 1½ million or something, and the death camps they couldn't even find, every deathcamp inspected by the allies turned out to be work camps to fuel the war effort, only camps inspected by the then communist russians were death camps, this is the official claim those 6 camps. And only after the fall of the soviets did the numbers come out and the casualties started to go down and down and down and down to the point where they even had to change the plaques. But in the media they still say 6 million. And due to famine, infections and all kinds of things, it's war supply lines are being cut off etc. And i love the pseudo experts who haven't studied this at all who also pretend that the nazis wanted to take over the entire world.
Almost every year or second year, they have some bullshit movie about holochaust or wwII which contains pure propaganda under the guise of being based on historical events. There's one out now with churchill called the darkest hour speaking of which. This immense propaganda over all these years is from where most people base their oppinions.
retard detected
Reread your rant again but this time with a clear mind.
strawman argument.
Europeans cared about ethnic sovereignty when it came to Europe for decades.
In post soviet countries people doubt if this "victory" over Germany was worse it. Especially looking on our cities horrified with soviet "architecture". At least we have pretty women.
Fag
bless your cotton socks.
The Nazis were seemingly the lesser evil, but ever since the Soviet Union disintegrated the tables have turned. There is guarantee that the Greater German Reich would have done the same.
And even more so taking in mind that Hitler had plans to displace a part of us and germanize the others. Atleast after Stalin died the full russification campaign was brought to a halt, I doubt the same would happen under Hitler.
>At least we have pretty women
Not really. And what difference does it make when many of them emigrate looking for a rich dick to hop on?
The Soviets had a completely equal part in starting the war, yet Germany was the only one charged for it, and even today no one but Germany is blamed
well, at least its not a spider
Funny how you mock this view, but the view that Hitler wanted to kill bunch of Europeans comes from mostly countries that were never touched by German occupation and Soviet Union (which lies about everything). I never met a single Lithuanian that said that German occupation was worse than soviet, its mostly "it was better" or "it was same". So I rather take experiences of my ancestors who lived trough it than of some faggots on internet
Be didnt start the war, Britain did.
germaniggers always ruin everything starting from their tribal period,nothing new
I am even beginning to doubt that General Ost plan, it just sounds as ridiculous as the Holocaust shit by now.
It was very real, just not fully enacted due to the unexpected difficulty of war in the east. If the Nazis won we would be made into a single state called Ostland, with Rīga being the only captial in the region.
The Nazis were a lesser evil in short term, but exaclty the same as the Soviets in long term. Whoever wins: we lose.
>Hitler was an evil Jew who started a war that killed millions of White men, killed the best and brightest Aryan stock of Germany and subjected half of Europe to communism due to his militaristic malfeasance.
>Anglos stop caring about sovereignty as soon as Germany is destroyed and leave Poland in soviet hands, along with the rest of Eastern Europe
I am not buying it. Maybe I would have believed it some time ago, but its probably just another lie to keep people from questioning shit. Its not like I think there would have been total independence or some shit, but probably puppet regimes. Did Krauts even genocide the Slavs that were in Germany before the WW2 like Czechs and Sorbs? There were repressions, but they were not carried of into "death camps" which are suspiciously all located in territory occupied by Soviets after the war.
Are you not buying operations Osen and Priboi too then? Those happened, that is a fact. Same thing as GnrlOst.
And have you studed the history of out occupaion by the Nazis? i don't nkow about about you but for is they explicity denied the return of independence. Latvians and Estonians became recognozed by the Nazi occupants only after the blitzkrieg into the Soviet Union falied and the reds were startingto regroup and push them out. The only reason previously independent nations got recognized out of the blue was to use us as cannon fodder against the approaching Soviets. Germany had no interest in letting us off the hook after the war, it is naive to think otherwise.
I don't know why do I even engage in this crap lately.
Both the Soviets and Nazis were foreign occupants with the same end goals.
This will be all from me here.