>>158528280

>Collective racial group identity is evil
>Support Israel

Other urls found in this thread:

polcheck.com/polcheck/
youtu.be/GJEb8HqfiFk?t=18m21s
youtube.com/watch?v=RnTMp3wTlzc
youtu.be/JXbmEH8wBgs
www94.zippyshare.com/v/ToVac7C1/file.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

a clear answer when a question is made. IDK

>the Jews are just taking their place in th dominance hierarchy!!!

Nobody ever said Jews were stupid. That’s how they get positions in media and banking.

The JQ is what they are doing with their positions of power. They obviously have a weird agenda and push many evil ideologies through the media they occupy

use this
polcheck.com/polcheck/

he is a controlled opposition red herring

it's as simple as that.

he's a fucking snake oil salesman selling 2000 dollar rugs to his chump followers

have you ever seen e. michael jones or kevin macdonald try to sell people rugs and other trinket shit? have you seen them begging for gibs on patreon? no. they are real truth speakers. this fucking [[[psychologist]]] is a plant.

gibbs me money, bucko

came in here to post this. let's look at an inverse situation: if nazis were in the jews' contemporary position

>hurr durr nazis are smart - therefore they will dominate higher studies and authoritan positions
>therefore we must also accept that they are enforcing the aryan race as the superior one and genociding subhumans (which is essentially what is happening today, the west is being flooded with foreigners outbreeding us)

he conveniently leaves out the important part of the question. he also doesn't mention that nepotism is a big deal among jews (i.e. not necessarily the right man for the job)

all the hallmarks of controlled opposition

they'll tell you the small truths that everyone already knows, but not the big ones that people really need to know. those are the truths he's there to defend.

>Collective racial group identity is evil
>unless we talk about Jews

Peterson's argument is that the only reason jews are over-represented in the various power structures of our nations is because they are "on average 15 IQ points more intelligent than Whites". This argument breaks down when you realize that there are actually more genius IQ level Whites than there are jews of any IQ level at all in any given White country. Therefore, average IQ differences cannot even begin to adequately explain the discrepancy.

Note that Peterson reacts to the demand to address the JQ with anger, saying "it's a hell of a thing to ask", as if it's a totally illegitimate and/or offensive line of inquiry. This is designed to mock and shame any of his viewers who have similar questions about the jews.

He also puts forth that anyone who has a problem with jews being over-represented in our nations' power structures as being psychologically deficient in some way, implying that the only reason one could possibly have criticisms about it is if they are irrationally envious and simply malicious towards "minorities", saying "what do you want, your minorities to be unsuccessful?" He also says that we should be grateful to have such an intelligent and successful minority in our countries.

He of course sidesteps the entire issue of how jewish power is exercised, making it out that people who have criticisms with regards to jewish power imbalance are envious / resentful of the power they have in general.

His answer is not just unsatisfactory, it's wrong and deceitful. The answer is designed to do the following:

A. Construe those who have questions about the jews as unreasonable and psychologically damaged or lacking in some manner.

B. Deceive his followers into believing that jewish power is less than it actually is.

C. Convince his followers that jews use their power in no manner that could be rationally criticized.

D. Word it just so such that people could potentially interpret it as just being a cagey response made for political reasons.

The day of the rake is coming but you shall be spared

If 99% of the stuff he says is innocuous or beneficial, Sup Forums doesn't care. But empty headed faggots sliding the boards do.

Call him bucko, he will never recover

Has it ever occurred to you that the reason why some of these guys are avoiding the JQ is because they're not autistic and realize that the moment they went there they would lose all credibility and be dismissed as conspiracy loons?

Like ffs, they are calling him "lobster guy" because he used lobsters in an example to describe evolution. What do you think they'd call him if he brought up the JQ?

You can't hold it against him that he's not an autistic retard...

Peterson's strategy of inscribing psychological deficiency to individuals who have questions about JQ is absolutely typical of jewish psychologists/academics, and in fact comes directly from the Frankfurt School. Kevin J. MacDonald's book 'Culture of Critique' explores the Frankfurt School's efforts to classify antisemitism as a psychological disorder in great depth, if you are interested in learning more.

Last year on 01/22 Jordan Peterson gave a talk with a jewish colleague of his name Dr. Norman Doige. During the Q&A session, this question was posed to Doige:

"Is there any connection between postmodernism and antisemitism on university campuses?"

