Are races different spicies of human?

Are races different spicies of human?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_of_Babel
allyouneedisbiology.wordpress.com/tag/peckhamian-mimicry/
heretical.com/miscellx/race.html
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coywolf
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5581171/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3366900/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

yes

I think so. I've always been curious about this at least.

If they're not, they're pretty close.

Yes, they are different species. This brings us to the Jews, who a a species of mimic which preys on humans by way of crypsis.

>Africoid
Negroid
>American
Also mongoloid

The bible explains it like this:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_of_Babel

no. Every dog is part of the same species (canis familaris) even though their all radically different

They are no where near Mongolia.

subspecies definitely

Are poodles and pitbull different species of dog?

>Are races different spicies of human?
*different spices

No, their offspring is fertile. The differences between races are so minor (as compared to races of other species) that the idea of human races existing at all is pretty outdated.

They are sub species. There are 9 different subspecies of tigers. They all look pretty much the same, but there are differences. Dont believe (((them))) that there is only one human race.

>Spicies
spaces*

Copypasta:
It was on TV. It must be true.
My teacher said it. It must be true.
It's in my textbook. It must be true.
The Reverend said so. It must be true.
He's a Ph.D. and he says it's so. It must be true.
She has written 69 books and she says it's so. It must be true.
Everybody says so. It must be true.

If you agree with the above, then what in hell do you need a brain for? A brain is for thinking and if what you believe is not based upon thought, then you've answered my question. You are little more than a ventriloquist's dummy -- and ZOG LOVES YOU!!!

We are told that all yapping bipeds belong to the same species, Homo sapiens. Homo is the genus name -- a classification much broader in scope than species. Sapiens is the species name under the genus. Let's talk about fruits -- real ones, not feces loving perverts. Let's talk about the oranges which Eskimos never eat but get their vitamin C quota anyway -- from animal sources. Let's go scientific with the names. Let's stick to the genus Citrus.

Orange: C. sinensis. Sour orange: C. aurantium. Tangerine: C. reticulata. Citron: C. medica. Grapefruit (pomelo) C. paradisi. Grapefruit (pummelo) C. grandis. Lime: C. aurantifolia. Lemon: C. limonum.

All of the above species are INTER-FERTILE and many hybrids exist and are marketed. Most of these fruits closely resemble each other and some people cannot tell one from another without a supermarket sign. The biological differences are small in comparison to the MAJOR differences between the nigeroid and the honkiod and the gookoid, YET (as I have also discussed relative to crows and foxes -- and penguins are a far more rich example) WE ARE TOLD that weez all b'longs ta da same species. Did you ever really think about this? Did you? Ever?

It takes VERY LITTLE to tell a black man's part from its white counterpart. Black hair HAS NO CORTEX, for example. One hair -- one microscope and the difference is as plain as Goldfarb's nose. Blacks are about as related to Whites as the lemon is to the tangerine. They belong to different species and anyone who has ever been around Black people knows -- unless they are zonked out on drugs or a true believer in American Marxist educational "truth" -- that Blacks and White differ far more than skin color. In fact, skin color is the LEAST SIGNIFICANT of these differences.

For the lack of better names, there are 3 species of yammering hairless apes: Home sapiens (white), Homo nigerus (black) and Homo mongulus (yellow). All other hoomun beans are mixtures of these species -- mongrels of one fornication formulation or the other.

If you think this is all not so OK, then go back to the beginning where you see Dumb 101, and read those 7 lines slower this time. If that doesn't change anything, then you probably love MTV.

*Spics

I think if they classified us like canines we'd probably have about 5 human species.

>being this retarded

Subspecies.

Caucasian, mongoloid, negroid, australolid, what's the fifth?

Species.

Pic related is absolute proof.

>It takes VERY LITTLE to tell a black man's part from its white counterpart. Black hair HAS NO CORTEX, for example. One hair -- one microscope and the difference is as plain as Goldfarb's nose. Blacks are about as related to Whites as the lemon is to the tangerine.

Amerimutt

nah we are all the same

We're classified like canines.

Negroid would probably be split into two, probably pygmies as a separate species.

Yes. I'm a wolf and you are a coyote.

also the fact that we have different ancestors, with blacks not having any neanderthal ancestry, how can someone say we're the same species when we evolved from different species?

