The Unibomber was right

This man embodies everything this board stands for.

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/154963372/#154963372
theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-the-system-s-neatest-trick
youtu.be/4YWfj5eizFA
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diogenes_Angelakos
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Ted K. is a tragic figure. Couldn't escape the degenerate world.

12. Those who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghetto- dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.

15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

16. Words like “self-confidence,” “self-reliance,” “initiative,” “enterprise,” “optimism,” etc., play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

21. Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calculated to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that affirmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred.

The entertainment industry serves as an important psychological tool of the system, possibly even when it is dishing out large amounts of sex and violence. Entertainment provides modern man with an essential means of escape. While absorbed in television, videos, etc., he can forget stress, anxiety, frustration, dissatisfaction. Many primitive peoples, when they don’t have work to do, are quite content to sit for hours at a time doing nothing at all, because they are at peace with themselves and their world. But most modern people must be constantly occupied or entertained, otherwise they get “bored,” i.e., they get fidgety, uneasy, irritable.

washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm

bumping this thread, anyone interested about him should give this thread a look too.
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/154963372/#154963372

>The Unibomber
#1. It was the UNA Bomber. (UNiversities and Airlines)
#2. Around here just call him Ted. We'll know what you're talking about.

There was a Ted thread that I missed? That's unusual.

He killed the wrong people. The CIA cooked his brain during MKUltra when this guy should've revolutionized the field of ecology.

Don't send people bombs dipshits.

Folks, I've been checking out Manhunt: Unabomber on Netflix. It's an 8-episode series, ranging from good to very good.

All-around well-done. Good storytelling, good acting. I'm up to ep 6. Ted's just walked into his first meeting with Prof Henry Murray, so MK Ultra is just around the corner.

No, he wasn't right. He was another postmodernist jackass who doesn't understand anything about the narrative reality of human existence who was just a few years ahead of his time, and thus didn't have any critics yet.
He tried to argue that you're a slave to your car because if your car dies your whole world stops. He failed to recognize that we choose to get cars because we want them. He says; "Actually you need them, to get to work." And the rebuttal is; "No, you can get a job within walking distance. In fact, that is what everyone used to be forced to do. Now you have a choice to do that, or to get a car. We've expanded choice. Just because one choice is better than the alternative doesn't make you a slave to either one."

yea, okay...

It's a good one. A lot of information about his growing up, time in college and the MK ultra stuff too.

>thus didn't have any critics yet.

He was created by cia niggers criticizing his opinions.

Ted was an asshole but he had a correct understanding of the trajectory of society and the human species.

>Several days earlier

They didn't just criticize the guy they did everything in their power to crush his spirit and his psyche.

>Ted was an asshole
that is not what the supermax guards and inmates say... kept sense of humor despite years of MK abuse at Harvard and mountains. The CIA continued to lase him from airplanes and helicopters in his cabin. Very good test of his character and good natured sensibilities. Went on to help the fellow inmates learn new skills etc during his 20 yrs.

Here is another good read
theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-the-system-s-neatest-trick

>Manhunt: Unabomber on Netflix
Netflix is so full of shit ... CIA and USAF assets tortured him daily in the cabin. There was no manhunt, he was filled with nano RFIDs and was lit up like a Christmas tree from the sky. Something very big happened that I won't type ... just remember years from now and you will then realize that Netflix made this 2017 movie shortly after the event happened .... further proving that they are douchebags and disinfo specialists.

This is actually an interesting collision of ideas I hadn't considered before. The MKUltra cunts experiment on TD was to criticize him incessantly. I think the connection between this experiment and his decision to stop having empathy for people is quite clear. Is it possible that he became immune to his own internal critic from the way he managed this stress? If you reject your own criticism, it seems, you're capable of forming a murderous ideology in your own head.

I heard he's treated like a little bitch by the other inmates and he complains a lot.

What was the event

Now that I've read your post this is what Sup Forums has become. Nothing but criticism and demoralization.
>thinking.joeg

>criticize him incessantly
The parallel to what the liberal left is doing to conservatives right now could be creating a callous and violent future.

Inmates? Oh yeah he's in prison, thanks for reminding me. No, Shareblue dude, you are really funny and awesome and thanks for visiting Sup Forums but it's time to get back to Infowars ok see ya mmm bye bye now.

You shouldn't criticize yourself into oblivion. You should refine yourself everyday in all your habits, and find skillful ways of making the world around you a better place.

Deep commentary. Is that paper the origin of the attack on "faux rebels"? As an idea it has gained meme status in the Dawkins sense in some circles

No I use non violent imagery to change perspective of the degeneracy of the left. I use my words as well. Violence is for blacks, or low iq whites, us Hindus got better things to do.

cant say but bigger than anything on Netflix which makes the Netflix show disinfo .... Pretty obvious when you page through their movies that they are working for the bad guys.

Absolutely. And the left, though currently is acting in cohesion, will fractionalize and destroy itself once it takes power. This is actually a topic in Industrial Society and it's Future that I happen to agree with entirely. I dug into 20th century history a bit after reading it in college and it seems as though TK's analysis that leftists criticize a tool of the powerful until they control it, then abuse it worse is a correct assumption in general.

It appears, unfortunately, that is political polarization continues, leftists will fractionalize and the dipshit right will take over. They're not the friends of the kekistanis, they're gonna remove the mountaintops and make you work long hours for shit pay with limited regulations.

Agreed I was stating that this board itself might damn we'll be a modified version of mkultra.

