DNA results are in

Brien Foerster finally received the results of the DNA tests of the samples from elongated skulls found in Peru.

youtu.be/r1k_b-jmz3k

Other urls found in this thread:

hiddenincatours.com/the-mysterious-red-haired-mummies-of-the-coast-of-peru/
youtube.com/watch?v=STqkZR2PSR4
youtube.com/watch?v=-eMhSjLIxcY
gov.pl/cyfryzacja/najpopularniejsze-imiona-2016-roku-to-zuzanna-i-antoni
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_cranial_deformation
ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/new-study-reveal-origins-elongated-skulls-carpathian-basin-001530
youtube.com/watch?v=KwAlxpRxsv0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

annnnd?

The results are in.

In where? What does in even mean? What do words even mean? What is language for?

>The elongated skulls of Paracas in Peru caused a stir in 2014 when a geneticist that carried out preliminary DNA testing reported that they have mitochondrial DNA “with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far”. Now a second round of DNA testing has been completed and the results are just as controversial – the skulls tested, which date back as far as 2,000 years, were shown to have European and Middle Eastern Origin. These surprising results change the known history about how the Americas were populated.

...

What do the results say?

>niggers wrap belts around infants soft skulls to change its shape

wow it's fucking nothing

They say white people and Arabs were in America 2,000+ years ago

These niggers were WHITE KINGS

L
M
A Y Y
O

...

You are NOT the father.

>In a normal human skull, there should be a suture which goes from the frontal plate … clear over the dome of the skull separating the parietal plates - the two separate plates – and connecting with the occipital plate in the rear,” said Marzulli. “We see many skulls in Paracas that are completely devoid of a sagittal suture."

we wuz aliens and shit

And they fucked nigger-aliens.

How about just GETTING TO THE FUCK POINT?

Ok fantastic, results are in.

THE FUCK ARE THEY THEN???

These people are the worst, never to the fucking point

No shit. They were capable of interstellar flight and genetically engineering a slave race. They sure as hell could get to S. America.

oh thank god! i was really worried there for a minute, they look like me, I guess I dodged another bullet

look guys, I have legit pictures of living aliens
crazy, right?!
Elongating the skulls of newborn was done by many tribes since the dawn of man
Comes from the idea of wanting to reunite our physical body with our soul

>implying it wasn't Jakub

hiddenincatours.com/the-mysterious-red-haired-mummies-of-the-coast-of-peru/

I linked the damn video on YT ya lazy bastard

reptilian ancestry

They were not capable of interstellar flight.
I learned on Sup Forums that the world is flat and surrounded by ice or some shit. We cannot fly from australia to south america as a result of false mercatur projection. The moon does not follow newtonian physics either.

WE

And he said that some of them were white lol according to the DNA. Had H2 markers which are commonly found in the caucus mountains lol we wuz space kangz I guess. But so were native americans? I dunno, but that's what he said the DNA said.

STOP SHOWING MY ANCESTORS

Why hasn't my boy spenc been posted yet?

ancient aryans CONFIRMED

"FUMAR CAUSA CANCER DE MAMA" Brien's Pall Malls have a one titty mamacita on the front of the pack. @ 2:35

Look up "sagittal suture" and tell me niggers don't have one. I'll wait.

WE WUZ INCA AN SHIIIEEEEEEET

sage

Humans are BILLIONS of years old and are NOT NATIVE to Earth. Here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the evidence) suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:

* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years (eoliths -chipped pebbles, thought to be the earliest known tools- at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years (end of part 1)

(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more. (end of part 2)

(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age. (end of part 3)

...

(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago. (end of part 4)

WE

(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end of part 5)

(start of part 6) A coin with curious and indecipherable inscriptions was discovered in Illinois in strata that would date it between 200,000 to 400,000 years ago. The finding was reported in 1871 by William E. Dubois of the (((Smithsonian Institution))). What makes this coin so significant is what Dubois said about it - he described the UNIFORM THICKNESS of the coin and concluded that it must have "passed through a rolling-mill; and if the ancient Indians had such a contrivance, it must have been pre-historic." Pic related (it's a depiction of the coin). (end of part 6)

(start of part 7) Here is the Nampa figurine (placed next to a coin for size comparison). The Nampa figurine is a tiny figurine made of clay found in 1889, when workers were drilling near Nampa, in southwest Idaho.

“The record of the well shows that… they had penetrated first about fifty feet of soil, then about fifteen feet of basalt, and afterwards passed through alternate beds of clay and quicksand…down to a depth of about three hundred feet when the sand pump began to bring up numerous clay balls, some of them more than two inches in diameter, densely coated with iron oxide,” geologist of Boston Society of Natural History, George Frederick Wright (1838-1921) reported in his book “Origin and Antiquity of Man” (1912).

