2018

The logic is deeply flawed. You can't use separate universes and their latent possibility of having a god or not as a mean to determine where he is, then concluding by "they were all one all along".
It completely circular.

Multiverse, yes.

that's not funny, andrew

>since it must exist SOMEWHERE.
...and you came to that conclusion how exactly?

>A parent gives their child the option to live the life they want, even if it goes against what the parent believes
I don't think my parents love me enough to sentence me a to an eternity of damnation and suffering for going against their values.

>How so would you go about doing that?
Well, seeing as how I would be an all-powerful deity, creator of all things, present at all times and all-knowing of the past, present, and future, I would be aware that my creation, Satan, would eventually defy me and cause my perfect human race to be sinners, and not create him to begin with.

According to Christians, humans are inherently good and have free will, but Satan drives them to commit sin. So I would just get rid of Satan? Not rocket science here.

But it was not laid out, and the Sucidal-user said that Christianity was not a factor in play.

For a "thought experiment" to work, you need to define your base elements, which in this case are
>God
and
>Different worlds
What is meant by these constructs?
If both of these are hypothetical, then you can't prove actual truths.
In this case you are trying to use your model(Many worlds) to prove existence of God as a actual truth. To do so, your model should be an actual truth itself, you can not get actual truth from two hypotheticals. So you should give reference to a previous discussion where the Truth of Different Worlds was proven before you can use said model to argue the existence of God.

I'm more inclined to believe that if there were such thing as an omnipotent being that transcends space and time, it would be more along the lines of a Lovecraftian type being; something so powerful that it would care about us as much as we care about the molecules on the petal of a flower. Even our complete anihilation would be of no concern to them.

I studied some theology and the third premise is the key problem:
-Existence>Non existence : "God can exist, therefor God exist". It's pretty easy to confute, 'cause if the premise "existence>non existence" is false, we get a universe where God may o may not exist. And accordig to Occam, this situation is pretty much a dead end for theism.
-Do I believe in God? Yes, I do.
-Does God intervene in human affairs? No
-Is it all powerful? Yes, It is.
-It is "good"? I don't think it makes any sense to even describe it with human reason.
God manifested itself with creation, that's it, no more, no less.

you do not understand how the multiverse works. there are infinite parallel universes. you do not know what infinite means. think of the following: infinite even numbers. that would go to infinity, but would NEVER include 1 or 3 because they are odd numbers. infinite does not mean all possibilities are played out. get it now?

And that takes away Free will. Congratulations, if your choices are limited you don't have free will.