Subspecies. Being able to produce fertile offspring is a more significant factor than hair, we're still the same species if we can make fertile offspring. It's

>spicies
Yeah, there are whites that can spell, and then the rest of the mudshits who can't.

...

Humans of all "races" produce fertile offspring when mixed. The offspring of a wolf and a coyote (if it's even possible to exist) would be sterile.

Jews lie with a straight face. It's a characteristic of their species, because they are Pechhammian mimics. Sup Forums needs to take this redpill. It's supported by biology and the bible.
allyouneedisbiology.wordpress.com/tag/peckhamian-mimicry/

heretical.com/miscellx/race.html


>“Dr. Montagu, who composed the UNESCO Statement on Race, has again skillfully trimmed the facts of anthropology to fit the Liberal propaganda line. Every anthropologist knows, for example, that aborigines in Australia propagated their species for a hundred thousand years without ever suspecting that pregnancy might be a consequence of sexual intercourse. Equally striking evidence of intellectual capacity is provided by the many peoples that never discovered how to kindle a fire or plant a seed. But Dr. Montagu, after making a great show of cautious objectivity, proclaims that ‘anthropologists are unable to find any evidence’ of ‘significant differences in mental capacity’ between ‘ethnic groups.’ If you can tell such whoppers with a straight face, you too can ask the ‘United Nations’ to recognize your right to largesse from the pockets of American taxpayers.” Revilo Oliver reviewing Ashley Montagu’s Man: His First Million Years in National Review, November 2, 1957. Note that Montagu can be indentified as a Jew by his behaviour alone. (He was born Israel Ehrenberg.)

>Is it pure coincidence that the most vocal opponents of sociobiology – Richard Lewontin, Stephen Gould, Steven Rose and Leon Kamin – were Jews? Thomas Jackson reviewing Defenders of the Truth in American Renaissance 11/9 (Sept. 2000).

lie.

>Subspecies. Being able to produce fertile offspring is a more significant factor than hair, we're still the same species if we can make fertile offspring. It's

A species is just a label we give something, and we have now found genetically very different species that can produce viable offspring. "Species" doesn't really have any meaning. It's a label.

Nonetheless, there a three important genetic groups of humans, which could be called sub or sister species.

>hehe he put an I where an E was supposed to be XDDDDD
BASED typo poster!!!!! XD

Lie.

There is no such thing as race, you racist asshole.

Race is a colloquial term for subspecies. Humanity, while it being a single species, has very distinct subspecies. This goes beyond simply black vs white vs yellow. This is what separates Czechs from Germans, Cambodians from Koreans, Blackfoot from Cherokee. All ethnic groups have seperate specific traits which have developed over time to help them survive in their native environments.

I've been getting consisten double and triple numbers through the whole thread. That should tell you something. You WILL take this redp[ill faggots.

Which part of my post is a lie?

True that the definition of species is quite arbitrary, but the ability to have fertile offspring is a large factor for the definition of a species

(((you)))

>and we have now found genetically very different species that can produce viable offspring.
Really? Never heard of it, got any examples?

lie

>True that the definition of species is quite arbitrary, but the ability to have fertile offspring is a large factor for the definition of a species

Consider what that means and consider the fallacy of what you just said

>we just label things as species
>but being able to interbreed is what species means

That statement has no value because we just label them. We have now found birds that are genetically different species (have highly variable dna) and produce fertile offspring.

The idea of speciation is kind of outdated and dumbed-down.

Many. look it up, you have internet. (((you))) can stop playing dumb any time now.

I said it was a factor

Where do you think native Americans came from?

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coywolf
Checked

not an argument

/thread

1000 hours in MS paint

Majority of native tribes have a mix of Asiatic-mongoloid/european DNA, usually more emphasis on the mongoloid DNA however certain tribes typically located in what is now Canada were known to have more Proto-European DNA.

The reason "race" isn't used by most scientists is because it's incredibly vague. We have better, more precise terms to describe the differences between populations. That's not to echo the SJW refrain of race being a social construct, only to make clear that the concept of race has been replaced by better descriptors.

Lol, yeah, that should say Amerindian in OP

(((pilpul))) is a characteristic of your species of mimic.

1. The Biological Analogy

Richard Dawkins provides several examples of how cunning parasites can be, and how easy it is to be fooled. The sophistication of some ant species makes the cuckoo look like a novice. He describes a parasitic ant which invades a neighbouring colony, seeks out its queen, climbs on top of it and methodically gnaws off its head. Having usurped the position at the top of this social hierarchy, the alien queen produces eggs which are tended by the invaded colonies’ workers, and new queens then go off to invade other colonies.