Doige then went on to answer the question by explaining that the reason people criticize the jews is being "jewish rabbis are a very masculine archetype" that people project their rebellion to authority onto. This is absolutely typical of jewish psychoanalytic pseudoscience in the vein of the Frankfurt School.

Peterson then adds on to the end of the question his typical little bullshit chastisement of "if you're going to be a minority you should at least have the decency to be unsuccessful", once again reinforcing that the only possible reason one could criticize jewish power is if they are psychologically deficient and are simply envious and resentful of their power (again side-stepping the issue of how the power is exercised).

youtu.be/GJEb8HqfiFk?t=18m21s

When will the JQ be addressed then? When the USA and European countries are South Africa tier? How should we go about this?

Whites should leave South Africa or genocide the blacks to be able to live.

Yes, those are options but what about addressing the JQ? When is the proper time?

>Has it ever occurred to you that the reason why some of these guys are avoiding the JQ is because they're not autistic and realize that the moment they went there they would lose all credibility and be dismissed as conspiracy loons?
Yes, of course that has occurred to me. And that's initially the game I thought Peterson was playing. However, after carefully analyzing his words and actions over the past year, I've come to the conclusion that this can't possibly be the case, and not only that, but that this is exactly what he and his handlers want us to believe that he is doing.

First of all, Peterson does not simply side-step the JQ. He has specifically addressed it and other questions tangential to the JQ with very insidious psychologically manipulative statements and outright falsehoods.

Second of all, Peterson is surrounded by jews. He himself has stated "most of my friends are jews", and its plainly evident that this is true. He counts Gad Saad, Oren Amitay, Ezra Levant, Norman Doige, and other explicitly or implicitly Zionist jews amongst his personal academic colleagues.

Your argument is basically that Peterson is "secretly redpilled on the JQ" and is hiding his power level while achieving some work that is in fact detrimental to the jewish power structure. This would be that his extensive jewish network of colleagues and the other jews he works with in the media would have to just be too stupid to realize he understands the situation our nation is in with regards to jewish power stanglehold, or that these jews are for some reason also working to undermine jewish power. Neither of those possibilities seems at all likely.

Peterson goes out of his way to explicitly downplay the reality of jewish power, and to also use his position of authority to assert that individuals who take issue with the use of jewish power in our nations are psychologically deficient, training his cult followers to reply to such inquiries with "clean your room".

There are still way more high iq whites than jews because we outnumber them so vastly. They are not successful to the extent in which they are because of their iq. This is especially true regarding their extreme dominance in their favoured industries, like media and banking

>When will the JQ be addressed then?

You shouldn't. You fight it with deep state fuckery and policy changes. Like when has the jews ever openly addressed the "white question" outside their circles?

What people fail to understand is that there's different political tiers. First there's the think tanks and philosophers. Guys like JF and Spencer who will red pill the next tier, which is the political agents. These guys, your Petersons (and yes Sargons) and politicians etc, red pill the plebs with policy. Then there's the plebs. The plebs don't need to know anything because they react emotionally and couldn't understand autists like JF even if they tried.

Everyone has their purpose. It's not about being woke on all levels but being a useful pawn. You've got your herder, your shepherd, your sheep and your fold - they're fundamentally different but cooperate to complete a task.

>Your argument is basically that Peterson is "secretly redpilled on the JQ" and is hiding his power level while achieving some work that is in fact detrimental to the jewish power structure.

My argument is that it doesn't matter if he's woke or not as long as he serves his purpose and is in fact detrimental to the jewish power structure.

>detrimental to the jewish power structure.
only partially

>Like when has the jews ever openly addressed the "white question" outside their circles?
jewish academics routinely "address the White question", it's in fact the foundation of Cultural Marxism ("White privilege").

You're trying to re-frame the debate around how to tackle the jewish power problem, when what is in fact being discussed here is not "should you name the jew/address the JQ", but Jordan Peterson and his motives.

Your argument so far is that Peterson is secretly working to dismantle the jewish power structure, and is playing coy politics. I addressed in my last post why I think that's an absurd proposition, but I'm open to hearing more of your arguments, if you have any.

Specifically I would like you to answer:

1. Why would so many jews be working with (the assumed power level hiding) Peterson to help him dismantle the jewish power structure.

