Two Memos (Nunes, Grassley) That Exposes FISA Abuse

House Intelligence Devin Nunes Memo
intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/memo_and_white_house_letter.pdf
Senate Judiciary Charles Grassley Memo
judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-02-02 CEG LG to DOJ FBI (Unclassified Steele Referral).pdf

Facts in the memos show that FISC was intentionally deceived through omission of relevant facts when presented with a FISA affidavit for Carter Page by the FBI/DOJ.
Facts as relevant material submitted to gain Title I surveillance on Carter Page was partly based on a dossier funded and sourced by the DNC, Hillary Clinton, and Obama's State Department. Actors in this deception include Cody Shearer, Sidney Blumenthal, Andrew McCabe, etc...
Title I surveillance is the most extreme type of 'wiretapping' whereby not only is the subject monitored, but every single person that comes into contact with that subject is also 'wiretapped.'
Why is that important?

Other urls found in this thread:

washingtonexaminer.com/dossier-author-steele-wrote-another-anti-trump-memo-was-fed-info-by-clinton-connected-contact-obama-state-department/article/2648099
forbes.com/sites/thomasdelbeccaro/2018/02/05/biased-fbi-and-doj-officials-broke-the-law-and-tried-to-decide-the-election-an-annotated-timeline/#68666d8c7f34
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

and yet it will be swept under the rug

I warned you this was only the beginning. We being 'managed' like obstinate school children to all turn around and go in a new direction.

Let's hope it's the one where Hillary's neck finally gets snapped in a noose on pay-per-view. Something needs to save cable from dying.

Grassley Memo

According to the referral, Steele wrote the additional memo based on anti-Trump information that originated with a foreign source. In a convoluted scheme outlined in the referral, the foreign source gave the information to an unnamed associate of Hillary and Bill Clinton, who then gave the information to an unnamed official in the Obama State Department, who then gave the information to Steele. Steele wrote a report based on the information, but the redacted version of the referral does not say what Steele did with the report after that.

Published accounts in the Guardian and the Washington Post have indicated that Clinton associate Cody Shearer was in contact with Steele about anti-Trump research, and Obama State Department official Jonathan Winer was a connection between Steele and the State Department during the 2016 campaign.

washingtonexaminer.com/dossier-author-steele-wrote-another-anti-trump-memo-was-fed-info-by-clinton-connected-contact-obama-state-department/article/2648099

Part 1 of 2 The DOJ FBI FISA request was for “Title I” surveillance authority. This is not some innocuous request for metadata exploration – the FBI said American citizen Carter Page was a “foreign agent of a hostile foreign government”; the FBI was calling Carter Page a spy.

“Title I” FISA surveillance of U.S. citizens is the most intrusive, exhaustive and far reaching type of search, seizure and surveillance authority, permitting the FBI to look at every scintilla of Mr. Page’s life. All communication, travel and contact can be opened and reviewed. All aspects of any of Mr. Page’s engagements are subject to being secretly monitored. This is an entirely different level of surveillance authority, the highest possible, and has nothing to do with FISA-702 search queries (Title VII) of U.S. persons.
To present a methaphor, under Title I FISA authority, Carter Page was essentially ‘patient zero’ in an Ebola pandemic. Labeling him as a foreign agent allowed the FBI to look at every single person he came in contact with; and every single aspect of their lives and their activities in growing and concentric circles; without limits to current time or historic review.
The “Title I” designation as a foreign agent applied retroactively to any action taken by Mr. Page, and auto-generates an exponential list of other people he came in contact with. Each of those people, groups or organizations could now have their communication reviewed, unmasked and analyzed by the DOJ/FBI with the same surveillance authority granted upon the target, Mr. Page.
(Cont’d)...

Part 2 of 2
Point being: There are strict rules requiring that each and every fact presented in an FBI request to electronically spy on a U.S. citizen be extreme-vetted for accuracy — and presented to the court only if verified.
There’s no dispute that at least some, if not a great deal, of information in the anti-Trump “Steele dossier” was unverified or false. Former FBI director James Comey testified as much himself before a Senate committee in June 2017. Comey repeatedly referred to “salacious” and “unverified” material in the dossier, which turned out to be paid political opposition research against Donald Trump funded first by Republicans, then by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Presentation of any such unverified material to the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court to justify a wiretap would appear to violate crucial procedural rules, called “Woods Procedures,” designed to protect U.S. citizens.
To think that unverified claims, gossip, media reports and generally salacious political opposition research, could be included in an application to remove an American’s right to privacy and liberty is really the BIGGER story being clouded in this discussion.
And keep in mind, amid all of this exhaustive FBI surveillance and DOJ national security division digging into every aspect of his life, Mr. Carter Page has never been accused of any crime, wrongdoing, or subsequent criminal conduct.

It appears the entire reason to label Mr. Page as a Title One “foreign agent” was so the DOJ National Security Division and FBI Counterintelligence Division, could use Mr. Page’s short contact with the Trump campaign as an excuse to monitor everyone else within the campaign before, during and after the election

Uppity if Trumpity

Bamp!!

...

...

At this point we should STOP GIVING A SHIT what the msm says or doesn't say. Fuck them. Ignore them. Just plow through them and stomp them down like the diseased rats they are.

...

How does the "unmasking" stuff tie into all of this?

