Help a brother out Sup Forums

Help a brother out Sup Forums...

As most of you here, I have spent countless hours arguing with people online--in fact, it feels like I've racked up thousands of hours engaging in it, by this time I should be an expert. I have extensive experience in the art of debate and expensive knowledge on certain political subjects.

Now, I've joined a debate society.

How does the skill of "online arguing" translate to real life debating?

And do you have any tips for not sounding autistic or getting kicked out for being offensive?

>instinctually more attracted to and comfortable with this than a normal woman

Seriously, off yourself. You'll just end up stuttering and mumbling about the Jews while getting btfo. Posting smug anime doesn't work in real life.

dude, right? that shit gave me an unexpected boner

I'm in the same boat. I'm looking to start my own blood sport channel on yt. I have tons of video equipment and would do a much better job than Warsky, although I respect his show.

Any takers for a debate network? must use actual face and not a logo. HMU

>pic unrelated

What is the equivalent of posting smug anime?

Call them niggerfaggots and redpill them on advanced antediluvian societies.

>How does the skill of "online arguing" translate to real life debating

It doesn't. You have 0 Real Life debating skills.

How is that not against the terms of use on YouTube?

You could have a brain the size of a basketball, but the ONLY THING THAT MATTERS is what you DO WITH IT!!!

Talk is cheap, write a few letters, and then the Secret Service and the FBI then wants to talk with you...

ew, gay

>that roastie
ruined it

>expensive knowledge
I bet it's worth about 3.50

1/10 Would tell her to cover up and be more considerate of pool atendees

...

fuck that, it looks like the perfect sized snack

>debating
Talk is useless. Action is more vital.

Talk is what goes us into the mess we have today.

>How does the skill of "online arguing" translate to real life debating?
It doesn't unless you're really really good at controlling yourself.

Something that may sound ingenious here would in theory have a hard time getting translated properly into physical speech aka not written. So it's better to engage both in normal and online debates and try to find a "middle point" between them so they both compliment each other IRL at any situation.

sorry not everyone is a beta cuck like you who likes slurping semen from a whore's snatch.

Debating online is different than debating in person, because when you are behind an anonymous message board, things like feelings and status don't come into play.

For example, if you are an attractive woman IRL, usually you will start off by saying, "As a woman...." and guys will nod and agree with you because they want to fuck you. It is the social and emotional factors that are coloring how you see the argument.

Here it is just text on a screen--no worrying about being offensive or having to respect someone's status. It is the truth distilled down to its purest form.

If you are arguing with someone in real life, just remember that facts don't matter--perception does--and if you can make anything look true by knowing which buttons to push because we are all just moist robots created not for finding objective truth, but for socialising and reproducing our genetic material.

You need to take a lesson from the Jews. The only way to get to people is to use the tools of a capitalist system. Action, like protests, is useless. Infiltrating a system and inserting subtle messages in all forms of media, especially the mass media, in a manner that is entertaining (propaganda)... that's how you bring change about.

which TOS term? It's entirely legit... what am I missing?

I have read Rhetoric by Aristotle and I know you can appeal to emotion, authority, logic, reason etc. and I understand that today there's a great emphasis on the emotional aspect of an argument.

See, the theory is all there, I just wonder how effective it all is in practice, when you're standing in front of a crowd.

remain calm. realise your right, and dont be a faggot. you kike faggot shill

see

The problem is, arguing from the right, we have sand traps around every topic, where we can accidently show our power level, and reveal ourself as a "racist or nazi" instant debate loser, and plus you lose your job, life, house etc etc etc.

So the game is rigged against us, while the left can say literally anything like "I want all whites to die" (Oprah Winfrey) and still remain a saint, worshipped by millions.

Don't worry I have memorised about a hundred quotes from Black and female academics like Thomas Sowell and Christina Hoff Sommers, I will be sure to drop their race and gender whenever I can, and hide behind it.

OK good luck, the one thing in our favor is, the truth is always on our side, we have many direct quotes of non-whites calling for white-genocide, these can be cited, quoted, and leftists can be asked why no sanction is ever brought on a leftist like Oprah, who calls for the death of all whites (or Oprah just called for the death of all old whites) no sanction, no problem for a leftist.

I just watched that video.... Jesus Christ how can she still be relevant.

>colour of skin

HOW ARE PEOPLE STILL USING THIS PHRASE?

I wish we were all the same colour so we could talk about race in terms of genetic and behavioural differences.