Blade Runner 2049

Can someone give me rundown of this movie?

Main character is a cuck

best movie of the decade

Androids

>Can someone give me rundown of this movie
Replicates can have kids now.
Bad guy businessman wants to control this.
It snows at the end.

real women are not important

Stereotypical white male lost in a diversity ridden society searching for meaning and purpose in his life. All the while struggling with the realities and complications of a holographic waifu.

>the plot is a red herring
>_____ was never the kid

those pics would be hotter in her gymnast uniform

Cinematic masterpiece best enjoyed in good surround sound.
Redpilled on the baseless urbanite society we're moving toward.

the moral:
You don’t have to be exceptional to do something exceptional

not political

mediocre shit. Ryan Gosling is a shit actor and has that wall eyed retard look on his face the entire movie

A replicant had a kid, no other one has been able to since Rachel was a prototype

Another millenial Dunning-Kruger director that wants to be Kubrick autistically tries to imitate a "cult classic" that was a lightning in a bottle impossible to dissect. Result is exceptionally pretty scenes that happen one after another tied together by a lame-o Save The Cat! plot full of holes.

Why do people keep posting rule 63 Shia Lebeauf around here?

Replicant wants to be a real boy.

why?

>Le Goose has robot feelings because of tfw no gf, just like me ;_;

that's why,

You're the hero of your own story, but that's not necessarily the story you think you're the hero of.

>INTERLINKED?

It is essentially this

gotta rescue your father from the underworld so you can be a real boy.

Wow, goddamnit jbp

>best movie of the decade
>remake
amerifat with great insight

>remake
It's a direct sequel

>He watched sleepily the flakes, silver and dark, falling obliquely against the lamplight. The time had come for him to set out on his journey westward. Yes, the newspapers were right: snow was general all over Ireland. It was falling on every part of the dark central plain, on the treeless hills, falling softly upon the Bog of Allen and, farther westward, softly falling into the dark mutinous Shannon waves. It was falling, too, upon every part of the lonely churchyard on the hill where Michael Furey lay buried. It lay thickly drifted on the crooked crosses and headstones, on the spears of the little gate, on the barren thorns. His soul swooned slowly as he heard the snow falling faintly through the universe and faintly falling, like the descent of their last end, upon all the living and the dead.

>men get holo waifus
>biocunts BTFO
>androids can have children now too
>real women fully obsolete

>remake
Remake of what? the original script they wrote? Dumb nigger.

A blood black nothingness
A system of cells
Within cells interlinked
Within one stem
And dreadfully distinct
Against the dark
A tall white fountain played

They're not androids

Yes, he literally rescues his father from the ocean at the end.

Beautiful - both aurally and visually. A shitty plot.

You're a colored boy, aren't ya

Stereotypical white male lost in a diversity ridden society searching for meaning and purpose in his life. All the while struggling with the realities and complications of a holographic waifu.

What is the socio-political relevance of this movie and can we learn anything from Jordan Peterson's teachings from here?

are you dull, tht wasn't his father

Hurrrdurrr

Durrhurr

God damn it. Fuck. That makes so much sense. I can't believe I didn't see that archetype the first time.

Watch it. Just watch it. 10/10

>we can't breed that makes us second class
>OMG RANDOM CLONE SHAT OUT BABI SHE BE JEBUS
>WE MUST REBEL SHE WILL LEAD US!
>guy want to make them able to breed cuz muh profits
>OMG EVIL GUY WANT TO MAKE US ABLE TO BREED HE MUST BE STOPPED BY THE REBELLION FOR SOME REASON!

apparently all that genetic engineering made the clones retarded.

also

>MUH AI WAIFU

Watched it, but need help understanding the relevance to us?

Strange

In the end, yes. But he believes at the time he was. Also you could argue metaphoricallt he is the representation of his father.

>Yes, he literally rescues his father from the ocean at the end
What?
No.
No. Just no.

Is this a real test btw?

blade runner is a movie made out of necessity
They didn't have the special effects to make convincing androids, so they made the replicants exactly like humans, and formed the story around that. And people are so amazed by this...

>In the end, yes. But he believes at the time he was.
he learned the truth about the child before he rescued deckard though
>Also you could argue metaphoricallt he is the representation of his father.
this is true

It wasn't that good but it could have been worse.

Reminder that Wallace was the hero of the story

She's a jewess ya know

Quick rundown

>How does a replicant get away with murdering 2 police personal at different visits to the LAPD?

>Why aren't the prostitute replicants caught going rogue when they do the baseline test?

>Why did Luv leave K alive when they captured Deckard. Why not just kill him?

>Why does the LAPD allow k to keep his police spinner car?

>Why go offworld to torture Deckard, that pyramid they were in was pretty private?

Checked. Utter bollocks, though.

he was the hero if this was a literal story, but metaphorically K is undoubtedly the hero. stop trying to be edgy.

great post

>tht wasn't his father
K believed Deckard was his father and that belief drove him forward. He found purpose in it, and ultimately became more "human" because of it.