Even this strategy has been improved upon by another ant species. To quote The Selfish Gene, p. 252 (Dawkins is here referring to the founder of sociobiology, Edward Wilson):

‘But sawing off heads is a bit of a chore. Parasites are not accustomed to exerting themselves if they can coerce a stand-in. My favourite character in Wilson’s The Insect Societies is Monomorium santschii. This species, over evolutionary time, has lost its worker caste altogether. The host workers do everything for their parasites, even the most terrible task of all. At the behest of the invading parasite queen, they actually perform the deed of murdering their own mother. The usurper doesn’t need to use her jaws. She uses mind-control. How she does it is a mystery; she probably employs a chemical, for ant nervous systems are generally highly attuned to them. If her weapon is indeed chemical, then it is as insidious a drug as any known to science. For think what it accomplishes. It floods the brain of the worker ant, grabs the reins of her muscles, woos her from deeply ingrained duties and turns her against her own mother. For ants, matricide is an act of special genetic madness and formidable indeed must be the drug that drives them to it. In the world of the extended phenotype, ask not how an animal’s behaviour benefits its genes; ask instead whose genes it is benefiting.’

fpbp

When I google "different species hybrid" the first three results are ligers, tigons, and zebroids, all three of which can't produce fertile males. Also
>everyone's a shill xD

There are three distinct species of human.

Caucasoid: Neandertal DNA present. Whites, asians, arabs, horn of africa. That's right, Somalians are white.
Negroid: No neandertal DNA present. Sub-saharan africa.
Negroid 2: San people of Southern Africa are the most distantly related humans to all other.
Denovisoid: Australian and Guinean aboriginals are the only humans to have Denovisian DNA, these people were more advanced and likely more intelligent than sapiens and neandertalensis, and passed away tens of thousands of years ago, probably because they were eaten.

It's just reality. People who are concerned with scientific reality cannot look at a 100% abo australian and say it is the same thing as a white person. Just no.

Hmmmm loss of worker caste...sounds familiar:


2. Loss of Jewish Worker Caste

Note that the Jews lost their peasantry (worker caste) around 1,000 AD. This is documented by Shahak in Jewish History, Jewish Religion, pp. 52-53 and is clearly evident today. Shahak is unable to explain how this change in Jewish social structure came about, but it is hypothesized that the evolution of the following traits is involved:

Love of being above someone (e.g. gloating);
Abhorrence of being looked down upon.

Jews appear to be capable of getting themselves appointed to government positions, elected onto academic editorial committees etc., without any formal role or qualifications.

Maybe you should've googled "different species fertile hybrid" then, you dunce.

(((google)))
not an argument.

That is a false equivalency fallacy

3. Control of the Media. Examples. Use of Women

Jews employ the same strategy as Monomorium santchii by their control of the media. For the facts about the enormous Jewish influence in television, films, newspaper publishing etc. in America see the National Vanguard publication Who Rules America?, in Britain the BNP publication The Mind-Benders.

Using this control they define fashions and promote mores which derogate those who seek to preserve Occidental culture. The policy, specifically, is to stigmatize potential or actual leaders (of thought or action) and manipulate others to attack them.

Sure it is (((nigger)))

You're that same guy i debated with last night

The Bushmen and Pygmies are both their own races as well. They're completely different than th other African races

You can say not all ethnicities are starting out on the same standards of intelligence, civilization etc...
But claiming there are different races of human just shows you're a dumbfuck who couldn't be bothered spending 15 min on wikipedia to learn about evolution or worse, are a white pride mongoloid who doesn't care about facts anyway

Looks=/= race
Does not equal. Inorder to see if races exist in humans you must look past the skin color and look into the genes

No, if we were different species then we wouldn't be able to have children. Or- we would, but the offspring of mixed race people wouldn't be able to reproduce. We are different, but still the same my friend.

You won't be debating us much longer. We have ways of dealing with invasive species.

I see

>The differences between races are so minor
despite the fact that each of them have their own separate attributes that were dictated by the enviornment around them, such as africans having dark skin due to their presence near the equator

>DNA can be tested to determine race
>Race doesn't exist

Hurr hurr hurr

(((No because we can interbreed)))

The different levels of taxonomy are completely arbitrary. It’s literally just for human convenience. The definition of species is not “they can produce viable offspring.” The definition of species is “we can distinguish these two groups and it’s convenient to do so.”