>Hindus
hindu dindu nutin

Uncle Ted is the preferred name

>Actually believing the left isn't in bed with wall street and big corps too
was right, its time for you leave now

He could have done more with his message if he just lectured and tried to sell his book. He had to be a sperg and send bombs which accomplished nothing in the long run except discredit him in the eyes of many.

Wrong. He addressed your very point in his manifesto. Did you even read it or are you just piecing together his views based on what you've heard people say about him?

How many Hindu u know in prison? Either we are criminal masterminds or law minded citizens. .. The world will never know

Say it or you are going to get aids and herpes

>everything this board stands for.
Oh, so this is the anarcho-primitivist online image board?

Stop appropriating other people's culture, you cunts. You're as bad as the homos.

Wrong. You're talking about him right now, and most people have heard of him. If he was doing what you are suggesting, I guarantee you'd have never heard his name in your life.

The key to resisting or breaking any conditioning is to have like minded individuals to reinforce your perspective so the seeds of doubt never grow. It seemed like Ted was targeted individually, shamed in private, in an effort to make him question his ideals. This doesn't work so well on here where there are so many people who agree with you and actively call out the bullshit. That's why sites with accounts where you care about perpetuating an image such as reddit are better suited for disillusion, because they target you personally.

>Unibomber

Feds love threads like these

Wait what.

No way can't say I'd rather catch Zika when my wife gets pregnant and win the lottery and die the next day

This argument is probably going to hold less water when your car can drive itself

Yes he is infamous for being a terrorist but that is also an excuse to write him off. He could have gotten published and recognition without it and maybe he might not have been as known but had a much more quality following

youtu.be/4YWfj5eizFA

whats this image of?

I don't agree with everything he did, but when you've been completely mindfucked by MKULTRA to the extent that he was who can blame him? He deserves a full pardon since he was a creation of the fedgovs inhuman experimentation

>Ted Kaczynski embodies an internet message board
No.

He killed his neighbors dogs, pretty much a prick.

the man invented weaponized autism.

Too bad he bombed dumb shit. His societal critique was 110% correct, though.

...

kek
just listened to that earlier today

He was 30 years ahead of his time.
The left is STILL owned by his critique. Every point is valid.

>He had to be a sperg and send bombs which accomplished nothing
He killed 3 child torturers or something like that. Not condoning it. It is wrong. And the other 27 or so torturers he failed to kill got exposed for being people who will eventually go to hell.

>you can get a job within walking distance

somebody should tell all those billions of people who transit to and from work every day....

Is he still alive? If so how old? And is he still lucid? What's the deal with him bombing random guys? Rundown appreciated

this is a gross oversimplification of his views and im convinced you've never actually read any of his work

He released a new book last year so the answer to most of your questions is yes.

Before you idiots start spewing shit you know nothing about, there is NOTHING "right-wing" about Kaczynski. He came from a tradition of left leaning people who got fed up with liberalism and the contemporary left's inability to enact change so taking to the path of radical propaganda of the deed (aka "direct action" aka "terrorism"). Read up on the Weather Underground, who ran a similar (but much more successful) campaign during and after the Vietnam war (and those people were literal hippies).
Kaczynski was an anarchist through and through.

CIAnigger dogs. Ted was being lased in the cabin. The whole fucking time in the mountains. Something Netflix fails to mention. He didn't know about RFID thought it was thermal so didn't learn until this year about the obvious way checkout lady's in Walmart kill RFIDs so your TV RFID doesn't light up walking out the Walmart door (magnets, right?)

Yeah Shareblue guy .... sorry about your dogs. Leash laws are your friend.

He's 75 and you can write him a letter, he's responded to some that he's received

>Kaczynski was an anarchist
STFU Shareblue guy he was lased over 100k times in his life .... he is a survivor nothing more nothing less. The trauma that was supposed to fracture his personality did not work.

>bombing random guys
not random ... in child torture industry

No he didn't like tech
Prolly not anime either

Except for bombing innocent people

lurk moar faggot, your lack of basic news is Miley Cyrus level attention whoring and camwhore pathetic kys

Quick link if possible. I've never studied the guy but have a PhD myself so his background is interesting to me
Ok alright. Maybe I'll have a look
He still responding?

>innocent
>implying they didn’t deserve it

>He still responding?
Not to stupid shit that he's heard a billion times before. He mostly just likes to talk about math.

>innocent
>bombing not a part of Sup Forums ethos
Wrong.

great point user thank you

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diogenes_Angelakos

one of the letter targets (a microwave expert and not for kitchens) ....
check out a few lines from this person's bio ....

Diogenes James Angelakos (1920 – June 7, 1997) was the director for 20 years of the Electronics Research Laboratory and a professor emeritus of electronic engineering at the University of California, Berkeley. He is credited with building up the research group into one the university's biggest research labs.[1] He is considered a pioneer in the field of microwaves, antennas and electromagnetic waves.[2]
On July 2, 1982, he was the victim of a bomb left by Ted Kaczynski, the "Unabomber", at an electrical engineering and computer science faculty lounge in Cory Hall. He was injured in the face and right hand, but recovered nearly completely.[1]

Whats this lasing you speak of ?

shut up faggot

>ted tried to stop the microwave auditory vector
God bless you Ted.

sauce?

simple MK Ultra stuff with lasers
or focused beam microwaves
russians did it to our embassy in Moscow 1953-1976
until we evacuated because our ambassador
was dying of cancer
old technology I guess....
can be used to kill in case of scalia
or just induce trauma in case of columbine kids

I posted the one microwave dude above. u can research each target and find something shady. takes 5 mins per target I guess.

You are really going to have to rethink better arguments.

Thank you user, whether youre being honest or spewing shit; youve given me much to look into this evening

microwaves BTFO