"We're all looking for something real" is a line that gets thrown around a few times, and is one of the underlying themes of the film.
Replicants are created with a purpose and spend their existence fulfilling that design. Humans are born. They're "pushed" into the world with no design and have to discover their purpose/place in the world. The memory doctor and the resistence leader state similar concepts about replicants having the luxury of purpose and how fighting for what's real is the most human thing you can do.

Realistic Anime Wifu

Something about going to the underworld and saving your father.

Now that I think of it I would like to hear JBP's thoughts on the movie

chxd niggers up set they werent the leading role in the movie Go watch your We WUZ KANGS movie

>white guy thinks he is the chosen one
>lol nope mary-sue WOMEN IS THE CHOOSEN ONE

>white guy go fucking kill yourself that’s the only thing you’re good for

>OKEY MA’AM

>white guy kills himself


That’s a wrap

>THE FUTURE IS WOMEN
>THE FORCE IS WOMEN
>THE MIRICAL IS THE WOMEN

WOOOHOOOOO GURRRRLL PWERRRRRRRRR

>its a movie
fuck off

She is beautiful.

the book literally revolves around androids posing as humans you mouth breather

This

Not anymore.

Clones

Wallace wanted to conquer the stars so that his "angels" could retake Eden. He saw himself as the god humanity needed, but was spiteful because, unlike God, he couldn't create life, only an imitation of it.

Jared Leto wants to make replicants that are able to naturally reproduce because it will make him even more money.

The female replicant Harrison ford banged in the first movie had a child that you are led to believe is Ryan Gosling(it’s not) but that’s why Jared Leto needs Harrison Ford

delet

Deckard is a replicant

i didn't like all the masculine women, but there was definitely a contrast between joi, who was really feminine, and all the stronk women who all had short hair and thick jaws. idk maybe that meant something

What is it then? He is a archetypical father even if he wasn't his (SPOILER) actual father.....

One of the few good movies to come out of hollywood in the past decade.

I like Dredd way more tbqh

It's pretty right wing. Give yourself meaning through your actions, not through your beliefs or your affiliations.

Exceptional film, and I'd go as far to say it's better than the original.

All of the best aspects that it borrows from the original film - the rundown, lived-in, corporate dystopia aesthetics of future LA, the ethical and philosophical implications of replicants, the excellent cinematography, and the slow, deliberate pacing - are all use effectively here while at the same time improving on the things that were weaker in the original - the characters are more compelling, the mystery plot is more engaging and the audience gets to experience seeing it unfold alongside K, the movie takes its time but outside of one or two moments never feels like it's dragging. On top of all that K's story is one of the better, more sympathetic character arcs in sci-fi in the last decade or two.

>holywood drivel
no thx

>he literally rescues his father
>He is a archetypical father
Rachel wasn't his mom, and Decker wasn't his father.
He's just a bot. There's no "father" to it. I think he realized it before he ever saved him from the chopper.

>I'd go as far to say it's better than the original
We're going to have to fight now....
No. Just no.

Civilization is doomed to a holographic pornographic dystonia.

Not convinced.

But good movie regardless. 9/10.

Heh? You weren't reading my post, man. Because I used the word "archetypal" not "actual", in reference to his role as a father.

But you're saying that that is contradicted by his decision made in the chopper? explain more please.

Don't get me wrong - the original is a classic, and its cinematography, aesthetics, and practical effects are among the best of 70s/80s era sci-fi. But the sequel is that plus a stronger story.

2049 did what sequels are *supposed* to do - take the things that worked in the original and build upon them and take them in a new direction.

It's more like
>white guy believes in himself to be able to create change
>mary-sue wymyn are deh messiah
>white guy kill your metaphorical father
>pulls himself up by his bootstraps when at his lowest point and chooses his own destiny

Somebody posted the book about the movie, apparently /ourguy/ Ryan Gosling was studying for the role and wrote/acted the 8 min. Baseline perfect first try. Probably will be on the DVD extra cut or something in the full release.

>But you're saying that that is contradicted by his decision made in the chopper?
I'm saying the bot wasn't thinking decker was his father BEFORE he saved him.
He knew by then, that the girl in the lab was the child....
He saved decker anyway.

Once upon a time it was the future, and everyone had decided to start acting like a twat...

Ok. I'll agree with that.

A great movie of high art. But the common pleb won't appreciate it and it will become a cult classic very soon

please delete this
s'il te plait, efface ça
cancella questo, per piacere

Stronger story? With a fucking golden child? You absolute bender.

Dunno man, the villain was awful. Didn't like the music either, only good music was what they took from the original.

Can you proove that?

>the villain was awful
The bad guy could have been developed a bit better.
The whole 'gutting' the droid scene was sorta wasted. There are 1000 better ways to show the tycoon is a twisted greedy fuck.

His dreams were programmed. Watch the original "director cut"

He was beyond twisted and greedy, he thought he was a God that could create life, life that could go on forever. He was pissed that it wasn't happening perfectly. Money was never a thing for him.

nicescifimovie.jpeg

He felt very anime/cartoony to me. Compare him to Tyler. Tyler wasn't even a villain, felt more realistic.

...