2. Why does Peterson go out of his way to paint individuals who ask the JQ as psychologically deficient, as per Frankfurt School protocols.

>What people fail to understand is that there's different political tiers. First there's the think tanks and philosophers. Guys like JF and Spencer who will red pill the next tier, which is the political agents. These guys, your Petersons (and yes Sargons) and politicians etc, red pill the plebs with policy. Then there's the plebs. The plebs don't need to know anything because they react emotionally and couldn't understand autists like JF even if they tried.
So you are actually arguing that Peterson, Sargon, and Spencer are secretly conspiring together to topple the jewish power structure? That is patently absurd.

>It's not about being woke on all levels but being a useful pawn
Thinking that controlled opposition agents are somehow "your pawn" is also absurd, and what we're discussing here is whether or not Peterson is controlled opposition of some nature, not whether or what some of the things he says are useful or truthful.

>only partially

And? Who is this Grand Master Jew who led his people to victory? There isn't one. You've got many liberal jews who complete their jew task, often totally bluepilled on the WQ and simply doing what they think is right. They'll add a black character in a movie or whatever because it feels good but aren't fully aware of why they're doing it only that other jews are doing it too. Like white people who hold up dumb signs to promote their own destruction.

Peterson doesn't have to understand the JQ. All he has to do is have credibility in specific anti-JQ policies and if he understands it or not is 100% irrelevant.

>My argument is that it doesn't matter if he's woke or not as long as he serves his purpose and is in fact detrimental to the jewish power structure.
Why would so many jews be helping Jordan Peterson do things that are detrimental to the jewish power structure?

>How does Sup Forums debunk Peterson?

I've taken Peterson's advice and use Ghandi as a role model, now I refer to blacks as Niggers, just like Ghandi did!

>So you are actually arguing that Peterson, Sargon, and Spencer are secretly conspiring together to topple the jewish power structure? That is patently absurd.

Learn to read.

>not whether or what some of the things he says are useful or truthful.

That's the only thing that matters.

>Peterson doesn't have to understand the JQ. All he has to do is have credibility in specific anti-JQ policies and if he understands it or not is 100% irrelevant.
It's basically impossible for someone with Peterson's level of knowledge about 20th century history to not know that jewish power is a serious problem. You are basically arguing that Peterson is just ignorant and naive about the jews, and that is frankly ridiculous.

>Why would so many jews be helping Jordan Peterson do things that are detrimental to the jewish power structure?

You're assuming that every jew is woke. They're not. Most are just useful plebs like Peterson and could even be swayed to promote their own destruction like white people have.

>That's the only thing that matters.
No, it isn't. If this were true, that would mean that people like Alex Jones, who are very evidently disinformation agents of the jews, are somehow beneficial to dismantling the jewish power structure because "he tells the truth about somethings". That's ridiculous.

What's being discussed here is if Jordan Peterson is controlled opposition/limited hangout disinformation agent. It goes without saying that limited hangout agents will tell the truth about some things.

Your argument is that there is nothing wrong with limited hangout disinfo agents because "they tell the truth about some things". That's retarded.

You still haven't answered my questions:

>You're assuming that every jew is woke.
jews like Ezra Levant, one of Peterson's colleagues, are foaming at the mouth Zionists. I refuse to believe that he would take Peterson under his wing if he thought Peterson posed any sort of threat to the jews.

You're now arguing that Peterson is secretly redpilled and is conning the jews into helping him dismantle the jewish power structure. Preposterous.

>It's basically impossible for someone with Peterson's level of knowledge about 20th century history to not know that jewish power is a serious problem. You are basically arguing that Peterson is just ignorant and naive about the jews, and that is frankly ridiculous.

Just because you and I are autistic enough to not be affected by psychological mechanisms of confirmation bias and peer pressure etc doesn't mean everyone is. You could show hard evidence of evolution to a creationist and they wouldn't lose their faith cause that's just how humans are.

>You're now arguing that Peterson is secretly redpilled and is conning the jews into helping him dismantle the jewish power structure. Preposterous.

No I'm not. Stop being retarded, please.

>Just because you and I are autistic enough to not be affected by psychological mechanisms of confirmation bias and peer pressure etc doesn't mean everyone is.
So now your argument consists solely of "Peterson is just naive about the jews, which is why he's pro-jewish and pro-Zionist, and is also why the jews are helping further his efforts".