It’s like asking where the cutoff for tall is. It’s a real measurable thing with a genetic basis, but the cutoff is arbitrary.

Or where exactly purple falls on the color spectrum.

Or why is the genius cutoff supposed to be 140, not 145.

These things are real phenomena, but our categorization of them is just for us.

I didn't know about this, thanks for linking the page.

Here's the full article if anyone is interested - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5581171/

Strangely enough, the first results for that search are mules, hinnys, and zebroids which still don't produce fertile males. Wonder why it didn't show what linked, which are actually fertile.

Also there is some speculation that Europeans couldn't really interbreed with Tasmanian natives, because there are essentially no surviving descendants, and there were a shitload of European men stationed there fucking the women.

Thousands of men are imprisoned unjustly because their instinct to rebel is valid but they are denied the information they need to direct their rebellion constructively. Consistently 97% of the prison population is male.

Note that Jews promote feminism via the media, particularly by the use of artificial media role models (AMRM’s: empowering females to further act against males by giving them dishonest stereotypes to emulate is another form of Malign Encouragement). Like supports like; females conspire (act together); ‘the gene is selfish.’ Because of their emotional and impressionable natures women are a complete pushover for Jews to manipulate, so it is in the Jewish interest to deliver as much power to them as possible. Jews support women and women support Jews; but while females’ optimal policy is Disguised Defection, the most advantageous policy for Jews is Disguised Invasion.

Due to the Jewish promotion of women we have the situation (in Britain at least) in which women incapable of repairing a bicycle puncture are driving around in fashion wagons chatting on mobile telephones while millions of their menfolk are unemployed. Big Sister’s policy is to derogate, assault, stigmatize, reduce to poverty, drive to suicide, deprive of medical treatment, refuse compensation for criminal attacks, silence and, if possible, imprison any Occidental male who threatens to expose their cosy parasitic scams.


PARASITES DON’T LIKE BEING EXPOSED

>Are races different spicies
Yes.

>of human?
Not all of them.

>gets stuck on semantics before even giving in the effort required to learn about shit
fucking die

Whatever the hell sort of alien species Somalians are

Sure. Species are a social construct anyway.

No we are all the Cumin race

Silence you filthy mamzer or I'll cut out your tongue.

So there are castes that run together genetically within races. Nobility, peasantry, merchants, warriors, etc., sometimes these are combined.

I'm genetically an Anglo, and my caste-race was mostly landed gentry before coming to America. I'm a nobleman in thought, stature, and sentiment. So is my father, and his ancestors. My mother is more from a bureacratic high-level non-nobility caste, like a mayordomo or chamberlain, as opposed to the baron or the king.

The Indo-Europeans had those who pray, those who fight, and those who work, as did Europeans. In western Europeans the noble caste is both the fighting caste and the praying caste. There's also a kind of "those who research" thing in a praying caste. So since primogeniture solved the issue of estate splitting, excess sons each generation focused on the praying/research/fighting while the eldest focused on ruling his land, but they pretty seamlessly dissipated (priestly celibacy and death in combat helps - though landed nobles had to fight too).

Jews have usually been a merchant caste-race, like Armenians, Greeks, or Patels, but the "court Jew" is a strong part of what they are. So they slip into that those who pray/do research but NOT those who fight because they have no tie to the land.

Basically, Europeans have had TWO noble caste-races: landed nobility, the Gentile nobles, and itinerant nobility, the Jews. Gentile nobles are basically top level serfs, as they are tied to the land. Jews are not tied down, so their loyalties shift much easier, but they have evolved those court Jews skills and talents because that was their sociological niche.

So of course in a liberal democracy that tries to displace everyone from the land and destroy interpersonal ties, Jews are best adapted to clb to the top in that system.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3366900/

Nah sadly they fall into Caucasian species

Kek.

Wait. >56ers thought he was serious

*neo-mongoloid

>Are races different spicies of human?

Generally speaking, if you can create viable offspring you're in the same species

Indians are not a race. they are neomongloids.
There are only 3 races.
Negroid
Mongloid
Europoid
The rest are just hybrids.

They all mated with various proto-human ancestors so they look different.

We haves castes like social insects, Jews are invaders into our hive who mimic us in order to steal our milk and honey.

Truth.

Subspecies.