The Nampa figurine appears to be of a female human and was discovered at a strata dated to about 2 million years. (end of part 7)

(start of part 8) Evolution is true, but evolution is caused by a conscious, intelligent field of energy underlying the entire universe (which you can call 'God' if you want, but I won't, because that word has religious connotations that I would rather avoid) which cranks out life anywhere and everywhere. Start watching this video from 10:27 (ignore the whole 2012 thing, because Wilcock is still right about how evolution really works):

youtube.com/watch?v=STqkZR2PSR4

I also don't like the term 'intelligent design', because 'intelligent' is a loaded word and somewhat anthropomorphic. I prefer using the term 'self-aware design' or 'intentional design'. And what I'm advocating is not magic, as it can be described in a purely scientific way. Evolution is correct, but (((Darwinian evolution))) is false. Evolution is never random. Also, humans are billions of years old and not native to Earth. Dr. Peter Gariaev is a Russian scientist who took eggs that were laid by a frog and then zapped those eggs with a laser light that had gone through eggs laid by a salamander. When the 'frog' eggs hatched, salamanders emerged from them - not frogs. The only thing that is necessary to rewrite DNA is wave information, which means that evolution can occur not through millions of years but instantaneously.

The agricultural division of the Ciba-Geigy corporation (now Sygenta) discovered that existing plant seeds could be transformed into extinct varieties, simply by zapping them with a weak electrostatic current. This process generated stronger and faster-growing wheat, extinct fern species, and tulips with thorns. Italian scientist Pier Luigi Ighina energetically transformed a living apricot tree into an apple tree, actually causing the fruits on the branches to metamorphose from apricots into apples in only sixteen days. Ighina also zapped a rat with DNA-wave information from a cat, and this caused the rat to grow a cat-like tail in four days. (end of part 8)

WE

Hey look it's richard spencers ancestor.

My bad if that joke was already made.

oh hai, not seen you for a while

is that richard spencers skull?

(start of part 9) There's a book by Ellis Silver called 'Humans Are Not From Earth: A Scientific Evaluation Of The Evidence'. He says (among other things) that sunburn, our relatively high chance of experiencing back pain and pain during labour are types of evidence that Earth is not an optimal environment for human beings and that we come from elsewhere.
My theory regarding the origin of the human species is that the human species comes from elsewhere in the Milky Way galaxy and, at some point in the distant past, our extremely ancient ancestors colonised vast swathes of the Milky Way galaxy (and are possibly still doing so) and both Mars and Earth were colonised by them along the way. There are pyramidal structures and a Sphinx-like object in various NASA photos of Mars. I also think that a fiercely destructive interplanetary war caused the destruction of a planet that used to exist between Mars and Jupiter, leaving only the asteroid belt that we know today. This war also sterilised Mars, turning what was once a lush, verdant, Earth-like planet into a cold, lifeless desert. (end)

I'm always here.

It's hard to tell precisely without more samples but those early remote tribes may have had slightly different morphology, bone geometry
Also, binding someone skull early in development might change/alter sutures in the skull
Finally, you can't exclude the hypothesis those skulls may also naturally be like this through mutation, inbreeding...

There are countless far more plausible explanations than "muh aliums"

These are alien nephilim skulls.

youtube.com/watch?v=-eMhSjLIxcY

[citation needed]

Stop fishing for your shitty youtube. If it was significant you would already have told us here

For the shape yes, but for them having middle eastern, summerian/anatolian DNA it's weird as balls.

Jakub is the second most common name given to boys in Poland in 2016

gov.pl/cyfryzacja/najpopularniejsze-imiona-2016-roku-to-zuzanna-i-antoni

Thanks for not posting the results faggot. You are exactly the reason why this board is shit.

No evidence of non human DNA.
Thus /thread.

Neat stuff, heres a (You) for your contribution.

It's cargo culture tho. They are mimicking the Gods. The real question is, who were those gods and where did they go.

Look the natives were basically deforming their heads. Might even be after death considering we only founds skulls

was the previous mitochondrial result wrong?

Did you watched the video?

It clearly states that they found they were mostly U2e and H

"Haplogroup U2 is an extremely old lineage, going back at least 40,000 years, when Homo sapiens first expanded from the Middle East into South Asia and Central Asia, and before they even set foot in Europe. Two of the oldest Homo sapiens DNA samples from Europe tested to date, a 37,000 and a 33,000-year old Cro-Magnons from the Kostenki site on the Don River in the Russia, both belonged to haplogroup U2 (see Krause et al. 2010 and Fu et al. 2016)."

They are extremely ancient and pre-date all former theories of expansion.

Thanks, Ameribro.

>were shown to have European and Middle Eastern Origin
so similar to the spanish, but coneheaded
quetzoecoatl was supposed to be a white man

yeah, some tribes do that to mimic the gods, but they can't enlarge the cranium volume
these skulls are of the 'gods', they are bigger

Europe, the Middle East, North Africa, the Levant (Eastern Mediterranean) and the Caucasus. I linked the video so you could see Brien's announcement. I'd rather let him go over it as it's his project - also, I am not your fucking secretary.

who ya calling pinhead?