What is your explanation for Peterson painting people who dare question jewish power as psychologically deficient?

What is your explanation for so many jews helping Peterson achieve media exposure?

>No I'm not.
Then what are your arguments specifically, then?

Lay them out very clearly so that I can dismantle them.

>No, it isn't. If this were true, that would mean that people like Alex Jones, who are very evidently disinformation agents of the jews, are somehow beneficial to dismantling the jewish power structure because "he tells the truth about somethings". That's ridiculous.

What if (((you))) are a political agent trying to make us eat our own via divisive jew tricks??

I'm being facetious ofc but try to get it through your mind how ridiculous you sound.

I also want you to tell me what your motives are:

Why is it important to you to try to convince us that Peterson is not a pawn of the jews?

the emo carpet salesman debunks himself.

>What if (((you))) are a political agent trying to make us eat our own via divisive jew tricks??
Anyone could be of course, what's being discussed here is evidence of that being the case with Peterson, and I'm waiting for your arguments.

>So now your argument consists solely of "Peterson is just naive about the jews, which is why he's pro-jewish and pro-Zionist, and is also why the jews are helping further his efforts".

God damn you're retarded...

No. Again. My argument is that it doesn't matter if he is or isn't as long as he serves his purpose. When or if he doesn't serve his purpose then we can start dismissing him.

Ezra is a honorary aryan you fucking idiot.

>but he's a zionist

Yes, he supports ethno states, that's a great thing. Do you really want the middle east full of brownies? They need to be exterminated and Israel is doing that.

>but he denounced the alt-right

Yeah, he denounced the kike-right, lead by nothing but jews in disguise and CIA agents like spencer, its because he knows what we need is a true national socialist movement, not some kike movement.

his point is that they're not Muslims

Islam is the religion of peace in so far that it achieves its goal of everyone being a Muslim and is under sharia law

>My argument is that it doesn't matter if he is or isn't as long as he serves his purpose.
I think that's a very naive and dangerous attitude to have towards the potential of various political figures being intentionally put forward as limited hangout disinformation agents.

You're just saying that we shouldn't try to use our discernment or care about jewish tricks if some of the things someone says are "useful to the cause".

>When or if he doesn't serve his purpose then we can start dismissing him.
I'm arguing that he is already intentionally serving a purpose for our enemies, and that it should in fact be analyzed and criticized.

>Yarden Peterstein

This is going to be a short thread then, pic related

Shout out to the best leaf on Sup Forums

>Why is it important to you to try to convince us that Peterson is not a pawn of the jews?

Because it's fucking retarded to eat our own on the basis of tin foil arguments and conspiracy theories. I know for damn sure that Peterson is doing a hell of a lot more than you are to red pill people.

Now let me ask you: why is it important for you to try to convince that one of our guys is a pawn of the jews? Why are you being (((divisive)))?

>Ezra is a honorary aryan you fucking idiot.
Ezra is a shekel hoarding Zionist neocon who is carefully diverting political dissent on the right in Canada into traditional Ziocon pathways. You're a fool if you trust that sneaky kike.

>he supports ethno states
Not in Canada he doesn't. The Rebel is used to stir up antagony towards muslims in Canada, to serve the Ziocon interests, while making it clear that ethnic or racial collectivization is evil and "nazi".

>Yeah, he denounced the kike-right
I didn't even bring this up, but that's because Ezra's The Rebel is firmly in Alt-Right territory, and several of his news agents have been "peeled off" into the (((Alt-Right))) by means of phony dramatic "falling outs" (Lauren Southern, Faith Goldy), which is just a means of giving "street cred" to those disinformation agents.

>his point is that they're not Muslims
Yes, Peterson is very exlicitly anti-islam, just like his jewish Ziocon peers such as Ezra Levant.

Of course, you will now try to denounce me as a "muslim lover" as the JIDF has trained you to do, so let me be exlicit: Islam and muslims have no place in our countries and should not be here, but the only reason they are here is because the jews let them in. Remove the jewish problem and the muslim problem goes away almost over night.

The jews specifically cultivate antagonism between the various goyim, don't fall for the JIDF muslims/jews false dichotomy.

Yeah know the JDIF really is good, but do you really think I don't know (((who))) YOUR working for, kike? Ezra works for Israel, true, but you work for the international Jew.

