Fuck hollywood

>Joan of Arc at the Coronation of Charles VII
>Painted by Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres, 1854
on a scale from 1 to 10, how black does she look to you?

obviously she was whitewashed over those 400 years

unbelievable that the story of a woman peasant leading a glorious venture isn't enough: it has to be a nigger now

10 because i see with my heart and not with my eyes. In my heart she was always a strong independent black woman dat don't need no man.

You fucking dumbass. That was a poster for a theatrical live act and not a movie. There isn't going to be a Joan d'Arc movie with a black Joan.

...

I dont mind. She ends up getting burned at the stake. Whats the problem?

>Montenegro
>Negro

That poster that you see on here and take at face value for being for a movie is for a play a handful of people will even see you fucking idiot American.

>Breton
>White

Honhonhonhon

WE WUZ FRANCH N SHEEEIT

>The Maid of Lorraine
>Breton

Burger education

why are you so butthurt about a tv show? no ones claiming joan of arc was black. its called acting you fucking ignoramous

>Negro-black
>Monte-mountain

As in the areas in wich the Montenegro was founded were filled with high,wide trees and that was called "black hills/mountains" in the time it was recognized as an area (12-13th century)

This is so dishonest. Imagine if they made a biopic about MLK with a blonde dude.

did joan of arc fighht for the civil rights of white people? was she arrested or attacked with dogs and firehoses for non violently protesting about the injustices inherent in the segregration of people based on their skin color? what exactly about joan of arcs story makes it offensive that a black person is playing her? you're comparing apples to oranges.

She was considered a prophet and no monarch would have taken a black crazy person seriously

IT'S JUST A THEATRICAL ACT BRO, NOT A MOVIE.

lmao so yeah you're just a retarded racist thanks for admitting it.

...

Technically, none at all. Except the fact she's historically a white girl. I personally don't care that much, but these same people are very hypocritical about this. They go hysterical over accuracy in details, except in this kind of details. Had Joan of Arc being a black girl back then, no one would have listened to her. She already was in trouble for being a young girl, imagine being black above that.

Now, there is always a context. The context here is trying to gaslight us all about how black people were very prominent in Europe in the middle ages. Of course, some people existed, and some had some relevance, but they were very few. The history of Europe was mostly white despite some African and Muslim influence. It's like they want to present it as the contribution of non-whites groups in Europe was the same amount as that made by whites.

i don't even give a shit anymore, i have wholesale abandoned the western entertainment industry, tv and movies won't get a fucking second of my life again. social justice has completely ruined cinema for me fuck hollywood.

Good that historical blacks only ever did what you describe. So Europeans can always be played by blacks but Shaka Zulu can never be played by whites.

dude you're being baited. theater plays do this gay shit all the time where they cast women and retarded africans in roles they clearly do not belong in for the sake of inclusiveness