Two memos
Two scoops
Impeach!

...

>good sources
kek

The rug is going to be burned soon enough

How is this memo not being used to press charges? why is no one talking aboout this. isnt this blatantly illegal?

source is himself being a member of the House Intelligence committee. How retarded are you not knowing who Lee Zeldin is?

correction: House of Foreign Affairs committee that has red the Schiff memo.

So when is the investigation about the U.K. interfering in our election start?
The democrats don’t seem to mind the methods used, so should we just hope trump uses them for the mid terms?

The biggest problem with the Nunes memo and the information that has come out so far is that it's complex and most people don't really pay close attention. The Democrat argument is simple: the Republicans are liars. The MSM goes right along with their narrative. Unless the Republicans come up with a way to condense the facts so the public can understand it they'll continue to not care about a scandal that's on par with Watergate

The weaponization of this is probably so much more than people understand. All you need is probably 100 different youtube/twitter/whatever social media platfrom doing some innocuous thing like doing a finger in the air in a aha moment (also used by jihadis who are labelled enemy of the state) and you just got the go ahead to legally spy on entire swaths of the population. For free.
>the old fucks in the gov't wont know who the popular person is anyway
>they'll be lied to about the severity or authenticity of the claim anyway
Now you know why so many social media outlets were given the go ahead to be so blatantly terroristic in their focus and refinement of ideas.

GCHQ is rotten to the core for what they did.

That says a lot about how stupid democrats and liberals are. Nothing in there is complicated at all. It as all due to the common core education system.

This is a good thing to focus on. The only fallback they have is that the UK are technically "allies" but then you can remind them of a time when they weren't, and that spurned the very creation of our nation in idealistic opposition to them. It would be a death spiral of redpilling how the American way of life, as intended by our founding fathers, is a superior system of governance. And they'd walk right into it.

>Why is that important?

Because it authorized the Demoncrats inside access into the Republican's presidential campaign.
>But 9000x worse than Watergate.

Trump has spoken a few time about how our "allies" are not friends at all.

Ask the average person who any of the players involved are and they couldn't tell you. Watergate narrative was simple: Nixon's a crook. Unless something comes out directly implicating a big fish like Obama or Lynch people won't care. Look at what we learned from Snowden. The public didn't even care enough to laugh at it.

This is only the start, we've got a ways to go until the next election, and leaks are being timed, coordinated to ensure that the biggest stuff will be fresh in the minds of the people at the right time. The the same basic game on both sides, nobody can really make a big move until they have enough to sway the public. If They oust Trump it will be seen as a coup. If Trump gets rid of his enemies all at once, it will be seen a coup. Its a very tense situation and we're still in the information warfare part.

>>>WOW ANONYMOUS SOURCES FAMILIAR WITH PERSON CLOSE TO THE SUBJECT MATTER JUST SAID ITS NOTHING: CNN

>ANONYMOUS SOURCES FAMILIAR WITH THE THINKING OF THE PERSON CLOSEST TO THE PERSON CLOSEST TO THE SUBJECT MATTER AS DETAILED ON A SCRAP OF PAPER FOUND IN THE WASTEBIN OF A GAS STATION BATHROOM: CNN

>its nothing
thanks, thats all i was asking

Bump.

heavy slide on the Grassley memo today

It needs to be simple. A single sentence that sums it all up with big names in it.

The obama justice department allowed the DNC to use the FBI to spy on the RNC based in lies.

I doubt it. Maybe for a bit by the MSM but from what I’ve seen this is literally the tip of the iceberg

Check. Wish it wasn’t redacted

Is he talking about the minority memo?

yes

Hillary Clinton made shit up and the FBI passed it on as a reason to spy on Trump. Though I doubt this would work on your normal mind. It lacks persuasion and emotional appeal. If we're going to do something, the one liner needs to invoke emotional appeal since Libs don't care much for logic.

Redact my shit up.

“You’ll soon see your allies can turn”

...

I just want the election fraud fixed or we are sunk.

“Just the tip”

Bump.

Are you a left wing journalist? You should be a jounralist.

The inequality angle would be a good play. Basically: the Clintons and their allies think they're better than you and here's why

>"Accordingly, we are referring Christopher Steele to the Department of Justice for investigation of potential violations of 18 U.S.C § 1001
18 u.s.c § 1001: False Statements, Concealment
"Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry. . ."
Steeley is fucked boyos.

I'm surprised it hasn't dawned on people yet that we still have plenty of time until the next election [2020] so obviously they're going to milk this and make it stretch out as long as they can. Little trails of breadcrumbs just to finally get to the big happening. Patience.

forbes.com/sites/thomasdelbeccaro/2018/02/05/biased-fbi-and-doj-officials-broke-the-law-and-tried-to-decide-the-election-an-annotated-timeline/#68666d8c7f34

>ANONYMOUS SOURCES FAMILIAR WITH THE THINKING OF THE PERSON CLOSEST TO THE PERSON CLOSEST TO AN ANONYMOUS SOURCE WITH KNOWLEDGE OF THE SOURCE FAMILIAR WITH THE THE SUBJECT MATTER AS DETAILED ON A SCRAP OF PAPER FOUND IN THE WASTEBIN OF THE BURGER KING WHERE THE SOURCE ALLEGEDLY HAD LUNCH 14 YEARS AGO TONIGHT ON CNN