Hay guise collectivism is bad mmkay

Unless its done by minorities ofcourse

Agreed. Gave him the benefit of the doubt but he's obviously a fucking kike trying to make us turn on our own.

>Because it's fucking retarded to eat our own on the basis of tin foil arguments and conspiracy theories.
My argument is clearly that Peterson is not "our own". For you to call analysis of a political figure to discern jewish tricks at play "tinfoil conspiracies" is a fucking red flag, user. Beginning to wonder why there are so many shills dedicated to steering lines of inquiry away from Peterson.

>Peterson is doing a hell of a lot more than you are to red pill people.
If you want to have a discussion with me about Peterson then cut out the personal attacks. Every single post of yours has included a personal ad-hominem, while none of my replies to you have. This is because I'm interested in discerning the truth and am open to hearing your arguments. For the sake of your arguments, ditch the personal attacks, because it makes you look like a shill. If you continue with the personal attacks I will ignore your posts with the assumption that you're a shill.

>why is it important for you to try to convince that one of our guys is a pawn of the jews? Why are you being (((divisive)))?
You are seriously asking me why I care about discerning the truth, and avoiding traps laid out by our enemies? You're criticizing me for exercising discernment, while ignoring my arguments.

The fact that you keep trying to convince us to stop asking questions about Peterson because he's just "one of our guys" and "useful to the cause", and accusing anyone who rocks the boat as "being a divisive jew", are red flags, and are in fact not arguments.

If you hide your nose a bit more I will continue discussing this with you, otherwise go collect your shekels and kill yourself.

If it was up to daddy Peterson, people from Sup Forums wouldn't have to hide like dogs anymore.
You should give him at least some credit for that.

Fuck off, kike. You've been exposed.

...

>Beginning to wonder why there are so many shills dedicated to steering lines of inquiry away from Peterson.

JIDF shills for Peterstein after his reaffirmation of munching jewish scrotum like an absolute madman. He's obviously an asset to them and they defend him as such. Also, respect his pronouns, bigot!

>Ezra works for Israel, true, but you work for the international Jew.
Do you actually have any arguments, or are you just going to accuse anyone who actually makes valid arguments of "being a jew"?

You're absolutely retarded if you trust (((Ezra Levant))).

I'd never trust a Jew, and that is why I don't trust you.

>You've been exposed.
You don't have any arguments, do you?

You answered only about half of my questions, and when I pointed out the fallacies in your arguments you simply devolved into calling me a jew.

Thanks for letting us know your opinion is irrelevant.

>Trust my conspiracy theories and turn on your own goy, I'm only exposing the truth.

>gets btfo repeatedly
>posts a picture of a Mein Kempf quote he found on google images
>thinks he fooled anyone

Look at pic related. Peterson openly admits that it's a goal of his to guide young men and women away from race-realism and far-right thought and herd them back into the cucked kosher center. He is 100% controlled by (((them)))

Kikes are flooding us with mudslimes so that we support their plight in eradicating Palestine.

Their greatest goal as kikes is to build Greater Israel and to control the masses. They've come far.

It's not Sup Forums's "job" to debunk all of these e-celebs.

>they obviously

How do you know they are a monolith that is trying to push 'evil'? Which Jews? The conservative ones? Leftist ones? All of them?

How do you explain how these political factions could disagree and openly challenge each other if they were such a monolith? Is it just a distraction tactic to confuse the goyim?

>wah! Hes making money!

>munching jewish scrotum like an absolute madman
You mean like when he spoke at the 'Canadians for Balfour 100' Zionist (((CELEBRATION))) of Israel's centennial last year?

youtube.com/watch?v=RnTMp3wTlzc

Watch the shills start shitting themselves because I posted this video again. They will immediately say "b... buut he was neutral! he didn't say anything supportive of Israel at all!!!!".

Yeah, it's totally neutral to speak at the Zionist (((CELEBRATION))) of Israel's founding.

You know that it's a kosher edit as well. They deliberately withheld the punchline; "Gradually, i began to hate them"

And here they come in force like magic. JDIF confirmed.

>Kikes are flooding us with mudslimes so that we support their plight in eradicating Palestine.
Exactly this, and also because they want us to hate muslims as a vague "other" so we continue to support endless wars in the Middle East, all of which are being used to expand Greater Israel.

Part of the end game is basically a WW3 level war involving the West vs. Middle East and China.

...