Jacob is just a cool sounding white name, it just happens to be Jewish.

Anyway I already know what the DNA results will say. It's the eternal Mutt

Huns used to wrap their heads as well. Some Germanics and Iranics picked it up from Huns.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_cranial_deformation

ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-origins/new-study-reveal-origins-elongated-skulls-carpathian-basin-001530

interesting, are these haplotypes based on mitochondiral dna?

...

Does not surprise me. Original settlers of the Americas descended from some Mal'ta-Buret like population and those also had some type of haplogroup U. Those are from South America, right? Those haplogroups are rare there but not unheard of ... these haplogroups were simply very low in the founding population, therefore nowadays other groups do dominate in South America.

Someone needs to make a new Mutt with elongated head

Actually, could this be our Mutt?

Who the fuck wants their kids to look like jew rats

Bullshit, those Haplogroups moved with Assyrians into the Levant and then sailed into the Mediterranean with Phoenicians.

Mulkurul

youtube.com/watch?v=KwAlxpRxsv0

minimum 88% White for admittance

I have seen that picture many times on the web, but I have never found the real source.
Nimrod? Nebuchadnezzar? Solomon?

White people are from mars and were brought to this planet 13,000 years ago.

Lulz it's not my DNA-test. I am predicting what his would look like. My DNA-test is all 100% European, look

oh gaaawd, oy veyyy

It's weird tough, those bloodlines were preserved since a theoretical early migration they were also mixed with the rest of the amerindians skulls, it's very probable that they are part of the south american gene pool just like they are part of the northern european, specifically the sammi that are the one group in europe that share the H haplogroup.

So are we going to just perish?

or... they were just dumb

Oy Veeey indeed. Now listen to chosen merchant here

Those skulls are the result of race mixing. THese guys also got elongated skulls

>White people are from mars

No, we're not from this planetary system.

No. We will survive and thrive.

That movie is fantastic

OMG it's real!!

perhaps they mixed with squids

Post more comfy dinotopia

But what caused the technological collapse of mankind and regression to primitivism?

In the Prequels Lucas is trying to square the circle, which is pretty complicated compared to basic equivalences. First thing you have to realize is; the Empire are the Ottomans. The Neimoidians actually represent Eastern Turkic peoples invading Constantinople. But at the same time the Empire is also the Turks. Remember, the Empire wins in the end and controls everything.

At the Hidden Fortress level of the Prequels(character interaction), the love story arc is Lucas' relationship with Marcia (Wife), where Lucas is Anakin and Marcia is Padme, this eventually ends in a split between the two(messy divorce), and Lucas himself turns into Darth Vader.

The wider expanded world set in Naboo is taken from Dinotopia (See pic related). This is not disputed by anyone, including Lucas.

I think everyone hates it due to the lack of characters and bad CGI, coupled with the fact that the audience didn't ever really understand Star Wars to begin with. I disagree with all the haters in relation to RotS, which is ultimately one of the best Sci-Fi films ever made. Lucas himself has said that most people in the development of the Prequels wanted RotS to actually be the first episode, but you have to understand that the Prequels explore Lucas' marriage/relationship to Marcia, and how the divorce affected Lucas films, Marcia got 1/2 of everything in the split and destroyed Lucas' vision for Skywalker Range and the future of independent film making. It was the divorce that Lucas cites as the reason for turning into Darth Vader. Lucas is far more complicated than what the audience gives him credit for.

God damn when do we take turkey back

u ok?

I am a HUGE fan of the Star Wars prequel movies (although I love the Star Wars original trilogy movies a little bit more than the Star Wars prequel movies, since I grew up with the Star Wars original trilogy movies). George Lucas is based as fuck. I love the Chiss Ascendancy. The Chiss (especially Grand Admiral Thrawn) are literally /ourguys/ - xenophobic, nationalistic, isolationistic, militaristic, speciesist and disciplined.

Cargo cult

Most of the dating stuff is inaccurate bullshit. That said, I think the spheres were the seeds of life that brought the genetic material used by life on Earth. Your post with the coin is interest, the 200-400k year range is about the same given to Adam's calendar and the stone circle structures in South Africa, and also fit the timeframe of the arrival of Annunaki/Sumarians who had the elongated skulls. Don't buy the diontopia part as much, I think our history on Earth is closer to a timeframe of 100k years, not millions. And yes, humans are hybrids of the angels and the 'slave' units, except mestizos and sub-sahara africans :)

As soon as the Durkas are done destroying it.

New Thrawn audiobook coming out soon.

Yeah, I'm hyped as fuck for that. So glad Thrawn is canon now, that's one of the only good things (((Disney))) has done with the Star Wars franchise.