>Peterson openly admits that it's a goal of his to guide young men and women away from race-realism and far-right thought and herd them back into the cucked kosher center.
Exactly this, and while he is doing so he also specifically reinforces the media narrative of the (((Alt-Right))) being the one-true dissident right-wing alternative that the youth are flocking to, without once trying to expose the (((Alt-Right))) as the controlled opposition shitshow that it is. You'll never see Peterson deconstruct Duginism, even though that's the obvious route for someone to take if they want to "save lost boys from the clutches of the Alt-Right".

>I can read minds, goy.
>I can predict the future, goy.
>Kill Peterson, goy.
>Kill them all.

Look at the yarmulke on the right.

>Unless its done by minorities ofcourse

he's explicitly against the postmodernists who are using the "rights" minorities as a way to a criticize and destroy western culture through power games. the post modernists, and the feminists who claim to be proponents for women's rights, even align themselves with the Islamist in the middle east, where women have absolutely no rights, because it gives them the ability to claim that multiculturalism is a good thing which they use as a tool against western society and say that it's not inclusive enough and therefore oppressive, they have no honest intention of even helping women

pay some fucking attention to what he's saying and clean your room

give him time, he is becoming increasingly red pilled due to the fame and positive reactions he gets when he attacks the left. If this keeps up, there will be a critical moment where he either goes full red pilled, or falls into leftist obscurity.

>You mean like when he spoke at the 'Canadians for Balfour 100' Zionist (((CELEBRATION))) of Israel's centennial last year?

Yeah, and pretty much in every single instance he mentions jews. He must really like circumcised jewish cock. He must have a fixation desu senpai.

>Watch the shills start shitting themselves because I posted this video again. They will immediately say "b... buut he was neutral! he didn't say anything supportive of Israel at all!!!!".

Yeah, and they have the even more hilarious approach of accusing us of being JIDF that faggot got in such a hurry that he misspelled his organization acronym.

Also note the memeflags

In the meantime, have some Yarden Peterstein content

>not having read the Protocols
>accusing me of inciting violence

>clean your room
And there it is.

He has already been influenced by kek. let the meme magic play out naturally.

The quote really loses it's tone and impact with that line left out. It's not just the way that jews and leftists argue but the way that normal people react to the tactics and deceit that they use.

Just gonna filter your posts mate but first I want you to understand, that by reading the responses ITT you have fooled and/or trolled a grand total of 0 people. Congrats.

>give him time, he is becoming increasingly red pilled due to the fame and positive reactions he gets when he attacks the left. If this keeps up, there will be a critical moment where he either goes full red pilled, or falls into leftist obscurity.

That's why the kikes wants us to turn on him.

>he's explicitly against the postmodernists who are using the "rights" minorities
Except when it comes to the jews. He considers criticism of that collectivism to be rooted only in psychological deficiency.

we don't. fuck off, shariablue.

sage this faggot thread.

>give him time, he is becoming increasingly red pilled
What is some evidence that he is becoming "increasingly redpilled" on the jews?

This is the argument that Peterson is "just naive about the jews and needs to browse Sup Forums LOL!!!". Totally absurd.

j*den peterstein

>The quote really loses it's tone and impact with that line left out. It's not just the way that jews and leftists argue but the way that normal people react to the tactics and deceit that they use.

Exactly, there is a narrative shift if you compare the two quotes, the actual and the kosher. The actual quote offers justification for Hitler's hatred of kikes, the kosher one is merely documenting an anecdote witnessed by Hitler.

Sneaky fucking kikes, they deserve the oven for real

I swear you guys are morphing that picture of him every time like Richard Spencer FUCK

He's playing with his victims on the left before striking, and probably red pilling millions while he does it. Wait until he is a threat.

youtu.be/JXbmEH8wBgs

>sage this faggot thread.

Answer this kike: in this thread you've named just about every pro-white and anti-SJW guy as an (((agent))). So who should we support? No one?

Nice (((trick))), faggot.

>He's playing with his victims on the left before striking
Got any explanation for why so many jews are helping Peterson "get into a striking position"?

>How does Sup Forums debunk Peterson?
Already been done b4.

Judging by Peterson's published work, his job seems to be analyzing mythology through the lens of psychology and helping young people fulfill their potential. He has a whole lot to say about totalitarian governments and how they operate as well. I'm not sure why everyone thinks it's his job to destroy his ability to do these things in order to single out jews specifically. Anyone who thinks this would be wise for him is ignorant of Monika Schaefer and Ernst Zundel. He's doing a great job of leading people right up to the curtain and most of us have cast the curtain aside and saw who was behind it. There you find a whole other group of people that can explain how deep the jew rabbit hole goes. The Kevin McDonalds of the world have nothing like the reach of Peterson. Peterson is a wide funnel and he's simply not trying not to narrow his reach.
He'd be toast and we would lose a valuable ally if he he made himself hostile to the jews.

Check this out, they get debunked even using their best case scenario:

I'm speaking generally. I think he is more of an asset than a threat until further notice.

>in this thread you've named just about every pro-white and anti-SJW guy as an (((agent)))
Ezra Levant, Faith Goldy, Lauren Southern, Richard Spencer, and Alex Jones are "every pro-White and anti-SJW" person?

Those are the only people I've named, except for a few other jews that Peterson counts as his personal colleagues such as Gad Saad (Zionist), Oren Amitay (Zionist), and that other weird jewish psychologist whose name I can't recall.

I suppose you are the type who would want us to drink the Alex Jonestein and (((Alt-Lite))) Kool-Aid.

>verbal IQ (only) + nepotism = intelligence

So WHO should we support then? Stop ducking the question, kike.

Fascism as a political doctrine that might be subject to something resembling 'progressiveness' within its own bounds has never been achieved (read: hurr tried) and a far more compelling case for this can be made than for the likes of communism which has seen a very predictable descent into true omnicidal (often (((bolshie)))) killing and brutal, widespread imprisonment every time, all the time.

The exact circumstances in which the Third Reich came to its end are shrouded in altered, obfuscated history and never to be fully known. We can only surmise the extents of effect that intensive (((allied))) military operations had in the country upon the political prisons that existed inside of it (these were facilities sometimes equipped to the extents of swimming pools and rabbit kennels for the express purpose of food) and what portion of the holocaust as it's known that was NOT a direct result of indiscriminate warfare waged into a prior politically stratified state is totally uncertain.

For all that we know everything seen could have been the results of disrupted logistics in the nation and a breakdown in supplies of course as things grew more desperate for Hitler. 100% of it. (((Facts))) do not fear investigation on this front.

Should the political system have come to its ultimate fruition in the FINAL STRUGGLE AGAINST COMMUNISM who knows what Man might've achieved by now. Fascism has never been carried out to anywhere near as full an extent as communism was.

Fascism isn't even collectivism. It is the synthesis of an environment that can only be maintained by the collective consciousness and will of a stable political, military, and societal entity whilst simultaneously allowing for the creation of spaces within these cultures for true individuals to be created and flourish within the confines of values that are deemed positive and forward-thinking. There is no indication that Nazi Germany wasn't a wholesome, beautiful place in its prime.

Communists won WW2.

At the end of the day, the kike doesn't give a fuck what you do unless you expose them. If you do that, you're toast.

Just ask Lauren Rose
Ask Mel Gibson
Ask Lorde.

Remember the recent thread where the student who asked JP about the Jewish question and gave him a book, and JP said "I can't answer". Well, I have that book.

"Dubbed the most banned book in the world, this tome is so feared by Jews that they have refused to allow it's English translation."

- - Originally written in Russian, it has been translated into German and French by a group of Professors who have offered their translations for free. A full proper English translation hasn't become available until now.

'Two Hundred Years Together' was written by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the famous Russian dissident who won a Nobel Prize for Literature ('The Gulag Archipelago'). Consisting of two volumes, the first being concerned with Russian-Jewish history between 1795-1916, and the second; Jews in the Soviet Union, this book exposes the role of the Jews in the Bolshevik revolution and Soviet purges where 60+ Million people died. So, it is clear enough why the Zionists were never going to allow an English translation of Solzhenitsyn's work.

FULL ENGLISH LINK: Can preview and read it without downloading it if you want (it auto populates the .pdf on screen.) Might have to click the orange button twice to d/l because it has a pop-up the first time you click it.

www94.zippyshare.com/v/ToVac7C1/file.html

This the original release from 8chn. The wordpress has been edited (probably by JIDF) and released. This is a full scan of the original as soon as we got our hands on it (before we released to public). Again, you can read it on the site w/o d/l if you don't trust a .pdf file.. Enjoy :)